Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Mental Health For Healthcare Professionals: Psych patient is granted full day in Ontario Provincial Court to cross-examine a top doctor.

A. Legal Health For Mental Professional
1.      Mental Health For Healthcare Professionals: Psych patient is granted full day in Ontario Provincial Court to cross-examine a top doctor.
By:Rene Helmerichs
Written: 10 April 2015
Contact: Rene Helmerichs
CNCC – 2C
1501 Fuller Avenue, Penetanguishene, ON. L9M 2H4 Canada

Financial support is welcome and appreciated! Every $2-30 can buy ten inmates each a cup of coffee!

Document Contents:
A.     Legal Health For Mental Professionals by Author, paragraphs 1 to 16
B.     What This Is All About by Author, paragraph 1
C.    Notes About The 5 Feb. 2015 Psychosocial Assessment (forensic), by Author, paragraph 1 to 6
D.    The Affidavit Of James Leslie Karagianis, sworn 30 March 2015, paragraph 1 to 9
E.     Affidavit Number 6 of Rene Helmerichs, effectively affirmed 1 April 2015 submitted to C-14-6966 at Barrie
F.     The 5 Feb. 2015 Psychosocial Assessment, by Allison Jones, paragraphs to follow [once Rene gets a second copy of it].

2.      Hello.
I am, WE ARE, going, already doing so, winning (although we aren’t really fighting so no real winning ever occurs). The court at Barrie, Ontario, Canada for file C-14-6966 (9969-hI noted) has scheduled 3 July 2015 for me to cross-examine the affidavit of James Leslie Karagianis, the top psychiatrist at Waypoint. Mr. Karagianis claims that psychiatrists are in the right, the legal right, to not verbatim-record assessments if their client refuses to speak to them unless it is so recorded. Oddly, the psychiatrists are thereby directly saying that it doesn’t matter if the court orders them to do an assessment on a person who desires only to ensure that psychiatrists don’t take statements out of context. The psychiatrists, specifically Mr. William Komer whom Mr. Karagianis is defending, have given written 3 Feb. 2015 statement to the court to say two court order could not be adhered because Mr. Helmerichs refuses to speak off the record to them.

3.      Fortunately for us, we have this thing our favourite book, A Court In Miracles, www.acim.org, calls Common Sense.

4.      Psychiatrists seem to be unable, as demonstrated by them, to grasp that common sense is evidenced all throughout Canada’s laws. For example, Criminal Code section 672.11(b) specifically states that the ordered assessment is for the criminal offence, that is, the psychiatrist is NOT required to have an active real-time dialogue with the client to fulfill the required court order.
   From section 672.11(b):
   “A court having jurisdiction over an accused in respect of an offence may order an assessment of the mental condition of the accused, if it has reasonable grounds to believe that such evidence is necessary to determine (b) whether the accused was, at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, suffering from a mental disorder so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility by virtue of subsection 16(1);”

5.       Of course (in miracles), argument can be made that the ordered “assessment of the mental condition” requires, at least in part, a real-time exchange to establish a currently functional mind, according to the judicial Operating Mind Test (see annotations to Charter s.7 in Martin’s Criminal Code 2014 somewhere in pages 1825-1827), however, for the case of sudden amnesia with one who is of Operating Mind, there is legislative phrase “may” included also in Criminal Code section 672.2(1).

6.      Criminal Code section 672.2(1) offers the person who makes the assessment the choice NOT to submit a report on “the mental condition of the accused” in writing. Unfortunately for the assessor, section 672.2(2) – correction: for us non-legal professionals who tend to group similar same-looking things into the same terms, we can call 672.2(2) a section but its actually a subsection of section 672, and even that isn’t quite accurate as the (2) denotes a paragraph so, technically, the correct correct phrase to use instead of “section 672.2(2)” is “subsection 672.2 paragraph (2)” but EVERYONE probably now knows exactly the part of our Canadian legislature that I’m specifically repeating contains The Interpretation Act of Canada keyword SHALL as IMPERATIVE – contains the keyword SHALL which The Interpretation Act of Canada reminds us equates to “no ifs, ands, or butts about it.”

7.      Again, section 672.2(1) says an assessment report ordered by the court may be submitted in writing, and does therein directly state a real-time assessment of “the mental condition of the accused” need NOT be included in the ordered assessment report to which section 672.2(2) refers since a report given orally in court does become a report in writing upon transcription of the oral testimony.

8.      Section 672.2(1) states: “An assessment order may require the person who makes the assessment to submit in writing an assessment report on the mental condition of the accused.”

9.      Section 672.2(2) states: “An assessment report shall be filed with the court or Review Board that ordered it within the period fixed by the court or Review Board as the case may be.”

10. Should argument arise that Section 672.2 does NOT permit an accused, the client of the assessment, to retain a right to silence off the record, then the liberty of the client under section 672.21(3)(f) must be considered in conjunction with the purpose of the section, namely, to determine whether statements of the client are even reliable. Section 672.21(3) provides that client statements given for the purpose of a mental assessment are “protected statements” and NOT admissible in court for use against the client (e.i. the admission of guilt) EXCEPT: “for the purpose of (f) challenging the credibility of an accused in any proceeding where the testimony of the accused is inconsistent in a material particular with a protected statement that the accused made previously;”

11. There is absolutely no way to legitimately challenge unrecorded testimony except under presumption that the assessor has recorded, accurately, the testimony of the client itself under scrutiny for inconsistency. As in this case the right of personal language (as an expression of personal religious or personal cultural belief) must be respected, a requirement repeatedly emphasized throughout the law AND The Diagnostic And Statistics Manual, DSM-V (2013), the circularity may be apparent for all but the most obstinate.

12. To not lose sight of our singular goal, which is to demonstrate the assumption of psychiatrists as incorrect, the client may make concessions with the ordered assessors.

13. In the case of Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario (aka Regina, or “R.”) versus Rene Helmerichs (aka [Sun] Lucifer Christ), The Psychosocial Assessment (forensic) dated 5 Feb. 2015 states, specifically on the first of eleven pages: “Mr. Helmerichs did however agree to participate in this interview through written responses to this writer’s questions on a Word Document.”

14. As The Psychosocial Assessment (forensic) dated 5 Feb. 2015 is in response to two court orders, the first dated “December 29, 2014 and signed by Justice W. G. Beatty” and the second “made on January 19, 2015 signed by Justice C. Mathias-McDonald for a period of 30 days to determine if he [Mr. Helmerichs] suffered from a mental disorder so as to exempt him from criminal responsibility by virtue of section 16(1) of the Criminal Code”, one should wonder why the court, pursuant to section 672.2(2), received only this 3 Feb. 2015 statement as filing for BOTH orders: “Further to your Assessment Order dated [one filing states “December 29, 2014” the other states “January 19, 2015”], Mr. Helmerichs was admitted to the Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care in Penetanguishene on January 5, 2015. He has refused to speak with me unless the meetings are audio [“auto”?] recorded and stated that he would be posting anything documented on the Internet. Mr. Helmerichs has been derogatory [see paragraph Sch.A.7 of blog post Schedule A To Applications – Gathering Steam To Impeach Ontario http://www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca/2015/03/gathering-steam-to-impeach-ontario.html] to me. Under the circumstances, I am unable at this time or in the future to do an assessment of him.

15. That Waypoint discharged me on 4 Feb. 2015 back into jail-jail, Waypoint being a hospital-jail, evidences that no other psychiatrist was willing to assess me either, for which the chief psychiatrist at Waypoint provided the 30 March 2015 sworn affidavit attempting to rationalize the otherwise illegal position of Waypoint following 5 Feb. 2015 Waypoint admission on page 1 of the not voluntarily submitted 5 Feb. 2015 Psychosocial Assessment (forensic): “This writer met with Mr. Helmerichs for the purpose of completing this Psychosocial Assessment. He was informed that participation in the interview was voluntary. He was further informed of the limits to confidentiality, including that information gathered would be shared with the multidisciplinary team and could be used in the court report. Mr. Helmerichs expressed a desire to have his interview captured in an audio recording however due to the lack of policy around storage and transcription of interviews at this facility Mr. Helmerichs’ request could not be accommodated. Mr. Helmerichs did however agree to participate in this interview through written responses to this writer’s questions on a Word Document. Mr. Helmerichs was [not] provided a [printed] copy of his responses to this writer [nor after TWO written requests sent via regular mail on 10 March 2015 and fax on 31 March 2015, and submitted thereafter on 1 April 2015 to court file C-14-6966 at Barrie for Mr. Karagianis to retrieve himself upon 1 April 2015 additional letter mailed to the chief psychiatrist of Waypoint] and another copy was placed on his clinical file. Mr. Helmerichs noted on his document that he has posted his responses at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca [typo corrected].”

16. The reader may begin to realize the larger picture of that currently keeping Mr. Helmerichs detained in jail, at monetary costs to only the taxed labourers of Canada. At no fault of Mr. Helmerichs were the assessments ordered 29 Dec. 2014 and 19 Jan. 2015 not submitted to the court pursuant to Criminal Code section 672.2(2). Thus is the issue not one of whether the court can, in the exact words of Ms. Dawson, judge of the April 1st New Goal Day proceeding at Barrie for this matter, “tell them how to do their job”, but that they, the psychiatrists, sincerely do believe themselves to be superior to judges of our courts for law AND OUR JUDGES AGREE! WHICH OUGHT TO SCARE EVERYONE DESIRING TO RETAIN THEIR OWN SENSE OF PERSONAL CULTURAL IDENTITY IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER FOR TRANSPARENCY, HONESTY, OR MUTUALLY DISCUSSIVE SOCIAL BETTERMENT WHATSOEVER, WHATSOEVER, WHATSOEVER!!!

B. What This Is All About
1. Mr. Helmerichs is distinctly challenging the prevailing opinions permitting potions and pills to act as therapist where once true listening was required. Mr. Helmerichs has, for the benefit of every taxed labourer in Canada, not without a lot of luck and patience, momentarily managed to secure an entire day, 3 July 2015, for the cross-examination of Mr. James Leslie Karagianis, currently the chief psychiatrist at Waypoint, specifically to utterly discredit (as is the purpose OF a cross-examination) that chief psychiatrist following the 30 March 2015 sworn affidavit. The text of the 30 March 2015 Affidavit of James Leslie Karagianis is included and directly countered legally with arguments herein provided, collectively with Affidavit Number 6 Of Rene Helmerichs (serving as “the common response of every taxed labourer in Canada”), and logically with simple questioning:
i) What is the goal of understanding? [Increase to awareness]
ii) Does linear time exist or not? [Apparently it does.]
iii) If time = linear exists, so to does cause and effect.
iv) To what end is the argued point a cause? Wherefrom did the first idea to that end stem? Must the goal and origin be same for an ever-present awareness to progress apparently within a past-future called linear time or is there no such thing as a COMMON law? [Common law exists AS our shared environment.]
v) What purpose does it serve to categorize disorders without exclusive focus on the repairing of inconsistent beliefs, ever with harm to none and only none, for healing of mind but medication for the brain in supposition of the temporary brain as non-linear thinking device? [Answer: Increase stress, cost, and taxation.]

C. Notes About The 5 Feb. Psychosocial Assessment (forensic)
1. From page 5 of The Psychosocial Assessment (forensic) dated 5 Feb. 2015 signed by Allison Jones, MSW, RSW: “The right of personal religion ensures each can live in false pretense of whatever special local workplace policy any may momentarily desire without also personally respecting The Golden Rule until Transparency (“the wholey ghost”) requires accountability for inaction of the intrinsic personal-social responsibility, that is Self-awakening always without real harm.”

2. ASIDE with respect to the 5 Feb. 2015 Waypoint report: Mr. Helmerichs has noted 29 inconsistencies in a cursory read of the 11 page Psychosocial Assessment (forensic) report. Of the errors, Mr. Helmerichs (Me, The Author of THIS document) would like to correct three fallacious points under subheading Education on page 6 and 5:

(1)   Yes, Mr. Helmerichs DID achieve his commercial fixed-wing pilot license, instrument flight rules and multi-engine endorsed, AND went on to receive ALSO his flight instructor rating CONTRARY TO the Waypoint statement “Mr. Helmerichs had planned to work toward his commercial license but abandoned his plan after some time. Mr. Helmerichs then worked toward getting his truck driving license.”;

(2)   YES, Mr. Helmerichs WAS accepted into a PhD program (in the field of Experimental Psychology to work initially under Dr. Boyles studying community structures in 2003; albiet conditionally accepted since I do not actually have a Bachelor’s degree and the university wanted to see if my 4.0 Master’s GPA would hold up through bridge year at Calgary, since I don’t actually have a formal psychology background either) CONTRARY TO the Waypoint statement “he reportedly applied for a PhD program in Calgary but was not successful in being accepted.” (I never began because an even better opportunity presented itself wherefrom I did then net also immediate financial gain, versus increase to student loan debt.); and,

(3)   NOT I “would often bring [my] son to school late for kindergarten as [I] had overslept” BUT there exist priorities in life such that when I NOW see exactly THAT misperception I smile at the memories of awaking each morning with my son beside me at OUR LEISURE because neither of us was in a particular hurry to be separated from the other. And then I recall the days I’d meet him at school to pull him out of school just to share Nutella sandwiches together in my car in the school’s parking lot, because a kid in his class had a nut allergy and my kid and I enjoyed the time together; AND I recall routinely causing him to miss an entire day, usually Fridays, just for us two to head first to “The EYC” (a favourite FREE public play place for kids aged 0-6) before then enjoying swimming together at a community pool with a water-slide, before then lunch buffet at Manderin ($18, tax-included, for us two to eat) before then hitting either an outdoor park or first a nap. That my kid took it upon himself to learn half of his multiplication tables (in addition to Chinese, French and English) before my Mum stole custody of him seems completely overlooked in the Waypoint allusion.

3. My favourite Psychosocial Assessment (forensic) outtake: “During his admission at this facility Mr. Helmerichs spent much of his time on the unit computer working on his legal matters and writing various letters to his attending psychiatrist and various other hospital staff i.e. dietary, to address his needs [i.e. NOT being fattened liken sheeple in line for psychiatric slaughter]. He attended recreation programs [thanks tax-payers!] when he could. Mr. Helmerichs managed to access restricted sites (email) online using the unit computer despite the safeguards that were in place. After the Information Technology department increased the security this writer believes he did so again on February 1st or 2nd as his document that included his responses to the psychosocial assessment were posted on line and the time stamp on the website was marked before this writer got to work Monday February 2, 2015 [Ground Hog Day – good movie – Now You See Me?].”

4. “Dr. Chawla was unsure if Mr. Helmerichs was experiencing thought insertion, withdrawal or broadcast.” Um, BROADCAST www.talk2dream.Me

5. Does the patient, author of his statements, lose right to keep discussing after the assessment? Any confidential information revealed can still come to light after the assessment in further testimony.

6. If the court is to extend the right for decision, whether or not an accused is to be permitted a trial for potentially a lifelong mental ward commitment intermittently as out and in patient, to a psychiatrist, then that psychiatrist must also take into account the individual as a personal culture with unique mannerisms, language, and mode of expression. Specifically, the psychiatrist must advocate for the fundamental freedoms of The Charter Of Rights And Freedoms. To advocate for fundamental freedom obligates the healthcare practitioner to place the health, the identified need for active listening called true listening, before his or her own fears of speaking or saying something the psychiatrist clearly fears can be taken out of context from a recorded record. The question is one for trust: “Why should I trust you if you don’t trust you?”

D. The Affidavit Of James Leslie Karagianis, sworn 30 March 2015.
I, James Leslie Karagianis, of the Town of Port Severn, in the province of Ontario MAKE OATH AND STATE AS FOLLOWS:

1.      I am a psychiatrist licensed either by general or specialist license in the provinces of Ontario and Newfoundland. I have also previously been granted specialist licenses in the provinces of Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island. I concluded my psychiatric residence at Memorial University in Newfoundland in 1990. I am an Associate Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Toronto and a Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry at Memorial University.

2.      I am currently the Psychiatrist in Chief at Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care in Penetanguishene (“Waypoint”) and have held that position since July 1, 2012. Among my responsibilities are medical affairs; physician leadership; and medical quality assurance. I also maintain a private practice in psychiatry.

3.      Waypoint is a public hospital under the Public Hospitals Act, a Schedule 1 psychiatric facility under the Mental Health Act and a designated hospital under Part XX.I of the Criminal Code, that part of the Code dealing with mentally disordered offenders.

4.      I have conducted over 100 court-ordered assessments during my professional practice and I have been previously recognized as an expert witness for the purpose of testifying at all three levels of court in Newfoundland and Labrador.

5.      The Applicant, Rene Helmerichs, has been ordered to have an assessment with respect to his criminal responsibility in connection with outstanding charges of breach of probation, criminal harassment and fail to appear in court.

6.      Mr. Helmerichs is applying for a court order “... requiring spoken statements of Rene Helmerichs given for the purposes of mental assessment to be audio recorded and a digital copy provided Mr. Helmerichs if the assessment, or reporting thereof, can reasonably affect a detention or further detention of Rene Helmerichs...” The stated grounds for the application include the allegation that “... the current charge for which I am being mentally assessed stems directly from false statements psychiatrists [names omitted] made...” He further asserts that “... testimony cannot be honestly challenged without a first-hand recording...”

7.      It is not usual medical practice for a court-ordered assessment to be audiotaped. As noted in Bloom and Schneider’s 2013 text “Mental Disorder – A Comprehensive and Practical Approach”, in the chapter entitled “The Psycholegal Assessment”, under the heading “Audio and Videotaping the interview”: “Videotaping interviews is not at this point part of the recommended practice of forensic psychiatry in Canada or the United States. There are no policies or practical guidelines from any regulatory body or professional association that direct, or even invite, psychiatric experts to record their interviews in that manner”. To my knowledge, this remains an accurate statement.

8.      In my opinion, there are serious privacy concerns raised in the Application, despite it being the patient who wishes the audiotaping to occur because such recording necessarily captures the words of the psychiatrist as well as the person being assessed. I am very concerned that the fact of being recorded can and will cause a restricting effect on the psychiatrist conducting the interview. In my opinion such a process is not conducive to a psychiatrist being able to conduct the best, most thorough and most comprehensive interview necessary to underpin the most accurate assessment required by the Court. It would be extremely difficult for a psychiatrist to remain objective and not be compromised where there is a risk of the recording being released, as I understand to be a real concern in the within case.

9.      A good court ordered assessment is a broad range inquiry. In the criminal context the assessment almost inevitably involves the patient discussing third parties – be they witnesses, victims or co-accused in the outstanding criminal charges. The privacy interests of these persons are also at risk if the assessment is recorded and particularly if the recording is released to the patient, as is being sought herein.

E. Affidavit Number 6 Of Rene Helmerichs, effectively affirmed 1 April 2015 submitted to C-14-6966 at Barrie
I, Rene Helmerichs, born in Bremen, Germany, AFFIRM AS TRUE:

1.      I am a projection of our unconscious and therewith commonly endowed to speak with our common spirit on my own behalf. Our common spirit is directly The Holy Spirit, also called the spirit of the law (singular) and the spirit of our God and loving Creator. As a culture, we agree the spirit of Matthew 5:33-7 in every common Bible to be of our real-time spirit such that we recognize the act of making oaths to be directly the spirit NOT of our common God.

2.      This affidavit is particularly important to clarify the daunting DSM page 87 statement “Delusions are deemed bizarre same-culture peers and do not derive from ordinary life experiences.” As none working under oath share my exclusive culture, specifically that FOR A Course In Miracles (www.acim.org), summarized also in Matthew 6:33, no mental assessment under Diagnostic And Statistics Manual, DSM, 2013, page 87-110, is lawfully valid when provided of an authority licensed specifically for that capacity, such as Mr. James Leslie Karagianis for Waypoint.

3.      A concise legal argument follows in compendium to statement from psychiatrist Mr. M. Scott Peck taken from The Road Less Traveled; the statement speaks to trust and private audio recording baises The legal argument is concluded with a fax to Waypoint Centre For Mental Health Care evidencing abuse for authority.

4.      On 29 Dec 2014, I stood trial for a breach of probation dating to 8 July 2014 when I’d posted a cited section of a police report (dated 4 Sept 2012) to the internet. I was not permitted to submit that report as evidence for my defence at the original June 2014 trial for C-13-205 that yielded the probation term thereafter breached. One could say that I am being actively denied the right of a fair defence.

5.      On 29 Dec 2014 the crown witness, the assigned probation officer, raised concern for mental health prompting the trial judge to pause trial for a criminal responsibility assessment. While court is normally recorded, its assessment was not to be? The same judge, to the record at Barrie on 14 Jan 2015, stated unwillingness to hear applications of the defence until the responsibility assessment is completed.

6.      On 4 Feb 2015, I was discharged from Waypoint, the place of assessment, on grounds that no assessment could be conducted because I am unwilling to speak off the record for purpose able to affect detention for me.

7.      On 24 Feb 2015, I agreed to a plea bargain so as not to lose my apartment: I would plead guilty and receive “time served” over the course of two days, one for each jurisdiction for the total six charges (begotten in my ongoing sincere attempt to still redress the original errors in law having prevented my June 2014 defence submissions)

8.      On 25 Feb 2015, the crown surprised me with an additional agreement requirement preventing my ability to redress their errors in law. The plea bargain agreement was cancelled. Unfortunately, a plea for C-14-3928 at Orillia had been made already on 24 Feb 2015 and now also needs to be redressed.

9.      On 4 March 2015, hearing for the application to have mental assessments audio recorded was set for 1 April 2015.

10. The crown has proposed that audio recording psychiatric statements is not to be permitted. The application for the requested order is specifically exclusive of the desire to record psychiatric statements as the purpose of the application is to ensure that my statements are not misconstrued, such as they have been, as indicated in the material posted on the internet 8 July 2014 to www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca for which I was arrested on 11 July 2014.

11. Page 88 of The American Psychology Association, APA, Diagnostic And Statistics Manual, DSM, 2013, describes 3 of 5 of the Diagnostic Criteria A for Schizophrenia (295.90; F20-9; page 99), of which any two of the five must be present “for a significant period of time during a 1-month period” (the 30-day assessment)

12. The DSM states, of the fourth of the five criteria: “Catatonic behavior is a marked decrease in reactivity to the environment. This ranges from resistance to instructions (negativism); to maintaining a rigid, inappropriate or bizarre posture; to a complete lack of verbal and motor responses (mutism and stupor).”

13. The fifth of five criteria is simply titled Negative Symptoms and includes such behaviour as is normally associated with resignation.

14. The first three criteria, of the five which only two must be present for justification of the diagnosis (Schizophrenia) are: (1) Delusions, including referential delusions the likes of which everyone suffers; (2) Hallucinations, including the “normal part of religious experience” in a culture whose Constitution is “founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God” but utterly fail to clarify the statement such as ours, CANADA, does; and, (3) “disorganized speech (e.g. frequent derailment or incoherence)” such as every article ever written of my hand that is otherwise, under s.2(b) of The Constitution, OURS CANADA, classified as a language unto itself via caselaw of Ford versus Quebec (Attorney General) in the annotations thereto.

15. To wrap this up neatly, if I insist upon my culture for absolute transparency to mean that I retain my Constitution s.7 right to silence in the face of a court order otherwise requiring psychiatrists to assess me, it does not matter that I fulfill the criteria of Catatonic behaviour (I could even play it up with rocking back-and-forth, or just stock-still blinking) and Negative Symptoms (“diminished emotional expression”; “avolation”; “anhedonia” OR, “asociality”) quite without further movement or action on my part BECAUSE the DSM also states there are “Culture-Related Diagnostic Issues” then not permitting the very ordered assessment.

16. Ergo, there is really not an argument left with respect to my polite request that our judges retain their granted judicial authority and order “spoken statements of Rene Helmerichs [an impolite break of a name in the affidavit of James Leslie Karagianis] given for the purpose of mental assessment to be audio recorded and a digital copy provided Mr. Helmerichs if the assessment, or reporting thereof, can reasonably affect a detention or further detention of Rene Helmerichs”, to quote Mr. Karagianis quoting Me. An author does not lose ownership over statements without explicit consent, and I do not consent to speaking without receiving my speech.

17. Re: Trust (Why should I trust you if you don’t trust you?)
Psychiatrist M. Scott Peak, in The Road Less Traveled, states:
An essential part of true listening is the discipline of bracketing, the temporary giving up or setting aside of one’s own prejudices, frames of reference and desires so as to experience as far as possible the speaker’s would from the inside, stepping inside his or her shoes. [There is listening or there is speaking; all does listen to HERE the same time.] This unification of speaker and listener is actually an extension and enlargement of ourself, and new knowledge is always gained from this. Moreover, since true listening involves bracketing, a setting aside of the self, it also temporarily involves a total acceptance of the other. Sensing the acceptance, the speaker will feel less and less vulnerable and more and more inclined to open up the inner recesses of his or her mind to the listener. As this happens, speaker and listener begin to appreciate each other more and more, and the duet dance of love is again begun. The energy required for the discipline of bracketing and the focusing of total attention is so great that it can be accomplished only by love, by the will to extend oneself for mutual growth. Most of the time we lack this energy. Even though we may feel in our business dealings or social relationships that we are listening selectively, with a preset agenda in mind [a mind-set], wondering as we listen how we can achieve certain desired results and get the conversation over with as quickly as possible or redirected in ways more satisfactory to us.

18. Pages 127-8 of The Road Less Traveled, 1979 ISBN ?-25067-1, speak directly to the fundamental importance of trust as healing mechinism in any and every human relationship, and specifically to the need of the mental health client to be reassured with, and within, transparency of the intent of any mental assessment able to affect detention irrespective of that assessment as specifically court-ordered. If a psychiatrist is unwilling to trust his or her own statements, why should the client trust the therapist? The dilemma is only in the belief that pills can act as a therapist.

19. Fax to Waypoint sent 31 March 2015 at 14h38:
(1)   TO: Clinical Information Services
RE: 18 March 2015 Waypoint Centre Logged Invoice ROI 0002199
FAX: 705-549-3778; DATED: 25 March 2015 (2 pages total)
Return to: Rene Helmerichs, CNCC, 1501 Fuller Ave, Penetanguishene, Ontario, L9M 2H4

(2)   Please be advised, with regard to invoice ROI 0002199:
Rene Helmerichs specifically stated the requested information to be copyright protected. The copyright protection is not merely the intrinsic right of an author to retain ownership of written statements, but formally registered in The United States Copyright Office by The Foundation For Inner Peace.

(3)   The invoice, ROI 0002199, is not only vexatious against Mr. Helmerichs, who also stated in the original request that he has not yet received a first printed copy of the requested written responses to the Waypoint Centre For Mental Health Care administered Psychosocial Assessment – vexatious because Mr. Helmerichs is incarcerated at Central North Correctional Centre without ability to pay following Waypoint inaction to assist Mr. Helmerichs with means to pay while at Waypoint, and was removed from Waypoint on 4 Feb. 2015 for Waypoint staff to avoid speaking onto the record – but illegal for its contravention of international copyright law.

(4)   As Mr. Helmerichs requires advertisement to better the administration of justice in Ontario, and advertisement for recognition as being equally a copyright holder of the copyrighted Psychotherapy: Purpose, Process, and Practice text (available from Penquine Books as well as www.acim.org), Mr. Helmerichs politely advises The Waypoint Centre that Waypoint Centre For Mental Health Care explicitly does NOT have permission to copy the copyrighted portions included within the file 20150202-Psycho.pdf submitted to the Forensic Assessment Program A on Ground Hog Day 2015.

(5)   Further to the evidence supplied in ROI 0002199 that Waypoint is charging $3.08 per page (tax included) for commercially copyrighted material, following notification that the contents of The Psychosocial Assessment of Rene Helmerichs were requested at the beheist of Waypoint because Waypoint elected to protect illegal psychiatric practice (of denying individuals their culturally sanctioned freedom of expression to declare those same individuals to be with delusions, of no insight into their delusions, to justify forcibly injecting those individuals for the exclusive financial growth of the psychiatric corporate enterprise – direct reference to pages 87-90, 93, 95, 98, 103, and 108 of the APA DSM 2013) for its psychiatrists (reference to the 3 Feb 2015 letters to The Ontario Provincial Court of psychiatrist Mr. William Komer), Mr. Helmerichs extends a generous willingness to partner.

(6)   A meeting with Waypoint negotiators is requested to arrange a peaceful settlement and spare The Waypoint Centre unnecessary negative social media internet publicity.

(7)   In Kindness,
R. Helmerichs, professor of A Course In Miracles, acim.org
Signed 25 March 2015 at Penetanguishene, Ontario, Canada

E. Affidavit Number 6 Of Rene Helmerichs, effectively affirmed 1 April 2015 submitted to C-14-6966 at Barrie
20. [The final page of the 1 April 2015, submission titled Affidavit Number 6 of Rene Helmerichs is the Waypoint invoice.]


F. The 5 Feb 2015 Psychosocial Assessment, by Allison Jones, paragraphs to follow [once Rene gets a second copy of it].

Saturday, April 11, 2015

WHAT TEACHERS CANNOT TELL STUDENTS

WHAT TEACHERS CANNOT TELL STUDENTS

By: Rene Helmerichs, former college teacher
Written: Friday 13th, February 2015

“mental illness occurs when the conscious will of the individual deviates substantially from the will of God, which is the individual’s own unconscious will” = Dr. M. Scott Peck, M.D., The Road Less Travelled pp.282-3.

1.      Dear Student, I’m writing this for your sake and mine. You may have wondered what your teachers haven’t told you, so be sure you won’t enjoy the mental ride.

2.      Life isn’t fair, you may have thought. Did you know that it can be? If you didn’t know, and now come to know, then getting from one the other is only willingness. Willingness is always for that not exclusive gain.

3.      No one has pointed out to you that there’s only one kind of honesty. Because there is just one kind of honesty, honesty is literally consistency but with always harm to none.

4.      Intent for harm is the inconsistency in the living state that is total honesty. Total means More Than, so consistency is actually constancy in Too Much.

5.      Beyond honesty exists the realm of the absurd.

6.      Mental Health is big in the news at the moment. Absurd is precisely for students to think anyone understands Mind better than the experiencer of thinking, if thinking is to originate in mind. Anyone pushing a pill on you in the pretense of mental health is professing the absurd, unless the pill is to be with mind to affect the cause of whatever is claimed to be absurd thinking. And THAT is manna for thought.

7.      Students, while you wander about anything at all, whether the struggles of addition, and multiplying vectors, or how a book like The Diagnostic And Statistics Manual can claim to categorize behaviours into mental illness groups, you are using your mind. But what is it you are using? And definitely don’t ask what you are to be using what you cannot identify, except maybe to agree to call It Mind.

8.      Does the brain think, or does it merely process thought for your body? Are you your body, or with More Than? Perhaps the only question you need to ask yourself is where you are.

9.      You are in a relative reality. Relative Reality means everything is always changing, Everything. If everything is always changing, then so too is your concept of yourself, including whatever you think of when you think of you or the mind you think you’re using to read.

10. There is no such thing as a straight line in a relative reality because the very nature of the concept of straight is always changing. The paradox is solved only with understanding not that the line does not exist, but that both ends of the line are continuously joined, except in the place of not.

11. Not is the only word the mind does not understand, because Mind itself is ever constantly thinking even when a person is thinking about nothing. Advertisers, and especially movie stars and politicians, understand the concept of not as “there’s no such thing as bad advertising” while Government Of Ontario folk might say “if I didn’t have bad luck, I’d have no luck. Blessed be one to know all luck if ignorance for Common Law.”

12. The place of Not is literally Time and Space. Time is considered linear yet you move through it.

13. You are with a present moment able to perceive symbols for reading to understand yourself still in a moment of real-time having accompanied you in your slide along the mental tangent this text suggests. Because you know yourself to be reading, or perceiving, continuously, you have not noticed not having furthered the space in your mind, because of the constancy.

14. Time is actually an ordered precession of gaps in thinking, so minute they are not perceived except when pooled into groups of thinking and painted with difference that one group appears odd to the other and neither, Not Either, perceives Both as Same. If Not Either were the opposite of Both, then it could itself not exist. As it is, where two are joined in solemn LIVING agreement everything is possible because there exists More Than. What is all-encompassing can have no opposite.

15. A living anything is simply the bestowed agreement to retain that anything in, with, flexibility of dynamically changing constancy, Every relative reality is dynamically changing all ways. A table does have a life of It’s Own, its natural cycle is larger than that of our finite physical life.

16. John Dewey has been credited as a father of modern education. Did you know schools were originally made to create productive government workers? Can you see the irony of needing to make a rigid structure to mask the fact that time itself is perfectly ordered?

17. Do clocks abide the same incremental length of a second, or not? If not is not understanding and a dynamic environment is constantly changing, where is your mind?

18. Your mind is clearly with you, but can you perceive the whole of a picture with only yourself in time if time is a concept IN your mind?

19. The gap of understanding that you are not your body is the same one that causes you to think you need to learn anything at all BECAUSE I know that I exist eternally and I am asking YOU to join with me in the simple agreement.

20. The simple agreement is, simply, that in a place where everything is always changing, no one can be absolutely sure of but one thing AND that One Thing is precisely that everything is ALWAYS changing, meaning that there exists an exception to every conceivable rule, and that we both already have eternal life but recognize it not.

21. The simple agreement leads directly into the realization that Heaven AND Hell co-exist as Eternal states but that Heaven releases while Hell is simply confusion for what release means.

22. Release is understanding, only understanding, but understanding is not known except with demonstrated action because, of course in miracles, understanding is of and living, and living is not stagnation.

23. Understanding is not understood except with personal realization to bring about the conviction earmarking the desired self-confidence to say to anyone “Do you see I have no need but for that our Me provides me?”

24. I am a projection of your unconscious, you are a projection of mine. We are both unconscious to ourselves and cannot continue to think of any as disordered except with want to hide ourselves in perfect order.

25. Since honesty is consistency, inconsistency is the want to hide for fear of harm.

26. Harm is the not understood change to our self-concept that cannot be anticipated except with sweeping generality to say we are all on separate mental tangents attempting to remember the bang that sets seeming differences as not parts in More Than for Too Much.

27. Physical harm is a masked fear, as all fear seeks always to hide and harm; upset, self-aggrandizement, or the promotion of confusion are its common off-spring.

28. The Honest State matters of fact plainly and tends to observe keenly, being good students for their natural propensity to learn A Course In Miracles in their own way, on their own time, with joy at the friendships they do therein forever find.

29. In this world, school is a formal learning system for understanding structure. Understanding is itself never limited to any classroom situation, making school a very valuable personal learning device.

30. Be nice, follow your heart, but always re-member only thoughts for harm to none can be eternal and what is not eternal is plainly the absurdity of thinking a pill cares how you feel.

31. If a pill cannot comprehend how you feel, how ever do you expect that it will ever become able to alter your thinking for understanding?

32. Classically, pill-pushers were known as witch-doctors. Nowadays they’re called psychiatrists with Mental Health nurses as dutiful brain-washed aides.

33. Case in point for the fraud that is all psychiatry is revealed in the utter insanity of courts for law bestowing the right to determine someone fit to receive trial to a psychiatrist in exclusively NOT AUDIO RECORDED mental assessments.

34. Stand with me students to challenge the blatant corruption at The City Of Barrie courthouse having denied us the right to have psychiatrists charged and arrested for forcibly injecting us on allegations of a criminal offence. HOW MANY MORE OF US SHALL BE SO CONVICTED?! IT IS THE CRIMINAL CODE DEFINITION OF 269.1(b) TORTURE!

35. Stand with me that YOU TOO need not waste years of your life realizing nothing you learned in school means a damn if lawyers and witnesses are let to lie in court! Why does The Ontario Government pay its attorneys for dishonesty?? THERE IS BUT ONE KIND OF HONESTY!!!

36. Stand with me and SEE the 6 Nov. 2014 police video statement where The Ontario Provincial Police admit the gross disservice psychiatrists do.

37. SEE THE POLICE SAY THAT THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO!!!

38. Then see the remainder of this blog for all the evidence anyone needs to know how corrupt Liaqat Ali and Anjana Chawla on behalf of The Ministry For Health And Long-Term Care for Ontario, in their calloused confusion, actually are.

39. SEE THE 6 NOV 2014 OPP VIDEO. Contact Daniel Lesperance daniel.lesperance@ontario.ca for directions to a copy until I have one posted on YouTube.


40. CONTINUE TO Schedule A of court application. Dr. Rene Helmerichs. Most Honesty Me, in Our Doctorate.

Friday, April 10, 2015

The Reflex Circuit

1.      The Reflex Circuit
By: Rene Helmerichs, professor of A Course In Miracles, ACIM
Written: 23 March 2015
CC:
l          Massimiliano Di Ventra (dept. of physics, Univ. of California, San Diego);
l          Yuriy V. Pershin (dept. of physics and astronomy, Univ. of South Carolina);
l          Andres M. Lozano (dept. of surgery, Vniv. of Toronto);
l          Helen S. Mayberg (dept. of psychiatry, neurology, radiology, Emory Univ.);
l          Michael Shermer (www.skeptic.com);
l          Joel Achenbach (Washington Post science writer);
l          Andrew Shtulman (Occidental College);
l          Francis Collins (director of National Institutes Of Health);
l          Dan Kahan (Yale University);
l          Susan Michaels (Sightings TV series);
l          Cynthia Hind (MUFON coordinator, Harare Zimbabwe);
l          Dimitri Galanakis (South African ufologist);
l          Ron Cowen (science writer based in Silver Spring, Md);
l          Robert L. Alexander (student, Univ. of Michigan);
l          Robert T. Wicks (research fellow at Goddard);
l          Bechara Saab (neuroscientist, Neuroscience Center Zurich);
l          Daniel C. Dennett (Centre For Cognitive Studies, Tufts Univ.);
l          Deb Roy (Laboratory For Social Machines, Massachusetts Institute Of Technology);
l          Joel Brenner (formerly – not any more? – National Security Agency)

I. RE: The Reflex Circuit, Shock Medicine, Scientific America March 2015

2.      RE: The Reflex Circuit, Shock Medicine, Scientific America March 2015

3.      TO: Kevin J. Tracey, president, Feinstein Institute For Medical Research at North Shore-LIJ Health System, Manhasset, New York

4.      With proper dissemination, WE can bring about World Peace.

5.      The article “Shock Medicine” presents a neatly woven theory for The Reflex Circuit. I offer legal insight to better our theory for harmonious intrinsic consistency. One is, of course, not immune to errors in states with relativity and your response is duly welcome and appreciated.

6.      Allow me to clarify the term legal. I am a teacher momentarily perceived as rogue. Legal is not confined to a courtroom. Legal is the balance of life itself. Life, for simplicity, is analogous to a line of points in line, points comprising a line without an actual line. In this way is context forever the determiner for validation of theory until GREAT CONTEXT is revealed, which I offer herein for The Reflex Circuit.

7.      The hypothesis “that injecting this experimental drug [any drug] into the brain would prevent TNF production” was near-sighted only to the extent of not abiding “by Sherrington’s idea that a simple reflex begins with sensory input travelling along a nerve”. We do not abide our own fundamental premise while we at all consider there to exist possibility for an “off” switch. There is a “change to” switch, but no true OFF switch possible with distinction for true.

8.      Revelation of Charles Scott Sherrington (1857-1952) is itself a circuit with real-time manner from one shared state. We understand the un-understandable GREAT CONTEXT (e.g. “whatever”) to exist as a singular-collective state when we agree ourselves to be currently within THAT as our ever-changing state. The idea is neather preposterous to neurological reflexes nor dependant upon proper spelling of culturally common words, neither: to agree our environment to be itself ever-changing is to establish for ourselves both fact of THE EVER STATE and fact of our inability to REAL-EYES THAT causing all that we see ever-changing to remain with change.

9.      To a state so encompassing as to present a sequentially ordered set with incrimants called moments, linear time, our lack of computational ability does not render that line viewed from its end head-on as just another moment. The principal for reflexing circuits does not, therefore, involve loss but change into another aspect not yet perceptible: as we increase our understanding, forgiveness for our Self-indulgence, we naturally increase our individual ability to manipulate change into desired material outcomes specifically because the desire WAS for increase to the greater reflex circuit in harmony with our finite subsets. See? WE are the healers and are also re-pairing without drugs FOR REFLEX, real-eyes.

10. There is an important distinction that exists in our common environment: truth does not exist but for same-established being eternally true. True applies equally and without dependence upon time; since time is not linear, past-future considerations confound real-time vision. The purpose of memory is for assurance of truth in comparing two beings and checking for consistency. Honesty is consistency such that truth is ever-changing under true guidance.

11. Somehow I think that my statements may be received as confusing, not unlike a brain surgeon explaining “release of neurotransmitters that diffuse across the synaptic cleft and bind to receptors” on page 30 of the March 2015 issue of Scientific America. I implore us to consider the relationship of orders and degrees not only collectively but also simultaneously individually. One separated from another within a same-ordered environment establishes the presence of THREE distinct sets: each one is itself a subset of the set not understandable to either specifically because it is encompassing of ALL simultaneously. There is not inconsistency in this text, which speaks entirely to the underlying assumption for the one lingering answer not confusing but simply deficient, inaccurate, incomplete (to which this gesture for bettering of the exceptional shock therapy is offered).

12. The inaccurate answer from the article Shock Medicine: (The combined output of millions of nerve signals that control reflexes directs the functioning of the body’s organs. But Sherrington did not address one lingering question: How do the electrical signals that course through motor neurons actually control organ function?) The answer is relatively simple. In effect, they produce “drug.” Neurons transmit information along nerve fibers, or axons, the long, wirelike extensions that terminate in the organ being regulated. At the very end of the axon lies the “synapse,” a word coined by Sherrington. The motor neuron’s axon on one side of the synapse does not physically touch the nerve or organ cells on the opposite side of the narrow gap called the synaptic cleft. Instead, the arrival of the electrical signals at the end of the axon stimulates release of neurotransmitters that diffuse across the synaptic cleft and bind to receptors.

13. The confusion is characteristic of the common held, albeit false, belief that a brain actually thinks. Thinking originates in mind, which is the cultural term for the encompassing order sustaining all brains. The mind itself is also split, fragmented, but that is beyond the scope of this article. The important distinction required to understand the relationship of administering cause to one region for effects across multiple regions is again the nature of order. Electrical signals and neurotransmitters are two entirely different orders, with electrical signals being more directly of the all-encompassing order.

14. The intent of the all-encompassing order must forever remain the gentle unwinding, unravelling of incongruancies between lower-order drives. In this way does the most encompassing forever remain equally not understandable except to bear mark one-same-same: of one kind exclusively for Self-sustaining equally inclusive FOR ALL sets irrespective of separating degrees. In allegorical terms, this is only expressed as the point of balance.

15. Because our entire universe is itself also in ONE endless motion, reference to everything itself IN ever-changing also AS one collective whole, anything perceptual entails deceit. That is not to say our intent is for deceit, but that neurotransmitters viewed as objects (molecules or otherwise) are carriers of a message not yet realized for the more encompassing relative order evidenced in understanding an electrical signal to have been its cause (its reason for being if not also understanding its relationship for sustaining same).

16. The undetected subatomic vibrational nature sustaining the electrical signal across communication media is a better explanation for the lingering question posed.

17. As an electrical signal is itself a pulse, analogy to fiber-optics in computer technology supports the embedded assertion that our bodies function effectively as machines such that I, as one collective, have not awareness how we are one while simultaneously operating so many different bodies all for the same one agreed goal of healing theoretically practised disparities.

18. Taking The Reflex Circuit full circle, to eclipse the point of balance for our need to compare desire with experience, outcome measured with outcome predicted, the importance of intent as foundation for every drive is portrayed in comparing us as individuals to our cell-phones: all day long we push each others buttons with intent to signal relationships bettering the micro and macroscopic whole completely unaware of the satellite network sustaining our linguistic ability to multi-culturally SAME communicate, pro-create.

II. GREAT CONTEXT IN The Reflex Circuit

19. GREAT CONTEXT IN The Reflex Circuit

20. Mr. Massimiliano Di Ventra and Mr. Yuriy V. Pershin in Just Add Memory, the Scientific America February 2015 article describing Three Memcomputer Building Blocks, state “Devising programs for maze running has long been a way to test the efficiency of computer hardware.” They give the comparative analogy of a maze runner holding charting equipment while running with one hand in constant contact to the wall as classical computational ability. Under heading The Power Of Memory, they state “One of the new memcomputing components, the memristor, responds in different ways to different levels of electric current.” Memcomputing cannot be compared to individual, sequential, maze tracing programs because the order for memcomputing, reference now The Reflex Circuit described herein, is more directly simultaneous: “Consider a network of memresistors, one at each turn of the maze, all in a state of high resistance. If we apply a single voltage pulse across the entrance and exit points, the current will flow only along the solution path – it will be blocked by dead ends in other paths.”

21. The analogy to memcomputing as more efficient maze running is offered for understanding GREAT CONTEXT as we each are effectively a memristor in a maze according to The Reflex Circuit, “Sherrington’s idea that a simple reflex begins with sensory input travelling along a nerve.” Just Add Memory draws analogy to such a nerve, in computational maze scenarios, as a current liken a river. If we add eddies at the openings to dead ends and errosion along the maze floor according to torrent strength, one can easily compare us to blind mice bickering and squaking for advertisement necessary to ensure our beliefs for reality of “Our Me” claimed to be eternal truths retain true being after their advertisement. Fortunately, greatest context is NOT understandable EXCEPT in hindsight for speculation of why the eddie is itself a reflexing circular carrier for The Life.

22. The question of Faith is essential for every discussion of healing because all healing is fundamentally the re-pairing of ties thought properly tied but not (knots). In hindsight, then, not as understood plan, this author (I as Rene Helmerichs, not exclusively any one form speaking for the not understandable I given simple fact of massive simultaneous replication ability of this text throughout our satellite clouds) has not relied upon memory but to remember to log events in such a way as to remain understandable while not knowing the next reflex offered to the singular drive for total personal transparency: only in a fully transparent personal environment is one able to retain full responsibility for self across every un-understandable fracture momentarily expressing itself as the endless hellish rift wherein blindness is perceived as colour for awareness in terms of understanding (money).

23. Whether or not brain surgeons are able to grasp the shere magnitude of The Reflex Circuit rests entirely upon their willingness to perceive the inner and outer dimensions without a synaptic cleft. Articles such as Forging Doubt (Science America March 2015) and The Age Of Disbelief (National Geographic March 2015) merely begin to conceptualize the scope of our current misunderstanding. Indeed, even Age Of Disbelief has retained the erroneous assumption of a thinking brain while attempting to reconcile differing mind-sets. Nonetheless, for a preposition to be proved true, it must continue to stand the test of time in an ongoing real-time manner.

24. The current theory for Shock Medicine is not incorrect. This article seeks only to ensure the Shock is removed from ill effects. That which can be used to heal, in any state of duality, can always be used to harm. Returning to the principal of subatomic vibrating nuclei carrying forward the means for healing along nerve fibers, it follows that alternate forms of electrical current, such as light or sound, should equally be able to affect the health of the shocked organism. Ms. Susan Michaels recounts one such initially far-fetching case that is, in principle, entirely plausible according to The Reflex Circuit theory Mr. Tracey presents in Scientific America. From Sightings (1997; ISBN 0-684-83630-0) of one of many visitations in Zimbabwe, quoting Ms. Cynthia Hind: I interviewed one man who lives in the Great Karoo, an area that’s almost completely unoccupied, just miles and miles of arid land with nothing on it [year of interview was 1992?]. This chap woke up one morning and walked out to a wall that surrounds the village where he lives. He saw what he thought was a caravan, what you call a trailer in the States. As he walked closer he thought it was strange the caravan hadn’t got any wheels, just tines sticking into the ground. When he got nearer still he saw four men standing in this trailer; one was at a console where a lot of lights were flashing, and the other three seemed to be examing meters. Something alerted them to the man’s presence outside. They all looked up, and with that, the man heard a click, and a light flashed on him. ‘I couldn’t get my breath,’ he told me. ‘l felt as though I was drowning. I was trying to get out of this beam of light, but it was difficult.’ His nose started to bleed. He began to vomit. As he tried to crawl out of the light, this craft lifted off the ground, the legs folded underneath, and it took off. He said it nearly knocked over his windmill. Well, the man died eighteen months later, because he was riddled with cancer. I’m only speculating because nobody knows, but I think he got too close to that craft, and he died from the effects of radium or some kind of radiation sickness. But no one would ever examine the case. The doctors all thought he was crazy and that I was crazy.

25. The book sightings: UFOs yields a trove of fascinating insight into a greater context reflex circuit, however, for the Shock Medicine at hand, Sound Bytes in Scientific America (March 2015) by Mr. Ron Cowen provides a clue of the potential electromagnetic currents (because electrical signals ARE with a magnet field) can have for physical healing.

26. At the very least, we know not to underappreciate sound. Speaking of an electromagnetic field actually present where-ever there exists a difference in subatomic charges (i.e. EVERYWHERE), composer and space physicist Mr. Robert L. Alexander paraphrased “The field is utterly silent, but it does fluctuate in strength and direction”, writes Mr. Cowen, “Alexander, who is also a graduate student at the University of Michigan working on solar data, applied his own algorithm to convert those variations into audible sounds.”

27. The universal law (of gravity, electromagnetism, one mind, or whatever the individual choose to call that establishing the ability for energy to not be destroyed but ever to change form) does provide the reverse to also occur, and occur across the plethora of sizes we, in our near-sightedness, may naively attribute to every bonded subatomic neurotransmitter.

28. For reassurance of the greatest context, we have eternal existence but know it not. In our not understanding of how we as timeless beings function, it does not follow that separation from physical reality leads us into the timeless awareness. Rather, we are doomed to repeat our experiences here in time until we fully grasp the nature of time is not for learning to manipulate, but for understanding transparency as the only feasible way to ensure survival of our planet!


29. A closing quote from the March 2015 issue of Science America reminds us of precisely the need to continue to work as one team in the collaborative universal drive healing our forgotten reflex circuit. From the article Our Transparent Future by Mr. Daniel C. Dennet and Mr. Deb Roy, “The real goal in security now is to retard the degradation of the half-lives of secrets.”, quoting Mr. Joel Brenner, former NSA senior counsel. It is actually our very drive to limit (the cost of) healthcare that causes increases to stressors now needing shocking medicine, but at what future drug-induced expense?