1.
Introduction.
ATTENTION:
ONTARIO JUDICIAL COUNCIL FOR JUDICIAL CONDUCT (OJCJC) REVIEW
BY: Rene
Helmerichs ∣ WRITTEN: 15 Aug 2015 ∣ LENGTH: 24 paragraphs
BLOG: www.talk2dream.info ∣ CROWD SOURCE FUNDING: www.talk2dream.net
A COURSE IN
MIRACLES (acim.org) FREE PDF: www.talk2dream.org
ONTARIO
PROVINCIAL POLICE (OPP) MORAL CORRUPTION: www.talk2dream.mobi
Similar email
to Law Society Of Upper Canada: https://www.dropbox.com/s/judw5tg33ctt696/20150829_Letter_to_LSUC-2015-169169.pdf
2.
Per
instruction from a John Gayle at The Office Of The Ombudsman received via phone
conversation on 7 Aug 2015, this letter begins: “I have a complaint about Mr.
C.R. Harris, judge, about a hearing that occurred from 14h30 to 16h30 on 5 Aug
2015 at the Barrie, Ontario, provincial court of justice. The matter is urgent.”
3.
John
stated the directions forwarded to him of The OJCJC, overwhich the ombudsman
apparently has no jurisdiction, are for me to “give as much detail as possible
as to why there was a misconduct.” I suppose John meant for me to provide what
The OJCJC is to evaluate in its review for misconduct that it can again, since
I have tried this once before in October and November of 2013, judge the
evidence to best remain unacknowledged for PREJUDICE.
4.
Here’s
the thing. I’ve been trying to have two psychiatrists arrested for criminal
wrong-doing amounting to nothing short of Criminal Code section 269.1(b)
TORTURE and 120 BRIBERY after one bartered to release me from injections if
only I stop blogging. A November 2012 conversation is available to evidence the
bribery confirmed with release from the forced injections.
5.
I’m
fairly certain nothing I will write or can say shall cause The OCJ to
miraculously become honest in The Argument, except maybe one thing. That one
thing is not at all considered with respect to the past because it bespeaks
only a future that is the future most honestly deemed LEAST desirable. Its
reference, however, begins with the past and specifically the events of 5 Aug
2015 at Barrie, the hearing being reviewed. The court did not permit counsel of
record for C-14-6966-OCJ to attend, instead used a lawyer not at arm’s length
to the prosecution to impede the defence and, when all was said and done, that “amicus”
refused to assist me to appeal the wilful Criminal Code section 219 NEGLIGENCE.
The hearings of 24 June and 17 July can confirm the amicus was not lawful
counsel of record for the defence and the prosecution had accepted me as fit
contrary to the 5 Aug 2015 events.
6.
On 5
Aug 2015, psychiatrist Mr. William Komer presented oral testimony to the court
that I should be deemed not fit to stand trial based exclusively on answers to
general knowledge questions that were not incorrect. Of course in miracles, “not
incorrect” does not equate to correct except within judgement of the assessor.
In this case, Mr. Komer had provided the court written statement dated 3 Feb
2015 declaring that assessment is not possible while I desire my answers
audio-recorded for later verification purposes.
7.
That
it took The Ontario Court Of Justice (OCJ) five months from 3 Feb. to 3 July
2015 to begin the hearing of my application requesting the court to ensure my
ability to verify my statements, ought to be a bit alarming. Nonetheless, that
I still desire my statements recorded, that I be afforded the dignity for equal
consideration in court to refute opinionated accusations, does reveal Mr. Komer
to have committed PERJURY on 5 Aug 2015 when he swore that he’d assessed me in
the period 24 June to 14 July 2015. As he was also on vacation from 25 June to
13 July 2015, a second count of the Criminal Code section 132 offence should be
applied.
8.
The
court heard testimony from Mr. Komer that I had claimed the two ways to plead
in courts for criminal law are Not Criminally Responsible (NCR) and NOT NCR. I
thank Mr. Komer for his accurate quotation and share with the reader why my
response is honestly accurate.
9.
In
Canada, there is no such thing as pleading innocent and one does not need to
enter a plea of Not Guilty since the court is obliged to consider the accused
not guilty until a Guilty verdict is rendered. The formal rendering of guilt
can arise voluntarily with Guilty plea, or upon trial conviction. In some
cases, such as that of Ryan Jeffery Hamlin on 22(?) Nov. 2014, a Guilty
conviction can apparently also arise at a status hearing but I suspect this may
be a Barrie courthouse custom not common to the rest of Canada.
10. In 1990, for the case of R. v. Chaulk,
Justice Dickson had vouched “not criminally culpable”, now NCR, to be a plea
and the only plea arriving at the intended “true acquittal”, the legalese
equivalent of innocent. It had been a New Brunswick prosecutor who referred to
it as a “plea” and everyone understood what was meant. Justice Dickson also
stressed, referring to himself in the earlier case of R. v. Oakes, that one who
pursues a plea of NCR is not necessarily desiring incarceration into a hospital
for medical treatment but willing to put up with the treatment on principle to
be expelled from an otherwise dead-end, in Mr. Dickson (or Ms; I don’t recall
reading a gender reference for that particular projection of our common
selfsame) was absolutely correct in both cases, all ways.
11. While I remained at The Waypoint Centre
For (malaligned; ref. GOV. ACC. NOW paras. 73-78 for www.talk2dream.ca) Mental Health Care, Mr.
Komer had asked me, for an assessment, “What are the TWO ways to plead in
court?” Since there is really only one plea, Guilty, with resulting NCR
diversion insinuating responsibility for the crime to be imposed upon the
physical body of the accused but not The Mind, incorrectly inferring that
Eternity FOR the body is NEVER with sufficient, or with whatever, necessary
awareness to provide the healing corporal reward-based benefit, I corrected him
morally with answer “NCR and NOT NCR”. Our mind-concepts begin at the
correction: common under-standing accompanies realizing NOT is equally
applicably, timeless innocence but its opposite, while not-where belief exists.
12. Now, one may judge my responses to have
been fool-hearted. I remind readers that I am a hearty fool for Law. Since I
have not been able to have Ms. Anjana Chawla and Mr. Liaqat Ali charged,
morally I have no choice but to compound advertising their crimes. I reveal MAG
to be corrupt until someone reading THIS, probably online, forwards it to someone
with more common sense than our idiot judge Mr. Harris and the necessary chain
of phone calls begins. THIS talk to dream is precisely the selfsame
unrecognized Golden Rule inaccurately considered grandiose by our bribing
torturers: reference GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY NOW posted online at www.talk2dream.info .
13. On 5 Aug 2015, attorney for the ordered
spinal-pain injections, Ms. Kathryn Elizabeth Hull, sided with psychiatrist Mr.
Komer to say that I needed the same injections that I had received at Royal
Victoria Regional Health Care (RVH; no care) in 2012. The claim presented to
the court is that I lack clear insight into the types of pleas available... and
that the injections caused me to stop blogging in 2012. Mr. Komer added his
professional opinion that I misperceived myself pleading guilty to a July 2014
charge and insisted that it is still live. The acting amicus, Mr. Vincent
Zenobio, a MAG Legal Aid Ontario lawyer, can confirm Legal Aid to have issued a
Letter Of Opinion certificate for appeal merits of the plea, demon-straighting
witch-doctor Will-i-am from moral corruption: 705-737-3400 ext.14.
14. I can identify over 30 distinct legal
contraventions of The Ministry Of The Attorney General, MAG, of Ontario for the
5 Aug 2015 hearing. Most disconcerting should not be the fact that the defence
was NOT permitted to conduct the cross-examination, itself grounds for a
section 7-11(d)-15-52(1) Constitution challenge to have all charges
ubitiquously dismissed, BUT the presumed assumption that the injections will
suddenly cause me to find the courtroom knowledge that I, on 24 Feb 2015 in
court at Orillia, clearly demonstrated when my plea was accepted.
15. On 24 Feb 2015, I pled guilty to the
charge of breach of probation that another morally confused officer, Ms. Tamara
Williamson, swore against me in Orillia, Ontario, on 11 July 2014. The charge
was for intentionally correcting the probation condition “Do not blog the name
Natalie Yewchyn”, which one will note is still being blogged. The charge, to be
accepted criminally, had to be taken out of context because the name had only
been blogged in a citation from the 4 Sept 2012 police report of MCSCS artist
Brian READ who vouched that Rene HelMeRichs had been arrested and subjected to
psychiatric punishment on presumption of guilt. The MAG disclosure for the
charge contains only the 28 pages that I had affirmed 8 July 2014 to begin
formal charges against A. Chawla and Her Minion Liar, and 3 pages to the
exhonourable dumbass mull-it-again Mulligan who, for Superior Court Of (NOT)
Justice file C-13-205-SCJ, did rule on 2 May 2014 that I was NOT permitted to
submit psychiatric evidence for the trial in June of 2014 for the allegations
for which I had already been arrested and injected in 2012. Ms. Hull was the
prosecutor covering for The Mormon Community Of Christ.
16. Honouring persistent teachers for Law,
from page 432 of The Girl Who Played With Fire (ISBN 978-0-14-317010-5), “The
prosecutor refused to listen to the facts.” Because Ms. Hull accepted my plea
of guilty on 24 Feb 2015, she is well aware that Mr. Komer openly committed
perjury on 5 Aug 2015 AND she elected to hide the fact. There is already a
complaint to The Law Society Of Upper Canada against her, file number LSUC-2015-169169;
however, I expect the greater Ontario government, GOG, to attempt its burial as
The College Of Physicians And Surgeons has so often been let to do. Hence our
need to share this story. The jail in which thickskin Hull insisted I remain,
Central North Correctional Centre, CNCC, a Ministry Of Community Safety And
Correctional Services, MCSCS, mismanaged affair of Ontario, permitted one only
to make collect calls and NOT to the LSUC or the vast majority of government
services normally toll-free. There are ongoing serious issues within MCSCS also
intentionally preventing inmates from obtaining necessary courtroom confidence.
17. On 24 Feb 2015, We DID strike a
plea-bargain naively thinking GOG would offer respect. The global position
agreement was altered the next day for Mormonism at Barrie. On the record of 25
Feb 2015, I was still offered “time-served” and any charge that I intended to
challenge with NCR generously dropped on that day. Therefore Mr. Peters, a
prosecutor at Barrie, did ALSO reveal me to understand how and why to plea.
This brings us to the true nature and object of the singularly adversarial
system before us. The actual matter concerns the definition of MIND not in
section 2 of The Criminal Code Of Canada.
18. The Criminal Code section 365 offence
PRETENDING TO PRACTICE WITCHCRAFT criminalizes the use of potions, the
injectible substances costing tax-payers 500 CAD per pop, to find lost
knowledge. Foregoing the common sense that forced injections of a substance
knowingly having only caused me spinal pain opposes goodwill and IS torture in
the educational and criminal law contexts, the simple fact of memory evidences
our living environment to be our common mind. These words are my lasting memory
as they are yours, and mine next time. What is more, that memory IS the ability
to bridge time for desired change to self, and all things physical cannot last,
the brain is NOT the thinking part of its operator. Confused? The Euchrist is a
fraud and the aliens know we all have eternal existence.
19. On 5 May 2015, Mr. Komer was tasked with
assessing me for fitness to stand trial. The task involves a general knowledge
assessment of courtroom basics. On 24 June 2015, an order was made for the
amicus lawyer to be appointed to assist me in the event of procedural deficit,
that I personally retained the right to cross-examine Mr. Komer. On 5 Aug 2015,
I was presumed incompetent to perform the cross-examination and, therein,
prejudiced; as teacher, I was not permitted equal protection of our Law. An
amicus is not defence counsel of record and lawfully I should have been let to
demonstrate, at the very least, that I had already been deemed fit in 2013.
Unfortunately, Mr. Harris was lead to believe that I am not mentally competent
with superfluous statements of Mr. Komer. Mr. Komer intentionally evaded a
twice-asked direct question wherefrom he had received his information. Mr.
Komer did not have my permission to consider more than that provided in our
real-time discussions and violated R. v. Abbey to insist third-hand information
need not be verified. Most alarming of all is the fact that a Matthew Keating
was the actual assessor of facts and who supported my assertion that I am
mentally fit, and stated to me: “An audio-recording would make this much
easier.”
20. With respect to the audio-recording,
Waypoint Centre chief psychiatrist Mr. James Leslie Karagianis had attempted to
end its discussion on 3 July 2015 with statement at lines 13-21 on page 37 of
the transcript. James is egocentric, not truly centric. He inferred that it is
MY mental illness that I desire NOT to have my statements taken out of context
WITHOUT assurance of the ability to verify what I had and had not said. James
(Jamie) assumed the lack for trust into THEIR religion for witchcraft IS the
mental dis-ease, which, noting the fine line available only in print, is as not
incorrect as the rest of my responses to the obstinate idiot Komer had been. In
summary, Waypoint Centre demonstrates itself to be exclusively for mental
hellth with insistence that its victims not be permitted to reveal to the
public THEIR grandiose tower of defamatory Babble we reveal is The Fraud Of All
Time.
21. There are two choices for action at any
given time. One is to REAL-EYES COMMON sooner and the other is to delay the
inevitable. Our system needs healing. The Choice Amidst The Argument In The
Business Of Being hellthy IS:
We shall conduct all further
psychiatric-related assessing of I exclusively in writing. Hands shall
hand-print every question put to us, as best as possible, while at Ontario
Shores in Whitby, Ontario. WE shall then answer the question on the same or
subsequent page, and ensure under-standing. Staff paid by the hour are going to
LOVE it. For my own compensation, I shall collect the pages for word-processing
and publishing in the book of life for which I’ve had a contract since June of
2012. The book is a reality book. I am told that any and everything I say or do
in a mental ward may be recorded and used for assessment purposes. Of course,
the hellth of the brainless system is of equal concern to the general-taxed
labourers who are offered a physical copy of our book in compendium to its
FREE PDF, when available, at www.talk2dream.com
22. While active, please join our petition at www.talk2dream.ca AND www.talk2dream.net .
23. Talk To Dream is the New Goal Day charity
for A Course In Miracles (acim.org) we attempted to register in May of 2012.
Our goal is to awaken common sense, that dreaming involves the projection of
ideas for benefit to The Dreamer, Self dreaming up a reality of ever-changing
objects not unlike the physical sphere in which we believe ourselves to be
awake. If we were really awake, why are we pretending that psychiatrists can
magically imbue an individual with courtroom knowledge through, exclusively,
forced injections? COMMON sense.
24. Publicity ensures honesty because honesty
is re-reciprocated consistency, 11:11, The Golden Rule, oneness ever-amplified.
Signed at MCSCS CNCC 2C8 15 Aug 2015, Rene Helmerichs.
TENTATIVE
PREAMBLE
“The best
possible care” is an expression hospitals use to distract from the single fact
of incarceration without trial on presumption of criminal guilt. Anything
harmful to self or society is a crime. Police are generally responsible to
ensure criminals are arrested and lawyers are tasked with metting out
correction. Hospitals are used to correct behaviour where jails fail but none
dares to question the supremacy of psychiatrists, as this book plainly
illustrates.
My name is
Rene Helmerichs. I still consider myself a teacher. It has been exclusively for
creative-writing publicly posted messages that I am considered a danger to
myself or others and mentally incompetent. I was not permitted to defend myself
in court. The following Introduction is an actual letter sent to a regulatory
body responsible, at least on paper, to ensure such a thing as THIS does not
happen.
Welcome to our
craziest LIFE in this smashhit reality book.
[Throughout
these pages, emotion is evidenced. The inclusion of emotion is itself a
critical message to those individuals that attempt to subdue feelings with
tranquilizers such as those Mr. Komer did reference on 5 Aug 2015. In time, the
hearing transcript will also be freely offered.]
25. CHAPTER ONE
Introduction To Reality.
26. 22 Aug 2015 about 11:30am at Ontario
Shores in Whitby, ON. confrontation between patients Cassey and Rene in front
of the meal window. Donna with broken finger sitting between Rene and Cassey.
Cassey rambling speech with rapid pace encouraging Donna to keep the brace off
her finger and to show him that its broken. Donna does as asked stating “When I
try to bend it, it hurts like hell. I can’t bend it.” Cassey laughing claims it’s
not broken and Donna yields to continue trying to bend it.
27. I, Rene as author, ask Donna if she had an
x-ray before the brace was given her. She replies affirmatively. I suggest she
leave on the brace and not listen to Cassey. Cassey directs his assaults my way
with comments “What do you think doctor Rene?” I reply, “I’ve just told you
what I think and think you should stop trying to get under my skin.” (The
quotation is an abridgement. Cassey had claimed “I AM a doctor” at one point, as
is undoubtably part of his superiority complex, i.e. ego). Nurse Tara was
present and I requested assistance, that Cassey be restrained from encouraging
others to hurt themselves.
28. Tara informs me that I am to talk to my
own nurse as she has her own patients. Cassey laughs and continues. In his mind
this place is jail and the rules of jail apply. He has made this plain in past
antagonizing mutterings to me. By those rules, I am now a tattle and in line
for corporal punishment from the group. The only option available to me is to
stand my ground. So I repeated to him, standing now further away on the way to
the nursing station to get the nurse assigned, Dana, to Cassey: “I’m calling
you on. I’m tired of your attempts to get under my skin (He had admitted to
trying to do this intentionally three days past, and two days past openly
threatened me with statement “If you’re Lucifer I’ll bang you out right now.”
The statement was not from conversation had with Cassey but his partial
overhearing of a Bibical conversation I and Anthony shared concerning the
equal-applicability of The Holy Spirit. Anthony and I had a good, and long, and
diverse, conversation interrupted only by Cassey.).”
29. Cassey responded affirming that I am me
and we agreed to leave it to the street, which may or may not happen. I
certainly have no desire to waste any more of my time attempting to speak
sensibly to his insanity.
30. Looking now at the layout of the area, I
stood about as far from Cassey as I had been sitting but at 90∘,
being, or having been, on route to the station. As vocals were raised, nurses
came. There was no longer need to call Dana. Brian and Michael, the charge
nurse, were present and should have reports.
31. I was lead further away, asked to explain,
and eventually stated to Brian my dislike of verbal encounters as there is not
an audio-recording. The next day, Brain declared me “a semantics guy.”
32. Michael made comments that I perceived
insinuating me to be at least equally at fault. Afterall, I had been heard
openly calling Cassey on. Not mentioned is my equally vocal reference to the
video surveillance necessitating Cassey make good on threats of assault and
come at me so that I am lay him out. I have not desire for violence but do need
to stand up for myself especially then, to end the argument peacefully (because
no tormentor will knowingly do something on a recording evidence to use in
court for the assault charge later).
33. The deferral to the street is great and
will end any future argument without need for similar nursing staff attention.
For the most part, I am ignoring him. Yes, we are all here for our separate
issues and we all need to learn to respect each other. This, actually, is the
perfect lead-in to Chapter One of my book.
34. Nurses are to be advised the Introduction
was written on 15 Aug 2015 and placed to my chart, a copy thereof.
35. We are writing this book together.
36. I’ve lost my life as I once knew it while
a college teacher at Georgian College over the, -- what we can call my mental
illness because you’re not going to want to believe that it actually happened
and therefore, in your denial, prevent me from presenting myself without
illness to you --, practice of misconstruing my statements and actions for want
to portray me to be unlike you. Refer to www.talk2dream.info
for the legal background if at all you care. It doesn’t matter anymore. Mental
Health is big in the news, and as a writing teacher I have full confidence in
my ability to write a smash-hit.
37. Chapter One (continued)
Reality at Ontario Shores Centre For Mental Health
Sciences
38. The reality is that health practitioners,
on the whole, command trust, respect, and obedience without reciprocation
honesty.
39. I arrived on 18 Aug 2015, transferred from
CNCC, because Waypoint Centre, according to testimony of William Komer on 5 Aug
2015, did not longer feel itself competent with respect to honest well-being.
The reader is to recall Mr. Komer lead the court to declare me not fit to stand
trial. Thereafter the judge, Mr. C.R. Harris, ordered me to be injected instead
of assuring us that idiot Komer assessed me. At Ontario Shores I pled for mercy
and received dictatorship instruction from Nancy Burns, one of two designated
social engineers in the Forensic Assessment Unit operating for the psychiatric
directive. I met psychiatrist Leslie Wong, fag gender, for the first time at
11:11 18 Agu 2015. He is a Criminal Code of Canada (C.C.C.) section 365 defined
witch for threatening me with injections if I do not answer questions of court
exactly to his own liking. To witchfag I spoke not a sound claiming “I lost my
voice on 5 Aug 2015.” Witchfag bickered with tangential questions and accepted
only my written statement “Irrelevant” concerning my son with my insistence to
postpone discussion. Witchfag insisted C.C.C. subsection 215(3)(c) DOES render
him criminally liable if he dose not ensure guardianship of my son is a trump
also at his disposal. I had warned him with explicitly tendered statement “[This
tangent] is a legal trap.” He assured otherwise and the reader shall behold
actioned statements as facts. [To Mr. Wong: IF YOU MAKE GOOD ON YOUR INSISTENCE
TO GET INVOLVED, as you now already are, FOR HONESTY, then you shall have my
respect and instantly – or as soon as I can have it done – the references to
you throughout this text shall reflect the respect you offer with proper
entitlement as “Dr. Wong” where currently you see “witchfag”. WE ARE
DYNAMICALLY WRITING THIS BOOK and I WILL need to stay at Ontario Shores until
the 6 Nov 2015 court date, with your generous agreement to actually help me get
out of this legal headache.]
40. To quote C.C.C. subsection 319(7)
appropriately for the offence PUBLIC INCITEMENT OF HATRED:
“statements” includes words spoken or
written or recorded electronically or electro-magnetically or otherwise, and
gestures, signs or other visible representations.
41. Psychiatrists report to program directors
who report to vice presidents who report to Chief Executive Officers of their
respective private hospital employers siphoning, collectively, BILLIONS of
dollars for pharmasuetical companies that in turn rely on research exclusively
considering not ever the possibility that our mind is eternal.
42. Witchfag lost his patience at our second
encounter two days after our first. He had wanted to meet with me for “just a
moment” because he heard that I was speaking. He lustfully neglected to
consider the reason for my election not to speak. Instead, he grew
short-tempered waiting for me to finish hand-printing his oral questions to me.
He prevented my ability by shifting questions, and evaded entirely my first
attempt to directly ascertain his definition for mind. While he sat with a
laptop recording opinions in secret, he also insisted on interrupting my
writing claiming that I took too long to answer his questions. I shutter to
think how a truly disabled victim must feel. The mental assault is
incomprehensible and this from one we designated a healthcare practitioner.
43. The nurse, and this nurse deserves true
credit, is genuinely respectful AND honest. Anon suggested to witchfag that the
questions witchfag needs to ask are already written. To save his precious time,
temper, and frustration, why not provide them to me to complete as a homework
assignment? Anon slipped me their verbatim answers with the questions as if to
spite witchfag on my behalf. Does witchfag really think I will do as witchfag
pleases not for us?
44. A mental ward is truly like kindergarten.
While supply teaching at Coddrington (sp?) Public School in Barrie, as the
kindergarten teacher, I explained life on planet earth:
Do you think that kid liked what you did?
It doesn’t matter if you don’t like him. Do you want friends (attention; the
means to end loneliness) or not? If you can’t play well with everyone, and bug
the people you don’t like, you’re going to be separated from the group and left
all alone. You can find people like you, but until you learn to treat everyone
equally you’re not going to awake.
The great thing about witchfags in
kindergarten is the absolute understanding that Teacher speaks with words like
GOD.
45. The issue of lack of respect is three-fold
understood with realization that Ontario Shores staff:
1) are not willing to assist me correct a
Family Court order of 28 March 2013 wherefore my mother to this day continues
to falsify testimony in her delusional inject-Rene-to-silence-him belief system
already witnessing her to have lied AND committed numerous assaults and the
least of which is her C.C.C. s.283 ABDUCTION of my son;
2) actively prevent one to demonstrate
judicial fitness by, believe it or not, denying the sending of faxes to defence
counsel with referral to The Psychiatric Patient Rights Advocate Marie Taylor,
who complains and argues about faxing or copying with such delay that days and
weeks pass with zero assurance that appearance at non-criminal court hearings
will be mitigated or permitted; and,
3) openly discriminate with reprisal for
adhering moral, truly legal trumping court, law.
46. Moral law is eloquently stated as “doing
to the other as you would have them do unto you in similar circumstance”
because there is only one kind of honesty that all motions equally share. My
use of flaring prose is restricted to those whom I first offer choice rendered
unto me begun in 2012 which IS the root of the whole of the current legal
headache.
47. In 2012, The Inept Chief Witch-doctor
Anjana Chawla bartered with me to remove me from her delcaration of mental
incompacity, believe it or not. As actions do hold greater legal merit than
their descriptions or justifications, there is no actual hope for Anjana Chawla
and Her Minion Liar Liaqat Ali not to go down in history as the secondary
antagonists of this story. The primary instigator had been The Euchrist of The
Mormon Community Of Christ and its Good Sense Budgeting Workshop OF 21 April
2012.
48. I am at Ontario Shores on an order for
treatment to be injected with a substance on the idiot advice that it will
bestow me with the magical ability to answer court-related questions the way
witchfags command. Page 8 of The Applicant’s Guide To Filing An Application
With The Human Rights Tribunal Of Ontario states, under heading “Types of
Discrimination”:
“Reprisal: Reprisal under the [Human
Rights] Code means that you believe the respondent intended to punish you for
claiming or enforcing your rights under the Code;”
I have a right to better the communal
understanding of the kindergarten questions being asked!
49. The substance for injection had previously
only caused me spinal pain. It is both inhumane and illegal to threaten me with
injection of that substance if I do not answer test questions exactly as
desired of me. For one, it negates the collaboration normally necessary for
well-being to be evidenced. Case in point is of the second witchfag session of
psychiatric tyranny. Mr. Wong refused to accept my previously tendered
responses, the result of which Ontario Shores chief witch-doctor The Krewl
Kraken Karen (KKK) DeFreitas submitted to court in a letter dated 12 Sept 2013
on 18 Sept 2013. It found me fit to stand in my own defence.
50. On 20 Aug 2015, Mr. Wong had attempted to
coerce my will into his with requests that I nod or shake my head in response.
I wrote the following as response:
“If you ask a
Y/N question for a nod or shake, it is for you to use in answer to a purpose
delineated further in your notes (to which I am denied access). For a record of
that to which I have agreed or disagreed, I will need to write the question.”
51. Witchfag did’t get it. I captured his
verbal response verbatim in script: “Your response is actually harder to
understand today than the previous day. -- can you stop writing please and
listen to me? (note that I had been acutely listening; I looked to confirm
understanding.) Can I take a look at that?” The page had come to an end and the
start of the new was shown to him. When he asked to see the reverse side, I
offered “You make notes; I make notes. Am I not permitted to take notes? Can I
see what you’re typing?” He responded, “We’re just typing what we’re talking
about here.” Odd was the subject pronoun witchfag had used, “we”. I closed
with, “The same here.”
Witchfag continued, “Let me ask you this: do
you think you suffer from a major mental illness such as schitzophrenia or ...?”
I replied with a direct assault to his ego: “Is my opinion relevant? I fail to
see how it has been in the past, and nothing that is occurring right now is
indicating your demonstrated concept of healing to involve a collaborative
process, or we two would not be waiting on me to hand-print everything.
FYI, your comment about me needing a pencil sharpener
was neither appreciated nor appropriate since we both know such a thing is not
offered to me here. The comment did remind me of an earlier A Course In
Miracles reference, and that had me smile. Thank you for that. My pencil, as
you may note, is adjustable and not in need of a sharpener.”
52. As witchfag sat upright from reading my
script, his eyes fixed not on me but the end of my pencil and therein did I
receive the necessary confirmation that my message is clear.
53. To ensure the message is affirmed, I offer
this exclusive: Mr. Wong, I trust you have enough sense to consider this in
need of forwarding to your supervisor, whom I imagine may be Susan Taylor but
should certainly extend well past Erik Hoskins [Mark Rice; the director], our
Minister for The Church Of Healthcare. You’ll not understand one can not be
attributed with illness for a creatively written legal message. You declined my
offer of answers to your general knowledge courtroom awareness quiz. Instead,
you demanded that I write the answers with my memory. Further, you fail
miserably to respect your duty under C.C.C. section 215(3) unless, and this is
a kind-spirited if, you and I make sudden amends. Amends shall include,
according to the asinine arrogance of your own imposed agreement, that
1) I NOT be injected, medicated, or silenced
while presenting Ontario Shores Centre For Mental Health Sciences ITS answers
to ITS courtroom questions;
2) You recognize those answers are NOT mine
and I shall therefore need to remain AT Ontario Shores until its staff respect
those answers to be partially inaccurate, therefore wholey incorrect; and,
3) I remain at Ontario Shores until the
accompanying document GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY NOW available from www.talk2dream.info is corrected to OUR
satisfaction.
54. The partially correct, wholey incorrect,
answers Rene Helmerichs was forced to copy without understanding discussion
only to avoid forced injections of the same substance for which witch-doctor
Anjana Chawla had bribed his release in 2012:
1) What charges are you facing?
You will be expected to know the charges that you are
facing.
2) What pleas are available at court?
Guilty
Not Guilty
(Innocent)
3) What is the role of the judge in court?
The judge listens to both sides (defense and crown)
and makes the final decision regarding the guilt or innocence of an accused.
The judge will also determine the sentencing or will order your release if
found innocent.
4) What is the role of the crown prosecutor
in court?
The crown prosecutor represents the state, the police
or the victim of the incident. He/she does not represent the accused.
5) What is the role of the defense attorney?
The defense lawyer represents the person who had been
charged (accused) with a crime. They represent this person and will speak for
you in court.
6) Do you have a lawyer and can you trust
him/her?
7) Will you be able to instruct your lawyer
as to what you want to happen in court?
Your lawyer will expect you to tell him whether you
are guilty or innocent of the charge and to instruct him as to what you want to
happen in court.
8) What is an oath taken in court?
An oath is to swear to tell the truth in court. It is
often taken with your hand on a holy book.
9) What happens if you lie in court? Do you
know what this is called?
This is called perjury. If you lie in court you may
be charged with perjury, ordered to jail or warned and released.
10) What happens if you plead guilty?
If you plead guilty, the judge will decide on some
time of punishment. He/she may want you to serve additional jail time or may
release you into the community on probation.
11) What happens if you plead not guilty?
The judge will order a trial.
12) What happens at a trial?
The judge will listen to arguments from the defense
attorney and the crown prosecution. He/she will then make a decision, based on
what he has heard from both sides, as to whether or not you are guilty or
innocent of the charge. If you are found guilty the judge will then decide on
punishment. If you are found not guilty the judge will order your release.
55. The numbers were added here for
cross-reference convenience. One shall note the question concerning trust can
have no correct answer as TRUST is the collaborative commitment to life as
one. Compensation negates trust.
56. Chapter One (continued; posting for www.talktodream.info)
Verbatim Complaint To Ontario Shores I
57. I’m on the FAU ward at Ontario Shores
where each is said to suffer their own issues and all are to be equally
respected. This matter concerns a nurse, Fred Asare, occurred 17h30 on 24 Aug
2015 at the meal window.
58. The meal was insufficient. I had asked for
bread and peanut butter to compensate. I’m told I’m on the list to see the
dietitian. The point is the refusal of staff to make active commitment to the
FAU Information Booklet Statement:
“We aim for Excellence -- through leadership and
learning, we achieve exceptional performance in all we do.”
59. How exceptional is it for a longtime nurse
of Ontario Shores, Fred Asare whom I recognize from 2013 conflicts, to be
permitted not only to enforce a “four peanut butter per 3 slices bread”, lower
than even that suggested of his meal-counter colleague, Stephanie, merely
because I asked for an addition 3 having used 3 on one slice before staff at
Ontario Shores had the courtesy of informing me of the new rule (the rule hadn’t
been enforced until I had asked for 3 more eaches packs in all the time I’ve
been here). So the issue clearly isn’t peanut butter. The issue is racism, or
discrimination, or leadership training. Whatever one wants to call it.
60. Fred Asare is NOT qualified to be a
healthcare practitioner in any practical sense. As a client here, I am aware
the cost of my stay grosses Ontario Shores somewhere in the ballpark of $1200
per night, more if I were ruefully medicated with tranquilizers or placed into
the “extra care” area the public believes to be used only responsibly. There is
simply no just cause to have promoted a scene that drew the attention of every
patient present and saw 3 additional nurses calmly take precautionary position
behind me.
61. The patient Cassey, having previously
decided to include me in the general verbal assaults he mutters in passing to
anyone around him, raised the tension with his newfound position physically
beside me but advocating for Mr. Asare. Nursing staff have thus for been
remarkably obtuse without regarding the borderline sexual harassment Cassey
imp-arted Nurse Agnes on Sat 22 Aug 2015 from leers while she did yoga in the
weightroom to ongoing courtyard courtings through games, jogging, and finally
chats on a bench. Nurse Crystal the evening of 25 Aug 2015 caught on to Cassey’s
insidious “jokes” though likely passed off the matter as par for Cassey, or due
to her own emotional hardness preventing her to actually see.
62. It was not appropriate for a nurse to make
or further a scene settled with the offering of goods collectively valued at
less than a dollar. The correct response was for Mr. Asare to offer the goods
and set aside a time to speak further about the matter. The actual reaction of
Fred is precisely that requiring his immediate black-listing; he is not to
appear on the FAU ward again if Ontario Shores has a semblance of sense.
63. Fred reacted with laughter at my comment
for him to review this complaint. Fred stated, “it’s my last day and I’m gone
at 7, so you better hurry.” I asked whether he’d be back or if indeed it was
his last day. He replied “I’m on float. I don’t work here anymore.” I assume he’s
already transferred to a position at some other hospital with, God help us,
more ability to assert his complex.
64. Fred does not understand the discretionary
aspect necessary to be considered a leader and certainly did not demonstrate
the kindness aspect normally, or what should be normally, associated with a
team environment of healthcare professionals. Most alarming of all, in this
situation, was the utter lack of mediation fellow nurses could have mitigated
but, of nature or nurture, did not. Any one of the 5 present staff could have
ended the silliest of arguments with a simple gesture of kindness. Instead, I
was ostracized for reaching into the eaches margarine bowl, to take two eaches
margarine in place of the peanut butter for the toast, with vehemous paraphrase
“Take your hand out of there. That’s not for patients to take. I will pass it
to you.”
65. Really, Fred? It is another new rule. My
lasting comment to nurses who are not longer regulars on the ward but let to
lead all staff into new, or perceptually new for one who did read the Patient
And Family Information (policy) Book, rules is to ensure also to amend the
global policy book so that other irregulars can play to the same tune.
66. Consistency IS the mark of mental
well-being. So where, Ontario Shores, is the fucking playbook or is it to be
the norm for each staff to enforce only the rules they arbitrarily, please,
without even verification to the invalid whether that invalid has ever heard
the rules?
Perhaps share the rules for an HONEST enterprise.
67. Chapter 1 (continue)
Email: Tax-Waste Ripe For Massive Budget
Cuts
FROM: Rene Helmerichs
WRITTEN: 25 Aug, 2015
COPY TO: www.talktodream.info
68. Hello Ms. Venessa Zanette, Manager of The
Psychiatric Patients Advocate Office, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
69. Since Rights Advocate Marie Tayor at
Ontario Shores Centre For Mental Health Sciences in Whitby, Ontario, seems
permitted to brush requests for rights advocacy aside with circular referrals
back to staff having referred the question to her, is Rene Helmerichs to assume
that he does not have the lawful right to attend a Family Court hearing on 14
Sept. 2015 at Barrie?
70. The Superior Court ordered the hearing but
Rene evidently needs a second order to be brought there. This is correctly a matter
for The Rights Advocate Office.
71. Are rights advocate not actually to assist
with rights advocacy?
72. Cathy Difonte at Waypoint Centre in
Penetanguishene refused to assist Rene attend his Civil Court proceedings
earlier this year and The Constitution of Canada advertises equal benefit of
the law in section 15 to exist. Rene wants to be doubly sure that your office
is the office of our Ontario government committing the greatest fraud against
Ontario tax-payers, or please help Rene attend the 14 Sept. 2015 hearing.
73. Chapter 1 (continued; verbatim as
originally printed) Leslie Wong secures a financial winfall for Rene Helmerichs
74. Mr. Wong, I would like you to know that I
would much prefer to communicate orally. Do you understand my hesitation?
(Please also be patient while I record that you speak
-- it will help us both to remain concise.)
Please help me obtain the public report assured under
Mental Health Act subsection 33.9(2), for the CTO at the foundation of our
silence. (my silence.) We understand this is not directly your job but one that
you are able to facilitate.
75. “I think this is something you would go
through the patient advocate here. Let me just jot that done. I think that
would be something that -- um.”
76. I’ve tried the advocate at Waypoint Centre,
Julian Kusek, without luck and Marie Taylor, at Ontario Shores, despite
numerous requests has not yet provided me with confirmation of even the attempt
to fax the Introduction referenced on 18 Aug 2015 to the three parties
requested. Thank you, however, for the normal suggestion.
77. “Update on where things are going...
Significant concerns as to your ability to
communicate.”
[Wong advises intent to force medication to make me
talk.]
78. Then our discussion outright ends.
79. “You are currently under a court order and
if you refuse, we will be ordering injections.”
80. We are done.
81. Chapter One (continued; verbatim written
request)
Unbelievable. To Nancy Burns, social engineer at
Ontario Shores
82. Hi Nancy, this note is for our book. On 19
Aug 2015 you had assured me of agreement for health to include a collaborative
effort. You had also advised me, with what I consider logic, that the court
order requiring me to be injected is informally stayed if I can evidence
fitness. Unfortunately, the assessor has declared me to be with inability to
communicate to his standard (no kidding and I agree) and therefore need to be
forcibly medicated.
83. Nancy Burns, in 2013 you remarked humour
at my reference to psychiatrist Anjana Chawla as The Inept Chief Witch-doctor.
On 19 Aug 2015 you also noted recollection of my referencing A Course In
Miracles. I share with you a quote from the particularly relevant chapter, The
Hero Of The Dream, available officially from acim.org:
Into eternity where all is one, there
crept a ting mad idea at which the son of God remembered not to laugh. In his
forgetting did the idea become both possible and real.
The quote is a best approximation; free pdf
at www.talk2dream.org .
84. Nancy, reality is a constant state
established by God. None of us here are to be gods over the others. For this
reason alone is wellness evidenced only with collaboration to peacefully
resolve misunderstandings. That I am literally unwilling to speak with any
psychiatrist off a record should evidence my lack of trust in the business
called psychiatry. That a psychiatrist is now intending to inject me for vanity
of his desire to hear me scream gives me full permission to publicly defame
Leslie Wong as The Witchfag Of All Time.
85. Dear reader, do realize psychiatrist Mr.
Leslie Wong at Ontario Shores did neither receive paragraphs 54 and 55, the
answers he requested of me on 20 Aug 2015 to be submitted in my own
hand-writing NOR has demonstrated any of the publicly advertised Values in the Forensic
Program FAU Patient And Family Information Booklet of Ontario Shores Centre For
Mental Health Sciences. The true hellth administered behind doors closed to
public scrutiny without audio-recording of the adverse healthcare publicly
sustained session should be plainly evidenced in the everlasting endgame
communication this publicly posted chapter permanently relays.
86. Ms. Burns, you will please convey exactly
this message to witchfags the likes of arrogant Wong:
“You fucking
arrogant prick. You think forcibly injecting me is going to improve my desire
to communicate to you? How about verifying your fucking near-sighted opinion
with POLITE communication I’ve had to Ms. Burns, or better, Lawyer Uma
Kancharla who’s assured me of her intent to appeal the order feeding your
vanity on grounds stated in the Introduction. Is this really how you intend to
be portrayed in a book of reality of OUR dynamic collaboration? I trust you’ll
somehow receive all further communication from the voices you hear in the
stethoscope held to my thigh while you listen to your fucking potion talk to
you. Just WHAT are you thinking? Until you re-evaluate your actioned belief in
mind or healing or wellness or well-being, this is the lasting piece of MY mind
I leave for all witchfags of your kind. There IS only ONE Kind of honesty and
THAT KIND is only assured with publicity because IT COMMUNICATES always to a
consistency evidently beyond your egocentric understanding. I fully intend to
absolutely ruin your career, legally AND publicly. Talk2dream.Me IS our means
to restore honesty where witchfags practice Criminal Code Of Canada section
365(a) defined WITCHCRAFT.”
87. Thanks Nancy, sorry for the tone. I trust
the message is sufficiently clear. The chronology that we’d begun on 19 Aug
2015 is available online at www.talktodream.info
, and the MHA subsection 33.9(2) request in paragraph 52 of GOVERNMENT
ACCOUNTABILITY NOW, available as word document download from www.talk2dream.info . Please get me onto
ODSP; I have bills to pay. As keepsake, paragraphs 54 and 55 of THIS chapter
are offered you per your 19 Aug 2015 naive assurance that the injections could
be stayed. (“Dumbass witch-doctors.”)
88. The record shall indicate Nancy and Rene,
me, sat for 45 minutes from 1:05 pm to 1:50 pm on 25 Aug 2015 alone in room
8-2502 on the FAU unit at Ontario Shores, emphasizing only that we trust each
other with equal respect. Nancy explained the limit of her judicial involvement
and re-emphasized to me her vision of the ensuring unnecessary hardship I
potentially face while I shared with her my consideration that Ontario Shores
will only be completely disreputed in our book. She then emphasized inability
to cause Marie Taylor, the rights advocate, to assist me with confirmation of
the faxes for which Marie claims me to have received confirmation. I need only
share that Uma Kancharla explicity requests a re-fax. Nancy confirmed receipt
of the Introduction, laughed at my grounds for submitting not my answers to the
fitness test, and disregard my caution to reason with Dumbass Wong. Nancy
stated opinion that I am already fit. This is Psychiatric Insanity.
89. CHAPTER TWO:
90. At what point do we begin to follow the
law?
91. Specific concern at Ontario Shores on 30
Aug 2015
92. My name is Rene Helmerichs. I am a client
to whom Ontario Shores psychiatrist Mr. Leslie Wong is assigned.
93. Mr. Wong is actively refusing to hear me.
I am here on a court order to receive treatment because the court had deemed me
to be not fit to stand trial, or stand in my own defense as the case may be.
The court has ordered medication to be administered into my person and Mr. Wong
complies.
94. The objective of the court order is,
however, not to medicate me but to help me become fit. And this is precisely
the matter for Ontario Shores concern.
95. While I am medicated, I can only refer Mr.
Wong to answers for the fitness questionnaire already provided, for which I had
been found fit in 2013.
96. The predicament is plain. His argument is
that I am psychotic and need the medication to be administered against my will.
It has been said that fitness of an individual can vary from time to time. My
response to these arguments is simply the ongoing request for explicit
clarification, precisely why we cannot speak of our differing views
peacefully, without threat of now increase to already forced medication.
97. Mr. Wong may attribute fault to my desire
to maintain our discussing restricted to recordable media, such as paper in
lieu of audio-recordings not available or not permitted at Ontario Shores.
98. A secondary, or tertiary, concern is thus
the lack of courtesy, dignity, and respect Mr. Wong displays to the actual
needs of his [victims].
99. My need is to be found fit. The need of
Mr. Wong is clearly to medicate me. Since I cannot answer fitness questions
incorrectly after having answered them correctly without medication, to be
found fit, Mr. Wong has condemned me to medication quite impossibly against the
purpose of the order.
100. If I am not permitted access to my 2013
answers, then the statement under the Ontario Shores declaration of Patient
Rights permitting me access to “information” is a lie. Moreover, that the
clinical manager, Ms. Susan Taylor, of The Forensic Assessment Unit cannot provide
me a list of the responsibilities of the social worker, I also cannot be sure
how to proceed with a formal complaint to The College Of Physicians And
Surgeons in the event the local Patient Advocate, Marie Taylor, simply is
overloaded with hospital complaints to acknowledge mine before the next
scheduled injection.
101. In the event my complaint is unclear, I
would restate it as an argument over the intended effect of the forced
medication. If I am to be medicated to be found fit, then I haven’t need for further
harassment from Ontario Shores staff demanding I answer fitness questions. And
this does apply to ALL patients in similar circumstance.
102. If, on the other hand, I am in need of
clarifying to staff in a real-time manner that I do comprehend the roles of
courtroom jesters, crowny clowns or other judiciaries, and the general process
having led to the presumption of illness against me, then I offer peace with
respect that Mr. Wong will cease and desist from his ordered assaults onto me.
103. Actions of “healthcare” staff against
clients led to believe medication is necessary for courtroom insight is not
above mentally raping the Constitutional freedom of belief. For Christ to
exist, mind is already eternal. For mind to be already eternal, the illness
preventing understanding is egocentricity beyond the realm of our physical
always-changing and permanently temporary sphere.
104. For a physician, in the case Mr. Wong, to
ruefully smite his client for attempting to converse peacefully with common
(uncommon) sense, several rules and regulations governing the license of that
physician are broken.
105. I am directly requesting assistance of the
Patient Experience office at Ontario Shores Centre For Mental Health Sciences
to assist me obtain the rules and regulations binding physicians to their
licenses, from their College website, www.cpso.on.ca,
as well as the means to submit and follow-up legitimate complaints.
106. I am also in need of money. Please explain
to your social worker that us arriving at Ontario Shores on court orders do
qualify for Ontario Disability Support Program (O.D.S.P.) Income Support under
Directive 2.6. The preamble does obligate no unreasonable delay to facilitate
victim receipt of financial compensation.
107. Thank you. Signed. Rene Helmerichs 30 Aug 2015.
