Item Num 1: The KA Set Application Coverpage. Court File Nums: C-14-6966 etal.; C-14-6985 etal.; C-14-3928; C-13-205-SCJ

Item Num 1:

The KA Set Application Coverpage.

Court File Nums: C-14-6966 etal.; C-14-6985 etal.; C-14-3928; C-13-205-SCJ

1.      ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE

Between

Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario (Respondent)

- and -

Rene Helmerichs (Applicant)

2.      APPLICATIONS

Under Rules 2.1, 1, and 5.3 of The Rules For Criminal Proceedings

3.      The KA Application Set 

ITEM NO. CONTENTS                                              DATED         Num of Pages

1. This page                                                             15 April 2015              1

2. KA 1 (assessment request)                               15 April 2015              1

3. Letter of Mr. Gunter Lorberg                                5 April 2015               1

4. Psychosocial Assessment (forensic)                  5 Feb 2015             11

5. Pages 99, 100, 87 and 88 of DSM-V    2013 [NOT RETYPED]         4

6. KA 3 (Mr. Komer C.C.s.361, 215, 672.2(2)     15 April 2015              5

7. Letters of Mr. William Komer                                  3 Feb 2015            2

8. KA 2 (Ms. Hull C.C.s.219, 141; Rule 6)              15 April 2015            1

9. KA 4 (Charter s.15)                                               15 April 2015            1

10. KA 5 (13 April bail denial investigate)              15 April 2015            1

11. Fax Confirmation report            10 March 2015 [NOT RETYPED]    1

12. Fax to Crown Office of 10 March                      9 March 2015            2

13 KA 6 (Ms. Jones C.C.s.299, 361 or cross-exam of 5 Feb report)

                                                                                      15 April 2015           1

14. Schedule B cover page                                       20 April 2015           1

15. The Affidavit Of James Leslie Karagianis       30 March 2015          4

16. The 5 Feb 2015 Psychosocial Assessment of Item Num 4               0

17. Outline Of Cross-examining For Mr. Karagianis 20 April 2015         7

“R. v. Rester (2011), 270 C.C.C. (3d) 162 (Alta. C.A.-Ch’rs) – An assessment of criminal responsibility is relevant to a conviction appeal,” from p.1428 of the green-covered handbook of crown rep. Ms.K.Hull.

TO THE APRIL 2015 POPULAR SCIENCE BLACK HOLE QUERY

1.      TO THE APRIL 2015 POPULAR SCIENCE BLACK HOLE QUERY.

Written: Sometime in April 2015

Author: Rene Helmerichs

Posted: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca

Length: 15 paragraphs

A second article in response to Science America follow.

2.      The article Death By Black Hole in the April 2015 issue of Popular Science neatly illustrates The Information Paradox: “The current debate revolves around how black holes handle entangled particles – entities whose properties are quantum-mechanically linked – when one of them falls across the event horizon. It’s akin to considering a human’s fate, but more intriguing to physicists. You can think of the particles as a pair of dice where when one is rolled, the other magically rolls itself so the sum of the two is always seven. Each particle can only be linked this way to a single partner—physicists call them ‘monogamous’”.

3.      The article summarizes The Traditional View, The Firewall View, The Wormhole View, and recounts the commonly considered flaw of each, but fails to recognize The Holographic View. In addition to The Information Paradox, the article summarizes: In the traditional picture, you fall into the black hole until gravity is so warped that it stretches you out like spaghetti. But if there’s a firewall, as soon as you cross the event horizon, you’re incinerated by a wall of energy. Or, a wormhole at the black hole’s center may whisk you unscathed (well, if you’re a particle. Humans wouldn’t actually emerge unscathed) to another part of the galaxy.

4.      The Holographic View is presented in Disappearance Of The Universe by Gary Renard. It accounts for the monogamous-not-monogamous seemingly irreconcilable disparity with revelation that time itself, in any state of general relativity, remains relative to The Not Definable. The Not Definable is then realized to be more than all understanding of, within, or even for the general state and is such a way as to be also the foundation of all order within any aspect of that but not definable.

5.      In human terms, unconditional love is not definable except with designation marking its advent as beyond common understanding. Since love itself transcends understanding to be not understood, it follows that the monogamous particle disparity speaks to love but in a subset field of chronically divergent relativity otherwise classified to be the event horizon into oblivion, the black hole. It is therefore not incorrect to consider our entire visible, that is known, universe to be the firewall surrounding oblivion, not unlike a fiery ring for circular motion in a set of not definable stilling calm, collective-reassuring.

6.      Physicists are pained to recall the very nature of a particle in motion does witness to that particle as of intelligence for the inherent message using motion itself as medium.

7.      A black hole, in galactic terms, is an area with mass so dense that its gravitational field lets not even light emit – light appears to bend, or warp around it. A problem, called a disparity, arises in considering that such a unified mass adhears the known concept of reality clearly existing outside its reach. Yet, that reality is shared, there is evidenced the gravitational effect of such a unified mass is directly experienced all throughout our reality in a living dynamic way, to assure us of a general state of relativity.

8.      Every discussion revolves around the same single question, which is ultimately some fundamental variation of “does completion exist in an ever-changing state?”

9.      While physicists and psychologists disagree that both study effectively the same one ever-evolving aspect, physicists are bound to continue to consider magical analogies for factual experiences and psychologists the materialization of our collective conscious into the vacuum of thin spaces.

10. From Death By Black Hole, “According to general relativity, nothing can escape black holes, so they should only get bigger over time as they swallow up detritus. But in the 1970s, Stephen Hawking pointed out that thanks to a quirk of quantum mechanics, matter actually can escape. Quantum mechanics says pairs of particles constantly pop into existence and immediately self-annihilate.”

11. Stephen Hawking, for all his brilliance, only pointed out that we do not understand what we call a black hole. Gary Renard has subtly and quite tactfully revealed, to continue the earlier analogy of particles for humans, that humans can silently pop into existence even in one’s livingroom. The question one should be asking is “Why?” or better “For what purpose?”

12. The answer, the best answer, to every question is always, constantly, “For bettering to the perceived system as being of one kind because general relativity within one common environment establishes time itself to be the not monogamous part of that aspect establishing Its order.”

13. Until the singular unified concept thoroughly explained in the text of A Course In Miracles is fully propagated throughout our momentary temporal malady – healing our mistaken belief in the need for forgetfulness to underscore our self-absolving, healing being – there will yet be many advances in quantum mechanics, including the ability for spatial relocation without apparent motion. Where there exists change, there exist not ability for annihilation but obligatory lessons that must be taught with unconditional love for healing benefit of unconscious self-acceptance.

14. We ARE inside a “black hole” seeing light in place of Its effects that are themselves merely affects of that we not longer recognize to be the trunk of each of our beings.

15. end.

On Memory And Mind (Mind The Gap?)

1.      On Memory And Mind (Mind The Gap?)

Written: April 2015

Author: Rene Helmerichs

Posted: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca

Length: 16 paragraphs

Re: Partnership similar to that of yours with Nestle

To: Science America and Nature, jabbate@sciam.com

Cc: Francis S. Collins, www.biologos.org

2.      My name is Rene Helmerichs. I am an extension of The Foundation For Inner Peace, currently with copyright of the text A Course In Miracles. My area of expertise is Applied Psychology with specific emphasis in the health and healing aspect of mind.

3.      The predominant theme repeatedly emphasized throughout science is directly the false assumption that either of two related somethings caused the other. In the April 2015 Persistence Of Memory article, the assumption is expressed in terms of memory: “If memory is not located in the synapse, where is it?” asks Roni Jacobson, after asserting “As intangible as they may seem, memories have a firm biological basis.”

4.      Memory does NOT have a firm biological basis except to better understand the full implication of the also included statement “evidence suggests that when someone recalls a memory, the reactivated connection is not only strengthened but becomes temporarily susceptible to change” while we are here with perceivably linear moments in communicating dimensions not confined to time whatsoever.

5.      The error of the assumption is furthered on the page 2 Scientific America April 2015 statement for the page 14 article asserting the article informing the reader “Where memories live” that “memories may reside inside brain cells” as opposed to outside them.

6.      The very changing nature of memory implies memory to have a life of its own, and thus live with whatever the memory affects. The memory clearly affects brain cells but can memories reside inside AND outside brain cells simultaneously?

7.      Let us first consider that we do not understand the process of or for memory and cannot therefore rule out the possibility that our current thinking for memory is completely askew. Our difficulty is merely our assumption that we are our bodies and not a multi-dimensional being operating our bodies in partnership with that not seen but sustaining, constantly beyond concept of consistency, the very motion of the universe as one whole (or each individual electron should a tangible microcosmic perspective be desired).

8.      The mere fact that everything, every particle, in our universe shares in it evidences us to have something more in common than any aspect within the otherwise closed paradox endlessly witnessing history to repeat itself differently as if itself confused. The closed paradox is perfectly portrayed in our ongoing desire to believe ourselves the makers of memory.

9.      If we are the makers of memory, it follows that we can alter memory to better reflect our liking. But what is our liking if we are perpetually expressing an unhappiness, a dissatisfaction, with what we are doing for certainly if we are able to make memory we would not be in the living nightmare needing understanding before permitting us the ability to make or keep only happy memories?

10. Memory is dynamic. This is actually common sense, except to the confused believing in the need to suppress bad for want of good. The common part of whatever sense is the realization of memory as a tool for learning.

11. Memory, simply put, is the active process of comparing two perceivable differences (different moments in time for those of us yet unable to accept time itself is not, not as the vacuum we also call space) for that with us functioning, actioning, the decision process extending our liking into not-exclusive sameness.

12. We might be momentarily against to real-eyes the endless longing driving “What am I?” into the myriad of perceivable differences, but transparency saves the day, ibid time. If memory includes the ability to bridge two distinct moments in time for the noted purpose of altering perspective that whatever is recalled, and memory of it therein strengthened with its active recollection, then we must concede memory is not dependent on the moment but sustains it, any and every moment equated synonymously with our concept of time (each our individual concept multimodally – dynamically but not confined to the, or any, concept).

13. Thus do we now understand our memories exist everywhere simultaneously but out of our awareness for shere necessity to obligate our free will choice expressing itself in the living moment as longing for whatever the unseen (wholey ghost, common echo, or crippling addiction).

14. Whatever our liking, that we co-exist with awareness in an environment itself ever-changing, we establish for ourselves fact only for ever-remembering, ever-recreating with intent not remembered. In partnering, then, for not-exclusive endeours furthering, empowering, responsibility do we strengthen memories of one likeness, that being of one kind, living constantly.

15. Not coincidentally, the April 2015 issue of Science America claiming “’Firewalls’ around black holes are confounding general relativity and particle physics” forgets to address the entire concept for linear time to be precisely the “firewall” surrounding the unconscious abyss of total memory obliteration for from wherewithall does lack of memory truly equate to perfect eternal presence of the timeless state AND not exclusive.

16. end.

The Administration Of Justice for Ontario, Canada. O Canada.

The Administration Of Justice for Ontario, Canada. O Canada.

Written: 2 May 2015

By: Rene Helmerichs

Contact:

Rene Helmerichs

1501 Fuller Ave., Penetanguishene, ON., L9M 2H4 Canada

Posted: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca

Dear Ontario Public,

I am the self-represented individual of court matters C-13-205-SCJ, C-14-3928, and C-14-6985 diagnosed with multiple Schedule 1 mental disorders but somehow let to self-represent in courts of law for pre-meditated criminal offences specifically for the purpose of claiming mental assessments, court-ordered, determining me to be not criminally responsible. I shall then be released without correction so that I can continue to waste your taxed labours. Thank you?

To Keep Mekong River THIS OFFERS LIMITLESS POWER

1.      To Keep Mekong River THIS OFFERS LIMITLESS POWER

By: Rene Helmerichs

Written: 3 May 2015

Talk To Dream One World Peace

Box 578 ORILLIA

Orillia, ON. L3V 6K5 Canada

www.talk2dream.com

Posted: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca

TO: Michelle Nijhuis, National Geographic Magazine; Submissions, www.ngs.org; Mariette DiChristina, editor in chief of Scientific America

CC:

l          Mr. Nguyen Huu Thien, U. Of Wisconsin now in Vietnam, has contributed to Mekong River Commission (MRC);

l          Mr. Pumee Boontom, northern Thailand, leader of Ban Pak Ing community;

l          Mr. Kraisak Choonhaven, a Thai activist and former senator;

l          Mr. In Pong, deputy chief of Vern Houy, Vietnam;

l          The 35-Rivers Protection Network, Vietnam;

l          Mr. Touch Seang Tana, chairman of a Cambodian commission for Mekong (dolphin conservation and economic development)

l          Mr. Guy Ziv, Princeton ecologist;

l          Mr. Brian Richter, water expert, National Conservancy;

l          Ms. Somkiat Khuenchiangsa, Jan 2013 protest organizer and high school teacher, Ban Huay Luek, northern Thailand;

2.      Is it because you don’t want to, or because you doubt it’s true?

3.      The Mekong is a 2600-mile river passing through 6 countries from The Tibetan Plateau to The South China Sea. The May 2015 National Geographic article Harnessing The Mekong Or Killing It reads like living horror in slow motion. Time, energy, and government politics began damming the critical lifeline following advocation of the construction of a series of hydropower dams in the 1960s by The United States. This article explains The Better Way to harness Mekong power without damnation.

4.      Power is measured as Energy per time. Energy, as everyone knows, can neither be created nor destroyed. But do you understand that Energy is both FREE and LIMITLESS?

5.      Take the basic Energy formula of work through a distance and understand work is relative only to gravity. In states independent of relative gravity, Energy is better considered in terms of pressure throughout a volume which can be directly applied to The Mekong without the need for dams.

6.      Considering power to be the harnessing of energy not required in a sustained system but present within it, and the neat trick of resonance to amplify present energy seemingly out of nowhere, the solution to building a free source of limitless power is simply in putting the pieces of the puzzle together.

7.      At some point an accident befell my first car. After repairs and inspection ensuring the repairs were done correctly, there persisted an annoying vibration at set increments of speed, every 40 kms per hour, that caused the entire frame to shutter before cyclically abating while I applied a constant acceleration. That same effect of resonance has caused glass to shatter and bridges to crumble. So why is it that part of the energy of a resonating system cannot be applied for purposes to harness power?

8.      If resonance is able to cause a shutter, it can cause a force to be applied through a specific medium, or, more accurately, pressure within a confined mass to build, be harnessed, and converted into the more global form called electricity.

9.      The application to harness power constructively from The Mekong, or anywhere, begins with understanding the basic dependency all energy has on time, expressed as frequency (inverted), and realized with resonance to be furthering motion.

10. Power does not require brain surgery. A simple echochamber built atop a hydropocket, a confined mass of water, can serve to seemingly create energy out of thin air since the wind itself, streamed through a specifically engineered geometric structure, can be used as freely available, completely renewable catalyst for the instigating supertones. Supertones are tones better not audible to our ears or the powerful device could quickly lose appeal at its noise pollution. The shape of the structure determines the wind speeds required to begin the echoing process. This same principle can be applied on a much smaller scale with electric catalyst or planetary with gravitational catalyst.

11. The key to saving The Mekong is simply the willingness to work honestly together as the citizens of One Planet Hell that we each are, that, and spreading the news about E = PV, Energy as pressure through a volume, being not actually dependent on relativity but its converter. Previously, we learned, for energy, that E = mc² is not true because the speed of light cannot be constant in relativity. However, since relativity is itself the constant, our perceptually closed system is revealed to be a subset of that limitless able to materialize energy in ways yet unimagined.

12. It is time to work together and not to doubt the mass destruction damming a critical multinational lifeline inflicts upon us as one system able now to harness the limitless.

Bridging The Gap AT Full Circle TO Understand Information Transfer

1.      Bridging The Gap AT Full Circle TO Understand Information Transfer

By: Rene Helmerichs

Written: 1 May 2015

Inspiration: Cellular Small Talk by Dale W. Laird, Paul D. Lampe and Ross G. Johnson; and Life.

To: Dr. Lampe, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center in Seattle; Dr. Laird, University Of Western Ontario; Dr. Johnson, U of Minnesota

Posted: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca

2.      The article begins on page 70 of the May 2015 Scientific America issue with a modernized picture of the ancient Yin Yang beneath caption: Neighboring samethings exchange necessary information through gaps that directly connect them. “Disruption of this signaling system can lead to disorders.”

3.      The article editor presents the following caption as falsely summative close: “Studying how mutations affect gap junctions could lead to therapies that counteract these defects without triggering serious side effects.”

4.      The article fails to address the conditional IF at full circle of whatever the information in the gaps referred because any information is definite and the gap forever representative of the same (damned) undefinable samenothing mutating in definite form.

5.      Simply put, the Yin Yang of old attempts to remind the sidewalk grasshopper not to fall into the divide of the concrete slabs, but to work as the ants to build bridges from things smaller that act as conduits within, throughout, overtop, or wherever-the-gap-here to transfer a samething across whatnot uniformly (lest relative gravity of a larger gap prevail to plummet a particle across a gap with quicker time).

6.      The fundamental discrepancy is still the obligatory consideration requiring conduits to exist as gaps themselves in motion for carriers of the one-same information no-where defined but apparently now-here.

7.      In the end one must concede having been not better off where one began because the whole of the consideration of a start to a circular ordered system is itself the oxymoron of all time, a disorder death can not ever compromise being still a definable structure within a system beyond linear time that IS itself functionally linear as well.

8.      Wellness maintains the motion causing temporal increments to steadily decrease according to the rate of halve lives, having lives in divide or halving half lives, believing in unknown somethings causing mutations clearly not understandable in that time. Learning thus is revealed the outcome for steady sharing.

9.      Where there is appearance, there is perception and motion. Motion functions directionally for that perceiving itself not stationary. One cannot NOT perceive itself not stationary because the motion must be perceiving separate from same or no gap in under-standing exists (as definable): Ibid.

10. The predicament is all-ways only surrounding the concept otherwise bouncing around the gap, The.

11. Fortunately, this serious reply speaks information silently.

Now-Memory Splinter Healing Splinters Of Memcomputing

1.      Now-Memory Splinter Healing Splinters Of Memcomputing

By: I with Rene Helmerichs

Written: 23 April 2015

Application: Understanding

Posted: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca

CC: Massimiliano Di Ventra; Yuriy V. Pershin; Supratik Guha (director of physical sciences at the IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center); Andrew Wheeler (deputy director of HP Labs)

2.      Yuriy and Massimiliano are to be applauded for their Feb 2015 Scientific America beautifully Just Add Memory article. The article echos perfection: it presents excitement for a novel concept able to better the lives of all, explains the concept, and includes reel-world barriers preventing application of the concept to all.

3.      It took me some time to zero-in on their dilemma. The solution I’d like to note now, before I forget it, is in the echoing echo IN the paradox, The Paradox.

4.      What finally got me in the article was the desire to test the durability of the memory of the four memcomputer building blocks that, also, would seem to want to simplify terms from memcomputer to memputer, memristor to memstor, memcapacitor to memcitor, and meminductor to memductor as neat new terms, neatly Neatly The Echoing.

5.      The very idea that termology can change for what must remain the same principal founding [undefined], is the paradox of all space and time, not meaning to emphasize echo in rhyme, The Paradox IN TIME.

6.      Information Technology relies, re-lies, upon quanta as storage indicators and obligates its quanta to remain constant for assurance of same-stored. Same-stored, however, must adhere The Law of that, as the founding device, enabling storing, which in this case is MEMORY.

7.      Memory is itself a paradox, The Paradox, THE PARADOX. Memory serves the exclusive purpose of ensuring sameness yet that IN relativity the only true service for memory is to ensure relativity is itself ever-echoing an idea not fully remembered, re-membered, built. Memory is thus a builder in service of itself for reasons not understood to itself being that all aspects with memory are essentially artificial and any aspect without is deemed lifeless. Memory, therein, is that active healing agent in every system wherein it is incorporated and must NOT be as it seems for lifelessness.

8.      Memory must remain understood to be ever-unreliable to acknowledge itself as living entity within any changing system because all change stems from one undefined origin driving memory. This is witnessed in the acknowledgement, agreement, absolute only with change itself.

9.      I hope I’ve helped. I trust memory with you to fill in the blankets in its own guided inspirations.

10. Consider memory is to addiction as the living is to a doorframe: information requires motion and motion defined in its conduit.