1.
Respecting
Criminal Code Section 315, Sch.B.25.
5 May 2015; 8
paragraphs; Court file Num. C-14-6985
From: Rene
Helmerichs, professor of A Course In Miracles
1501 Fuller Ave.,
Penetanguishene, ON., L9M 2H4 Canada
TO: James
Karagianis; attorney general; city@thestar.ca
CC: William
Komer; Allison Jones; Kathryn.Hull@ontario.ca
RE: Correcting
Misinformation About Dr. Helmerichs.
ATTENTION MR.
JAMES LESLIE KARAGIANIS:
2.
We
are politely advised that I am self-represented for the purpose of
cross-examing you with respect to statements made in your affidavit sworn 30 March
2015. We are further advised that I am an individual diagnosed with several
Schedule 1 psychiatric mental disorders self-representing in court of law for
pre-meditated offences claiming to be not criminally responsible merely to have
the opportunity to question a psychiatrist on a public record. In thanks for
your assistance, stepping up to the plate so-to-speak, please expect a blog
post titled “Outline Of Questions For Mr. Karagianis” to accompany a copy of
your affidavit at: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
for the Victea Day weekend, or shortly thereafter.
3.
Of
course in miracles, My Book at www.acim.org,
announcement shall include: 1) happily publicized email inclusive of media and
The Attorney General for recipients; 2) endless opportunity to partner in
advance of the public courtroom confessions; and, 3) the enclosed second draft
of questions to which your responses shall be recorded in court unless we begin
our mutual collaboration correcting misrepresentation of facts dating to Mr.
Liqat Ali and Ms. Anjana Chawla at Royal Victoria Hospital back in 2012
unnecessarily furthered in the 5 Feb 2015 Psychosocial Assessment produced by
Ms. Allison Jones for Mr. William Komer (whom you defended with affidavit) at
Waypoint (the place at which you currently believe yourself to be responsible
for an exclusive quality-assurance way).
4.
The
questions then, Take 2:
1) Mr. Karagianis, we are here today to
debate the legitimacy of your refusal of my request that psychiatrists under
your charge audio-record my oral responses to medical assessments otherwise
court-ordered to ascertain my mental condition. In what regard do you not share
my understanding of the purpose for our meeting today?
2) In paragraph 2 of your 30 March 2015 sworn
affidavit, you state your responsibilities as Psychiatrist In Chief of Waypoint
Centre in Penetanguishene, Ontario, one of the, if not THE, most state of the
art mental hellth [typo imperceptible in speech] facilities in all of Canada,
to include: “medical affairs; physician leadership; and medical quality
assurance”. Is that correct?
3) Does quality assurance involve maintaining
a prescribed standard?
4) In paragraph 1 of your affidavit, you
state yourself to be “a psychiatrist licensed either by general or special
license”, and, in paragraph 4, having “conducted over 100 court-ordered
assessments”. Is this correct?
5) Does the standard for your personal
professional quality assurance involve assuring your subjects that their
statements, given in faith for legal purposes, are also received as intended so
as not to be accidentally misconstruced?
6) At what point in an assessment process is
recognizably false or misleading representation of essential facts best corrected,
because I’m diligently STILL waiting since 3 Sept. 2012.
5.
IT IS
NOT THAT MIND ≦ BRAIN BUT MIND IS
GOD: Mr. Karagianis, hereafter do we enter a legal nightmare not imaginable but
including investigation into every of your previous assessments and the
competance of the Waypoint Centre For Mental Health Care board of directors if
it does not immediately place you under full suspension pending College Of
Physicians And Surgeons review of those specialist licenses that you have
claimed to be abiding – The Royal College for Canada and its partnered
provincial affiliates.
6.
I AM
trying to communicate with you. The 5 Feb 2015 Psychosocial Assessment contains
serious misrepresentations for which The Provincial Court Of Justice for
Ontario, in a hearing for court file C-14-6966 at Barrie on 27 April 2015, did
bestow responsibility to you, to answer to, at the cross-examination
crucification. Furthermore, Mr. Karagianis, statement of Mr. William Komer
dated 3 Feb 2015 to the court directly contradicts statement on page 1 of the
11-page psychosocial 5 Feb 2015 report and the only worry you expressed in
vanity of the want for A Religion Of Secrecy is already addressed in Criminal
Code sections 672.21, 672.5, 672.84, 672.51, and other subsections denying an
accused access to statements of self for privacy concerns, barring an actual
assessment standard to even exist.
7.
We
are again reminded, Mr. Karagianis, that every inmate at Waypoint is directly
under your charge for any purpose included in the Criminal Code section
215(1)(c)(ii) phrase “necessaries of life”, in which maintaining that
elusively-secret medical quality assurance standard is certainly fully
included. You’ll want to review that section because the placing of a copy of
this for you with any court information accompanying the criminal
responsibility assessments I intend to have ordered to bring me back under your
direct charge does directly obligate you to work with me to correct the
two-dozen-or-so 5 Feb 2015 misrepresentations IN ADVANCE Of our 3 July 2015
courting date or one kind Sir shall be irreperibly liable for formal charges
including Criminal Negligence and medical malpractice, not to mention having
wasted the court’s time, and our own, and for which you’ll still be liable even
if this well-meaning note does not formally meet a clenched-jaw gaze until
after the possibly delayed persecution date since you can be called again to
testify at the disposition hearing for whatever any medical staff next decides
to write about me (under Criminal Code section 672.5(11) for future 672.11(b)
orders: either for C-14-6966, C-14-6985, C-14-6986, C-14-3928 and its appeal,
C-13-205-SCJ and its appeal, or however many more bizarre emails to the Mormon
Community Of Christ 2012 Barrie treasurer Natalie Yewchyn the original TORTURE
redress requires).
8.
Contact
Me via Kathryn.Hull@ontario.ca
while she remains an attorney for The Crown and let us speak off the record to
your liking. At this point, it makes absolutely no difference except to save US
time and them a living legal nightmare. Sun L.C. 111. Two simple proofs are
included:
9.
Proof:
The Answer arise unique to any question.
10. Proof: Medication for mental health is NOT
ultimately for well-being.
