15 July 2015 LSUC
confirmed received
1.
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY NOW.
TO: The Ministry Of
Health And Long-Term Care, MHLTC, for Ontario, Canada
CC: Law Society Of
Upper Canada, LSUC-2015-169169 against Kathryn Hull
CC: College Of Physicians And Surgeons for Ontario,
CPSO
RE: Psychiatric malpractice of Mr. Liaqat Ali and
Ms. Anjana Chawla
By:
Rene Helmerichs
Written:
21 June 2015 updated 23
July 2015
Table
Of Contents:
2.
ATTENTION
MPP
ERIC HOSKINS, Minister referenced in para. 52:
You are official public.
The contents of this document disgrace our public office while we permit
decision-makers within the MHLTC to disgrace social justice for mental hellth.
This document supports the global petition at www.talk2dream.ca .
3.
ATTENTION
BRIDGET QUESNELLE, of Waypoint Centre For Mental Health Care:
Thank you for confirming receipt of
para. 4 to 72 in person on 26 June 2015. Manager of psychiatric patient rights
advocates, Venessa.Zanette@ontario.ca,
is herewith requested to petition Patrick Griffith, Linda Thompson, Beverley
Clarke, and Mr. Rajender Kumar of Accreditation Canada. It cannot be tolerated
that psychiatrists rely on an inaccurate record for assessments their managers insist
are to be conducted exclusively off the record. Waypoint Centre refusal to
assist correction of serious errors contravenes the very foundation of a public
accreditation system.
4.
With
respect to Rene Helmerichs and the singular argument propelling The Choice
Amidst The Argument In The Business Of our argument, The principal error in
need of correction is the community treatment order, CTO, issued at Royal
Victoria Regional Health Centre, RVH, in Barrie on 30 Oct. 2012 presumably
under MHA subsection 33.1(1) while conditions under subsection 33.1(4), and
preceding obligations of related acts, were not met.
5.
Psychiatrist
Ms. Anjana Chawla issued the CTO. Mental
Health Act subsection 33.9(2) states "The first review must be undertaken
during the third year after the date on which subsection 33.1(1) comes into
force." The third year ends 29 Oct.
2015 necessitating this correction to occur expeditiously notwithstanding the
unreasonable delay already occurred.
6.
The
Statement in dispute is the intent of that recorded on page 8 of 11 of the
Waypoint 5 Feb 2015 forensic Psychosocial Assessment report speaking to the 30
Oct 2012 discharge from Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, RVH, under the
CTO: "Discharge diagnosis: 'Most likely schizoaffective disorder,
substance abuse, rule out schizoid personality disorder.'"
7.
There
are six distinct categories revealing unlawful the intent and related actions
of the two principal psychiatrists, Mr. Liaqat Ali and Ms. Anjana Chawla, during
and preceding the short period of community treatment order effect, 30 Oct.
2012 to 28 Nov. 2012:
1.
The Criminal
Arrest Of 3 Sept. 2012;
2.
Diagnostic
And Statistics Manual Culture-Related Diagnostic Issues;
3.
Mistaking
"delusions of grandiosity and persecution";
4.
Errors
specific to The Substitute Decisions Act (1992)
5.
Corrections
under The Mental Health Act (1990)
6.
With
The Personal Health Information Protection Act (2004)
8.
Record
of the Criminal arrest on 3 Sept. 2012 is found in the Waypoint 5 Feb 2015
forensic assessment report on page 8 of 11:
Mr.
Helmerichs had become "obsessed" with a lady and he began to pursue
her for approximately one year prior to his initial charges which resulted when
Mr. Helmerichs approached police with a bag of marijuana asking to be arrested.
9.
The
police report of arresting Barrie police officer Sergeant Doug Henderson dated
3 Sept. 2012 confirms the arrest to have been for possession of marijuana and a
contradictory report of detective Brian Read dated 4 Sept. 2012 reveals the
arrest to have been for allegations of criminal harassment adding also
suspicion of bomb threat for 100s of emails vaguely sited in a report of 1 Sept.
2012. The allegations of Criminal
Harassment are not directly mentioned in the 1 Sept. 2012 report of detective
Tanya Lynch and completely omitted in the 31 Aug 2012 report of Barrie police
constable #4755 Watt. Criminal
Harassment was alleged to one Ms. Natalie Yewchyn, treasurer of The Mormon
Community Of Christ at Barrie, and pastor Mr. Matthew Swain at the time.
10. A Criminal Code arrest precludes the arrest
under Mental Health Act, MHA, s. 17.
Evidenced is an unlawful inconsistency between written and practiced law
in actions of The Ministry Of Community Safety And Correction Services, MCSCS,
for Ontario. Mr. Helmerichs had
"approached police asking to be arrested" states Mr. Helmerichs to
have peacefully instigated the arrest notwithstanding accuracy of the additional
5 Feb 2015 forensic report statement:
Police
asked why he wanted to be arrested and Mr. Helmerichs allegedly replied that 'being
arrested was the final part of his plan before he could claim his kingdom. He needed to be arrested to become the king
of Canada and the world and that he would not be able to unite all churches
until he was arrested.'
11. MHA s. 17 provides "Where a police
officer has reasonable and probable grounds to believe that a person is acting
or has acted in a disorderly manner and... and that it would be dangerous to
proceed under section 16, the police officer may take the person in custody to
an appropriate place for examination by a physician." However, section 16 is also in place to remind
of the "limits of the jurisdiction of the justice", which The
Criminal Code defines, essentially, as the judicial court process and The
Constitution of Canada in section 52(1) ensures to be supreme to The Mental
Health Act.
12. It
is an irreparable violation of the first section of our Constitution and the
integrity of a free and democratic society when police are permitted to
circumvent fair Criminal process with arrest and incarceration into a hospital at
presumption of criminal guilt, as occurred for the Criminal arrest on 3 Sept
2012. One who voluntarily approaches
police to be taken into custody is not only NOT a risk to public safety,
therewith does NOT constitute a MHA s. 17 "person", but is also
demonstrably verifying the minimal self-awareness necessary for The Operating
Mind Test, in the annotations to Constitution s. 7 in our judicial edition of
Martin's Criminal Code 2014, legally obliging fair trial before declaration of
criminal incapability or the process itself is self-defeating.
13. Schizoaffective disorder is an incorrect
diagnosis for grounds stated in The American Psychiatric Association, APA,
Diagnostic And Statistics Manual, DSM, the very book establishing the criteria
for issuance of the diagnosis.
14. Under subheading "Culture-related
Diagnostic Issues" on page 108 of the current DSM, V, for Schizoaffective
Disorder:
Cultural
and socioeconomic factors must be considered, particularly when the individual
and the clinician do not share the same cultural and economic background. Ideas that appear to be delusional in one
culture (e.g., witchcraft) may be commonly held in another.
15. An abridgement for the culture of
students, especially teachers as students, for A Course In Miracles adhere is
necessary for understanding culture-related diagnostic issues. Clarification of disorders founded upon
Schizophrenia libel continues on page 103 of DSM-V:
In
some cultures, visual or auditory hallucinations with a religious content
(e.g., hearing God's voice) are a normal part of religious experience.
16. A Course In Miracles, the combined student
Text-Workbook-Manual-For-Teachers with Clarification Of Terms and two
supplements, is officially available from The Foundation For Inner Peace at www.acim.org .
A Course In Miracles is not a religion, per se, but a means of
conversion from personal theology into universal experience. It discretely converts thought processes from
misperceived choice into the acceptance for willingness of common truly
limitless purpose, before understanding all space and time never was. Its introduction speaks for itself:
This
is a course in miracles. It is a
required course. Only the time you take
it is voluntary. Free will does not mean
that you can establish the curriculum.
It means only that you can elect what you want to take at a given
time. The course does not aim at
teaching the meaning of love, for that is beyond what can be taught. It does aim, however, at removing the blocks
to the awareness of love's presence, which is your natural inheritance. The opposite of love is fear, but what is
all-encompassing can have no opposite.
This course can therefore be summed up very simply in this way: Nothing
real can be threatened. Nothing unreal exists. Herein lies the peace of God.
17. To understand the nature of A Course In
Miracles, its source must be considered lest the reader misperceive the intent
to be the dawning of a cult(ure) advocating only One World
Peace-without-war. From its preface:
A
Course in Miracles began with the sudden decision of two people to join in a
common goal; their names were Helen Schucman and William Thetford, Professors
of Medical Psychology at Columbia University's College of Physicians and
Surgeons in New York City.... Helen, the
one who received the material, describes herself:
Psychologist,
educator, conservative in theory and atheistic in belief, I was working in a
prestigious and highly academic setting. And then something happened that
triggered a chain of events I could never have predicted. The head of my
department unexpectedly announced that he was tired of the angry and aggressive
feelings our attitudes reflected, and concluded that "there must be
another way." As if on cue, I agreed to help him find it. Apparently this
Course is the other way.
18. Excerpts from A Course In Miracles establish
the legitimacy of the universal experience, the divisively referred
"religious experience", for qualification of the DSM page 103
culture-related absolve:
A
universal theology is impossible, but a universal experience is not only
possible but necessary. It is this
experience toward which the course is directed.
Here alone consistency becomes possible because here alone uncertainty
ends. (C-in.2.5-7)
I do
not know the thing I am, and therefore do not know what I am doing, where I am,
or how to look upon the world or on myself. (T-31.V.17.7-9)
I do
not know what anything, including this, means.
And so I do not know how to respond to it. And I will not use my own past learning as the
light to guide me now. (T-14.XI.6.7-9)
A
common purpose is the only means whereby perception can be stabilized, and one
interpretation given to the world and all experiences here. (T-30.VII.4.1)
What
shares a common purpose is the same. (T-27.VI.1.5)
Magic
is the mindless or the miscreative use of mind.
Physical medications are forms of "spells," but if you are
afraid to use the mind to heal, you should not attempt to do so. The very fact that you are afraid makes your
mind vulnerable to miscreation. You are
therefore likely to misunderstand any healing that might occur, and because
egocentricity and fear usually occur together, you may be unable to accept the
real Source of the healing. Under these
conditions, it is safer for you to rely temporarily on physical healing
devices, because you cannot misperceive them as your own creations. As long as your sense of vulnerability
persists, you should not attempt to perform miracles. (T-2.V.2.1-6)
Only
the mind is capable of illumination.
Spirit is already illuminated and the body in itself is too dense. The mind, however, can bring its illumination
to the body by recognizing that it is not the learner, and is therefore
unamenable to learning. The body is,
however, easily brought into alignment with a mind that has learned to look
beyond it toward the light. (T-2.V.6.3-6)
In
time we exist for and with each other.
In timelessness we coexist with God. (T-2.V.A.17.6-7)
19. Fear is a necessary cultural
distinction. "All fear is
ultimately reducible to the basic misperception that you have the ability to
usurp the power of God." (T-2.I.4.1)
Since we are all one of God, and therein for the selfsame constancy, we
are all rightfully gods without lawful authority to inflict force of will over
one another being equal. The common law
of God is directly the single The Golden Rule, The Law Of One, and translates as
perceived karma within perspectives for time since singular knowledge is
timeless. Time, thus, is not up to any
of us but all of us according to our willingness to remember our common
identity, free of form, with equal respect for each other and harm to none.
20. A Course In Miracles reminds "true is
everything that God created" (T-4.VII.3.3) and "God is not in you in
a literal sense; you are part of Him.... because you had made another
voice." T-5.II.5.5-7) "You are
the Kingdom of Heaven, but you have let the belief in darkness enter your mind
and so you need a new light." (T-5.II.4.1)
"The Holy Spirit is in you in a very literal sense. His is the Voice that calls you back to where
you were before and will be again. It is
possible even in this world to hear only that Voice and no other."
(T-5.II.3.7-9)
21. Because we are created eternally but
perceiving ourselves with deteriorating bodies, we require assistance understanding
the illusion without desire to abolish it.
This it calls the little willingness as an entire section in Chapter
18. We must simultaneously acknowledge
fear as real and unreal if God is to be all-encompassing and our existence in
time to be affirmative. "Let us not
forget, however, that words are but symbols of symbols. They are thus twice removed from
reality." (M-21.1.9-10)
22. The categorization of mental disorders can
become a linguistic attempt to project fear.
There exists a subtle distinction between concern and fear best
recognized when considering the respective verbs "concerning" and
"fearing". The statement
"it is concerning" may be equally valid to all while the statement
"it is fearing" is subjective to the perspective of the perceiver. As anything true must be commonly shared, a
simple test can be devised for application to such Criminal matters as the
accusation of criminal harassment, Criminal Code section 264, for the condition
"reasonable, in all the circumstances", s. 264 cited in paragraph 70.
23. Given The Constitution Act of Canada
states "Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy
of God" and for The American Psychiatric Association, especially
judiciaries having defined "mental disorder" as "a disease of
the mind" without considering the authority imp-arted APA representatives
to find that they seek in place of mental wellbeing, A Course In Miracles
provides a universally consistent definition of Mind for the APA to lawfully
adopt:
A
Course In Miracles Clarification Of Terms Chapter 1. MIND–SPIRIT
C-1.1.
The term mind is used to represent the activating agent of spirit, supplying
its creative energy. 2 When the term is capitalized it refers to God or Christ
(ie, the Mind of God or the Mind of Christ). 3 Spirit is the Thought of God
which He created like Himself. 4 The unified spirit is God's one Son, or
Christ.
C-1.2.
In this world, because the mind is split, the Sons of God appear to be
separate. 2 Nor do their minds seem to be joined. 3 In this illusory state, the
concept of an "individual mind" seems to be meaningful. 4 It is
therefore described in the course as if it has two parts; spirit and ego.
C-1.3.
Spirit is the part that is still in contact with God through the Holy Spirit,
Who abides in this part but sees the other part as well. 2 The term
"soul" is not used except in direct biblical quotations because of
its highly controversial nature. 3 It would, however, be an equivalent of
"spirit," with the understanding that, being of God, it is eternal
and was never born.
C-1.4.
The other part of the mind is entirely illusory and makes only illusions. 2
Spirit retains the potential for creating, but its Will, which is God's, seems
to be imprisoned while the mind is not unified. 3 Creation continues unabated
because that is the Will of God. 4 This Will is always unified and therefore
has no meaning in this world. 5 It has no opposite and no degrees.
C-1.5.
The mind can be right or wrong, depending on the voice to which it listens. 2
Right-mindedness listens to the Holy Spirit, forgives the world, and through
Christ's vision sees the real world in its place. 3 This is the final vision,
the last perception, the condition in which God takes the final step Himself. 4
Here time and illusions end together.
C-1.6.
Wrong-mindedness listens to the ego and makes illusions; perceiving sin and
justifying anger, and seeing guilt, disease and death as real. 2 Both this
world and the real world are illusions because right-mindedness merely
overlooks, or forgives, what never happened. 3 Therefore it is not the
One-mindedness of the Christ Mind, Whose Will is One with God's.
C-1.7.
In this world the only remaining freedom is the freedom of choice; always
between two choices or two voices. 2 Will is not involved in perception at any
level, and has nothing to do with choice. 3 Consciousness is the receptive
mechanism, receiving messages from above or below; from the Holy Spirit or the
ego. 4 Consciousness has levels and awareness can shift quite dramatically, but
it cannot transcend the perceptual realm. 5 At its highest it becomes aware of
the real world, and can be trained to do so increasingly. 6 Yet the very fact
that it has levels and can be trained demonstrates that it cannot reach
knowledge.
24. The brain does not think but is as a
pencil to our eternal being, or the CPU of a cellphone we use to communicate to
other aspects of our common internet Self.
That readers understand analogy to bridge gaps-divides of their own
consistent mental understandings evidences joining, directly healing
reparation, to be transmitted from otherwise meaningless text on a page that
does not enter the body except as mustard seedling idea following careful
consideration for its honestly honing intent.
25. It is not possible for one to be lawfully
diagnosed with either Schizoaffective Disorder or the less severe Schizophrenia
merely because one advocates for absolve of the need for such libel. Ms. Chawla often repeated Mr. Helmerichs
"lacks insight into his illness", "lacked insight into his
illness", and has "slightly improved insight into his illness"
with "some effect noted" that she then attributed to her
interventions of forced injectable. The
reader is to understand Ms. Chawla necessarily instituted a circular process
attributing mental improvement to an external source to quell her own temporal
misperception, a misperception yet ongoing until she is formally arrested. Her mind believes forced injections of
Risperidone Consta are necessary for an individual to be afforded the dignity
to be considered with equal respect as an individual attempting to better
social understanding, or she would not have injected Mr. Helmerichs for
attempting to tell her that she herself is literally with an insane belief
system.
26. If we were truly one in purpose, our
physical appearance cannot matter except to the extent that interpretation is
attributed any, practically considered the least, of us. Recognizing a common purpose can stop the
reign of ISIS with an "US-IS" (to quote the Mayor of city in which the
recent news story of the 14-year black girl police assaulted for being too noisy
at a pool party in the United States broke), it is hardly appropriate that I be
declared incapable on grounds of arguing the point to psychiatrists who refuse
to acknowledge MY culture for a thinking mind not brain. "Every miracle is but the end of an
illusion." (T-19.IV.A.6.8)
27. Waypoint social worker Ms. Allison Jones
in the 5 Feb 2015 forensic report for Rene Helmerichs, for the time period 3
Sept 2012 to 28 Nov 2012, that including the CTO in question, states:
Symptomology
included delusions of grandiosity and persecution.
Dr.
Chawla was unsure if Mr. Helmerichs was experiencing thought insertion,
withdrawal or broadcast.
Mr.
Helmerichs reportedly described seeing "a column of light" in 2006
but he denied hallucinations.
Mr.
Helmerichs had reportedly stated to his sister that he was God and that his son
was Jesus.
During
his admission to hospital Mr. Helmerichs threatened to "impregnate" a
young lady on the unit.
28. Page 87 of our current base for mental
disorder reference, DSM-V, states:
"Delusions
are deemed bizarre if they are clearly implausible and not understandable to
same-culture peers and do not derive from ordinary life experience."
29. Life experience rests upon the single
agreement that we exist in a world itself always changing. This single agreement bridges all perceived
differences when carefully considered. We
agree to be in-and-of one common environment, thus an extension of that we do
not fully understand because we also find ourselves with partial perspectives. However, there exists a changeless part
denoted with concept behind the word "always", literally all-ways-one,
consistency same-applied.
30. Ordinary life experience is perfectly
reflected in The Constitution Act of Canada.
Any not exclusive state for consistency is necessarily a living dynamically changing state not
ever fully definable. This requires a
measure of common sense to include willingness for absolve of dispute "in
the now" such that psychiatrists, ideally, ARE equated to be judiciaries
if they acknowledge their client to be with equal voice to their own. The Constitution states, from sections 52 and
1:
The
Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the
inconsistency, of no force or effect.... as can be demonstrably justified in a
free and democratic society.
31. If free choice is to truly exist, then we
must always have the singularly same-choice to be for sameness within ever-changing
change, guided from an aspect entirely for each of us individually and
simultaneously with harm to none.
32. The DSM statement "clearly
implausible and not understandable to same-culture peers" is key. The phrase "same-culture" can
absolve psychiatrists of the cultural genocide they unwittingly impart if there
was not also emphasis on "clearly implausible and not
understandable." The requirement to
be "clearly implausible" obligates psychiatrists to share new ideas,
or, rather, ideas I present to them that in one-on-one sessions appear
psychotic without understanding. Once
the question "WHY?" arises, and the answer revealed to FOR social
betterment, there cannot be further argument that I am of a different culture
unless I have committed a criminal wrong, in which case the matter correctly
belongs before an impartial public court FOR our common spirit and not one
acting like a god.
33. One cannot have attributed "delusions
of grandiosity" for suggesting being the second coming as part of a
grandiose marketing campaign correcting mistaken Mormon Community Of Christ
beliefs about money, the nature of causality amidst the mistaken act of worship
because Constancy Is. A Course In
Miracles clarifies "The Second Coming of Christ means nothing more than
the end of the ego's rule and the healing of the mind." (T-4.IV.10.2) Specifically, "The Second Coming is
merely the return of sense. Can this
possibly be fearful?" (T-9.IV.9.4-5)
Sense is always common.
34. For one to be a true teacher of God, as
Gary Renard in his honest best-selling translation for A Course In Miracles,
Disappearance Of The Universe, states, one must necessarily seek to ever-respect
the unlimited as ultimate goal for every limited concept, including every
selfsame currently defamed with mental illness.
This requires only the restoration of sight with respect to our ultimate
goal. Is the goal of any relationship to
be one for sense or nonsense? Sense is
of its selfsame goal.
35. A Course In Miracles has stated the sex
drive to be a misguided drive to relate excepting the honest desire to
procreate for joy of a richer course-style forgiveness lesson. Accordingly, Mr. Rene Helmerichs and Ms.
Fan-Xiu Hsiao (Lindsay), his first wife after Brigitta (wed 5 Sept 1999), made
proper use of the Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, RVH, hospice service
at each of her visits into the lockdown ward of 3NC. Only if two consenting adults, Mr. Helmerichs
and his young spouse and then hot yoga teacher Lindsay, are not permitted to
spread their sense into minds placed under communal divine birthright charge, can
there be any issue with the statement "During his admission to hospital
Mr. Helmerichs threatened to 'impregnate' a young lady on the unit."
36. Mr. Helmerichs has been quite transparent
about his intentions, negating ability to attribute delusions to his
actions. He began marketing Talk To
Dream as a New Goal Day charity with debut dwarfing that of even current
Movember, using the first of each month as the designed day the public should
convene in groups to review life goals large and small. In June of 2012 a book publishing contract
was secured at Balboa Press for the book The Choice Amidst The Argument In The
Business Of Being Happy: A Course In Miracles And Ode To My Love Born On
Christmas intended to market the upcoming charity. Notice of the charity was submitted to The
Federal Charities Directorate in May of 2012.
The principle of not exclusivity is that propelling the advertisement
campaign initiated at the expense of The Mormon Community Of Christ when, for
their Good Sense Budgeting Workshop at Barrie, friends of Mr. Helmerichs, local
Mormon minister Matthew Swain, through his wife Irina and treasurer Natalie
Yewchyn, deceived Mr. Helmerichs to advertise the workshop as a tax-tip
workshop in Georgian College without advising Mr. Helmerichs that the workshop
itself is discriminatory and not-NOT religious.
The workshop of 21 April 2012 at Grove Park Home in Barrie directly
contravened the tithing principles of Deuteronomy 14:22-28 and provides Mr.
Helmerichs the implicit agreement necessary to lawfully use the Mormon
Community Of Christ to establish the NOW choice for One World Peace-without-war
as a simple choice for partnership to abide by our written law.
37. Corrections to the record are necessary
for a number of reasons, all equally valid, and none favorable to our
opposition. Contact senior United States
Mormon Community Of Christ ministers Kris Judd, kjudd@cofchrist.org, Tim Stanlick, and Carmen Thompson for a summary of the
hundreds of emails sent to the Mormons the summer of 2012 advising of
partnership sooner not later. In one
email, Ms. Judd expressed interest the "column of light", in another,
of her own inspiration, she accurately described the illusory state citing
"perfect love casts out fear" from A Course In Miracles:
Perfect
love casts out fear.
If
fear exists,
Then
there is not perfect love.
But:
Only
perfect love exists.
If
there is fear, It produces a state that does not exist. (T-1.VI.5.4-8)
38. Addressed with The Substitute Decisions
Act, SDA, is the preceding Waypoint 5 Feb 2015 forensic statement from page 8
of the 11-page report, to the essential statement for correction:
Mr.
Helmerichs was made incapable of consenting to treatment and he was treated
with Risperidone Consta with some effect noted such as settling of his mania
and his psychosis.
He
continued to lack insight upon his discharge from hospital and once he returned
home he did not continue with his treatment.
Mr.
Helmerichs' mother stated that by February Mr. Helmerichs was having difficulty
once again; he was presenting as irritable.
Upon
discharge Mr. Helmerichs was reported to be euthymic with reactive and
appropriate affect; his speech rate was normal rate, rhythm and volume and he
was noted to have a slightly improved insight into his illness.
Discharge
diagnosis: "Most likely schizoaffective disorder, substance abuse, rule
out schizoid personality disorder.
39. Thorough investigation is requested into
actions of RVH senior lawyer June Bell and her tribunal having authorized Ms.
Chawla to appoint a substitute decision maker against that of the wish of Mr.
Helmerichs. "Mr. Helmerichs was
made incapable of consenting to treatment" specifically because he refused
treatment, but he did resign himself to remaining at RVH until need for the
treatment was equitably resolved in fair judicial proceedings normally required
for the criminal arrest under which he was believed to be. His lawyer at the time, Mr. David Northcott,
did not inform Mr. Helmerichs of options nor of the legal obligation for the
tribunal to consider first section 45 of The Substitute Decisions Act, SDA. SDA section 45 specifically states:
A
person is incapable of personal care if the person is not able to understand
information that is relevant to making a decision concerning his or her own health
care, nutrition, shelter, clothing, hygiene or safety, or is not able to
appreciate the reasonably foreseeable consequences of a decision or lack of
decision.
40. The first portion of SDA s. 45 cannot
apply to one whose basic necessities are state-ensured, for its circularity and
the phrase "appreciate the reasonably foreseeable consequences of a
decision or lack of decision" is directly negated where one presents the
unbelievable but entirely logical argument that need for pharmacological
treatment fundamentally opposes mental wellbeing. This lucid advertising feat demonstrates
time-and-again Mind itself is ever joined at the most fundamental level and
cannot ever therewith be healed with compelled belief for prescribed addiction.
41. The allegation of medical negligence
against Ms. Chawla, and RVH senior lawyer June Bell who chaired the October
tribunal rendering Mr. Helmerichs incapable, is conclusively secured with SDA
s. 55(2).
42. SDA s. 55 states:
(1)
The court may, on any person's application, appoint a guardian of the person
for a person who is incapable of personal care and, as a result, needs
decisions to be made on his or her behalf by a person who is authorized to do
so.
(2) The
court shall not appoint a guardian if it is satisfied that the need for
decisions to be made will be met by an alternative course of action that,
(a)
does
not require the court to find the person to be incapable of personal care; and
(b)
is
less restrictive of the person's decision-making rights than the appointment of
a guardian.
43. I do not recall being served notice of the
application put before the tribunal in October of 2012, and this is directly
also neglect of the legal aid lawyer, Mr. David Northcott, allegedly serving my
best interests. There was certainly not
a separate date for the application, if indeed there was an application, as the
only hearings had been for my continued contesting of the involuntary
psychiatric forms under which I was kept without first having received a
criminal trial for any of the allegations of criminal wrong used to justify claims of "no insight" and the
incapable finding.
44. SDA .s. 55(1) does preclude the fact that
the entire purpose to declare me incapable was the presumption of guilt of the
criminal offence for which I had not yet received criminal hearing, barring the
criminal pun.
45. The presumption in SDA s. 2 is for
capability. To have rendered me
incapable merely to hinder my ability to argue the point of the fundamental
error in the assumption of a thinking brain circumventing awareness of a thinking
eternal mind directly raises serious freedom of belief, religion, human rights,
and social democratic rights concerns that are not at all Constitutionally
justified. Therein is SDA s. 55(2)
violated.
46. An investigation into the grounds for
incapability with consideration of the notes I placed to my medical record at
RVH during that time will reveal Ms. Chawla to have specifically contravened
SDA s. 66(8) in addition to the numerous legal infractions necessary to have reached
that point. SDA s. 66(8) states:
(8)
The guardian shall, as far as possible, seek to foster the person's
independence.
47. There is clearly no independence fostered
when one is forced to endure injections while attempting to argue the point of
having been presumed guilty for a criminal offence without trial of that
offence. If there was not a criminal
offence, there was not a ground for me to have been criminally arrested, which
did happen.
48. SDA s. 66(4) adds the moot point of Ms.
Chawla having intentionally chosen my mother as substitute decision maker specifically
because my mother opposed the principle A Course In Miracles assertion and with full awareness that I
desired my spouse Lindsay to act on my behalf if the court was to deny me
capability. My mother advocated for
injections while my spouse is still prepared to see me remain locked into a
mental health center, currently Waypoint, until the reviews of Mental Health
Act 33.9 reveal The College Of Physicians And Surgeons for Ontario to be acting
in bad faith siding with Ms. Anjana Chawla.
SDA s. 66(4) requires:
(4)
In deciding what the person's best interests are for the purpose of subsection
(3), the guardian shall take into consideration,
(a)
the values and beliefs that the guardian knows the person held when capable and
believes the person would still act on if capable;
(b)
the person's current wishes, if they can be ascertained; and
(c)
the following factors:
1.
Whether
the guardian's decision is likely to,
i.
improve
the quality of the person's life,
ii. prevent the quality of the person's life
from deteriorating, or
iii. reduce the extent to which, or the rate at
which, the quality of the person's life is likely to deteriorate.
2.
Whether
the benefit the person is expected to obtain from the decisions outweighs the
risk of harm to the person from an alternative decision.
49. A month after their start, my complaints
to my mother of spinal pain were finally heard.
Independent of the complaints, Ms. Chawla had also begun to barter with
me that I lower a blog of defamatory statements against Ms. Chawla, and RVH in
general, in exchange to be removed from the injectable. Conversations evidencing the Criminal Code s.
120 bribery of Ms. Chawla are available from www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
.
50. As this matter is yet unresolved, clearly
Ms. Chawla underestimated my drive to ensure we speak with my mind, I, as equal
among The Collective, the entity commanding our common Mind, to
"appreciate the reasonably foreseeable consequences of [her] decision or
lack of decision". Ms. Chawla
forcibly disassociated my own decision-making aspect into a substance under her
exclusive control for want to control the decision-making process without my
legal input and did, therewith, assume full responsibility for any and all
public backlash hopefully to befall her sooner not later. Of particular concern should be the
insistence of Ms. Chawla that nursing staff of RVH during October 2012 deny any
and all supportive visitors from communicating or meeting me in 3NC because Ms.
Chawla projected fear onto a proverbial scapegoat for herself.
51. There was no separate hearing declaring me
incapable. As such, I am unsure whether
the order was made on motion of the court of its own initiative or that of Ms.
Chawla. If it was made of Ms. Chawla, as
she did directly insinuate in the 26 Oct 2012 audio-recording indicated
authority over the outcome of the court irrespective of pretense for hearing,
Ms. Chawla did very much neglect to inform me of my SDA ss. 78(1) and 78(2)(c) rights
to refuse to be assessed.
52. Mental Health Act, MHA, section 33.9 states:
(1)
The Minister shall establish a process to review the following matters:
1.
The
reasons that community treatment orders were or were not used during the review
period.
2.
The
effectiveness of community treatment orders during the review period.
3.
Methods
used to evaluate the outcome of any treatment used under community treatment
orders.
(2)
The first review must be undertaken during the third year after the date on
which subsection 33.1(1) comes into force.
(3) A
review must be completed every five years after the first review is completed.
(4)
The Minister shall make available to the public for inspection the written report
of the person conducting each review.
53. The community treatment order, CTO, in
question came into force on 30 Oct. 2012 under MHA subsection 33.1(1). The subsection states the purpose of the
order to fall broadly into that described in subsection (3) with specific
criteria for its issuance listed in subsection 33.1(4) including:
33.1(4)(e)
..."the physician is satisfied that the person subject to the order and
his or her substitute decision-maker, if any, have consulted with a rights
advisor and have been advised of their legal rights"
54. The issue of the CTO is truly the circular
requirement of needing redress of the fact that a criminal arrest saw Mr.
Helmerichs enter a mental ward on 3 Sept 2012 without acknowledgement in the
criminal context except for the presumption of guilt contravening the
foundation of our Constitution. Mr.
Helmerichs was declared incapable for arguing the point of mental illness
accusations in presumption of guilt at alleged criminal offence(s) of
harassment to Natalie Yewchyn and assault to his son, the latter of which did
absolutely not occur and the former not according to the legal definition of
criminal harassment in s. 264 of The Criminal Code. The allegations were used to support allegation
that Mr. Helmerichs suffers a psychosis, a loss of contact with reality, having
required forced injections.
55. Mr. Helmerichs is yet still arguing the
very same point that Mr. Helmerichs was placed under a CTO to ensure the
injections would continue to dissuade Mr. Helmerichs from attaining the
credibility to complain about the inherently illegal process. This is evidenced not only in fact of three
police station attempts on 7 Oct 2012, but also oral statement of a supervising
Ontario Provincial Police, OPP, officer witnessed at conclusion of the 6 Nov
2014 video statement given at the Orillia Peter Street OPP detachment. The statement is posted to https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1fsRYdv6gTTSDeFp47f37FJsg4lQgam0
for public viewing convenience. Viewers
are to note the lack of respect afforded us, the Ontario public, as the OPP
declares there to be a lack of documentation to begin a formal investigation.
56. The annotations to section 7 of The Charter
Of Rights And Freedoms in Martin's Criminal Code 2014 judicial edition, a
Canada Law Book, state "what is fair depends entirely upon
context". Context is the
culture-related diagnostic issue causing forced injections on presumption of
criminal guilt to be a form of disrupting "the continuity of
histologically normal brain tissue", understanding the mind to be more
than the brain but using the brain to exact effect for its thinking, notably
illegal according to MHA s. 49, psychosurgery, and again for the discrimination
having caused severe mental, and at the time physical, suffering that is
ongoing to this day for the ongoing need to redress all criminal charges
instigated to bring attention to this case as one whole! Mr. Helmerichs was not advised of his rights
before issuance of the CTO or a CTO issued exclusively to subdue the voice of
Mr. Helmerichs could not possibly have occurred. The act of discrimination is directly that of
Criminal Code s. 269.1(b), torture on Canadian soil.
57. MHA s. 49 states:
(1)
Psychosurgery shall not be administered to an involuntary patient, to a person
who is incapable of giving or refusing consent to psychosurgery on his or her
own behalf for the purposes of the Health Care Consent Act, 1996, or to a
person who is remanded or detained in a psychiatric facility pursuant to the
Criminal Code (Canada).
(2)
Psychosurgery is any procedure that, by direct or indirect access to the brain,
removes, destroys or interrupts the continuity of histologically normal brain
tissue, or that inserts indwelling electrodes for pulsed electrical stimulation
for the purpose of altering behavior or treating psychiatric illness, but does
not include neurological procedures used to diagnose or treat organic brain
conditions, intractable physical pain or epilepsy, if these conditions are
clearly demonstrable.
58. Fact of severe mental suffering is
recounted on page 2 of 11 of the Waypoint 5 Feb. 2015 assessment report with
understanding that each Form 1 should have adhered MHA s. 38.1 (1), "The
attending physicaian of a person who is the subject of an application for
assessment under section 15 [the Form 1] or an order under section 32 shall
promptly give the person a written notice of the application or order" :
Central
North Correctional Centre; Form 1 signed December 5, 2013; January 21 and 31;
February 6, 20, and 26; March 13 and 27; May 1; June 10, 26, and 30 (all 2014)
59. All criminal charges initiated following
that of 3 Sept. 2012 are to demonstrate the administration of justice in
Ontario to not be respecting its public.
Not only were the Form 1 applications illegal as Mr. Helmerichs was not
informed of the assessments for the applications, but no assessments occurred
unless reading of creative writing constitutes an active mental assessment. Further, the ongoing criminal matter in the
court, file C-13-205-SCJ at the time, required Mr. Helmerichs to receive review
of the detention order for possibility of an interim order of release,
Constitutionally "reasonable bail", which did not occur for the
Criminal Code section 672.17 obligation associated with MHA s. 15
applications. That no judge gave fair
hearing to the argument of medical malpractice and compounded the issue with
actually recording in the endorsements of, for example, 21 March 2014 (if
memory serves), that Mr. Helmerichs consented to the detention or waived his
right to a review, only further demonstrates the extent of judicially
corruption. The attorney Ms. Kathryn
Hull echoed the example in paragraph 7 of her Book Of Authorities dated 20 May
2014 for the defence Charter s. 9 application that trial judge Mr. Mulligan
simply also elected not to honestly consider, given the recounted facts. On 2 May 2014,
Mr. Mulligan prejudicely ruled the defence not to be permitted to submit
psychiatric evidence for my innocence, despite the simultaneous psychiatric
applications recounted in para 58, raised again in para 70.
60. Personal Health Information Protection
Act, PHIPA, section 55 requires the health information custodian to ensure the
accuracy of its record when a request for correction to the record is
submitted. There are numerous requests
for correction submitted, all stemming from an original error warranting criminal
charges to psychiatrists Mr. Liaqat Ali and Ms. Anjana Chawla already sworn and
presented the attorney for Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario in Her
disclosure for Criminal file C-14-3928-OCJ, one of several resulting charges
against Mr. Helmerichs. The
backwardation may appear, at first, unbelievable.
61. Additional specific corrections to the record are numerous yet not
specifically recited secondary corrections to subtle errors Mr. Helmerichs
notes in the 5 Feb 2015 forensic Psychosocial Assessment by Waypoint social
worker Allison Jones. In particular,
there is the issue of Waypoint having declared a Bill Of Rights "To Treat Others
As We Would Like To Be Treated" while consenting to arbitrary forensic
statements such as that in page 11 of 11 of the 5 Feb 2015 report:
Mr.
Helmerichs did agree to respond to psychosocial questions via written documents
thus this writer provided the questions in a Word document for Mr. Helmerichs
to fill out using the unit computer. Mr.
Helmerichs provided a 37-page document; the answers to questions asked were
extensive and often unrelated to the question.
Simple demographic information such as 'place of birth' resulted in a
two paragraph answer that did not result in the appropriate answer. A copy of Mr. Helmerichs' responses was
placed on file.
62. To note is the specific reference to
"the appropriate answer" that specifically evidences the culture of
Mr. Helmerichs with respect to the subtle mind-body living distinction for all-equality.
If there were truly respect, the assessment questions would have been
asked in person and answers recorded by the questioner who has then the ability
to verify that answers are simultaneously both appropriate and accurately
portraying cultural distinctions. The
37-page document was not provided Mr. Helmerichs upon request for a copy on
grounds that Ms. Jones claimed to have already provided one copy. If there were respect, benefit of doubt would
have been bestowed upon Mr. Helmerichs who has since received permission to
review the record at Waypoint but yet awaits permission under PHIPA s. 54(12)
for a waiver of fees to print a subsequent copy. The delay is truly unnecessary and speaks to
only larger scale vexation otherwise attributed as delusions of persecution.
63. Further to the correction necessary with
respect to the page 11 of 11 answer, is the 3 Feb 2015 written statement of
Waypoint psychiatrist Mr. William Komer, provided the court for assessments
ordered 29 Dec. 2014 and 19 Jan. 2015 for C-14-3928-OCJ and C-14-6966-OCJ respectively:
Further
to your Assessment Order dated [respectively], Mr. Helmerichs has been at
Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care in Penetanguishene. He has refused to speak with me unless it is
audio recorded and stated that he would be posting anything documented on the
Internet. Mr. Helmerichs has been
derogatory to me. Under the
circumstances, I am unable at this time or in the future to do an assessment of
him.
64. The attorney for the crown, at several
hearings since, has attempted to attribute fault to Mr. Helmerichs for the lack
of assessment report, yet statement of Ms. Jones clearly relates agreement to
conduct the assessment onto recorded media to the satisfaction of Mr.
Helmerichs. Since Criminal Code s. 315
permits Mr. Helmerichs to publicize this, in its entirety, to ensure the
requested corrections, and statement evidencing derogatory conduct to witness
to the presence of mental conflict, clearly there was ability and need to
complete the assessment. The record is
to reflect that Mr. Helmerichs is blameless.
65. Corrections for the principal concern of
an omitted CTO record are requested. The
subsequent correction is for inclusion of evidence of the CTO within the 5 Feb
2015 forensic Psychosocial Assessment report.
Another correction requested is the lawful arrest of Ms. Anjana Chawla
and Mr. Liaqat Ali, in addition to Ms. Natalie Yewchyn and Mr. Matthew Swain
for perjury at the criminal trial of C-13-205-SCJ in June 2014 had for the
allegations of harassment used to justify claims of psychosis against Mr.
Helmerichs at the time of the CTO.
66. Our Constitution section 15 states
individuals to have equal benefit under the law and equal protection of the
law. The 5 Feb 2015 report about Rene
Helmerichs, me, states "He continued to lack insight upon his discharge
from hospital and once he returned home he did not continue with his
treatment." An individual under a
forced CTO, mandating complacency of forced injections, does continuously
maintain commitment to continue with his treatment or find himself forcibly
recommitted back into custody for continuance of the ordered treatment under
The Mental Health Act. As the law itself
ensured the forced complacency until the CTO issuing overseeing psychiatrist deemed
the treatment to not longer to be necessary, it is hardly appropriate for that
psychiatrist to present the stated opinion.
It is directly necessary for the psychiatrist to also note improvement,
despite only complacent silence on the part of the true victim for the Criminal
Code s. 269.1 (b) Torture, at the forced treatment lest the matter be earlier
revealed as fraudulent and misappropriation of public trust.
67. Since the 30 Oct 2012 CTO was cancelled just
weeks after its issuance, the issuing physician is criminally liable for either
medical negligence under Criminal Code 215(3) if the treatment was ended prior
to need as our uncorrected information currently suggests, or under any of:
s.
423 for unlawful intimidation evidenced in an audio-recording of 26 Oct. 2012;
s. 269.1(b)
for cultural discrimination resulting in severe mental suffering;
s. 361
for the contradictory statement claiming disorder in addition to the principal
concern of an unlawful diagnosis revealed herein unlawful on cultural grounds;
or,
s.
120 for the bribery clinician psychiatrist Ms. Anjana Chawla offered to release
me from the CTO, and all treatment obligations therewith, in exchange that I
lower the since truncated blog of defamatory statements currently at www.renehelmerichs2.blogspot.ca
.
68. A copy of the audio-recording confirming
The Criminal Code s.120 offense of Bribery did indeed occur is also available
online. An excerpt from the recording of
26 Oct. 2012 sufficing evidence for the s.423 offence is available from www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
. A partial transcript of 26 Oct. 2012
session at RVH in Barrie was included in the crown disclosure for court file
C-13-205-SCJ at Barrie on 2 March 2013, and formal sworn charges therefore into
the crown disclosure for C-14-3928-OCJ at Orillia, believe it or not. Excerpts from the 26 Oct. 2012 recording
include:
Ms.
Chawla: You'll have to follow the suggestions made in the CTO. Part of that would be to take your
medications. Part of that would be to
follow up with a psychiatrist which in this case is me, I don't think I can
find anyone to replace me and I don't really want to.
Me:
Despite the non-therapeutic relationship.
Ms.
Chawla: Well, the therapeutic relationship was spoilt by you not me.
Me:
Really? We've had two hearings where
we're countering each other. You don't
think that after a hearing where we're countering each other that constitutes a
breakdown in communication?
...
Ms.
Chawla: I don't think the first hearing has any bearing on the second or third,
they're all considered very independently.
...
Me:
Are we having another hearing before then?
Ms.
Chawla: You want to?
Me: I
put a request in the other day for it.
Ms.
Chawla: Up to you, then I will take the opportunity--It's going to go the same
way as it's gone the other three times, OK?
Me:
Well, I've already put in the process to start the hearing in.
Ms.
Chawla: You can always stop it.
Me:
You can always let me out for Halloween.
Ms.
Chawla: No. That won't happen. Because I have to make sure that I'm working
in the best interests of you.
Me:
So, if I go to a hearing then our deal for next weekend is out?
Ms.
Chawla: Ya, because the--you're showing me that I can't trust the process we've
spent the last whatever time discussing.
[By challenging the current form via another hearing.]
Me:
Is that a threat?
Ms.
Chawla: Ya, I guess, in a way. We
couldn't just leave it at that. Alright,
so why don't I do this. Hearing or no
hearing I'm going to let the form 4 lapse [in 25 days]. I'm not going to attach that form lifting or
discontinuing to anything. So we're just
going to go through the whole, whatever days it's valid for [about 25 days] and
we'll have you as our guest then. Does
that seem reasonable then?
Me:
You're insane!
69. Of insanity, A Course In Miracles states:
The
case for insanity is strong to the insane. 4 For reasoning ends at its
beginning, and no thought system transcends its source. (T-11.V.16.3-4)
The
Holy Spirit will restore your sanity because insanity is not the Will of God.
(T-13.XI.7.4)
The
Holy Spirit is in you in a very literal sense. 8 His is the Voice that calls
you back to where you were before and will be again. 9 It is possible even in
this world to hear only that Voice and no other. (T-5.II.3.7-9)
God
is not in you in a literal sense; you are part of Him. 6 When you chose to
leave Him He gave you a Voice to speak for Him because He could no longer share
His knowledge with you without hindrance. 7 Direct communication was broken
because you had made another voice. (T-5.II.5.5-7)
Inward
is sanity; insanity is outside you. 5 You but believe it is the other way; that
truth is outside, and error and guilt within. 6 Your little, senseless
substitutions, touched with insanity and swirling lightly off on a mad course
like feathers dancing insanely in the wind, have no substance. 7 They fuse and
merge and separate, in shifting and totally meaningless patterns that need not
be judged at all. (T-18.I.7.4-7)
A
common purpose is the only means whereby perception can be stabilized, and one
interpretation given to the world and all experiences here. (T-30.VII.4.1)
70. On 3 Sept 2012 I approached local
representatives for our Ontario government with statement "I will do no
harm, let us use the judicial process to resolve misunderstandings having
caused MCSCS to threaten me on 1 Sept 2012 for sending a church common purpose
propaganda." That propaganda is
specifically to create, in time, an ever-increasing established marketing
platform advertising churches professing One God as justification for tithing
campaigns to confuse money with Life. While
we agree criminal harassment to be unlawful, we do not agree the wording of the
Criminal Code section 264 offence to be accurate. The difference between fear and concern has
been noted in paragraph 22 and our common spirit of law cited in the Rules For
Professional Conduct of The Law Society Of Upper Canada; "in all the
circumstances", does literally absolve a true minister for One God under
Criminal Code section 175 for the ongoing 315 publicating in good faith for
redress of the April 2012 Mormon wrong, incredible as this all sounds. Currently, the offence of Criminal Code
section 264(b) for which Mr. Helmerichs was tried and convicted without permission
to present psychiatric evidence for his courtroom defence in June of 2014, file
C-13-205-SCJ at Barrie, states:
No
person shall, without lawful authority and knowing that another person is
harassed or recklessly as to whether the other person is harassed, engage in
conduct referred to in subsection (2) that causes that other person reasonably,
in all the circumstances, to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone
known to them."
71. This active case is demonstrably
testifying justice of Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario to be the
presumption of guilt such that the role of a judge in courts for law of Ontario
is to find me guilty without contextual hearing. Judges are witnessed not to have innately
received the herein information with Constitution section 15 equal benefit of
law. Until psychiatrists are held
accountable for their ego-complexes, judges are witnessed to administer hindrance
to our public administration of justice causing Mr. Helmerichs not to be able
to answer the first question of Metfors Fitness Questionnaire in a way to
permit further lawful courtroom appearance.
Until such time that this matter receives fair, "what is fair
depends entirely on context" to quote the annotations to section 7 of
Martin's Criminal Code 2014, hearing, the original false assertion that one is
mentally unwell for challenging the lack of transparency for mental health
shall only further indebt the country of Canada.
72. "I am an equal member of GOD; you
have co-authorship in the sonship to redefine us. Neither of us can imagine NOT; NOT what is,
to understand without illusion for God; illusion IS Not of God. God is The Collective, I am, in consistently
perfect singular for all intents and purposes.
We all carry responsibility to better the singular system advocating
exclusively for literal wellness of []
R. Helmerichs
Signed 22 June
2015 at Penetanguishene, Ontario, Canada
73. For that of 24 June 2015 received from Ms.
Quesnelle in room 3066 of Waypoint on 26 June 2015
Ms.
Roxanne Jameus, "Certified Health Information Manager", states
"Correction request relates to a document or documents not originally
created by this hospital. We do not have
sufficient knowledge, expertise, and / or authority to correct it." The 24 June 2015 statement is designed
Waypoint file number ROI0002641.
74. Waypoint psychiatrist Mr. Komer is legally
criminally liable for use of incorrect or inaccurate information used for
purposes of a court assessment.
Liability falls under Criminal Code section 215(3) for negligence
(medical malpractice), additionally under s. 128 for misconduct of licensing
standard, s. 423 for intimidation, s. 132 for perjury, and others.
75. To satisfy Waypoint, employer of Mr.
Komer, that Waypoint does have authority (given knowledge for yet
unacknowledged expertise) to correct incorrect actions whenever and wherever
they are identified, directors of Waypoint, specifically Bridget Quesnelle and
Carol Lambie, are also included in the Criminal Code s. 2 definition for peace
officer and become criminally liable each for charges of, at the very least, s.
128 misconduct for permitting false return to our process.
76. Our process is for betterment to our
system. Betterment includes the ability
to prevent errors with correction to the record from any point, at any time,
within the same greater system unless our singular system is itself to be
acknowledged systemically divided, irreparably broken. Waypoint has approved the definition of
Quality to be helping the right person at the right time in the right way. That Michael MacNeil nor any other
administrator has stepped up to address my complaints concerning lack of
assistance with pursuit of Mr. Gunter Lorberg that he do is lawful job, or that
I receive unintentionally hindered ability to correspond with my power of
attorney, also directly impeded marks only lack of quality care at Waypoint
bringing Human Rights concerns to light.
77. Support for The Statement Of Disagreement
herewith submitted to counter the active misconduct of Waypoint director
Bridget Quesnelle in oral responses on 26 June 2015, also for the 24 June 2015
written response of Ms. Jameus, is easily obtained from the annotations to Criminal
Code section 16 defence of mental disorder.
The judicial edition of Canada Law Book Martin's Criminal Code 2014
under subheading "Expert evidence" in the annotations to s. 16 states:
While
an expert opinion based on second-hand evidence is admissible, if relevant, the
facts asserted in this second-hand evidence are not admissible for their
truth. Thus, while medical experts are
entitled to take into consideration all possible information in forming their
opinions, "this in no way removes from the party tendering such evidence
the obligation of establishing, through properly admissible evidence, the
factual basis on which such opinions are based." R. v. Abbey, supra.
78. Waypoint is simply not permitted to use
any, absolutely none of any psychiatric documentation since 3 Sept 2012, until
the original error is corrected. The
original error is, to recap, having been:
i)
criminally
arrested and not given a criminal trial;
ii) incarcerated into a hospital on
presumption of criminal guilty; and,
iii)
forcibly
injected under a community treatment order for openly challenging Ontario
tyranny.
79. Prior to Follow-up (1)
Sent
22 June 2015 to CPSO via formal complaint against Ms. Chawla, Mr. Ali, Mr.
Lorberg;
Sent
22 June 2015 to Waypoint Clinical Information Services, CIS, via inter-mail;
Copy
to psychometrist Matthew Keating at Waypoint on 23 June 2015;
Copy
to psychiatrist William Komer at Waypoint on 25 June 2015, included on chart
for 43125;
Acknowledgement
26 June 2015 in meeting with CIS director Bridget Quesnelle at Waypoint.
30
June 2015 to the Spiritual Care representative and A Course In Miracles fan
Rachel Dart
Anti-psychiatry
groups via Facebook, direct download links, friends, and other social
activists.
80. Natalie Yewchyn committed perjury at the
June 2014 trial for C-13-205-SCJ. She
claimed not to know what a keloid is, despite having nagged about how much she
hated hers on 12 Feb 2012, or whatever the date of the snowstorm for which I
shoveled her driveway in exchange to listen to her rant over tea afterwards. At trial she twisted the story and left off
the tea invite completely, or her story would have been self-defeated on the
spot. What of the 28 March 2012 spa date
that had also been exclusively of her own January 2012 inspiration? What of the attached confirmation to the 6
Dec. 2014 email instigating C-14-6966-OCJ at Barrie for further redress of the
June 2014 perjury and October 2012 injections for criminal harassment? The 6 Dec 2014 email attachments are found
also on the 6 Dec. 2014 TWITTER post for @talk2dream and show Natalie Yewchyn
to have given Rene Helmerichs explicit permission to call her, months after she
claimed him to have called her without consent.
What of the dozens of other encounters not specifically mentioned nor addressed? See copies of the witness statements of
Natalie Yewchyn and Mormon minister Matthew Swain posted 10 Jan. 2014 to www.luciferchristforworldpeace.blogspot.tw
.
