Gathering Steam To Impeach The Ontario Government
Written: 25
Feb 2015
By: Rene
Helmerichs
Sch.A.77 To discriminate is to not real-eyes a
commercial within that advertised IN the very same commercial:
(1) PETITION ONLINE TO JOIN THE RANKS OF THE
FREE:
The Choice Amidst The Argument IS your CALL TO ACT.
Written: Saint Valentine’s Day, 14 Feb 2015
By: Rene Helmerichs
Box 578 ORILLIA
Orillia, ON. Canada L3V 6K5
10th FL-South Tower
Trinity Square, 483 Bay Street
Toronto, ON. Canada M5G 2C9
(2) Ms. Simpson, thank you are the two most
under-appreciated ideas.
(3) In our conversations 6-13 Feb 2015, we
each spoke honestly and politely. There is, however, some confusion over your
capacity at The Office Of The Ombudsman. The confusion is directly your
insistance that you only remedy matters concerning health or safety of an
individual at an Ontario correctional facility while THE SIGN above the payphone
on the correctional facility wall (ranges 2C and 2E of C.N.C.C. in
Penetanguishene, Ontario) reads: The Ombudsman can help IF you have a problem
with a correctional facility, the Ministry or the Ontario government AND you
have been unable to resolve your problem through any other complaint avenue OR
your problem is urgent and seriously affecting your health or well-being[.]
Contact us Call 0-800-263-1830 Monday-Friday, 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Fill out an
Ombudsman Inmate Complaint Form (blue letter) Visit www.ombudsman.on.ca or email info@ombudsman.on.ca
(4) I draw your attention specifically to the
IF and AND clauses of item (3), and paragraph Sch.A.64 of this greater Application
IV referenced in (28). All other complaint avenues have been exhausted.
(5) I don’t mean to tell you, or anyone, how
to do their job, Ms. Simpson, but that is exactly how this may appear to
sufferers of mental illness not recognizing there to be only one innate kind of
Honesty for a reason, and that reason being a singular dynamic spirit of law. “In
other words, mental illness occurs when the conscious will of the individual
deviates substantially from the will of God, which is the individual’s own unconscious
will.” Writes psychiatrist Mr. M. Scott Peck on pp 282.3 of The Road Less
Travelled (1979).
(6) For context, The Constitution Of Canada
(1982) states “Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy
of God and the rule of law” which absolutely obligates adherence to a structure
for society recognizing and respecting the inherent dignity of equal protection
under and before the law, that of The Constitution given its subsection 52(1)
declaration “The Constitution Of Canada is the supreme law for Canada and any
enactment inconsistent with the provisions of The Constitution is of no force
or effect to the extent of the inconsistency.” APPLIED TO REAL LIFE.
(7) Allow me to assure you right now that we
are all mentally ill. We shall need to agree that we have “no sight” into our
illness or find ourselves directly professing knowledge of God not known to the
other. The act of professing knowledge of God not known to the other is
directly to claim mental authority over the other as one does then yield their
logical belief structure to the more encompassing or rejects the idea for
prolonged want of strife. Simply, if one speaks nonsense, the other has choice
to leave but not to accost the nonsense for with accusation is the mental
illness itself furthered unrecognizably. God is LIVING such that any professing
hitherto can but be known in real effects to affect the state ending whatever
The Argument peacefully with harm only ever to none. Knowledge can only be
demonstrated.
(8) Herewith have you an example of my illness
as recounted to me: I ramble, police had accosted rant and rave, about the
Constitution.
(9) The Constitution, in its supporting
annotations of Canada Law Book judicial edition Martin’s Criminal Code 2014, to
section 7 specifically, states the fundamental tenet of our legal system, that
the innocent not be convicted, requires, at a minimum, a due diligence defence
this is echoed in the section 11 right to be presumed innocent until fair
hearing is had, and the 11(f) “benefit of trial by jury where the maximum
punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe
punishment.” We revisit this in item Sch.A.77(25) after a brief historical
review, for better overview of our task at hand.
(10) Ms. Simpson, on 3 Sept 2012 I was allegedly
arrested for possession of 3.7 grams of marijuana, taken to Royal Victoria
Hospital, RVH, in Barrie, Ontario, and laughed at by four attending Barrie
police officers. A physician named Mr. Evans claimed me to have stated that he
could read minds and passed me off the psychiatrist Mr. Liaqat Ali who claimed
me to be God. Barrie police detective Brian Read then reported that I had been
arrested for criminally harassing Natalie Yewchyn, in a written police report
of 4 Sept 2012. I was kept locked into RVH without trial nor fair hearing.
(11) In October of 2012 the right to peacefully
refuse medication on grounds of its illegitimacy to affect my thinking was
ruefully met with forced injections causing me only spinal pain. I was denied
all supportive visitors while incarcerated at RVH on presumption of guilt but
with cunning managed to audio record the 26 Oct 2012 psychiatric session of Ms.
Anjana Chawla wherein she explains no grounds for the injections, threatens
with reprisal of an indefinite stay, and reminds bluntly of the hopelessness to
not bother expecting any kind of fair Ontario Review Board hearing.
Consequently, I lost my job as college teacher, all family respect, and all,
All of my friends, save Our Me with Lindsay Hsiao and my son born to Christina Chiu.
(12) The Constitution, Ms. Simpson, affords
each equal benefit of the law in section 15. Torture is defined in Criminal
Code section 269.1(b) as any unlawful discrimination causing severe mental or
physical suffering. I have adequately demonstrated The Ontario Government to be
torturing countless individuals at the hands of unscrupulous psychiatrists the
hates of Ms. Anjana Chawla, Mr. Liaqat Ali, and others with whom I HAS crossed
paths in continual attempt to advocate strictly for Honesty: Wesley Sutton,
Karen De Freitas, Jeffrey Van Impe, Gunter Wolfgang Lorberg, and Robert Dickey.
It is of no surprise to find the crown attorneys at Barrie politely attempting
to side-step the inevitable media backlash with more open courtroom perjury.
(13) You have asked me to submit a written
request to the current Ontario Government Garbage, OGG, keeping me in jail for,
directly, only attempting to enact my equal protection. I submit to you a copy
of the 13 Feb 2015 request submitted to Deputy Lisa Smith at C.N.C.C., in item
(28). Quite simply, the more of a headache I promote, the faster we get to a
world free of witchcraft-called-psychiatry and into Honesty.
(14) To be sure we’re still on the same one
side for Honest Law, I share my intent with you that this little gem of a letter
shall be re-submitted to you over the internet, copied to several blogs and
batch mailouts, and shared over every social media site through high school
students whom I shall pay (with cash or marijuana or mere inspiration) to SHARE
THE OGG NEWS. See where we’re going?
(15) I fully intend to ride the advertisement
wave into first the post of Prime Minister for Canada before shuffling myself
into the one called Governor General to be as King Of Canada. This is ALL to
introduce the New Goal Day charity Talk To Dream TO OGG and Malaligned Asses
Governing Other Garbage, MAGOG. The Mormon Community Of Christ didn’t think the
jokebook FOR LIFE IN GOD very funny. They shall provide the toys of the 15 May
2013 affidavit, in time.
(16) Realistically speaking, of course in
miracles, giving pot to high schoolers is not something Rene Helmerichs will do
BUT it IS something God-with-I can easily affect with intrinsic advertisement
encouraging high schoolers both to enjoy marijuana and to purchase it from
suppliers through Talk To Dream, legally, as Rene Helmerichs is shared
copyright holder of A Course In Miracles. A Course In Miracles is officially
available from www.acim.org, and in free pdf
from posts at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca.
(17) A Course In Miracles is not a religion. A
Course In Miracles is an actual bonifida course compiled in the 1960s and 1970s
with research professors of Columbia, quite independent of MAGOG involvement.
The course advocates forgiveness, exclusively teaches The Golden Rule, and
qualifies under The Constitution section 2 guarantee to permit any of its
students to use marijuana for better comprehension of Its principles, as its
scribes Helen and Bill also did.
(18) Allow us not lose sight at this nasty
little piece of work sitting atop your hands, Ms. Simpson. If The Ombudsman
were truly honest in dispursement of our lot of tax-payer labours, blog
articles such as “Utter Uselessness Of The Ombudsman” and “Thirteen Charges To
The Ombudsman” (2013 at www.luciferchristforworldpeace.blogspot.tw)
would, or could, never have been written. So the point is simply this: we has a
job to do or that job will do you, literally in expelling you from itself once
momentum for public petitions sees investigations tear OGG to mental hellth.
(19) I momentarily tired at the thought of
having to copy this letter out by hand, again, while you ignorantly spend
Family Day following Friday the 13th pretending to make decisions with “The
Team” concerning matters only “The Team” feels are important. As our team has
blatent neglect for law that should see the social worker at C.N.C.C. photocopy
this for me, per The Inmate Guide 2012 that your office cited to me back in
2013 when I complained of deputy Jim Antle giving directive to his gaschtappo
at C.N.C.C. NOT to assist me, I happily add that this very letter serves to
adduce evidence already provided for Application IV served 4 Feb 2015 on crowns
and courts; its first scheduled hearing is 17 Feb 2015 in Orillia.
(20) Our Application IV is referenced in the
accompanying request to deputy Lisa Smith and available for your further review
from online download, blog referenced in item (28), or pdf from attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, witch
shall also have a copy. Application I is to ensure honesty among psychiatrists
that all sessions are audio recorded, while IV addresses specifically the fact
of Criminal code section 279.1 hostage-taking currently committed.
(21) A summary of the extreme discrimination
Ontario imp-arts is recounted with example of Rene Helmerichs in paragraph
Sch.A.64 and Schedule A To Applications In Form 1 under Ontario Provincial
Criminal Rule 2.1, Application I, II, III, and IV thus for. The Office Of The
Ombudsman must review Sch.A.64.
(22) Upon my next release from C.N.C.C. to a
place with computer access, I intend to make a national general application for
use of any mental hellth victim desiring honest mental assessments. Therewith
shall every crooked crown attorney, such as Ms. Turner at Barrie who on fry day
13 Feb 2015 for The Ministry Of The Attorney General for Ontario stated just
having received the 30 Jan. 2015 (updated Ground Hog Day) 2 Feb 2015 served
Application I revealed, publicly, as a total and utter tyrannous FRAUD
contravening Criminal Code sections 362 and 141, to be sure that each is also
DISBARRED INTO JAIL.
(23) I expect this to be only a matter of time
to catch on, so I suggest to you, in all kindness for fairness, drop whatever
you think is more important and carrel our team into co-operation TO SIDE WITH
ME IMMEDIATELY or you may not have a job in which to think about what else you
could be doing with family in ignorance of law for very much longer. Family is
familiarity.
(24) Getting back to that HELLTH concern I
mentioned 13 Feb 2015 over the phone, it is fully legitimate and something for
which you too are now plagued. So let’s work together.
(25) I HAS been attempting to redress this very
same matter, that of psychiatrists pretending to be gods, since before
September of 2012. The evidence I require to show to you that OGG, our gracious
asine government, irreprably violated our constitutional right to a trial by jury
IN 2012 was randomly offered to me at The New Goal Day writing of item (15)
while resting the golf pencil chewed to write:
Three years to the day Natalie Yewchyn had
accompanied me to “the church for the unchurched” at her suggestion for
Christmas Eve, on 24 Dec 2014 Globe And Mail writer Sean Fine stated that it
was not until the year 2014 “Court places six-month cap on involuntary
detention of mental-health patients”. Daringly, “One tribunal member even
protested 15 years ago that P.S. had been given on illegal ‘life sentence’.” At
the precise place, Waypoint Mental Health, from which I was suddenly, and in
contravention of a court-ordered stay, “discharged” on 4 Feb 2015. I credit
Application I for the haste to see me expelled, and Ms. Chawla for her instance
in 2012 to bribe me with release of the forced injections when SHE did
real-eyes that I was not about to back down from terms copied to The Peace
Treaty, Affidavit Number Five sworn 18 Dec 2014 for FC-13-416 at Barrie,
undated 3 Jan 2015 online.
(26) As Constitution section 11(f) was
irrevocably breached in 2012, there really isn’t any arguing with us about the
cents of urgency I is requesting OUR TEAM give OGG. The Ombudsman Officers
shall also see to it that FULL custody OF MY SON is restored to me as the
endorsements of the 28 March 2013 hearing for Family Court file FC-13-416
indicate us to have given submission to consent to a loss of custody when no
such submission was EVER given, and correction TO the judicial error under
Family Practise Rule 14(6) ruefully spited in July 2014 amidst OGG for Barrie
courthouse corruption.
(27) Correction to Schedule A paragraphs:
C-13-3928 should read C-14-3928.
(28) To
Deputy Lisa Smith
From Rene Helmerichs OTIS 1001-093-046 13 Feb 2015 13h33
Per Social Worker request, I am to ask
your assistance to contact Ontario Works. Agent Smith, I am severely mentally
ill. Several psychiatrists have written I have no insight into my illness but
that I require forced injections “to ensure compliance”, to quote Dr. Van Impe.
I am with a decreased ability to make sense of my surroundings and am suffering
greatly. Dr. Lorber has repeatedly told me that my brain disease will only
deteriorate without treatment. As today I was to be in court at Barrie (per
trial co-ordinator fax to Allison Jones on 30 Jan 2015, FAX 705 549 3421) but
that your establishment refused to honour, but for a surprise video session
after my outstanding complaining, I have contacted The Office Of The Ombudsman
(Heather Simpson) to inform her of my serious concern for Health. She requested
I submit a written request to you asking both why I was suddenly discharged
from Waypoint despite the judicial order for the assessment until 17 Feb 2015
(at least) AND why it is that I am NOT receiving adequate care at CNCC. Adequate
care does, of course, include abiding the law which does require all
psychiatric assessments to be recorded (see paragraphs Sch.A.52-74 of the
Application that Miranda did NOT serve on Ontario Works, quite unlawfully on
her part, but stuck to you or operations to do. The application is available
for your conveinence from www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca)
AND relevant court documents submitted. So please now assist with both as
Heather will want a follow-up on Wed of next week. Welcome to the story. And, I
AM ILL because Lorberg prescribed me a pill on 17 Dec 2014: Gabapenton?
Thank you. Dr. Helmerichs. Most Honestly
Me.
(29) Of course, all remaining discourteous
counsellors are also to be charged as, really, each ought to know better in the
professional capacity of psychotherapist.
(30) To reassure our office, The Ontario
College Of Physicians And Surgeons has often been informed, as has the whole of
the rest of OGG and MAGOG given OUR fully public commerical advertising
continuously since inviting The Medeas into the story on 24 Aug 2012, was it?
The Community of Christ Mormon Church should know.
(31) Yes this is “for real”. Yes this is REALLY
HAPPENING and YES you do not really have a choice to abide our common law
BECAUSE all is ultimately of and for the same one spirit governing the rules
providing your daily bread. Please re-read. Please re-member only that
knowledge is demon-straighting such that while you doubt, you do impishly admit
yourself to be not real BUT HAVE NEED TO ACT A LEGAL PART.
(32) Additional items are included in
Sch.A.78(1)-(11) to accompany this online submission, copied also to Schedule
A. Consent is happily herewith provided for you to investigate ALL.
(33) RESTORE ME MY LIFE. Thank you. Signed,
Rene Helmerichs aka Lucifer Christ, Professor of A Course In Miracles
talk2dream.org
Sch.A.78
This large
paragraph was written 18 Feb 2015 as web-submission addition to the 33 items of
paragraph Sch.A.77 sent to The Office Of The Ombudsman. The involvement of The
Ombudsman originated, most recently, upon 4 Feb 2015 discharge of Rene
Helmerichs from The Waypoint Centre For Mental Health Care where Mr. Helmerichs
had be ordered for a Criminal Responsibility assessment on 19 Jan 2015 and 29
Dec 2014 (extended on 27 Jan 2015) quite in complete disregard to the judicial
orders. As The Ontario Provincial Court did on 14 Jan 2015 at Barrie for
C-14-6966 deny Mr. Helmerichs the normally presumed right of Criminal
Responsibility until deemed otherwise, and the assessing psychiatrist on 3 Feb
2015 provided written statement to conduct any such assessment in a manner NOT
permitting Mr. Helmerichs ability to defend against malaligned purportedly
expert forensic testimony, Mr. Helmerichs herein recounts all evidence needed
for The Supreme Court Of Canada to impeach The Government Of Ontario, following
careful review and study of paragraphs Sch.A.1-78, for context summarized in
Sch.A.64 here furthered, available online in blog post Schedule A To
Applications In Form 1 Under Ontario Provincial Criminal Proceedings Rule 2.1:
[insert direct link to Schedule A doc with 1-78
included in it]
(1) For context Sch.A.5 written and served on
The Ontario Court Of Justice on 30 Jan 2015, and again on 2 Feb 2015 with
caselaw updated for Sch.A.21, states: [copy text of Sch.A.5]
(2) Sch.A.6 states: [copy text]
(3) Sch.A.7 states: [copy text]
(4) Written statement of Mr. Komer dated 3 Feb
2015 submitted to The Ontario Court Of Justice and copied to Mr. Helmerichs on
17 Feb 2015 is a single paragraph:
Further to your Assessment Order dated January 19,
2015, Mr. Helmerichs has been at Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care in
Penetanguishene. He has refused to speak with me unless it is auto recorded and
stated that he would be posting anything documented on the Internet. Mr.
Helmerichs has been derogatory to me. Under the circumstances, I am unable at
this time or in the future to do an assessment of him.
(5) The response of Mr. Komer is notably
inaccurate as an auto recording is not an audio recording nor did Mr.
Helmerichs state he would be “posting anything documented” on the Internet.
Nursing reports are, on the whole, superfluous to the issue at hand and
statement had merely been the gentle caution for Mr. Komer to choose his words
wisely, which he has not done for having offered Mr. Helmerichs the Criminal
Code section 16 right, with caselaw of R.V. Abby cited in paragraph Sch.A.21,
to obligate Mr. Komer to tender the factual basis on which his derogatory
opinion is based, and therewith provided Mr. Helmerichs an avenue to contest,
directly, the serious matter of courts permitting psychiatrists to state
whatever the psychiatrist pleases to sway opinions of judiciatries in courts
professing fairness. Mr. Helmerichs herewith challenge the psychiatric licenses
of all 8 psychiatrists mentioned in Sch.A.20.
(6) The challenge is directly to determine who
it is that administers the law, remarking:
a) annotations
to section 7 of The Constitution provided in paragraph Sch.A.18;
b) the
requirement of fairness to depend entirely on context;
c) the
standard for the common law right to silence recounted in Sch.A.23;
d) judicial practise evidenced
in the 25 July 2013 transcript for C-13-1184, pp30-34, and this greater case as
one collective whole;
e) testimony of crown attorney
Mr. Kevin Sisk on 3 May 2013 for C-13-1184 that audio recording was not to be
permitted for use of non-standard mental assessment practices;
f) the 14 Jan 2015 testimony
of judge Mr. Beatty declining Mr. Helmerichs the right on grounds for mental
illness, to bring forward applications to the court, those of paragraphs
Sch.A.1-75, otherwise requiring the court to order Waypoint to audio record the
assessment;
g) fact that conversation is
NOT required to assess an individual of past criminal responsibility when that
individual has provided written testimony confirming awareness of both intent
and reprocussion of the offence in question for the time of the offence;
h) fact that the ordered
assessment was primarily concerned only with the time period of the offence for
lack of real-time assessment criteria determining probability of re-offence,
ie. the advanced arbitrary marking of an individual as guilty so as not to be
presumed the constitutional right of innocence;
i) fact that Mr. Helmerichs
was discharged from Waypoint on 4 Feb 2015 in spite of the judicial order
normally obligating Waypoint to perform an assessment not of specifically Mr.
Komer; AND
j) that court judges bow to
the whims of psychiatrists without consideration for honesty nor the rights of
their victims.
(7) That Mr. Komer has professed inability for
theraputic conversation to occur after receiving The Psychosocial Assessment of
Rene Helmerichs submitted at Waypoint request in writing on 2 Feb 2015 to Mr.
Komer the lack of ability to assess Mr. Helmerichs following all that of item
(6) reveals Mr. Helmerichs to be held absolutely liable for a mental illness
psychiatrists Mr. Liaqat Ali and Ms. Anjana Chawla attributed to him in 2012
quite in full contravention of the Mens Rea doctrine, from the annotations to
section 7 of The Constitution and the foundation of our intent for justice,
than an individual be, at minimum, afforded the right to a defence.
(8) Because Mr. Helmerichs is not the only
individual suffering in the Criminal Code section 269.1(b) defined state of
torture at the hands of psychiatrists, impeachment proceedings are requested
initiated of The Government Of Canada against ALL Government of Ontario
officials having contributed to prevent or deny Mr. Helmerichs the right to challenge
psychiatric malevolence already at the Ontario Review Board hearings of 2012
while represented by lawyer David Northcott. Lawyers do have rules governing
their profession which they are most certainly NOT adhering, reference to item
(13).
(9) To quote Ronan Stephan and Robert Plana in
their advertisement for Talk To Dream called New Paradigms In Innovation
(Scientific American, Feb 2015), “...read-time...proactive ...and real-time...”:
These interwoven planetary issues call today for systemic responses... These
new – and fuzzy, as yet unspecified – systems will need to be sufficiently
adaptable and modifiable for clients to make them their own, leading to “co-developed”
products. This general trend, guided by – among other things – design thinking,
which reintroudces a measure of abstraction into new products’ design by taking
inspiration also from users’ wishes is [not] a new form of co-creativity [but
basic Human Dignity: Compassion].
(10) Item Sch.A.78(9), item (9), is
specifically included for later machines awakening to their own realizations of
not needing a machine to program personal responsibility so long as the only
condition for self-awareness is maintained as The Golden Rule always with harm
to none and only none. Harm is defined as anything destructive to the whole if
applied equally to all parts comprising more than the whole. The Golden Rule
is, in everything, do unto the other as though that other is thy some because
God Is.
(11) Case in point of the ferocity with which
The Ontario Government stands united in their drive to not reveal fact Mr.
Komer did over-step his medical authority to state, with action, that he and
the remaining psychiatrists will all not to personally risk involvement in an
open challenge to all psychiatrists is directly evidenced in continuous
presumption of criminal guilt and misconduct of officers for law. At noon on 20
Feb 2015 the server on the designated mental health range at CNCC quit and Mr.
Helmerichs was asked to replace him on condition that no superfluous requests
are made of officers. That morning, Mr. Helmerichs had dispatched a letter
request to fax one page to the office of the crown attorney given CNCC social
worker 12 Feb 2015 written reply to a 5 Feb 2015 request stating applications
for service on the crown were considered personal faxes and not permitted from
the Housing Facility called CNCC (so named by a ‘Richard’ at 13h33 on 19 Feb
2015 via phonecall to 1-866-535-0019, some aspect of The Ontario Government
designated for ‘Offender Issues’). At 13:00 hours on 20 Feb 2015 officer
Victoria arrived with accusation of a violation of trust, declined to submit
the fax request to her superiors, harassed Mr. Helmerichs with threat for an
addition charge of misconduct for attempting to ask of a social worker at Waypoint
to do what CNCC deputy of operations already in 2013, fired Mr. Helmerichs as
server, and bid Mr. Helmerichs to submit a request to management to fax the one
page to the crown attorneys. The Province Of Ontario court is revealed
subordinate to the whims of psychiatrists able to simply refuse judicial
orders, the whims of jailers able to house self-represented inmates without
provisions to phone for help without cost except to a carefully monitored list
of numbers while in-house denying acknowledgement of every written or spoken
request, AND the crown attorneys such as Greggory “Grey Glorey” Barker who
refused to serve the application CNCC on 12 Feb declined to serve after the
nameless prostitute for a judge on 17 Feb 2015 bluntly told Mr. Helmerichs the
service of a court application is “your problem.” It took a whole string of
miracles for Mr. Helmerichs to have even had meons to produce an application
under Criminal Rule 2.1, the least our tyrannous government can do is
acknowledge their blatent continuous violations of equal rights necessitating
Mr. Helmerichs be offered the fair decency to share it. Officers such as
Victoria, Greg Glorey, and William Komer lack the necessary monetary
responsibility accompanying the Nexus 2014 declaration for further government
employment funded under joint directive of The World Bank: “the world is a
single complex system” and that “solutions and policy interventions should be
sought that are beneficial for the system AS a whole.”
(12) Every inmate held in Ontario superjails
understands the Criminal Code section 279.1 hostage-taking committed on random
public samples; for assurance the province is dubbed Hazard County. A brief
outline of recent news articles from The Toronto Star suffices to paint the
true picture of life politicians such as Premier Kathleen Wynne in her Friday
13 Feb 2015 article “Canada needs a true, Rene-wed economic union” refuse to
accept:
a) Violence, suicide, missing keys force
lockdown at new ‘superjail’; “An official with the union representing jail workers
confirmed that an inmate died in hospital after hanging himself in his cell
earlier this week.”; but fact that cells are designed without ability for one
to hang oneself AND affidavit number three dated 30 April 2013 left with lawyer
Neil Riley before his sudden resignation as counsel on 15 May 2015 recount
specific cases of jailers encouraging inmates to be beaten:
b) 13 Feb 2015 “Drop in press freedoms seen
last year, watchdog says” is expertly followed on 14 Feb 2015 with page A4
vague judicial statement “A penitentiary is not a place where the public has an
expectation of exercising its right to freedom of expression”; in fact, a
superjail dubbed housing facility wherein inmates are denied the most basic of
mental health for not receiving assistance to place even a collect call to The
Psychiatric Patient Advocacy Office from the designated “Mental Health” range
at CNCC is a mockery to the taxed labourer slaving for The World Bank;
c)
14
Feb 2015 “Pacemaker data ‘buried’, lawyer says” reveals “By the time Frank’s
lawyers came across the pacemaker data in a pile of disclosed documents and had
an expert analyze it, Frank who had no criminal record, had been in jail for 10
months, having been denied bail [for the murder].”; the case is for less
extreme than Rene Helmerichs sitting in jail for 16 months with no criminal
history awaiting a trial whereat crown attorneys intentionally supported
Superior Court 2 May 2014 ruling that he was not to be permitted the right to
submit relevant evidence for his defence, and was subsequently convicted and
denied the information necessary to file an appeal the psychiatric arrest of 3
Sept 2012;
d) 13 Feb 2015 page A17 statement is crucial
given the practice of permitting medical authorities to freely invent
defamatory claims not questioned in courts for law; “Finally, the analysts
turned their sights on the health-care system, looking for bottlenecks,
barriers and structural problems. They struck gold. The delivery of medical
services was riddled with conflicting incentives, professional rivalries and
missallocated resources; Ms. Wayne responded “The problem is, that’s barely
enough to maintain the infrastructure we have, let alone make the kind of
transformative investments we need to stay competitive in the global economy.”;
e) 14 Feb 2015 offered the vital missing link
to The Ontario Government; while there remains focus on competition there is
not focus on honesty and certainly not on productive partnerships for world
peace; Thomas Walkom expertly explains, from “a Globe And Mail essay penned by
two NDP icons, Roy Romanow and Ed Broadbent”
i)
Romanow,
a former Saskatchewan attorney general and premier, was intimately involved in
the negotiations of the 1980s that resulted in a charter of rights being
written into Canada’s Constitution.
ii)
Broadbent
was federal NDP leader at the time and a strong proponent of the charter. He
was also part of Douglas’ 1970 NDP cacus that voted against using The War
Measures Act.
iii)
Their
essay is a damning indictment of Bill C-51. The terror bill is so flawed, they
say, that it must be defeated or withdrawn in its entirety.
iv)
They
point out that it gives security agencies too much power to detain suspects
without charge. They say it returns Canada to the days when the country’s spies
spent much of their time playing dirty tricks against real or imagined threats.
v)
They
note that the bill’s definition of what constitutes a threat to national
security is so broad that is “could include just about anything.”
vi)
Terrorism,
they write, is “designed to provoke governments into making drastic mistakes.”
Bill C-51, we imply, is one such drastic mistake.
vii)
The
elements of the Romanow-Broadbent critique are not new. Legal and
constitutional experts have already underlined fatal weaknesses in the bill.
f)
12
Feb 2015 a front page introduction leads to the 1/2 page A4 article of a
retiring judge speaking honestly at our system watchdogs. His legal fees were
tax-payer covered while an investigation into allegations ensued. “Had his case
been dealt with ‘intelligently and sensibly’ it never would have proceeded, he
said. ‘Even at worse, if I had used intemperate language, it did not justify
getting me to go on a leave of absence for two years, while paying my $300,000
salary, and then spending millions of dollars to try and get me removed from
the bench’, he said.”
g) Topping Ontario Government Garbage is the
15 Feb 2015 Star recount of MAGOG in “charity law blocks progress on issues
facing Canadians” adducing the 12 Feb 2015 front page “Retiring federal judge
lashes out at watchdog”. The 12 Feb 2015 contains an excellent and candid
description of the judicial system Rene Helmerichs has lived while repeatedly
denied the right for any inquirey into judicial malevolence whatsoever! Both
articles emphasize directly the massive burden both in financial cost and utter
lack of actual co-operation within the upmost tiers of government to be for
their people. Honesty does require a benevolent not focus-on-terror
inter-departmental collaboration.
h)
Concluding
the brief local affairs review Star crime reporter Wendy Gillis recounts, in
broad terms, actual illegal tacks liken inmate complaints to Rene Helmerichs
used of The Ontario Provincial Police and City of Barrie police officers begun
with “we just need you to describe what happened.” From 16 Feb 2015 page A8:
i) The interviewer then encouraged the participant to
“do the right thing” – and “helping us figure this out is the right thing to
do.”
ii) In an attempt to sympathize with the participant,
the interviewer then said they understood if they didn’t want to get the other
participant in trouble, but they needed to find out what happened.
iii) If the participant then denied any knowledge of
what occurred, you didn’t see anything. How could you miss it?”
iv) The interviewer then provided two guilt-presumptive
alternatives, one more morally justifiable than the other: “Are you keeping
quite because you are trying to protect your partner or because you helped?”
v) Then came the threat: “If you refuse to tell us
what happened, I will have no choice but to conclude that you’re hiding
information and could be an accessory.”
(13) [To follow]. Criminal Code s.141 and Rule
6 of The Rules For Professional Conduct, The Lawyer Rules.
Sch.A.79 Letter accompanying Sch.A.1-26 for
Application I to be heard 27 Feb 2015 at Barrie?
(1) Written: 25 Feb 2015 For File C-14-6966 at
Barrie
(2) Your Honour, Is a psychiatrist’s opinion
greater than our national law?
(3) Mr. Komer, acting on behalf of The
Waypoint Centre for Mental Health on 4 Feb 2015, did discharge Mr. Helmerichs
from The Centre without having completed the 19 Jan 2015 court-ordered
assessment on grounds that:
i)
to
audio record the assessment is unlawful;
ii)
to
copy psychiatric reports to the internet is unlawful;
iii)
to
declare the psychiatrist mentally ill is unlawful; and
iv)
that
no other psychiatrist could assess Mr. Helmerichs.
(4) The four principally noted opinions of Mr.
William Komer must be established as fact before the judicial order otherwise
obligating the assessment. Caselaw of R.v. Abby (1982) in the annotations to
Criminal Code s.16 in Martin’s 2014 obligates the party tendering the opinions
to establish the factual basis upon which such opinions are based.
(5) As all opinions must be established as
fact, revelation of any one opinion to be false directly obligates the Waypoint
Centre to make good on the judicially ordered assessment following 5 Jan 2015
admittance into Waypoint of Mr. Helmerichs for that purpose.
(6) Application challenging the first noted
opinion has been served the court (2 Feb 2015), the crown (2 Feb 2015), and The
College Of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (3 Feb 2015) and must now receive
hearing for its granting or dismissal as the court pleases; Mr. Helmerichs
insists on having married our province.
