1.
Understanding
Light Gives A Moment Of Time
Written: 16
Feb. 2015
By: Rene
Helmerichs
Posted: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
Copy to: www.ScientificAmerica.com/ Oct
2014 [under article as comment to “A Beacon From The Big Bang”] and email
editers@sciam.com
2.
In
response to Lawrence M. Krauss responding to Betancourt in the Feb. 2015 issue
of Scientific America:
Light does not travel. It is precisely light that we
do not understand. Light is not perceived relatively because light exists and
what exists, must exist continuously to exist at, for, and with all relatively.
In other words, we do not perceive light, we experience effects of affects of
that we claim to be a source.
3.
Bear
with me while I explain a perception for a yet unconsidered reality. We stumble
over concept for a source that is one but many or for one with every and any.
Consider memory.
4.
Why
can one visualize images with memory? Why can one recall a memory so vividly as
to cause its being to be momentarily perceived as reality in substitute of
reality to no avail of either reality (or any one snapping fingers loud enough
to wake the dead but not the dreaming)?
5.
We
have memory. Memory is thus an effect affected in our being. But the being we
perceive is in symbiosis with our body differently from the environment
containing the body. Difference is therefore the effect of affects not
understood or no division between self as one being and self as many could
exist. Light is established as for our being not understood as also of it until
we understand how one can be many symbiotically.
6.
Returning
to the fact of light existing continuously, and therein revealing our inability
to truly perceive light in any relative reality, it is not the concept of
continuity that we seek to understand but directly that for existence.
7.
We must
agree ourselves to be in a reality that is itself ever-changing because every
object, even the smallest particle thereof, is never to be exactly-exactly the
same from one moment to the next. Such a particle, if it existed, would be
called The God Particle and contain infinite energy, the substance for change.
But what does not itself know change cannot be expected to change, nor can an
aspect eternally present be exclusive of any other aspect eternal. Since the
world does always change, we know not that the world is true but have
established fact of a state of ever that is not understood for considering it
as infinitely changing. A moment is always a moment.
8.
Let
us amalgamate that not considered with our understanding of waves. Light, we
claim, travels in waves. Forgoing our inability to understand light, we can
understand waves.
9.
Waves
are fundamentally frequency, “a look per second” as my high school physics
teacher once explained. The number of looks, or revolutions, oscillations,
cycles, beats, whatnots per second establishes the Hertz of the waves. On a
frequency spectrum, it is entirely possible to correlate the colours of the
rainbow with music notes as they are separated only with equally-spaced
degrees.
10. If one space were the exact-exact same as
the next, difference itself could not be perceived and thus is evidenced the
original “bang” as symbiotic dual nature of every aspect affecting every
further effect for difference.
11. Simply, time itself is neither linear nor
absolute but a structure in which to contain the myriad of frequencies causing
all things to appear as separate beings. Time is inescapable except with faith
in that ever-ever not know but sought as source of all. We have eternal life
and know it not nor know or understand how to apply fact of eternity to the
ever-changing universes.
12. Understanding is founded upon logical
reasoning. Logic itself is the continuum of agreement we have begun with “I
think, therefore, I am.” We need not understand how we think, per se, to know
that reaction does evidence thinking to us, despite memory claiming us to have
thought this or that for want when reality is the effect perceived.
13. The question of expanding space, or an
expanding universe, is directly answered with fact of being not exclusive,
being more than all-encompassing. Considering eternal means there is not time,
nor concept of difference in a way understood within that known as time, fact
of being not exclusive is personally evidenced with memory.
14. Memory is the ability to bridge two
distinct moments in time for the purpose of bettering the whole of time, as
that operating memory must exist beyond time and intent for destruction of time
is to self-obliterate the awareness of that driving memory. The circular nature
of time is revealed with awareness that the relative future can be just as
easily recalled as the past but with thinking completely relatively opposite to
that considered in associating memory only to remembering past events. This is
not to say the future is specifically pre-determined but entirely the opposite:
the past is not fixed nor permanent but completely alterable with real-time
considerations for joining, eternally.
15. Bodies cannot join eternally. We, that of
our self-concept, awareness, life, are not inert and cannot ever be fully
corporal no matter how temporal, temporary, we may aspire to become. We are not
our body but exist as capacity for The Choice balancing duality.
16. The logical rule of thumb for any decision
is thus to contemplate which is more encompassing and choose that one. The
Choice is only for an idea. Ideas alter beliefs to bring about realizations,
understanding, awareness. Ideas facilitate eternal life and eternal life is
always for joining, ordering, structuring amidst perceived differences two
concepts alike.
17. Consistency lends to constancy but with
dynamicity equanimbus.
18. Honesty is consistency but the law of
continuity requires that affecting effects to be self-honing, causing concept
for honest to remain innate, appreciated, and, at times, bland for its
sameness: I am like you but with nothing more” is only honestly understood as “I
am a projection of your unconscious; you are a projection of my unconscious; we
are each unconscious to ourselves because the relative reality requires it for
our awareness of difference.”
19. Mr. Kraus nailed it when he replied “light
is not traveling ‘outward’ from a single ‘center’ but rather from all of space”.
To facilitate understanding, allow as to present analogy to a pane of glass
shattered with a sound wave to reveal countless different shaped fragments
quite independent of the spacial rifts also evidenced to then be “expending”
with motion of the frequency wave. Prior to thought for destruction, thought
determined of present consideration for visualized effect not the benign intent
of thinking up a harmless example, there existed not concept for shape as the
pane was not defined. Were one to examine now the pieces, one recognizes
sameness amidst difference and speculates at a cause for that not (from the
source sought with speculation) known. The confusion is not solved except to
return again to the single fact that we do all share one common environment and
must therefore be alive within the mind governing the whole of the environment
unaware of itself.
20. For a real-time lived understanding of
life, experience A Course In Miracles personally. Gary Renard has the best
introduction titled Disappearance Of The Universe, however, physicists should
perhaps be more interested to explore The Unpublished Seth Sessions On Sound,
available online somewhere.
21. The universe is healing. It is neither
expanding nor contracting; it is healing. Healing is to gain join for self-awareness
and therewith more rapidly correct inconsistencies in whatever the individual
thinking. Thinking is evidenced with reaction and action of any kind is motion
for that I am.
22. Post Thought:
Symbiosis within one and symbiosis without one are
different but both occur with same affecting is symbiosis, liken symmetry.
Difference is the blind part of faith independent of personal thinking: So as
night is to a full day is dark to light itself blindly perceiving colour,
texture, taste, and sound in silent text. Universe is atoning, uni-verse is
a-toning the details for one unrecognized whole. There is no explanation how I
know on 3 Sept. 2012 that a story between myself and Natalie Yewchyn begun,
formally, on 18 Aug. 2011 would lead to grounds for me to justly inpeach the
government of Ontario provided me, in writing, on 17 Feb. 2015, 42 months to the
day since I recognized my book of Revelation walk to have had begun. So
consider again, how it is we lack of the why of knowing ourselves blindly with
sight.
No comments:
Post a Comment