My Mother Cried On 10 July At Hearing Of An Impending Criminal Charge

1. Post title:

My Mother Cried On 10 July At Hearing Of An Impending Criminal Charge

By: Rene Helmerichs

Written: 10 July 2014

Blog: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com

Reference: Revelation 12:15-16

Contents:

i. My Mother Cried On 10 July At Hearing Of An Impending Criminal Charge

ii. The Barrie Courthouse Circus Includes The Superior Family Branch

iii. Regarding Designations As Not With Perfect Mental Order

iv. Revelation For A Course In Miracles

2. She may not real-eyes that there is more than one charge to be pressed.

3. The hearing was yet informal.  I did intentionally give my Mother and sister not-ice before The Superior Court Of Canada Family Court Branch judge that they understand I'm not playing games.  My sister asked how it is that I could be so cruel.  They seem rather to be looking at clouds imagining shapes not thinking what repercussions they enact in MY life with THEIR actions.  Cruel is as cruel does; honesty is for equality.

4. My Mother has claimed, in the Settlement Conference Form 17C document signed and dated 9 July 2014, paragraph 8:

"The respondent father [that's me, Rene Helmerichs] has a history of mental health problems and, until July 2, 2014, was in jail for criminal harassment.  During this time, I [that's my Mum, Ingrid Helmerichs] was granted an interim order for custody of the child of the matter.  Since the respondent father's release, I have granted him access to the child of the matter at my discretion and under my supervision.  I would like for this situation to continue."

5. Unfortunately, Gary and Cindy-Lora Renard, in their outstanding introduction to A Course In Miracles To Unite ALL Churches For World Peace, are dead accurate to say that one can be totally right in court and still be totally miserable.  Since I'm the one that's totally right, I can tell you first hand that none of this is actually fun.

6. I do not suffer mental health problems.  I resolve the problems of others, plain and simple.  For example, the June 2014 issue of Popular Science recounted a likely water shortage in the Colorado River region for which the U.S. government has set aside 53 Billion dollars to connect a deeper straw into lake Meed, since the topmost straw is expected to suck in only air come 2016.  THE CURRENT U.S. PLAN DOES NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF THE EVER-DECREASING WATER in LAKE MEED.  I can't remember how to spell the lake's name.  PARAGRAPH 18 or so OF BLOG POST Open Letter To Her Majesty In Right Of Ontario AT http://www.luciferchristforworldpeace.blogspot.tw/2014/06/156-ontario20140604-open-letter-to-her.html DESCRIBES A MUCH MORE COST-EFFECTIVE WAY, TICKETED AT ABOUT 100 MILLION USD, less than 0.2 percent of the current total money already allotted for the current idiot idea of digging another hole, THAT CAN REPLENISH THE WATER IN THE LAKE AND AVOID NEED FOR PLAYING IN MUD.  But that's ok.  Keep playing in mud and calling the one guy pointing out the difference between dirt and sobriety, disordered.

7. My mother is attempting to use the court order of 28 March 2013 with wording "Interim custody of the child as mentioned above, shall be to the Applicant Ingrid Helmerichs" to imply that she has authority to conceal or detain my son over whom I have not relinquished custody and thereby contravene Criminal Code Of Canada section 282(1)(a).

8. After hitching a ride with seemingly random motorist Tony Degroot, who remarked having taken an unusual trip home before happening to find me standing at the highway 400 North onramp, for having been abandoned in Barrie by Mum, I stopped by the Ontario Provincial Police headquarters in Orillia, Ontario, to discover the guardians of our earth shan't intervene in the judicial headache of correcting the misleading wording of the 28 March 2013 order.  I had desired only that my Mum be given a head's up notice of her illegal actions regarding abduction of my son.  Officers Hatfield and Geldenhuys were courteous, polite, and spoke with a tremendous more amount of common sense than The City Of Barrie enforces of law have shown throughout this greater case since 1 Sept. 2012.

II. The Barrie Courthouse Circus Includes The Superior Family Branch

9. The endorsement of the 28 March 2013 Superior Court Of Canada Family Court hearing between Ingrid Helmerichs as  the Applicant and her son Rene Helmerichs as Respondent reads:

"Motion for custody of child (temporary custody).  Mr. Helmerichs was here today and is in custody.  He made submission to the court.  It was apparent from Rene submissions that Mr. Helmerichs is agreeing to the interim custody order."

I can't make out the scribbled shorthand that follows, nor the judge's name.  McD J seem to be the initials.

10. The important information to note is that (1) the 28 March 2013 order of, paragraph 6 above, was made by agreement, and, (2) that the agreement is evidence in submissions made by me that day.

11. Wouldn't ya know it?  There is no filed submission from me listed in the table of contents for Family Court file FC13-416-00 at Barrie before that of 15 May 2013.  So where is it?

12. Well, on 28 March 2013 I stood in Criminal Court begging the guy conducting the hearing to help me serve the 25 March 2013 sworn affidavit unto my Mother because the Ontario Ministry Of Community Safety And Corrections Services, MCSCS, Central-North Correctional Center, CNCC, in Penetanguishene was electing NOT to abide by the law, and written policy, requiring, according the The Family Court Rules, that I be assisted with the swearing, copying, serving, and filing of judicial documents while in MCSCS custody.  Justice Solsas (sp?) had taken pitty to permit the serving, because I happened to have carried the sworn affidavit with me into court, until duty council lawyer Fenik intervened following Court Services Officer #165 encouragement that I not be assisted.  Mr. Fenik ultimately convinced the presiding, er, hmm, Prostitute, to further spite The Canadian Charter Of Rights on grounds that I could serve it during the family court hearing which I did not at that time know that I would be permitted to attend.

13. The Barrie courthouse MSCSC Court Services agents did laugh when I requested to attend my family court hearing and did in fact, on 15 May 2013 and thereafter until 10 July 2014, deny me the right of attendance at my own hearing.  Prejudice?  Discrimination?  Um, YA.  Think Human Rights App.

14. The only thing to note in the side-show of The Barrie Circus Act is the fact of a thrice mentioned physical document, the first time at the hearing of 25 March 2013 for C13-205-SR where the presiding Prostitute, er, judge, refused to assist me to copy the document for service on 28 March 2013.  As it was, the Family Court judge on 28 March 2013 let me hand serve the sworn affidavit onto my Mother in court of his law before then requiring MY MOTHER, the opposing party to me, to photocopy copy it so that I could have a copy AT STAPLES, a local office store in town, knowing full well that she was leaving to Germany on 31 March 2013 and pressed for time to file it at the Family Court counter following the photocopying. 

15. Since when does the opposing party have to photocopy and file the document served on them by the party that they've brought to court?  How is this NOT a Circus???

16. So the document is lost.  It did get filed.  My Dad told me 2 weeks later, when I finally got through to him on the payphone from jail, that the Family Court counter refused to accept it because it was written in pencil.  The jail won't give me a pen.  The Family Court counter insisted on the original and not an inked photocopy.  So, my Dad explained, since my Mum ended up having to leave it with my Dad to file, that my Mum would need to swear a document at the counter on her return in April of 2013 stating that she did indeed send a copy to Taiwan as indicated at the hearing by oral remarks of the presiding Prostitute.

17. Truly I'm unsure how it is that tax-payers aren't already beside themselves at the lunacy of The City Of Barrie courthouse.  But that's ok, keep calling me disordered.

18. At no time did I ever agree not to retain custody of my son.  The order for interim custody of 28 March 2013 is a fraudulent misrepresentation of fact under Criminal Code section 361(2) unless The Superior Court Of Canada admits that "an error in good faith" occurred to have not expressly stated "joint custody" in the wording of the order.

19. As I'm still fighting this case, it should be noted that I did not at any time agree or consent to the raping of my rights committed time and time again at the courthouse in Barrie, reference to every other post on this and other of my blogs.

20. I have the Criminal Court file C13-205-SR transcripts evidencing the Family Court affidavit omitted from the Family Court file FC13-416-00 by The Barrie Courthouse Circus.  It is only a matter of time until I get the wording corrected.  In the meantime, my Mother was advised of impending criminal charges for having contravened Criminal Code Of Canada section 282(1)(a) Abduction in contravention of a custody order, and herewith additionally section 299 Defamatory libel publishing, and section 181 Spreading false news given that Criminal Code section 16(2) states "Every person is presumed not to suffer from a mental disorder until the contrary is proved on the balance of probabilities".

III. Regarding Designations As Not With Perfect Mental Order

21. For information of the general Canadian public, Martin's 2014 Annual Criminal Code Judicial Edition Canada Law Book in section 2 as the definition for Mental Disorder states:

"The definition of 'mental disorder' as a disease of the mind clearly imports the terminology used to define insanity under the previous provisions of section 16.  Therefore, see the notes under s. 16."

22. The notes under section 16 state, as a general summary to the section notes:

1) "Meaning of 'disease of the mind' -- The term 'disease of the mind' is a legal concept and it is therefore a question of law for the trial judge what mental conditions are included within the term.  Any malfunctioning of the mind, or mental disturbance having its source primarily in some subjective condition or weakness internal to the accused (whether fully understood or not), may be a disease of the mind if it prevents the accused from knowing what he is doing, but transient disturbances of consciousness due to certain specific external factors do not fall within the concept."

2) "The term 'disease of the mind' embraces any illness, disorder or abnormal condition which impairs the human mind and its functioning, excluding, however, self-induced states caused by alcohol or drugs, as well as transitory mental states such as hysteria or concussion."

3) "Mental illness short of insanity--Our Criminal Code does not recognize the defence of diminished responsibility and even though the accused may have been ill at the time of the offence he is technically sane if he was able to distinguish between right and wrong: R. v. Chartrand, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 314, 26 C.C.C. (2d) 417 (8:0)."

23. There is application of The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms to specifically the issue of mental disorder defame for any desiring to stand up to the fraud of government drug-pushers with me.  The operating mind test requires us ALL to RETAIN our right to make an active choice with direct respect to ALL courtroom and legal matters (because, as it turns out, the Barrie courthouse is almost exclusively in service for only prejudice to the accused, contrary to The Crimes Against Humanity And War Crimes Act 2000 section 4(3) and section ONE of The Canada Act 1982).  From the annotations of the Judicial Edition of Martin's 2014 Criminal Code published by Thomson Reuters:

"The operating mind test includes a limited mental component which requires that the accused has sufficient cognitive capacity to understand what he is saying and what is said.  This includes the ability to understand a caution that the evidence can be used against the accused.  The same standard applies with respect to the right of silence as guaranteed by this section [s. 7 of The Charter] in determining whether a mentally ill accused has the mental capacity to make an active choice: R. v. Whittle, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 914, 92 C.C.C. (3d) 11, 32 C.R. (4th) 1."

24. Since I am explaining the law, requiring that I also adhere to our common legislative supreme law of Canada and all rules and laws thereof, it ought to be clear that I am able to distinguish between right and wrong, even while high on marijuana given my actions while high were done specifically and with lawful sanction to redress previous wrongs done to me, explained blog post "The Canadian Charter Of Rights Section ONE Breach At The City Of Barrie", which is itself grounds to obliterate consideration of me as, somehow, NOT having been perfectly mentally well the entire time.

IV. Revelation For A Course In Miracles

25. My Mother, to use an apt expression, does not state a chance in Hell at retaining custody of my son.  A Course In Miracles begins:

Text.In.1.1 This is a course in miracles. 2 It is a required course. 3 Only the time you take it is voluntary. 4 Free will does not mean that you can establish the curriculum. 5 It means only that you can elect what you want to take at a given time. 6 The course does not aim at teaching the meaning of love, for that is beyond what can be taught. 7 It does aim, however, at removing the blocks to the awareness of love's presence, which is your natural inheritance. 8 The opposite of love is fear, but what is all-encompassing can have no opposite.

26. On 8 July 2014 I did commence criminal proceedings in privately sworn information against my Mother for the Criminal Code section 328 offence recounted in the 8 July 2014 post titled "Privately Sworn Information To Commence A Proceeding At Barrie", isolated from the post for a concise presentation of fact.

27. On 10 July 2014 I requested of The Ontario Provincial Police to please speak sense with my Mother that she will face as many charges as it takes for me to get it through to her that she is standing on the illegal side of an invisible fence.  I do not desire her to be placed into custody, rather, her Mum, my Oma, recently passed and has left her childhood home vacant.  Once the Human Rights Tribunal Of Ontario, HRTO, application terms are met, I shall have money enough to purchase the house for her outright.  Until then, I'm sure I'm red-flagged and shall not receive more than a courteous greeting from the local kings of the earth, our Crooks On Patrol called COPs until we partner with The Order For World Peace of The HRTO Applicaion.  Afford me mild amusement with word-play, for having kept me in solitary confinement the past 16 months?

28. Dear government readers, we're on the same One Team.  I should hope you'll clue in soon that by opposing me, you do oppose World Peace, which means you advocate for World War III.  See the predicament?

29. Arrest psychiatrists The Inept Chief Witch-doctor Ms. Anjana Chawla who did bribe me to save her own hide with my release from her forced injections (had she thrown in a few million dollars, I might not have continued with the global psychiatric redress) AND Liar Liaqat Ali.

30. In learning how to fly, there is only wind to manage. 

31. From A Course In Miracles:

1) Text.4.IV.1.1 If you cannot hear the Voice for God, it is because you do not choose to listen. 2 That you do listen to the voice of your ego is demonstrated by your attitudes, your feelings and your behavior. 3 Yet this is what you want. 4 This is what you are fighting to keep, and what you are vigilant to save. 5 Your mind is filled with schemes to save the face of your ego, and you do not seek the face of Christ. 6 The glass in which the ego seeks to see its face is dark indeed. 7 How can it maintain the trick of its existence except with mirrors? 8 But where you look to find yourself is up to you.

2) Text.20.V.4.1 How can you estimate the worth of him who offers peace to you? 2 What would you want except his offering? 3 His worth has been established by his Father, and you will recognize it as you receive his Father's gift through him. 4 What is in him will shine so brightly in your grateful vision that you will merely love him and be glad. 5 You will not think to judge him, for who would see the face of Christ and yet insist that judgment still has meaning? 6 For this insistence is of those who do not see. 7 Vision or judgment is your choice, but never both of these.

3) Text.20.VI.5.1 The Holy Spirit's temple is not a body, but a relationship. 2 The body is an isolated speck of darkness; a hidden secret room, a tiny spot of senseless mystery, a meaningless enclosure carefully protected, yet hiding nothing. 3 Here the unholy relationship escapes reality, and seeks for crumbs to keep itself alive. 4 Here it would drag its brothers, holding them here in its idolatry. 5 Here it is "safe," for here love cannot enter. 6 The Holy Spirit does not build His temples where love can never be. 7 Would He Who sees the face of Christ choose as His home the only place in all the universe where it can not be seen?

4) Text.20.VI.6.1 You cannot make the body the Holy Spirit's temple, and it will never be the seat of love. 2 It is the home of the idolater, and of love's condemnation. 3 For here is love made fearful and hope abandoned. 4 Even the idols that are worshipped here are shrouded in mystery, and kept apart from those who worship them. 5 This is the temple dedicated to no relationships and no return. 6 Here is the "mystery" of separation perceived in awe and held in reverence. 7 What God would have not be is here kept "safe" from Him. 8 But what you do not realize is what you fear within your brother, and would not see in him, is what makes God seem fearful to you, and kept unknown.

32. I was born 2 March 1977.  Check the Chinese Zodiac.  There is more to Heaven and Earth than meets the eye.  In this place, there is not God.  There is remembering God to leave this wasteland.  Lucifer means light-bearer.

Follow Up 1 To: Privately Sworn Information To Commence A Proceeding At Barrie 20140708

1. Blog post title:

Follow Up 1 To: Privately Sworn Information To Commence A Proceeding At Barrie 20140708

 

By: Rene Helmerichs

Written: 9 July 2014

Blog: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com

 

 

2. Background:

 

Mr. Helmerichs considers it an honest pleasure to have spoken with Justice Of The Peace Mr. Brian Norton, who was initially reluctant to give his name for understandable reasons but did in turn assure there to be no reason not to mention his name since the conversations were recorded and he and Mr. Helmerichs spoke only truly on 8 July 2014 at Barrie.

 

The 8 July 2014 judicial submission was appended with printed copy of the 4 July 2014 blog post "Threat Of Reprisal By Psychiatrist Ms. A. Chawla To Her Unassuming Victim Rene Helmerichs" as well as the two referenced documents of crown attorney Ms. Katheryn Hull in the 8 July 2014 submission, and the contact information for Ms. A. Chawla from http://www.physiciandirectory.ca/phy.php?id=27747 and for Mr. Liaqat Ali from http://www.physiciandirectory.ca/phy.php?id=15659 .  Both links have prevented backspacing to this page; the reader is advised to "right-click: open-in-new-tab" for easier viewing.

 

Mr. Norton has not had a choice not to permit Mr. Rene Helmerichs to swear information alleging criminal offences against the mother of Mr. Helmerichs for expeditiously ending a custody battle that should never have legally begun.  It is understood that Mr. Helmerichs does NOT wish to see his mother, Ingrid Helmerichs, in custody.  Information specific to the Criminal Code Of Canada section 334 offence committed by Ingrid Helmerichs in October of 2012 was sworn on 8 July 2014.

 

 

3. Objective:

 

To have psychiatrists Mr. Liaqat Ali and Ms. Anjana Chawla charged and arrested for intentional abuse of authority recounted in the 8 July 2014 post "Privately Sworn Information To Commence A Proceeding At Barrie" subsequently entered as a legal court document in the swearing of information on 8 July 2014 at 11:45 hours before Justice Of The Peace Mr. Brian Norton at Barrie. 

 

 

4. Discrepancies Concerning Information Against The Psychiatrists:

 

The Honorable Mr. Norton has voiced reasonable concern over the matter of swearing information against two psychiatrists.  On 8 July 2014 at Barrie, Justice Of The Peace Mr. Norton:

 

1) was of the opinion that Ms. Anjana Chawla and Mr. Liaqat Ali are to be deemed recognized experts at the Royal Victoria Hospital review board hearings of 2012 despite Mr. Ali having knowingly, and with intent to deceive, submitted fraudulent misrepresentations of fact contravening Criminal Code section 361(2);

 

2) did express uncertainty that opinions of experts presented at tribunal hearings weigh more than the opinions of those against whom psychiatrists argue at those tribunal hearings;

 

3) did believe there to be a medical review board or some sort of tribunal process in place specifically to address and redress abuses of authority committed by Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario represented by officials of any of Her Ministries, particularly that of Health;

 

4) did remind Mr. Helmerichs that, as an independent law enforcement agency, the onus rests with Mr. Helmerichs to demonstrate merits for arresting two socially established individuals in more than a frivolous or otherwise superficial manner.

 

For due diligence and good practise of law, The Honourable Justice Of The Peace Mr. Norton has effectively requested of Mr. Helmerichs to present the case in such a light so as to leave no doubt and only reassurance that all discrepancies are understandably resolved.  This entails a measure of context for law not included with the first submission to begin the criminal proceedings.  The case shall be presented in the blog post titled The Canadian Charter Of Rights Section ONE Breach At The City Of Barrie summarized below.

 

 

5. Summary Of The Canadian Charter Of Rights Section ONE Breach At The City Of Barrie, Canada

 

With respect to the listed discrepancies:

 

1) Individuals who profess health to originate from an external substance of any kind cannot be experts for well-being of any kind as they do subtly prescribe only addiction to the substances for which they momentarily advocate with personally vested monetary interest.  This is specifically described in the section The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms Unlawful Section ONE Breach At The City Of Barrie.  With direct respect to the unlawful conduct of psychiatrists Mr. Liaqat Ali and Ms. Anjana Chawla from 3 Sept. 2012 until 28 Nov. 2012, contesting the psychiatric use of Criminal Code Of Canada, C.C., section 299 defined defamatory libel publicating, C.C. section 361 false pretences, C.C. section 264 criminal harassment, C.C. section 264.1 uttering threats, C.C. section 265 assault, C.C. section 219 defined criminal negligence with respect to C.C. section 215(1)(c) extending The Charter section 7, C.C. section 423 defined intimidation, C.C. section 120 defined bribery, and C.C. section 131 perjury for the their engineered Criminal Code section 319 defined public incitement of hatred necessary to maintain their Criminal Code section 2 defined mental disorder at committing Crimes Against Humanity And War Crimes Act section 4(3) according to the Criminal Code section 269.1 definition of Torture as any act causing severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, without lawful sanction noted by the various criminal code infractions of Mr. Ali and Ms. Chawla in their delusions of grandeur circumventing the fact of equal rights, contesting the psychiatric incorporation of criminal code offences in place to maintain law and order does negate the very opinion that a recognized expert is to be assumed law abiding and requires the experts to be charged without further recognition given to their fraudulent expert status;

 

2) Specifically with respect to expert testimony at Charter section 11(d) public tribunal hearings, The Superior Court Of Justice at Barrie has, both in its common Family Court practices and verbatim from a Court memorandum read to the court record on 16 June 2014 for the trial of Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario versus Mr. Rene Helmerichs, court file C13-205-SR, stated, on page 14 for item 123,

"When a party calls an expert as a witness, the party must first establish that the expert has the right training and experience to give an opinion on a particular subject.  This is done in the absence of the jury by asking the expert about his or her education, qualification and work in the area."

The fact that an expert must first be established as an expert AT the hearing, requires equal input from both parties for which the hearing is in place.  This ensures that no expert who vexatious seeks to circumvent the law in his or her common routine practice can be called upon as an expert in a court of law.

 

3) Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario is subject to The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms not differently than any other corporation or individual defined as a person with gender in The Interpretation Act Of Canada.  As such, hearing for exclusive or special practise seeking to delay, impede, or dissuade from the legal right of a Canadian Citizen desiring not to delay the restoration of law but to commence a criminal proceeding with privately sworn information, is rendered itself also a contravention of The Charter section One not possible for exclusion under The Charter section 33 vexatious circumvention rule because medical review boards and tribunal processes are not in place to commence a criminal proceeding with privately sworn information.

 

4) Mr. Helmerichs accepts responsibility that, as an independent law enforcement agency, he must demonstrate the merits for arresting two socially established individuals in more than a frivolous or otherwise superficial manner and submits The Canadian Charter Of Rights Section ONE Breach At The City Of Barrie specifically for this reason.

 

 

Mr. Norton was inspired to offer Mr. Helmerichs his personal 2014 Martin's Annual Criminal Code Judicial Edition Canada Law Book published by Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd.  Mr. Helmerichs cannot express the full extent of his appreciation to The Honourable Mr. Brian Norton for his kindness and assistance to see the law restored at The City Of Barrie. 

 

The Canadian Charter Of Rights Section ONE Breach At The City Of Barrie shall be based entirely on verbatim Superior Court Of Canada courtroom legal reference book guidelines stated in Martin's 2014 and supported with caselaw for the proper administration of justice in Canada specifically to reassure all attorneys acting on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario represented by officials for Her Ministry Of The Attorney General with veto authority over privately sworn information of Mr. Rene Helmerichs that to veto THIS information is for them to openly, recklessly, and with full knowledge of legally prescribed repercussions, commit the offence of Criminal Code Of Canada section 131 Perjury.

 

Privately Sworn Information To Commence A Proceeding At Barrie

Privately Sworn Information To Commence A Proceeding At Barrie

By: Rene Helmerichs

Written: 7 July 2014

Blog: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com

Submitted: 8 July 2014 to The Office Of The Justice Of The Peace at the Barrie Courthouse

The Particulars

Sworn Information recounts particulars against:

Ms. Ingrid Helmerichs

psychiatrist Ms. A. Chawla

psychiatrist Mr. Liqat Ali

crown attorney Ms. Katheryn Hull

and several more by extension.

I was referred to the Justice Of The Peace by:  Police [_]  Crown [_]  Lawyer [X]

Other [_] _____________________

Have the police investigated this matter:  No [X]  Yes [_]  Occurrence Number: ___________________

Have you filed a statement of allegations regarding this matter with a Justice Of The Peace previously:  No [X]  Yes [_]  When:  Throughout Criminal Court file C13-205-SR but not specifically separately.

If your answer is yes to the previous question, are you now providing additional material for consideration:  No [_]  Yes [_]

Your statement of allegations in support of a charge:

I WILL SAY

1. From 3 Sept. to 30 Oct. 2012 I was held against my will inside Royal Victoria Hospital, RVH, at Barrie.  Barrie police detectives Tanya Lynch and Troy Armstrong warned me to cease and desist from sending email to senior Mormon ministers of the Barrie congregation of The Mormon Community Of Christ on 1 Sept. 2012.  I had commenced lawfully sanctioned Criminal Code Of Canada section 315 Publicating in good faith for redress of a wrong done to myself and the public at large by The Community Of Christ fraudulent Good Sense Budgeting tithing workshop of 21 April 2012.  The workshop contravenes Deuteronomy 14:22-28, but moreso, the co-pastors had put my Georgian College teaching position at work for having deceived me to think that it was a year-end tax advice workshop similar to that which was had the previous year in their apartment.

2. On 3 Sept. 2012 I directly challenged the authority of local police to intervene in church affairs.  I sent one more email to a hundred or so random recipients including many news email addresses, everything was done by email specifically for its record.  I was only then informed that, whom I believe to have been their former treasurer, was threatening to press criminal harassment charges against me personally.  The local minister had compounded the allegations with allegations of his own and I was promptly arrested under The Mental Health Act, escorted for detention at RVH, and denied The Constitution Of Canada section 11(d) right to be presumed innocent of a criminal offence until proven guilty in a fair and public manner by an impartial tribunal.  Instead, the Criminal Code section 16(1) presumption of mental fitness was also sidelined and I was left to prove myself to be without a mental disorder.

3. To my dismay, not only had members of The Mormon Community Of Christ begun a fabrication of claims, but my explicit written statement of 3 Sept. 2012 in the email attachment titled The Good News Is Here sent also to Barrie City Police, but not permitted for me to admit at the recent trial finally addressing the criminal allegations against me, was intentionally misconstrued.  I had explicitly stated that I was a voice for God with the direct implication that I am one of many as we are all equally forever with the all-inclusive not definable state.  Psychiatrist Mr. Liqat Ali did at RVH on 4 Sept. 2012 accuse me of believing that I were God despite my adamant insistence to him that he has intentionally read something into my email that is not actually there and certainly not something I can claim.

4. Mr. Ali extended the psychiatric form under which I was arbitrarily detained, contravening section 9 of The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms and therewith The Constitution Of Canada for which It is Part I.  On about 18 Sept. 2012 I took part in the first of three Review Board hearings held at RVH to contest the detention imparted me by Mr. Ali.  I obtained a lawyer, Mr. David Northcott, and sat attentively listening to Mr. Ali convince the hearing committee attended by RVH senior lawyer Ms. June Bell, ancient community member Janice Laking, and a supervising psychiatrist.  To my utter disbelief, Mr. Ali fraudulently stated that I believed I could fly while implying it to be a trick of some means not assisted with due science.  Criminal Code section 361(2) is used for the definition of fraud.  Mr. Ali laughed at me following the review board hearing; he said something to the effect of, "Of course I know you once held a commercial pilot's licence, but the hearing panel members don't."  I couldn't believe my ears.

5. To my recollection, I was denied the right to redress the six counts of offences of Mr. Ali contravening Criminal Code section 132 Perjury.  A second count is his insistence that I have somewhere or somewhen said that I believed I were God in someway other than to explicitly make clear that I am an equal member in and of God just as every of us is.

6. I gave oath to Mr. Ali to see his medial licences revoked.  He was quick to pass me onto his supervisor Ms. A. Chawla who then took it upon herself to repeatedly harass me about the alleged criminal offences and pastor claims which she considered to be fact.  At no time did an honest conversation occur with Ms. A. Chawla who kept repeating "I am expert in mind" and implying her witchcraft to be somehow justified.  And expert in mind DOES obey the commonly agreed Constitution and all written consistent laws.

7. Not ever having been in a situation quite as I was, locked into a hospital, denied all supportive visitors, denied all access to the internet and all access to any other normal means of reassurance for my own mental sanity and emotional well-being, I began to hand-write letters that Fan-Xiu, a longtime friend visiting from Taiwan from 20 Sept 2012 to 19 Oct. 2012 for the specific purpose of entering a longtime conjugal relationship with me, did agree to type, post online, and send to any and every person of whom we could think in the hopes of finding sense amidst the psychiatric tyranny.

8. Following my one and only one day-pass excursion on Thanksgiving Sunday 7 Oct. 2012, my mother, Ingrid Helmerichs, did hide my computer from Fan-Xiu upon the behest of Ms. Chawla who by action and direct statement indicated that I should somehow not stand up for my rights because, in her view, I was not able to pass the operating mind test of The Criminal Code.

9. The official Barrie courtroom reference book for law, Martin's Criminal Code 2013, states on page 1817 in the annotations to section 7 of The Charter Of Rights:

"The operating mind test includes a limited mental component which requires that the accused has sufficient cognitive capacity to understand what he is saying and what is said.  This includes the ability to understand a caution that the evidence can be used against the accused.  The same standard applies ... in determining whether a mentally ill accused has the mental capacity to make an active choice: R. v. Whittle, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 914, 92 C.C.C. (3d) 11, 32 C.R. (4th) 1."

10.  Ms. Chawla has convinced my mother that I am irreparably without an operating mind.  Despite being deemed a fit father by The Simcoe County Children's Aid Society in February of 2013, I am not to be permitted near the son whom I've helped raise from birth and for whom I did have sole custody prior to the second arrest instigated to redress the first arrest.  There is currently a family court case, file FC13-416-00, in the Superior Court Of Justice at Barrie as a result of this matter and it is specifically for this very matter that I refuse to further play the games of psychiatric babble every lawyer encountered seems so far to follow so happily blindly.

11. This willsay is to serve the purpose of evidencing necessary grounds to charge Ms. A. Chawla with the criminal offence of Uttering Threats and, ultimately, either with adduced statement or formal Crown Attorney investigation (when they finally get their act together), the offence of Criminal Code section 269.1 Torture for the severe mental AND physical suffering caused as a direct result of unlawful discrimination contravening The Human Rights Code Of Ontario by official representatives of The Ministry Of Health of Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario.  This charge is absolutely necessary for me to obtain the requested orders of The Human Rights Application filed 29 April 2014 with The Human Rights Tribunal to restore justice amid the blatant Charter section ONE breach of dignity, respect, and responsibility bestowed myself at others in psychiatric wards all throughout Ontario.

12. While I was detained at RVH, I gave Fan-Xiu Hsiao, known also as Lindsay, use of my computer to assist me to attempt to figure my way out of the RVH Criminal Code section 279.1 Hostage-taking situation in 2012.  My mother took it upon herself to deprive Fan-Xiu of my computer by hiding my computer and causing Fan-Xiu such fear that Fan-Xiu elected to shorten her stay with the hope that she could be of more assistance to us from Taiwan.

13. My mother does not recognize the illegality of her position.  My mother simply does not realize that it is not up to her to manipulate other people by intentionally depriving them of their property mere because she thinks something ought to be done or not done for or to them without actually listening to what the individual, upon whom the help is forced, is able to accept.

14. From the period of at least 9 Oct. 2012 to 19 Oct. 2012, Ingrid Helmerichs did deprive Fan-Xiu and myself, Rene Helmerichs, the use of my personal computer in contravention of Criminal Code sections 328 and 322 Theft.  I do not desire my mother to be explicitly charged or placed into custody, however my mother does seem rather unable to find common sense necessitating the very swearing of this information before a Justice Of The Peace for social assistance.  I am tired of arguing over assumptions and false presumptions.  My mother has a home prepared in Germany and, I do hope, will be permitted to depart the country expeditiously before a summons is issued for her arrest?  She has sufficiently other family to assist her with packing of her belongings after she has expeditiously departed the country.  I have stated furthered grounds for further criminal charges to the record of the family court matter on 15 May 2013. 

15. Case in point with respect to my mother, just today 7 July 2014 my son and I walked to the dollar store to buy a container for iron filings that we searched recently with a magnet, as a fun activity, in sand near the driveway and at the beach.  My mother insisted I buy only one container.  When my son and I returned with two, two that my son both liked and to keep the beach filings separate from the road filings, a 34 cent salt shaker with plastic lid and one dollar little mental turn-top container, my mother became upset.  How, with my own $1.34, my own son, and only joy, can someone possibly find grounds to fault me for breaking her commandment that I was to buy just one?  Only the insane argue with insanity. 

16. For irrefutable evidence of the Criminal Code section 328 contravention by Ingrid Helmerichs, I offer her own words.  The following excerpt from about the 38th minute of voice file 20121122_Voice0608_with_Chawla recorded in an open-door meeting at RVH between my mother, myself, and two others:

Rene: Oh Mom, I write a blog [post] every other day or every three days maybe--

Ingrid: Or did Lindsay help you with that?

Rene: She helped me when I was in the hospital.

Ingrid: That's another reason to--

Rene: No.

Ingrid: ...to take the computer away from her.

The voice file is available for public download from https://www.dropbox.com/s/wlvojm4pd4a9ajb/20121122_Voice0608_with_Chawla.amr

and a more complete transcript is provided the public in the 4 July 2014 blog post "Partial Transcript Of Voice File 20121122_Voice0608" available at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com

18. With respect to psychiatrist Ms. A. Chawla and her unlawful threat of reprisal contravening Criminal Code section 265 Uttering Threats constituting blatant medical malpractice personally served me until 28 Nov. 2012 when I had the last of her forced injections into my thigh, after hearing her barter with me to release me from the injections to lower a blog of defamatory evidence of her actions, criminally the offence of bribery, I offer direct statement from Ms. Chawla on 26 Oct. 2012:

Rene: So, if I go to a hearing then our deal for next weekend is out?

Chawla: Ya, because the--you're showing me that I can't trust the process we've spent the last whatever time discussing.  [We hadn't been discussing a process.  I'd been constantly challenging the tyranny of having been arbitrarily detained since the first hearing with Mr. Ali.]

Rene: Is that a threat?

Chawla: Is it?  Ya, I guess, in a way.

The voice file is available for public download from https://www.dropbox.com/s/rib9h7atvivyp9q/20121026_Voice0596_at_RVH.amr

and a more complete transcript is provided the public in the 4 July 2014 blog post " Threat Of Reprisal By Psychiatrist Ms. A. Chawla To Her Unassuming Victim Rene Helmerichs" available at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com

19. The public is reminded that a threat, to lawfully be construed as a threat under the criminal code section 265 definition (I hope I got that section right, it's near there if not exactly 265), does NOT need to be given expressly in words and can be given in gestures or other statements so long as there is reasonably threat of harm intended to the recipient of the individual claiming to have been threatened.  I assure the reader that, had I been able or permitted to record more closed-door psychiatric sessions (Fan-Xiu slipped me my cell phone in a parting hug exceptionally permitted by Ms. Chawla who had denied me all supportive visitors in her fraudulent administration of healthcare) I would have solid evidence of much greater and much more severe threats involving removing Sunjay from my custody.  Ms. Chawla made certain to remind me of her intent to see this happen at each of our supposedly "therapeutic" visits. 

20. A duplicate of the 26 Oct 2012 audio recording transcript is included with submission of this willsay for context of the charge and subsidiary evidence found in the 14 Nov 2012 and 22 Nov 2012 audio recordings leading to the Criminal Code section 120 offence of Bribery committed by Ms. A. Chawla thereafter.  Bribery is evidenced in my abrupt released from the forced injections before the normal 30-day community treatment order requirement for all patients having required hospitalization for more than 30 consecutive days and well in advance of the anticipated years Ms. Chawla had otherwise stated to me that anticipate being with them.  It is absolutely imperative that this woman be formally charged and held accountable for her continual abuse of authority.

21. Finally, in this initial commencement for Criminal proceedings by a privately sworn information, there is the matter of the Criminal Code section 132 Perjury offences of psychiatrist Mr. Liqat Ali.  The necessary evidence is in the transcripts of the first review board hearing.  Legal Aid Lawyer David Northcott was present at that hearing and did not return to me the submissions of Mr. Ali.  These submissions do also witness to further charges of Criminal Code section 299 Defamatory Libel Publicating against Mr. Ali.  With respect to the hearing transcript, I had contacted a second criminal lawyer and a personal injury lawyer following my release from the injections in 2012.  Both lawyers declined involvement and prompted me to the more creative endeavour of using the threat of a criminal charge from the Mormons against them to have a charge pressed against me whereby I naively expected to be able to redress this matter in open public court.

22. Unbeknownst to me at the time, in March 2013 when I intentionally harassed the complainant of the charge having become Superior Court file C13-205-SR presently beginning its appeal stage on solid grounds of errors in law filed already in The Court on 30 June 2014 but dismissed by the prejudice trial judge who, himself, was not in a position of legal authority to dismiss an application for mistrial, I had thought the court system of Canada was fair.  I've admitted to being naive.

23. In The Superior Court Of Justice at Barrie on 6 Dec. 2013 for court file C13-205-SR, I did specifically request the hearing transcripts of the review board hearings held at RVH in 2012.  The presiding judge ordered all hearings relevant to the then submitted Charter section 11(b) application. 

24. Martin's Criminal Code 2013 does specifically state on page 1844 under the annotations for section 11 of The Charter:

"However, even a private, domestic or disciplinary matter can fall within this section if it involves the imposition of true penal consequences, namely, imprisonment or a fine which by its magnitude would appear to be imposed for the purpose of redressing the wrong done to society at large rather than to the maintenance of internal discipline within the limited sphere: R. v. Wigglesworth, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 541, 37 C.C.C. (3d) 385."

25. Martin's Criminal Code 2013 does specifically state on page 1845 under the annotations for section 11(b) of The Charter that

"A person is only charged with an offence within the meaning of s. 11 when an information is sworn against him alleging an offence or where a direct indictment is laid against him when no information is sworn."

26. Barrie police detective Brian Read did in his General Occurrence Report BA12042846 Threats@2012/09/03 11:12  state:

"In the e-mail that HELMERICHS sent out on September 3rd 2012, HELMERICHS does make reference to YEWCHYN several times, he talks about wanting to be with in a Viper (motor vehicle) and describes in an inappropriate manner areas in which he would like to kiss on YEWCHYN.  YEWCHYN inquired about laying a charge of Criminal Harassment against HELMERICHS.

READ explained to YEWCHYN that it was apparent that HELMERICHS was suffering from a mental disorder and that he was now confined to the RVH for assessment."

27. Unfortunately, in precisely that one e-mail sent specifically to challenge the corruption for justice at Barrie, I had made NOT such remarks about Ms. Yewchyn.  The report by Brian Read is a fraudulent document unless he is able to verify that I did.  I have posted a direct link to the 92-page attachment titled The Good News Is Here on the 4 July 2014 blog post "List Of Voice Files As Evidence For The Superior Court Of Canada File C13-205-SR And Derivative Human Rights Tribunal Of Ontario Application" at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com for media to verify.

28. Understandably, the superior court did not permit the report of Brian Read to be entered into evidence for my defence at the trial despite Officer Lori McIlravey directly referencing that report in her testimony on about 18 June 2014 and the direct statement of the presiding judge Mr. Mulligan to the jury that they would receive that report.

29. The report verifies that statement of crown attorney Ms. Katheryn Hull in a letter dated 1 April 2014 wherein she explicitly writes "6. The Crown will continue to provide transcripts of proceedings" to my continued request for ALL transcripts for this matter, including the ENTIRE bail proceedings transcript of 21 Oct. 2013 and the transcripts of 22 and 25 July 2013, all of which I have been repeatedly denied despite several more requests, is perjurous and contravening Criminal Code section 132 as well.

30. Ms. Hull did give other potentially perjurous statements in a Book Of Authorities response to my Charter section 9 application.  The Charter section 9 application is found in paragraphs 16 to 18 of blog post "Avoiding A Superior Court Of Justice Canada Mistrial" posted at www.luciferchristforworldpeace.blogspot.tw .  The false statements of Ms. Hull are specifically in paragraph 7 on page 2 of her book:

"On February 10, 2014 the Applicant [Mr. Helmerichs] appeared in court again without counsel.  [I WAS SELF-REPRESENTED.]  The Respondent [the acting crown attorney] suggested bail terms to which the Applicant would not agree.  [THIS STATEMENT IS FALSE UNLESS THE COURTROOM AUDIO RECORD CAN REVEAL OTHERWISE.]  At that time the Applicant was subject to a Form 1 in any event.  The matter was adjourned February 21, 2014 so that counsel could attend.  [I WAS SELF-REPRESENTED.]"

and continued in paragraph 8 on page 2:

"On February 21, 2014 the Applicant again attended without counsel.  The matter was put over from time to time and addressed again on March 17, 2014.  [I WAS SELF-REPRESENTED AND BRUSHED ASIDE.]"

and continued in paragraph 9 on page 2:

"On that day the Applicant attended with counsel subsequently [PREVIOUSLY] appointed to conduct the cross-examination of the complainant.  On this day the Applicant expressly declined to bring an application for bail having been informed that a [psychiatric] Form 1 had been signed. [FALSE.]"

31. Crown attorney Ms. Katheryn Hull did repeatedly commit the Criminal Code offence of section 132 Perjury as her statements were submitted to The Superior Court Of Justice.  Her paragraph 9 comment is specifically vexatious because I had repeated stated that The Superior Court Criminal Rules Of Justice, rule 20.05 (1), requires

"The notice of application in Form 1 under rule 20.03 shall be accompanied by: ... (d) where the applicant seeks to review an order earlier made, a transcript of the proceedings on the judicial interim release hearing under section 515 or 522 of the Code, as the case may be, and of previous review proceedings, if any, taken before a justice or judge;"

And that by endorsement of 3 February 2013, having required a formal bail review application to be submitted, I am required and rightfully to receive the 6 Dec. 2013 ordered 21Oct. 2013 bail proceedings transcript inclusive of MY testimony under oath to the justice AND the reading of the synopsis by the crown, neither of which has to this day on 7 July 2014 been provided.

32. Thus we see that the crown attorney at Barrie is very much responsible for obtaining the transcripts of the RVH hearing of 2012 for, in all honesty, not having conducted any amount of legitimate legal practice the entire duration of the Superior Court case begun 2 March 2013 and now to be appealed all to redress the 2012 hospital contravention of Charter section 9, the right NOT to be arbitrarily detained, for email send to The Mormon Community Of Christ in Barrie and senior ministers Kris Judd, Carmen Thompson, and Tim Stanlick in the United States, to redress the fraud of their Good Sense Budgeting tithing workshop contravening Deuteronomy 14:22-28.  The invoice tendered 30 Aug. 2012 to that church for a Dodge Viper, and other high-ticket toys, is legal according to Deuteronomy 15:8 and stated reasons in the 15 May 2013 sworn affidavit placed to The Superior Court Of Canada Family Court file FC13-416-00 and copied, as best as possible, for convience of the media to blog post "The Summery" at:

www.luciferchristforworldpeace.blogspot.com

33. Going forward, if the Mormons are arrested and the crowns are willing to work with me, I'll refrain from swearing more information.  I do expect the Human Rights Application orders to be fully granted.  Information was sworn against the Mormons at the bail proceedings of 21 Oct. 2013.  Let us expeditiously undue the guilty verdict entered 30 June 2014 and resulting probation order for grounds please review the 7 July 2014 blog post "Application For Mistrial In Court Case C13-205-SR" at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com

34. Cooperation is appreciated.  All of psychiatry is notedly fraudulent, nevermind the fact that its founding premise of thought originating in the brain, or anywhere else in body, is completely incorrect.

TOP News Story Of ALL Time

Post Title:

TOP News Story Of ALL Time

It's a bit lengthy, but well worth the read and follow up.  It is a summary for the purpose of this blog and continued in the post: Incompetence Of The Superior Court Of Canada

What happened?  Where did it happen?  Who did it happen to?

The outcome is The Choice offered.

By: Rene Helmerichs

Written: 6 July 2014

Blogs:

(4) www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com (4 July 2014 and ongoing)

(This is Blog 4.  The Superior Court has requested the Mormon treasure not to be specifically identified by name in this blog.)

(3) www.luciferchristforworldpeace.blogspot.tw (March 2013 to July 2014)

(The Superior Court is NOT a court of competent jurisdiction to order the name of the specifically identified Mormon treasurer to be excluded by this blog as this blog is neither in Canada, nor maintained by Rene Helmerichs.)

(2) www.renehelmerichs.blogspot.com (8 Jan 2013 to 2 March 2013)

(This is the blog that The Superior Court Of Canada would not permit to be submitted, in full, as evidence for the defence of Rene Helmerichs at his criminal trial instigated to redress crimes recounted in Blog 1)

(1) www.renehelmerichs2.blogspot.com (Sept 2012 to November 2012)

(This is Blog 1.  It is better rephrased in the voice transcript of 26 Oct. 2012 posted 4 July 2014 on Blog 4.)

1. This is written in the first-person.  I am Rene Helmerichs.  What follows is a brief recount of my story life from 2010 to July 2014 having witnessed me enter a mental ward, loose a reputable college position, pass the Ontario Ministry Of Transportation school bus road test, and then spent 16 months in jail for the same allegations having resulted in the mental ward stay only to find the jury prejudiced by the Superior Court judge and no one in the world to care, yet.

2. I was a teacher of Workplace Communication at Skills Georgian College in Barrie.  I met Irina Swain through a class in late 2010 and she in turn introduced me to her husband Matthew Swain.  Mr. and Ms. Swain are co-pastors for The Barrie Congregation Of The Mormon Community Of Christ, in Barrie since 1927 and 40 or so more countries.

4. In January of 2012 I had requested to be taken off The Mormon email list.  By the end of April 2012 they had deceived me to market a Good Sense Budgeting Workshop claiming it to be tax-tip advice beneficial to the accounting-related participants I taught at Georgian.  They were well aware of my express desire not to tithe to their church and knew I was instead devoting my own finances to facilitating The Barrie Area A Course In Miracles Study Group (Dec. 2011-June 2012).

5. Unfortunately, Darlene Hintzen of Positive Pathways then at 40 Belfarm Road, offered her space to the study group and The Mormons, and soon enough she too was involved in this argument over money.  Darlene, ultimately, kept effectively all donations of every of the more than 30 members of the study group gave to the pot that she put on the table and keep watch over (she gave me a $10 discount on a painting once as my share).  Under sections 328 and 322 the actions of Darlene are the offence of Theft.  I'm not sure that she stole from The Mormons.

6. The 21 April 2012 Good Sense workshop was the demise of my normal happy relating to The Mormons.  They had lied to me in whatever their false belief of Christ.  At the time I had also made plans to leave Georgian College at the end of my teaching contract on 31 March 2013.  I am developing an idea for a charity and book marketing platform.  I'd heard a story about a guy who in 2012 wrote a book about relative interactions and conversations with people on a bus, and became an instant success.  It seems memoirs and reality shows are the way to go to ensure popularity.

7. On 30 August 2012 I antagonized senior Mormon ministers Kris Judd, Carmon Thompson through Ms. Judd, and Tim Stanlick with an invoice for a Dodge Viper sports car according to Deuteronomy 15:8.  My own car had died and the name Dodge Viper is to remind me to dodge the snakes and vipers of Canada's courtrooms.  Conversely, one could also call me a snake and that I am to be dodged.  In any event, the sports car is a perfect match and rightfully owed to me :)

8. As one ought now be able to tell, I'm still at this.  Police didn't know what to do with me so they brought me to the mental ward where I stated detained from 3 Sept 2012 to 30 Oct. 2012.  On the surface this may seems just and right but according to the annotations to The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms in the official Barrie courtroom copy of Martin's Criminal Code 2013, sections 9, 7, 2b, 15, and 11d were violated in the process.  I was released only with forced injections into my thigh and threat that the police would use force to retrieve me if I did not return willingly.

9. On 22 Nov. 2012 psychiatrist Ms. A. Chawla at Royal Victory Hospital, RVH, in Barrie made the pact with me to to remove me from all community treatment orders, including the injection, that I could demonstrate to her my normal behaviour free from injections.  She stated concern of character defame to her person and used the lowering of my blog as a bargaining chip.  This is recounted in a partial transcript of the 22 Nov 2012 recorded conversation both available in 4 July 2014 posts on this blog.  Ms. Chawla did unlawfully contravene Criminal Code Of Canada section 120 Bribery.

10. Barrie police seemed unwilling to help me press charges of criminal harassment to Ms. Chawla.  It seemed lawyers were also unwilling to help.  I contacted both a criminal and personal injury lawyer.  Having little emotional self-esteem left upon release from the secretly conducted Criminal Code section 269.1 defined Torture at RVH under supervision of Ms. Chawla, I opted for a more creative way to redress this.

11. Thus far, my writings to The Mormons had been legally permitted under Criminal Code section 315 Publicating in good faith for redress of wrong done to the public via the fraudulent Mormon workshop.  The workshop directly contravenes the tithing principles recounting in Deuteronomy 14:22-28 NKJV.

12. The treasurer, or whom I believe to have been the treasure, claimed that I had been criminally harassing her while Matthew Swain claimed that a picture of my son with 3 mosquito bites constituted grounds to launch a Children's Aid Of Simcoe County investigation.  Irina Swain corroborated the story and the combined effect was that I was declared "of harm to myself or others" and able to be, simply, locked into a psychiatric ward without the due process of a proper, fair, and public criminal trial by which to determine whether or not there was even guilt!

13. In March of 2013 I elected to take the treasurer up on her threats to press a criminal charge as no Christian church can begin court proceedings and still consider themselves Christian for violating The Book Of Matthew 5:25 and 7:1-3 NKJV.  I intentionally severely harassed the treasurer without really actually harassing her at all.  I emailed and blogged, onto the second blog of this story, several obscure and bizarre statements, some pages in length, to be arrested. 

14. The intent in March of 2013 was that I then use the bulk of the second blog that did not contain harassment in court of law to redress the psychiatric wrong done to me atop the Mormon wrong that kicked everything off.  My statements of March 2013 are legally protected under Criminal Code Of Canada sections 315 and 269.1.  Given the extent of the medical malpractice and abuse of authority to my person, there are several Canadian Charter Of Rights sections that also apply, specifically, section ONE which ordinarily requires individuals to be treated with dignity, decency, and the basic respect afforded the best of every other human being.

15. On 2 March 2013 I was arrested and from 3 March 2013 to 30 June 2014 I was keep at Ontario Ministry Of Community Safety And Correction Services, MCSCS, Central-North Corrections Center, CNCC, Penetang, the superjail in Penetanguishene, Ontario, Canada.

16. From 16-27 June 2014 I finally had a trial.  It was a full jury trial.  And, it was a full jury psychiatrist-backed, crown-prejudiced, judge-complacent trial.  There was nothing fair about it.  I was denied the right to bring forth any psychiatric evidence on grounds of the 2 May 2014 judge ruling that he, Mr. Mulligan at Barrie, somehow felt psychiatric evidence didn't apply to the indictment period of 31 May 2012 to 2 March 2013 for my first ever criminal offence, one count of criminal harassment, section 264(b) of The Criminal Code.

17. Realistically, had the court permitted me to put psychiatrists on the stand in the witness box, to speak under oath, I would have torn them to proverbial pieces.  Psychiatrists know absolutely nothing about mind and do only harm in prescribing pills and medications for mental health.  The proverbial Tower Of Babble that IS psychiatry extends beyond all boards into all countries where there exists a television set to spew the cultural subterfuge that psychiatrists, especially forensic psychiatrists, know anything at all about law or mind.

18. The crown attorney Ms. Hull brought me an XL Tim Horton's coffee on 27 June 2014.  She did not wish to be publically thanked for this.  I'm unsure why on other someone would NOT wish to be thanked, ever.  Ms. Hull fears reprisal of her employers for believing that she was not permitted to give me a coffee?  Psychiatrically, paranoia indicates mental unwellness.  I was not paranoid to accept and drink the gift from my legal opposition before the second half of the court proceedings and my opposition was not paranoid to give a gift of only wellness: this is kindness, likeness. 

19. Paranoia originates in the belief that an imaginary supervisor, or a supervisor of a supervisor, or imaginary supervisor thereof, somewhere way above despite all equality, has the power to fire someone for a random act of kindness.  My friends, this is the belief of insanity and can only be stopped by placing one guy, one fully public guy, at the very top of the incomprehensible tower of babble so that ALL IN THE TOWER can ever ensure that THAT one guy is fully known to them.  Only in this way can everyone rest with perfect mental sanity because everyone can verify, for themselves, that THAT one guy is ever being consistent, and all consistency lends only to constancy, the only state of mental sanity.  See?

20. The churches in their tithing campaigns have only been furthering the state of mental disassociation.  They have, according to the tithing principles of Deuteronomy 14:22-28 NKJV, declared themselves as LORD without recognizing that the lord our God is ONE.  That means that while there is more than one top decision maker in any religious organization, and the public is to note that all Canadian charities must have a least three members on the top board of directors, there cannot be a One God expressed by the religious organization.  Thus, all registered Christian churches are, literally, fraudulent AND solely in service to the anit-Christ, Satan.

21. Now let's look at Satan.  In this world we have compassion and logic.  Think of Spock on Star Trek.  Think of the robots that are just beginning to be developed.  They will, one day, have the capacity to self-evolve.  By definition, they will be alive.  But they will be entirely logic-based and ever seeking to understand emotion.  Emotion is actually the pulling of one aspect of self in the opposite direction of where another aspect of self desires to go.  The phrases "over emotional" and "don't be so emotional" express the pains of the physical drive to copulate with the mental drive to unite in likeness.  Bodies, simply, do not join.  They can fit together like puzzle pieces for brief moments of time, but they do not actually join.  For two of the same sex to seek each other for sex is to confuse the whole learning point of life and declare both in need of psychiatric re-programming.  Russian President Putin is absolutely correct in his 2013 comment to "leave the kids out of it", referencing publicly displayed same-sex propaganda in potential sight of children.  The phrase "You are what you eat" refers ONLY to the mental sphere of an individual such that every bit of television nonsense advertising same-sex sexual relationships in any way (even if one does consider it a psychological male turn-on to see two attractive women making out) is still only "garbage in, garbage out."  Enough said on that point.

22. Satan is the logic structure of the world.  It is the scope and scape so large that we call "The System".  It is heartless from our shallower emotional views.  Ultimately, however, all emotion and all logic structures are not real.  Reality is IN relationships AS likeness because Reality is whole.  Reality cannot be divided.  The attempt to divide reality is the very thing driving this entire universe of time and space.  None of it is actually real, but in the state of relatively with which we're momentarily faced, there are certainly real choices that need to be made.

23. The Canadian Government knows that I've been actively promoting myself as Lucifer Christ since the sworn affidavit of Family Court file FC-13-416 at Barrie on 15 May 2013.  The document is available to the public.  I partially typed version by Fan-Xiu Hsiao is available on the third blog of this story: www.luciferchristforworldpeace.blogspot.tw

24. The Canadian Government knows that I have, at no point, been joking.  I have been dead serious the entire time.  I SEEK WORLD PEACE.  They could have partnered a long time ago.  Instead, they actively promote the idea of WORLD WAR.  Which would YOU like?  This is The Choice Amidst The Argument In The Business Of Being Happy, that reality book I began writing to market the charity Talk To Dream with first of each month New Goal Day to become a charity dwarfing even Movember.  Of course, The Canadian Charities Directorate sent back my idea in May 2012 and told me to scale it down.  The Choice is YOURS.

25. I claim to be walking The Book Of Revelation.  I can't say I'm the second coming.  For all I know, I'm the first.  I don't recall my birth but the baby pictures my Mom has of me do rather seem to indicate that my body came from her.  I recognize I am NOT my body.  I am a logic program driving a body that is itself a bunch of organically expressed logic subroutines reeling in pain when they are not continually fed and nourished.  Most of the time, I prefer not to think like that and simply look around at a world of colourful moving pictures, other aspects of our one mind lost in confusion of how we got to be in the mess that we currently are.  Some, like Steven Hawking, have put forth ideas to sway multitudes of masses without realizing they've missed the whole point of why they are with a wheel chair.  A strong will is necessarily impeded throughout its physical sojourn so that it will not be an overly destructive influence on the weaker wills with which it interacts no recognizing that ALL wills are of and ultimately for One Will trying to, simply, figure it all out.

26. I decided I was blind.  I figured, if heaven is all around me then I'm essentially walking into a bright light.  Just as a deer is caught in the headlights, one cannot tell where or how one walks while looking into a bright light.  So I looked at my life and decided I didn't have a clue where the thoughts that were in my head were coming from.  I decided that faith was trusting myself to have an active choice NOT to impart harm and that while I do not have harmful thoughts, I cannot at all be meaning harm since whatever it is that is giving me my thoughts is clearly working with me, just as it is with us all if you happen to find yourself with unexplained nonharmful thoughts as well.  Creativity is the expression of the nonharmful thoughts.  In-spiration is their origin.

27. In looking back over my life, I made goals and figured that all goals I wrote down and double checked with other people for inconsistencies, so long as they were all mutually harmonious, are achievable.  Only the timing is not up to the part of me that I identify with.  The rest is the creative expression of thousands and thousands of pages since 2012 in my marketing campaign for Talk2dream.Me.

28. The Superior Court Of Canada at Barrie did solidify the Human Rights application of Rene Helmerichs by botching the trial to the extent they did.  This is described in the 7 July 2014 blog post "Incompetence Of The Superior Court Of Canada" at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com , the post to read following this post, mentioned again in paragraph 35.  The initial application was dismissed on 30 June 2014 by the same judge Mr. Mulligan who had conducted the mistrial.  This in itself invalidates the ruling since the application was not fairly heard. 

29. On 30 June I was sentenced to one day because the crown and judge thought I belonged in a psychiatric ward.  On 2 July I was released from the psychiatric ward despite written statement of Mr. Lorberg claiming criminal charges against me.  I will continue to insist Mr. Lorberg is charged with, at the very least, offences of 264(b) Criminal Harassment, 265 Uttering Threats, 299 Defamatory Libel Publishing, and 366 Making A False Document for the many of his illegal and unsubstantiated psychiatric Form 1s, of which the contents of the most recent, that of 26 June 2014, is copied online here in a 7 July 2014 post "Psychiatric Fraud Exposed By Rene Helmerichs" at blog www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com

30. Superfluous ASIDE1: At RVH on Canada Day 2014 I noticed I'd been marked as patient MH001666 to fulfil Rev 13:18 NKJV?  In the crown closing remarks on 23 June 2014, Ms. Hull stated to harass is to bedevil.  A devil is manipulative, yes, but entirely in the service of One God, The State Of ALL Equality.  A devil is only evil when that devil is confused about living a life entirely on faith in service of the state of all-inclusivity, all knowledge and every thing in it, not knowable from any state of relatively.  This in itself is confusing but entirely homogenous to the one true fact that every thing is of constancy and in service for constancy when the semi-conscious wills driving the things as personal bodies consider for a moment that mind is ever joined and nothing can ever really exist apart from All That Is: If we remembered that we have eternal life, we would not be living lives pretending that we don't.

31. Superfluous ASIDE2: Interested in becoming a devil?  It's simple really.  Empty your mind.  Let our higher mind guide it the whole way.  Act with intent for decency, respect, personal responsibility, and kindness TO the shared state of our one mind from which the inspirations FOR the random acts of kindness do come, and come WITHOUT knowing your pre-planning for that only shows that you are NOT with an empty mind, and you've got the trick.  It's like looking back while walking forward.  Faith is in knowing that the one who leads IS aware of so much than can ever be imagined.  But what do I know?  Ultimately, every one of us knows nothing at all while here.

32.  The witness statements of the fraudulent Mormon minister, his wife, and the friendly treasurer, were posted 10 January 2014 at www.luciferchristforworldpeace.blogspot.tw

33. There are likely typos contained in the above and other posts.  Discrepancies are easily resolved with text message to the author, Rene Helmerichs, at 705-795-4774.

34. The intent of these blogs is to redress the wrong of the Superior Court following the wrong of psychiatry following the wrong of The Mormon Community Of Christ in this insanely gigantic misunderstanding requiring one to stand up for the equal rights of all.

35. Please continue to the 7 July 2014 blog post "Incompetence Of The Superior Court Of Canada" at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com