Follow Up 1 To: Privately Sworn Information To Commence A Proceeding At Barrie 20140708

1. Blog post title:

Follow Up 1 To: Privately Sworn Information To Commence A Proceeding At Barrie 20140708

 

By: Rene Helmerichs

Written: 9 July 2014

Blog: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com

 

 

2. Background:

 

Mr. Helmerichs considers it an honest pleasure to have spoken with Justice Of The Peace Mr. Brian Norton, who was initially reluctant to give his name for understandable reasons but did in turn assure there to be no reason not to mention his name since the conversations were recorded and he and Mr. Helmerichs spoke only truly on 8 July 2014 at Barrie.

 

The 8 July 2014 judicial submission was appended with printed copy of the 4 July 2014 blog post "Threat Of Reprisal By Psychiatrist Ms. A. Chawla To Her Unassuming Victim Rene Helmerichs" as well as the two referenced documents of crown attorney Ms. Katheryn Hull in the 8 July 2014 submission, and the contact information for Ms. A. Chawla from http://www.physiciandirectory.ca/phy.php?id=27747 and for Mr. Liaqat Ali from http://www.physiciandirectory.ca/phy.php?id=15659 .  Both links have prevented backspacing to this page; the reader is advised to "right-click: open-in-new-tab" for easier viewing.

 

Mr. Norton has not had a choice not to permit Mr. Rene Helmerichs to swear information alleging criminal offences against the mother of Mr. Helmerichs for expeditiously ending a custody battle that should never have legally begun.  It is understood that Mr. Helmerichs does NOT wish to see his mother, Ingrid Helmerichs, in custody.  Information specific to the Criminal Code Of Canada section 334 offence committed by Ingrid Helmerichs in October of 2012 was sworn on 8 July 2014.

 

 

3. Objective:

 

To have psychiatrists Mr. Liaqat Ali and Ms. Anjana Chawla charged and arrested for intentional abuse of authority recounted in the 8 July 2014 post "Privately Sworn Information To Commence A Proceeding At Barrie" subsequently entered as a legal court document in the swearing of information on 8 July 2014 at 11:45 hours before Justice Of The Peace Mr. Brian Norton at Barrie. 

 

 

4. Discrepancies Concerning Information Against The Psychiatrists:

 

The Honorable Mr. Norton has voiced reasonable concern over the matter of swearing information against two psychiatrists.  On 8 July 2014 at Barrie, Justice Of The Peace Mr. Norton:

 

1) was of the opinion that Ms. Anjana Chawla and Mr. Liaqat Ali are to be deemed recognized experts at the Royal Victoria Hospital review board hearings of 2012 despite Mr. Ali having knowingly, and with intent to deceive, submitted fraudulent misrepresentations of fact contravening Criminal Code section 361(2);

 

2) did express uncertainty that opinions of experts presented at tribunal hearings weigh more than the opinions of those against whom psychiatrists argue at those tribunal hearings;

 

3) did believe there to be a medical review board or some sort of tribunal process in place specifically to address and redress abuses of authority committed by Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario represented by officials of any of Her Ministries, particularly that of Health;

 

4) did remind Mr. Helmerichs that, as an independent law enforcement agency, the onus rests with Mr. Helmerichs to demonstrate merits for arresting two socially established individuals in more than a frivolous or otherwise superficial manner.

 

For due diligence and good practise of law, The Honourable Justice Of The Peace Mr. Norton has effectively requested of Mr. Helmerichs to present the case in such a light so as to leave no doubt and only reassurance that all discrepancies are understandably resolved.  This entails a measure of context for law not included with the first submission to begin the criminal proceedings.  The case shall be presented in the blog post titled The Canadian Charter Of Rights Section ONE Breach At The City Of Barrie summarized below.

 

 

5. Summary Of The Canadian Charter Of Rights Section ONE Breach At The City Of Barrie, Canada

 

With respect to the listed discrepancies:

 

1) Individuals who profess health to originate from an external substance of any kind cannot be experts for well-being of any kind as they do subtly prescribe only addiction to the substances for which they momentarily advocate with personally vested monetary interest.  This is specifically described in the section The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms Unlawful Section ONE Breach At The City Of Barrie.  With direct respect to the unlawful conduct of psychiatrists Mr. Liaqat Ali and Ms. Anjana Chawla from 3 Sept. 2012 until 28 Nov. 2012, contesting the psychiatric use of Criminal Code Of Canada, C.C., section 299 defined defamatory libel publicating, C.C. section 361 false pretences, C.C. section 264 criminal harassment, C.C. section 264.1 uttering threats, C.C. section 265 assault, C.C. section 219 defined criminal negligence with respect to C.C. section 215(1)(c) extending The Charter section 7, C.C. section 423 defined intimidation, C.C. section 120 defined bribery, and C.C. section 131 perjury for the their engineered Criminal Code section 319 defined public incitement of hatred necessary to maintain their Criminal Code section 2 defined mental disorder at committing Crimes Against Humanity And War Crimes Act section 4(3) according to the Criminal Code section 269.1 definition of Torture as any act causing severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, without lawful sanction noted by the various criminal code infractions of Mr. Ali and Ms. Chawla in their delusions of grandeur circumventing the fact of equal rights, contesting the psychiatric incorporation of criminal code offences in place to maintain law and order does negate the very opinion that a recognized expert is to be assumed law abiding and requires the experts to be charged without further recognition given to their fraudulent expert status;

 

2) Specifically with respect to expert testimony at Charter section 11(d) public tribunal hearings, The Superior Court Of Justice at Barrie has, both in its common Family Court practices and verbatim from a Court memorandum read to the court record on 16 June 2014 for the trial of Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario versus Mr. Rene Helmerichs, court file C13-205-SR, stated, on page 14 for item 123,

"When a party calls an expert as a witness, the party must first establish that the expert has the right training and experience to give an opinion on a particular subject.  This is done in the absence of the jury by asking the expert about his or her education, qualification and work in the area."

The fact that an expert must first be established as an expert AT the hearing, requires equal input from both parties for which the hearing is in place.  This ensures that no expert who vexatious seeks to circumvent the law in his or her common routine practice can be called upon as an expert in a court of law.

 

3) Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario is subject to The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms not differently than any other corporation or individual defined as a person with gender in The Interpretation Act Of Canada.  As such, hearing for exclusive or special practise seeking to delay, impede, or dissuade from the legal right of a Canadian Citizen desiring not to delay the restoration of law but to commence a criminal proceeding with privately sworn information, is rendered itself also a contravention of The Charter section One not possible for exclusion under The Charter section 33 vexatious circumvention rule because medical review boards and tribunal processes are not in place to commence a criminal proceeding with privately sworn information.

 

4) Mr. Helmerichs accepts responsibility that, as an independent law enforcement agency, he must demonstrate the merits for arresting two socially established individuals in more than a frivolous or otherwise superficial manner and submits The Canadian Charter Of Rights Section ONE Breach At The City Of Barrie specifically for this reason.

 

 

Mr. Norton was inspired to offer Mr. Helmerichs his personal 2014 Martin's Annual Criminal Code Judicial Edition Canada Law Book published by Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd.  Mr. Helmerichs cannot express the full extent of his appreciation to The Honourable Mr. Brian Norton for his kindness and assistance to see the law restored at The City Of Barrie. 

 

The Canadian Charter Of Rights Section ONE Breach At The City Of Barrie shall be based entirely on verbatim Superior Court Of Canada courtroom legal reference book guidelines stated in Martin's 2014 and supported with caselaw for the proper administration of justice in Canada specifically to reassure all attorneys acting on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario represented by officials for Her Ministry Of The Attorney General with veto authority over privately sworn information of Mr. Rene Helmerichs that to veto THIS information is for them to openly, recklessly, and with full knowledge of legally prescribed repercussions, commit the offence of Criminal Code Of Canada section 131 Perjury.