Incompetence Of The Superior Court Of Canada

Post Title:

Incompetence Of The Superior Court Of Canada

By: Rene Helmerichs

Written: 6 July 2014

Regarding: Court File C13-205-SR at Barrie.

1. Rene Helmerichs was criminally charged with having committed the offence of Criminal Code section 264(b) Criminal Harassment to the then treasurer, or who Mr. Helmerichs believes to have been the treasurer, of The Mormon Community Of Christ at Barrie on 2 March 2013.  The indictable period of the offence was 31 May 2012 to 2 March 2013.  The Superior Court jury trial determined Mr. Helmerichs to be guilty of the offence without having given Mr. Helmerichs a fair hearing as is his Charted 11(d) right.

2. Mr. Helmerichs has repeatedly stated to have intentionally triggered the criminal charge in order to redress the wrong of having been arrested under The Mental Health Act and forced to endure noxious injections into his thigh for the allegations of the same period begun in 2011 to 3 Sept. 2012.

3. The Superior Court trial is demonstrably an abomination of desolation given that Mr. Helmerichs has suffered severe character defame, the loss of his college teaching position, the loss of his home, the unrevealing of debt agreements causing him to be pursued by banks, and is now embroiled in a custody battle over his own son by the mother of Mr. Helmerichs for her fear that Mr. Helmerichs is somehow mentally unwell for having needed the injections!

4. Mr. Helmerichs demands social justice.  The Constitution Of Canada requires that an individual is innocent until proven guilty.  The annotations to The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms, on page 1850 of Martin's Criminal Code 2013 (the official Barrie courthouse reference book), under subheading "Presumption of innocence [s. 11(d)]" gives:

"A statutory provision which requires an accused to disprove on a balance of probability the existence of a presumed fact, which is an important element of the offence in question, violates s. 11(d): R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103, 24 C.C.C. (3d) 321."

5. The Criminal Code does also state, in section 16(1), that an individual is to be presumed mentally fit. 

6. Throughout the entire period from 1 September 2012, the time of the first visit of Barrie police detectives Tanya Lynch and Troy Armstrong, until well after sentencing following the farce trial, the administration of law of Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario as represented by the officials of Her ministries for community safety, health, and courtroom crown attorneys, Mr. Helmerichs has been accused of having a mental illness and required to prove his innocence of that presumed fact.

7. To properly redress the psychiatric wrong of forced noxious injections for allegations of criminal offence for which no criminal proceedings had occurred in or to determine whether there was actual guilt, Mr. Helmerichs desired to bring psychiatric evidence forth at his tril.

8. Mr Mulligan, the presiding Superior Court judge for the trial from 16-27 June 2014, and sentencing on 30 June 2014, did on 2 May 2014 give his prejudiced Reasons For Ruling:

"I see no relevance or necessity for any psychiatric evidence to be called on your behalf, especially when the individuals are not going to be supportive of you.  So, I do not see any benefit.  It does not relate to the indictment before the Court, that evidence may well help in the sentencing phase and I may well want to hear more information from various doctors.  So, it may well be appropriate that they come at another phase if the jury indeed finds you guilty of the count, so there is a time and place for that."

9. Unfortunately for Superior Court judge Mr. Mulligan, the courtroom reference book for law (2013) gives, on page 1821:

"The fundamental tenet of our system, that the innocent not be convicted, implies that, before a judge may exclude evidence which is relevant to a defence, the potential prejudice to the trial process must substantially outweigh the value of the evidence: R. v. Seaboyer, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577, 66 C.C.C. (3d) 321, 7 C.R. (4th) 117 (7:2)."

10. The psychiatric evidence is absolutely relevant to the defence as Criminal Code section 269.1(4) protects all statements of Mr. Helmerichs made following the first detention on 3 Sept 2012, itself also a Double Jeopardy violation and error in law, because Criminal Code section 269.1 Torture DID occur according to the definition in the Criminal Code Of Canada for stated unlawful reprisal evidencing the unlawful discrimination, defined in The Human Rights Tribunal Of Ontario Applicant Guide To Filing Applications on page 8, given in the transcript and audio recording of the closed-door psychiatric meeting between Mr. Helmerichs and psychiatrist Ms. A. Chalwa of 26 Oct. 2012.  All posted online for the reader's personal verification.

11. That was strike one by Mr. Mulligan in The Superior Court Of Canada.

12. Strike two by Mr. Mulligan is the rather alarming error in law caused by a misapprehension of the legislature of the law BY MR. MULLIGAN WHO, as Superior Court Judge, REALLY OUGHT TO KNOW BETTER.

13. Specifically, 12 errors in law were admitted as Application For Mistrial on 30 June 2014 before sentencing.  Mr. Mulligan, having already demonstrated himself to be prejudice toward the defendant Mr. Helmerichs, could of course in miracles not find reason enough to see that he was not mentally competent to judge the merits of the mistrial application for having been the one to conduct the alleged mistrial.  This, in itself, is another strike.  As strike 12 on the original application is somewhat of a clincher farce, let us consider this to be strike 12: damned if you do, damned if you don't.  Does an all-encompassing state possibly leave an out?  It does so only with equal partnership.

14. Mr. Helmerichs requests $700 Million CAD transferred to his President's Choice chequing account and a government official to warn his mother, Ingrid, of the impending legal action for the charge of Criminal Code section 328 Theft at her having taken property from Fan-Xiu in October of 2012 while Fan-Xiu was trying her very best to get Mr. Helmerichs OUT of the hospital.  Ingrid has a place waiting in German and was first advised through the Family Court on 15 May 2013 of impending charges.  See recording transcript for 22 Nov 2012 for necessary evidence of the charge of Theft to Ingrid, by her own insistence that her actions were not wrong.  Therewith, too, is The Book Of Revelation 12:13-16 NIV fulfilled according its understanding interpretation:

"When the dragon

[the headless state of Parliament Of Canada having 7 heads symbolic of heavenly decision makers expressed physically in the Book Of Life parallel as 7 psychiatrists named near the close of the 7 July 2014 blog post "Psychiatric Fraud Exposed By Rene Helmerichs" AND 10 horns symbolizing the 10 Canada provinces and their respective figurehead sovereigns]

saw that he had been hurled to the earth, he pursued the woman

[symbolic of Israel, and expressed in a person for this play-by-play story analogy as Ingrid, mother of Rene Helmerichs]

who had given birth to the male child.  The woman was given the two wings of a great eagle [an airplane], so that she might fly to the place prepared for her in the desert

[The Voice of A Course In Miracles reminds that EVERYWHERE IN THE UNIVERSE OF TIME AND SPACE is a proverbial desert for being NOT recognizably with God],

where she would be taken care of for a time, times and half a time [Rene does not wish to see his mother in jail, he only wishes not to argue with her concerning his right to raise his Sun], out of the serpent's reach [outside Canada].  Then from his mouth the serpent spewed water [symbolic of the emotions] like a river, to overtake the woman and sweep her away with the torrent.  But the earth helped the woman by opening its mouth and swallowing the river that the dragon had spewed out of his mouth.  Then the dragon was enraged at the woman

[on the all-inclusive level symbolic of Israel, symbolic of all organizations anywhere for One God]

and went off to make war against the rest of her offspring

[for the fraudulent misrepresentation of Deutoronomy 14:22-28 tithing principles such did kick off this very same Legal Case Of ALL Time, reference to the 14 Sept 2013 blog post at www.luciferchristforworldpeace.blogspot.tw ]

--those who obey God's commandments and hold to the testimony of Jesus

[but who do not realizing their own misperception of law of The Constitution Of Canada which that dragon does have authority to use against them, being the self-acclaimed "supreme law of Canada" in Its section 52(1)]

And the dragon stood on the shore of the sea

[symbolic of emotional health is governed by psychiatry to be, properly, watched over BY The Superior Court].

15. A Human Rights Application is confirmed received by the Human Rights Tribunal Of Ontario on 29 April 2014 (by manager Mary Dujmovic?).  The application is never-ending until its requested orders are granted.  It is now only a matter of time until a critical mass catch on to the utter raping of all of the rights of ALL CANDIANS by "Her Majesty In Right Of" the headless state of Ontario, et al, including The Superior Court Of Canada.

16. Partner.  It makes only sense.  With partnership for all equality of The Golden Rule (Book Of Matthew 7:12 KRV) is all sense common so that COMMON SENSE is recognized.

17. Please continue to 7 July 2014 blog post "Application For Mistrial In Court Case C13-205-SR" at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com