Tuesday, July 8, 2014

Privately Sworn Information To Commence A Proceeding At Barrie

Privately Sworn Information To Commence A Proceeding At Barrie

By: Rene Helmerichs
Written: 7 July 2014
Submitted: 8 July 2014 to The Office Of The Justice Of The Peace at the Barrie Courthouse

The Particulars

Sworn Information recounts particulars against:
Ms. Ingrid Helmerichs
psychiatrist Ms. A. Chawla
psychiatrist Mr. Liqat Ali
crown attorney Ms. Katheryn Hull
and several more by extension.

I was referred to the Justice Of The Peace by:  Police [_]  Crown [_]  Lawyer [X]
Other [_] _____________________

Have the police investigated this matter:  No [X]  Yes [_]  Occurrence Number: ___________________

Have you filed a statement of allegations regarding this matter with a Justice Of The Peace previously:  No [X]  Yes [_]  When:  Throughout Criminal Court file C13-205-SR but not specifically separately.

If your answer is yes to the previous question, are you now providing additional material for consideration:  No [_]  Yes [_]

Your statement of allegations in support of a charge:

I WILL SAY

1. From 3 Sept. to 30 Oct. 2012 I was held against my will inside Royal Victoria Hospital, RVH, at Barrie.  Barrie police detectives Tanya Lynch and Troy Armstrong warned me to cease and desist from sending email to senior Mormon ministers of the Barrie congregation of The Mormon Community Of Christ on 1 Sept. 2012.  I had commenced lawfully sanctioned Criminal Code Of Canada section 315 Publicating in good faith for redress of a wrong done to myself and the public at large by The Community Of Christ fraudulent Good Sense Budgeting tithing workshop of 21 April 2012.  The workshop contravenes Deuteronomy 14:22-28, but moreso, the co-pastors had put my Georgian College teaching position at work for having deceived me to think that it was a year-end tax advice workshop similar to that which was had the previous year in their apartment.

2. On 3 Sept. 2012 I directly challenged the authority of local police to intervene in church affairs.  I sent one more email to a hundred or so random recipients including many news email addresses, everything was done by email specifically for its record.  I was only then informed that, whom I believe to have been their former treasurer, was threatening to press criminal harassment charges against me personally.  The local minister had compounded the allegations with allegations of his own and I was promptly arrested under The Mental Health Act, escorted for detention at RVH, and denied The Constitution Of Canada section 11(d) right to be presumed innocent of a criminal offence until proven guilty in a fair and public manner by an impartial tribunal.  Instead, the Criminal Code section 16(1) presumption of mental fitness was also sidelined and I was left to prove myself to be without a mental disorder.

3. To my dismay, not only had members of The Mormon Community Of Christ begun a fabrication of claims, but my explicit written statement of 3 Sept. 2012 in the email attachment titled The Good News Is Here sent also to Barrie City Police, but not permitted for me to admit at the recent trial finally addressing the criminal allegations against me, was intentionally misconstrued.  I had explicitly stated that I was a voice for God with the direct implication that I am one of many as we are all equally forever with the all-inclusive not definable state.  Psychiatrist Mr. Liqat Ali did at RVH on 4 Sept. 2012 accuse me of believing that I were God despite my adamant insistence to him that he has intentionally read something into my email that is not actually there and certainly not something I can claim.

4. Mr. Ali extended the psychiatric form under which I was arbitrarily detained, contravening section 9 of The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms and therewith The Constitution Of Canada for which It is Part I.  On about 18 Sept. 2012 I took part in the first of three Review Board hearings held at RVH to contest the detention imparted me by Mr. Ali.  I obtained a lawyer, Mr. David Northcott, and sat attentively listening to Mr. Ali convince the hearing committee attended by RVH senior lawyer Ms. June Bell, ancient community member Janice Laking, and a supervising psychiatrist.  To my utter disbelief, Mr. Ali fraudulently stated that I believed I could fly while implying it to be a trick of some means not assisted with due science.  Criminal Code section 361(2) is used for the definition of fraud.  Mr. Ali laughed at me following the review board hearing; he said something to the effect of, "Of course I know you once held a commercial pilot's licence, but the hearing panel members don't."  I couldn't believe my ears.

5. To my recollection, I was denied the right to redress the six counts of offences of Mr. Ali contravening Criminal Code section 132 Perjury.  A second count is his insistence that I have somewhere or somewhen said that I believed I were God in someway other than to explicitly make clear that I am an equal member in and of God just as every of us is.

6. I gave oath to Mr. Ali to see his medial licences revoked.  He was quick to pass me onto his supervisor Ms. A. Chawla who then took it upon herself to repeatedly harass me about the alleged criminal offences and pastor claims which she considered to be fact.  At no time did an honest conversation occur with Ms. A. Chawla who kept repeating "I am expert in mind" and implying her witchcraft to be somehow justified.  And expert in mind DOES obey the commonly agreed Constitution and all written consistent laws.

7. Not ever having been in a situation quite as I was, locked into a hospital, denied all supportive visitors, denied all access to the internet and all access to any other normal means of reassurance for my own mental sanity and emotional well-being, I began to hand-write letters that Fan-Xiu, a longtime friend visiting from Taiwan from 20 Sept 2012 to 19 Oct. 2012 for the specific purpose of entering a longtime conjugal relationship with me, did agree to type, post online, and send to any and every person of whom we could think in the hopes of finding sense amidst the psychiatric tyranny.

8. Following my one and only one day-pass excursion on Thanksgiving Sunday 7 Oct. 2012, my mother, Ingrid Helmerichs, did hide my computer from Fan-Xiu upon the behest of Ms. Chawla who by action and direct statement indicated that I should somehow not stand up for my rights because, in her view, I was not able to pass the operating mind test of The Criminal Code.

9. The official Barrie courtroom reference book for law, Martin's Criminal Code 2013, states on page 1817 in the annotations to section 7 of The Charter Of Rights:
"The operating mind test includes a limited mental component which requires that the accused has sufficient cognitive capacity to understand what he is saying and what is said.  This includes the ability to understand a caution that the evidence can be used against the accused.  The same standard applies ... in determining whether a mentally ill accused has the mental capacity to make an active choice: R. v. Whittle, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 914, 92 C.C.C. (3d) 11, 32 C.R. (4th) 1."

10.  Ms. Chawla has convinced my mother that I am irreparably without an operating mind.  Despite being deemed a fit father by The Simcoe County Children's Aid Society in February of 2013, I am not to be permitted near the son whom I've helped raise from birth and for whom I did have sole custody prior to the second arrest instigated to redress the first arrest.  There is currently a family court case, file FC13-416-00, in the Superior Court Of Justice at Barrie as a result of this matter and it is specifically for this very matter that I refuse to further play the games of psychiatric babble every lawyer encountered seems so far to follow so happily blindly.

11. This willsay is to serve the purpose of evidencing necessary grounds to charge Ms. A. Chawla with the criminal offence of Uttering Threats and, ultimately, either with adduced statement or formal Crown Attorney investigation (when they finally get their act together), the offence of Criminal Code section 269.1 Torture for the severe mental AND physical suffering caused as a direct result of unlawful discrimination contravening The Human Rights Code Of Ontario by official representatives of The Ministry Of Health of Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario.  This charge is absolutely necessary for me to obtain the requested orders of The Human Rights Application filed 29 April 2014 with The Human Rights Tribunal to restore justice amid the blatant Charter section ONE breach of dignity, respect, and responsibility bestowed myself at others in psychiatric wards all throughout Ontario.

12. While I was detained at RVH, I gave Fan-Xiu Hsiao, known also as Lindsay, use of my computer to assist me to attempt to figure my way out of the RVH Criminal Code section 279.1 Hostage-taking situation in 2012.  My mother took it upon herself to deprive Fan-Xiu of my computer by hiding my computer and causing Fan-Xiu such fear that Fan-Xiu elected to shorten her stay with the hope that she could be of more assistance to us from Taiwan.

13. My mother does not recognize the illegality of her position.  My mother simply does not realize that it is not up to her to manipulate other people by intentionally depriving them of their property mere because she thinks something ought to be done or not done for or to them without actually listening to what the individual, upon whom the help is forced, is able to accept.

14. From the period of at least 9 Oct. 2012 to 19 Oct. 2012, Ingrid Helmerichs did deprive Fan-Xiu and myself, Rene Helmerichs, the use of my personal computer in contravention of Criminal Code sections 328 and 322 Theft.  I do not desire my mother to be explicitly charged or placed into custody, however my mother does seem rather unable to find common sense necessitating the very swearing of this information before a Justice Of The Peace for social assistance.  I am tired of arguing over assumptions and false presumptions.  My mother has a home prepared in Germany and, I do hope, will be permitted to depart the country expeditiously before a summons is issued for her arrest?  She has sufficiently other family to assist her with packing of her belongings after she has expeditiously departed the country.  I have stated furthered grounds for further criminal charges to the record of the family court matter on 15 May 2013. 

15. Case in point with respect to my mother, just today 7 July 2014 my son and I walked to the dollar store to buy a container for iron filings that we searched recently with a magnet, as a fun activity, in sand near the driveway and at the beach.  My mother insisted I buy only one container.  When my son and I returned with two, two that my son both liked and to keep the beach filings separate from the road filings, a 34 cent salt shaker with plastic lid and one dollar little mental turn-top container, my mother became upset.  How, with my own $1.34, my own son, and only joy, can someone possibly find grounds to fault me for breaking her commandment that I was to buy just one?  Only the insane argue with insanity. 

16. For irrefutable evidence of the Criminal Code section 328 contravention by Ingrid Helmerichs, I offer her own words.  The following excerpt from about the 38th minute of voice file 20121122_Voice0608_with_Chawla recorded in an open-door meeting at RVH between my mother, myself, and two others:
Rene: Oh Mom, I write a blog [post] every other day or every three days maybe--
Ingrid: Or did Lindsay help you with that?
Rene: She helped me when I was in the hospital.
Ingrid: That's another reason to--
Rene: No.
Ingrid: ...to take the computer away from her.
The voice file is available for public download from https://www.dropbox.com/s/wlvojm4pd4a9ajb/20121122_Voice0608_with_Chawla.amr
and a more complete transcript is provided the public in the 4 July 2014 blog post "Partial Transcript Of Voice File 20121122_Voice0608" available at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com

18. With respect to psychiatrist Ms. A. Chawla and her unlawful threat of reprisal contravening Criminal Code section 265 Uttering Threats constituting blatant medical malpractice personally served me until 28 Nov. 2012 when I had the last of her forced injections into my thigh, after hearing her barter with me to release me from the injections to lower a blog of defamatory evidence of her actions, criminally the offence of bribery, I offer direct statement from Ms. Chawla on 26 Oct. 2012:
Rene: So, if I go to a hearing then our deal for next weekend is out?
Chawla: Ya, because the--you're showing me that I can't trust the process we've spent the last whatever time discussing.  [We hadn't been discussing a process.  I'd been constantly challenging the tyranny of having been arbitrarily detained since the first hearing with Mr. Ali.]
Rene: Is that a threat?
Chawla: Is it?  Ya, I guess, in a way.
The voice file is available for public download from https://www.dropbox.com/s/rib9h7atvivyp9q/20121026_Voice0596_at_RVH.amr
and a more complete transcript is provided the public in the 4 July 2014 blog post " Threat Of Reprisal By Psychiatrist Ms. A. Chawla To Her Unassuming Victim Rene Helmerichs" available at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com

19. The public is reminded that a threat, to lawfully be construed as a threat under the criminal code section 265 definition (I hope I got that section right, it's near there if not exactly 265), does NOT need to be given expressly in words and can be given in gestures or other statements so long as there is reasonably threat of harm intended to the recipient of the individual claiming to have been threatened.  I assure the reader that, had I been able or permitted to record more closed-door psychiatric sessions (Fan-Xiu slipped me my cell phone in a parting hug exceptionally permitted by Ms. Chawla who had denied me all supportive visitors in her fraudulent administration of healthcare) I would have solid evidence of much greater and much more severe threats involving removing Sunjay from my custody.  Ms. Chawla made certain to remind me of her intent to see this happen at each of our supposedly "therapeutic" visits. 

20. A duplicate of the 26 Oct 2012 audio recording transcript is included with submission of this willsay for context of the charge and subsidiary evidence found in the 14 Nov 2012 and 22 Nov 2012 audio recordings leading to the Criminal Code section 120 offence of Bribery committed by Ms. A. Chawla thereafter.  Bribery is evidenced in my abrupt released from the forced injections before the normal 30-day community treatment order requirement for all patients having required hospitalization for more than 30 consecutive days and well in advance of the anticipated years Ms. Chawla had otherwise stated to me that anticipate being with them.  It is absolutely imperative that this woman be formally charged and held accountable for her continual abuse of authority.

21. Finally, in this initial commencement for Criminal proceedings by a privately sworn information, there is the matter of the Criminal Code section 132 Perjury offences of psychiatrist Mr. Liqat Ali.  The necessary evidence is in the transcripts of the first review board hearing.  Legal Aid Lawyer David Northcott was present at that hearing and did not return to me the submissions of Mr. Ali.  These submissions do also witness to further charges of Criminal Code section 299 Defamatory Libel Publicating against Mr. Ali.  With respect to the hearing transcript, I had contacted a second criminal lawyer and a personal injury lawyer following my release from the injections in 2012.  Both lawyers declined involvement and prompted me to the more creative endeavour of using the threat of a criminal charge from the Mormons against them to have a charge pressed against me whereby I naively expected to be able to redress this matter in open public court.

22. Unbeknownst to me at the time, in March 2013 when I intentionally harassed the complainant of the charge having become Superior Court file C13-205-SR presently beginning its appeal stage on solid grounds of errors in law filed already in The Court on 30 June 2014 but dismissed by the prejudice trial judge who, himself, was not in a position of legal authority to dismiss an application for mistrial, I had thought the court system of Canada was fair.  I've admitted to being naive.

23. In The Superior Court Of Justice at Barrie on 6 Dec. 2013 for court file C13-205-SR, I did specifically request the hearing transcripts of the review board hearings held at RVH in 2012.  The presiding judge ordered all hearings relevant to the then submitted Charter section 11(b) application. 

24. Martin's Criminal Code 2013 does specifically state on page 1844 under the annotations for section 11 of The Charter:
"However, even a private, domestic or disciplinary matter can fall within this section if it involves the imposition of true penal consequences, namely, imprisonment or a fine which by its magnitude would appear to be imposed for the purpose of redressing the wrong done to society at large rather than to the maintenance of internal discipline within the limited sphere: R. v. Wigglesworth, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 541, 37 C.C.C. (3d) 385."

25. Martin's Criminal Code 2013 does specifically state on page 1845 under the annotations for section 11(b) of The Charter that
"A person is only charged with an offence within the meaning of s. 11 when an information is sworn against him alleging an offence or where a direct indictment is laid against him when no information is sworn."
26. Barrie police detective Brian Read did in his General Occurrence Report BA12042846 Threats@2012/09/03 11:12  state:
"In the e-mail that HELMERICHS sent out on September 3rd 2012, HELMERICHS does make reference to YEWCHYN several times, he talks about wanting to be with in a Viper (motor vehicle) and describes in an inappropriate manner areas in which he would like to kiss on YEWCHYN.  YEWCHYN inquired about laying a charge of Criminal Harassment against HELMERICHS.
READ explained to YEWCHYN that it was apparent that HELMERICHS was suffering from a mental disorder and that he was now confined to the RVH for assessment."

27. Unfortunately, in precisely that one e-mail sent specifically to challenge the corruption for justice at Barrie, I had made NOT such remarks about Ms. Yewchyn.  The report by Brian Read is a fraudulent document unless he is able to verify that I did.  I have posted a direct link to the 92-page attachment titled The Good News Is Here on the 4 July 2014 blog post "List Of Voice Files As Evidence For The Superior Court Of Canada File C13-205-SR And Derivative Human Rights Tribunal Of Ontario Application" at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com for media to verify.

28. Understandably, the superior court did not permit the report of Brian Read to be entered into evidence for my defence at the trial despite Officer Lori McIlravey directly referencing that report in her testimony on about 18 June 2014 and the direct statement of the presiding judge Mr. Mulligan to the jury that they would receive that report.

29. The report verifies that statement of crown attorney Ms. Katheryn Hull in a letter dated 1 April 2014 wherein she explicitly writes "6. The Crown will continue to provide transcripts of proceedings" to my continued request for ALL transcripts for this matter, including the ENTIRE bail proceedings transcript of 21 Oct. 2013 and the transcripts of 22 and 25 July 2013, all of which I have been repeatedly denied despite several more requests, is perjurous and contravening Criminal Code section 132 as well.

30. Ms. Hull did give other potentially perjurous statements in a Book Of Authorities response to my Charter section 9 application.  The Charter section 9 application is found in paragraphs 16 to 18 of blog post "Avoiding A Superior Court Of Justice Canada Mistrial" posted at www.luciferchristforworldpeace.blogspot.tw .  The false statements of Ms. Hull are specifically in paragraph 7 on page 2 of her book:
"On February 10, 2014 the Applicant [Mr. Helmerichs] appeared in court again without counsel.  [I WAS SELF-REPRESENTED.]  The Respondent [the acting crown attorney] suggested bail terms to which the Applicant would not agree.  [THIS STATEMENT IS FALSE UNLESS THE COURTROOM AUDIO RECORD CAN REVEAL OTHERWISE.]  At that time the Applicant was subject to a Form 1 in any event.  The matter was adjourned February 21, 2014 so that counsel could attend.  [I WAS SELF-REPRESENTED.]"
and continued in paragraph 8 on page 2:
"On February 21, 2014 the Applicant again attended without counsel.  The matter was put over from time to time and addressed again on March 17, 2014.  [I WAS SELF-REPRESENTED AND BRUSHED ASIDE.]"
and continued in paragraph 9 on page 2:
"On that day the Applicant attended with counsel subsequently [PREVIOUSLY] appointed to conduct the cross-examination of the complainant.  On this day the Applicant expressly declined to bring an application for bail having been informed that a [psychiatric] Form 1 had been signed. [FALSE.]"

31. Crown attorney Ms. Katheryn Hull did repeatedly commit the Criminal Code offence of section 132 Perjury as her statements were submitted to The Superior Court Of Justice.  Her paragraph 9 comment is specifically vexatious because I had repeated stated that The Superior Court Criminal Rules Of Justice, rule 20.05 (1), requires
"The notice of application in Form 1 under rule 20.03 shall be accompanied by: ... (d) where the applicant seeks to review an order earlier made, a transcript of the proceedings on the judicial interim release hearing under section 515 or 522 of the Code, as the case may be, and of previous review proceedings, if any, taken before a justice or judge;"
And that by endorsement of 3 February 2013, having required a formal bail review application to be submitted, I am required and rightfully to receive the 6 Dec. 2013 ordered 21Oct. 2013 bail proceedings transcript inclusive of MY testimony under oath to the justice AND the reading of the synopsis by the crown, neither of which has to this day on 7 July 2014 been provided.

32. Thus we see that the crown attorney at Barrie is very much responsible for obtaining the transcripts of the RVH hearing of 2012 for, in all honesty, not having conducted any amount of legitimate legal practice the entire duration of the Superior Court case begun 2 March 2013 and now to be appealed all to redress the 2012 hospital contravention of Charter section 9, the right NOT to be arbitrarily detained, for email send to The Mormon Community Of Christ in Barrie and senior ministers Kris Judd, Carmen Thompson, and Tim Stanlick in the United States, to redress the fraud of their Good Sense Budgeting tithing workshop contravening Deuteronomy 14:22-28.  The invoice tendered 30 Aug. 2012 to that church for a Dodge Viper, and other high-ticket toys, is legal according to Deuteronomy 15:8 and stated reasons in the 15 May 2013 sworn affidavit placed to The Superior Court Of Canada Family Court file FC13-416-00 and copied, as best as possible, for convience of the media to blog post "The Summery" at:

33. Going forward, if the Mormons are arrested and the crowns are willing to work with me, I'll refrain from swearing more information.  I do expect the Human Rights Application orders to be fully granted.  Information was sworn against the Mormons at the bail proceedings of 21 Oct. 2013.  Let us expeditiously undue the guilty verdict entered 30 June 2014 and resulting probation order for grounds please review the 7 July 2014 blog post "Application For Mistrial In Court Case C13-205-SR" at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.com

34. Cooperation is appreciated.  All of psychiatry is notedly fraudulent, nevermind the fact that its founding premise of thought originating in the brain, or anywhere else in body, is completely incorrect.

No comments:

Post a Comment