1.
The
Choice Amidst The Argument In The Business Of Being Happy
Written By:
Rene Helmerichs
Updated: 10
Sept. 2015
TENTATIVE
PREAMBLE
“The best
possible care” is an expression hospitals use to distract from the single fact
of incarceration without trial on presumption of criminal guilt. Anything
harmful to self or society is a crime. Police are generally responsible to
ensure criminals are arrested and lawyers are tasked with metting out
correction. Hospitals are used to correct behaviour where jails fail but none
dares to question the supremacy of psychiatrists, as this book plainly
illustrates.
My name is
Rene Helmerichs. I still consider myself a teacher. It has been exclusively for
creative-writing publicly posted messages that I am considered a danger to
myself or others and mentally incompetent. I was not permitted to defend myself
in court. The following Introduction is an actual letter sent to a regulatory
body responsible, at least on paper, to ensure such a thing as THIS does not
happen.
Welcome to our
craziest LIFE in this smashhit reality book.
[Throughout
these pages, emotion is evidenced. The inclusion of emotion is itself a
critical message to those individuals that attempt to subdue feelings with
tranquilizers such as those Mr. Komer did reference on 5 Aug 2015. In time, the
hearing transcript will also be freely offered.]
2.
Introduction.
ATTENTION:
ONTARIO JUDICIAL COUNCIL FOR JUDICIAL CONDUCT (OJCJC) REVIEW
Petition
“mind”” www.talk2dream.ca ∣
Petition “jailtime”: www.talk2dream.co
BY: Rene
Helmerichs ∣ WRITTEN: 15 Aug 2015 ∣ LENGTH: 24 paragraphs
A COURSE IN
MIRACLES (acim.org) FREE PDF: www.talk2dream.org
ONTARIO
PROVINCIAL POLICE (OPP) MORAL CORRUPTION: www.talk2dream.mobi
3.
Per
instruction from a John Gayle at The Office Of The Ombudsman received via phone
conversation on 7 Aug 2015, this letter begins: “I have a complaint about Mr.
C.R. Harris, judge, about a hearing that occurred from 14h30 to 16h30 on 5 Aug
2015 at the Barrie, Ontario, provincial court of justice. The matter is urgent.”
4.
John
stated the directions forwarded to him of The OJCJC, overwhich the ombudsman
apparently has no jurisdiction, are for me to “give as much detail as possible
as to why there was a misconduct.” I suppose John meant for me to provide what
The OJCJC is to evaluate in its review for misconduct that it can again, since
I have tried this once before in October and November of 2013, judge the
evidence to best remain unacknowledged for PREJUDICE.
5.
Here’s
the thing. I’ve been trying to have two psychiatrists arrested for criminal
wrong-doing amounting to nothing short of Criminal Code section 269.1(b)
TORTURE and 120 BRIBERY after one bartered to release me from injections if
only I stop blogging. A November 2012 conversation is available to evidence the
bribery confirmed with release from the forced injections.
6.
I’m
fairly certain nothing I will write or can say shall cause The OCJ to
miraculously become honest in The Argument, except maybe one thing. That one
thing is not at all considered with respect to the past because it bespeaks
only a future that is the future most honestly deemed LEAST desirable. Its reference,
however, begins with the past and specifically the events of 5 Aug 2015 at
Barrie, the hearing being reviewed. The court did not permit counsel of record
for C-14-6966-OCJ to attend, instead used a lawyer not at arm’s length to the
prosecution to impede the defence and, when all was said and done, that “amicus”
refused to assist me to appeal the wilful Criminal Code section 219 NEGLIGENCE.
The hearings of 24 June and 17 July can confirm the amicus was not lawful
counsel of record for the defence and the prosecution had accepted me as fit
contrary to the 5 Aug 2015 events.
7.
On 5
Aug 2015, psychiatrist Mr. William Komer presented oral testimony to the court
that I should be deemed not fit to stand trial based exclusively on answers to
general knowledge questions that were not incorrect. Of course in miracles, “not
incorrect” does not equate to correct except within judgement of the assessor.
In this case, Mr. Komer had provided the court written statement dated 3 Feb
2015 declaring that assessment is not possible while I desire my answers
audio-recorded for later verification purposes.
8.
That
it took The Ontario Court Of Justice (OCJ) five months from 3 Feb. to 3 July
2015 to begin the hearing of my application requesting the court to ensure my
ability to verify my statements, ought to be a bit alarming. Nonetheless, that
I still desire my statements recorded, that I be afforded the dignity for equal
consideration in court to refute opinionated accusations, does reveal Mr. Komer
to have committed PERJURY on 5 Aug 2015 when he swore that he’d assessed me in
the period 24 June to 14 July 2015. As he was also on vacation from 25 June to
13 July 2015, a second count of the Criminal Code section 132 offence should be
applied.
9.
The
court heard testimony from Mr. Komer that I had claimed the two ways to plead
in courts for criminal law are Not Criminally Responsible (NCR) and NOT NCR. I
thank Mr. Komer for his accurate quotation and share with the reader why my
response is honestly accurate.
10. In Canada, there is no such thing as
pleading innocent and one does not need to enter a plea of Not Guilty since the
court is obliged to consider the accused not guilty until a Guilty verdict is
rendered. The formal rendering of gulit can arise voluntarily with Guilty plea,
or upon trial conviction. In some cases, such as that of Ryan Jeffery Hamlin on
22(?) Nov. 2014, a Guilty conviction can apparently also arise at a status
hearing but I suspect this may be a Barrie courthouse custom not common to the
rest of Canada.
11. In 1990, for the case of R. v. Chaulk,
Justice Dickson had vouched “not criminally culpable”, now NCR, to be a plea
and the only plea arriving at the intended “true acquittal”, the legalese
equivalent of innocent. It had been a New Brunswick prosecutor who referred to
it as a “plea” and everyone understood what was meant. Justice Dickson also
stressed, referring to himself in the earlier case of R. v. Oakes, that one who
pursues a plea of NCR is not necessarily desiring incarceration into a hospital
for medical treatment but willing to put up with the treatment on principle to
be expelled from an otherwise dead-end, in Mr. Dickson (or Ms; I don’t recall
reading a gender reference for that particular projection of our common
selfsame) was absolutely correct in both cases, all ways.
12. While I remained at The Waypoint Centre
For (malaligned; ref. GOV. ACC. NOW paras. 73-78 for www.talk2dream.ca) Mental Health Care, Mr.
Komer had asked me, for an assessment, “What are the TWO ways to plead in
court?” Since there is really only one plea, Guilty, with resulting NCR
diversion insinuating responsibility for the crime to be imposed upon the
physical body of the accused but not The Mind, incorrectly inferring that
Eternity FOR the body is NEVER with sufficient, or with whatever, necessary
awareness to provide the healing corporal reward-based benefit, I corrected him
morally with answer “NCR and NOT NCR”. Our mind-concepts begin at the
correction: common under-standing accompanies realizing NOT is equally
applicably, timeless innocence but its opposite, while not-where belief exists.
13. Now, one may judge my responses to have
been fool-hearted. I remind readers that I am a hearty fool for Law. Since I
have not been able to have Ms. Anjana Chawla and Mr. Liaqat Ali charged,
morally I have no choice but to compound advertising their crimes. I reveal MAG
to be corrupt until someone reading THIS, probably online, forwards it to
someone with more common sense than our idiot judge Mr. Harris and the
necessary chain of phone calls begins. THIS talk to dream is precisely the
selfsame unrecognized Golden Rule inaccurately considered grandiose by our
bribing torturers: reference GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY NOW posted online at www.talk2dream.info .
14. On 5 Aug 2015, attorney for the ordered
spinal-pain injections, Ms. Kathryn Elizabeth Hull, sided with psychiatrist Mr.
Komer to say that I needed the same injections that I had received at Royal
Victoria Regional Health Care (RVH; no care) in 2012. The claim presented to
the court is that I lack clear insight into the types of pleas available... and
that the injections caused me to stop blogging in 2012. Mr. Komer added his
professional opinion that I misperceived myself pleading guilty to a July 2014
charge and insisted that it is still live. The acting amicus, Mr. Vincent
Zenobio, a MAG Legal Aid Ontario lawyer, can confirm Legal Aid to have issued a
Letter Of Opinion certificate for appeal merits of the plea, demon-straighting
witch-doctor Will-i-am from moral corruption: 705-737-3400 ext.14.
15. I can identify over 30 distinct legal
contraventions of The Ministry Of The Attorney General, MAG, of Ontario for the
5 Aug 2015 hearing. Most disconcerting should not be the fact that the defence
was NOT permitted to conduct the cross-examination, itself grounds for a
section 7-11(d)-15-52(1) Constitution challenge to have all charges
ubiquitously dismissed, BUT the presumed assumption that the injections will
suddenly cause me to find the courtroom knowledge that I, on 24 Feb 2015 in
court at Orillia, clearly demonstrated when my plea was accepted.
16. On 24 Feb 2015, I pled guilty to the
charge of breach of probation that another morally confused officer, Ms. Tamara
Williamson, swore against me in Orillia, Ontario, on 11 July 2014. The charge
was for intentionally correcting the probation condition “Do not blog the name
Natalie Yewchyn”, which one will note is still being blogged. The charge, to be
accepted criminally, had to be taken out of context because the name had only
been blogged in a citation from the 4 Sept 2012 police report of MCSCS artist
Brian READ who vouched that Rene HelMeRichs had been arrested and subjected to
psychiatric punishment on presumption of guilt. The MAG disclosure for the
charge contains only the 28 pages that I had affirmed 8 July 2014 to begin
formal charges against A. Chawla and Her Minion Liar, and 3 pages to the
exhonourable dumbass mull-it-again Mulligan who, for Superior Court Of (NOT)
Justice file C-13-205-SCJ, did rule on 2 May 2014 that I was NOT permitted to
submit psychiatric evidence for the trial in June of 2014 for the allegations
for which I had already been arrested and injected in 2012. Ms. Hull was the
prosecutor covering for The Mormon Community Of Christ.
17. Honouring persistent teachers for Law,
from page 432 of The Girl Who Played With Fire (ISBN 978-0-14-317010-5), “The
prosecutor refused to listen to the facts.” Because Ms. Hull accepted my plea
of guilty on 24 Feb 2015, she is well aware that Mr. Komer openly committed
perjury on 5 Aug 2015 AND she elected to hide the fact. There is already a
complaint to The Law Society Of Upper Canada against her, file number
LSUC-2015-169169; however, I expect the greater Ontario government, GOG, to
attempt its burial as The College Of Physicians And Surgeons has so often been
let to do. Hence our need to share this story. The jail in which thickskin Hull
insisted I remain, Central North Correctional Centre, CNCC, a Ministry Of
Community Safety And Correctional Services, MCSCS, mismanaged affair of
Ontario, permitted one only to make collect calls and NOT to the LSUC or the
vast majority of government services normally toll-free. There are ongoing
serious issues within MCSCS also intentionally preventing inmates from
obtaining necessary courtroom confidence.
18. On 24 Feb 2015, We DID strike a
plea-bargain naively thinking GOG would offer respect. The global position
agreement was altered the next day for Mormonism at Barrie. On the record of 25
Feb 2015, I was still offered “time-served” and any charge that I intended to
challenge with NCR generously dropped on that day. Therefore Mr. Peters, a
prosecutor at Barrie, did ALSO reveal me to understand how and why to plea.
This brings us to the true nature and object of the singularly adversarial
system before us. The actual matter concerns the definition of MIND not in
section 2 of The Criminal Code Of Canada.
19. The Criminal Code section 365 offence
PRETENDING TO PRACTICE WITCHCRAFT criminalizes the use of potions, the
injectible substances costing tax-payers 500 CAD per pop, to find lost
knowledge. Foregoing the common sense that forced injections of a substance
knowingly having only caused me spinal pain opposes goodwill and IS torture in
the educational and criminal law contexts, the simple fact of memory evidences
our living environment to be our common mind. These words are my lasting memory
as they are yours, and mine next time. What is more, that memory IS the ability
to bridge time for desired change to self, and all things physical cannot last,
the brain is NOT the thinking part of its operator. Confused? The Euchrist is a
fraud and the aliens know we all have eternal existence.
20. On 5 May 2015, Mr. Komer was tasked with
assessing me for fitness to stand trial. The task involves a general knowledge
assessment of courtroom basics. On 24 June 2015, an order was made for the
amicus lawyer to be appointed to assist me in the event of procedural deficit,
that I personally retained the right to cross-examine Mr. Komer. On 5 Aug 2015,
I was presumed incompetent to perform the cross-examination and, therein,
prejudiced; as teacher, I was not permitted equal protection of our Law. An
amicus is not defence counsel of record and lawfully I should have been let to
demonstrate, at the very least, that I had already been deemed fit in 2013.
Unfortunately, Mr. Harris was lead to believe that I am not mentally competent
with superfluous statements of Mr. Komer. Mr. Komer intentionally evaded a
twice-asked direct question wherefrom he had received his information. Mr.
Komer did not have my permission to consider more than that provided in our
real-time discussions and violated R. v. Abbey to insist third-hand information
need not be verified. Most alarming of all is the fact that a Matthew Keating
was the actual assessor of facts and who supported my assertion that I am
mentally fit, and stated to me: “An audio-recording would make this much
easier.”
21. With respect to the audio-recording,
Waypoint Centre chief psychiatrist Mr. James Leslie Karagianis had attempted to
end its discussion on 3 July 2015 with statement at lines 13-21 on page 37 of
the transcript. James is egocentric, not truly centric. He inferred that it is
MY mental illness that I desire NOT to have my statements taken out of context
WITHOUT assurance of the ability to verify what I had and had not said. James
(Jamie) assumed the lack for trust into THEIR religion for witchcraft IS the
mental dis-ease, which, noting the fine line available only in print, is as not
incorrect as the rest of my responses to the obstinate idiot Komer had been. In
summary, Waypoint Centre demonstrates itself to be exclusively for mental
hellth with insistence that its victims not be permitted to reveal to the
public THEIR grandiose tower of defamatory Babble we reveal is The Fraud Of All
Time.
22. There are two choices for action at any
given time. One is to REAL-EYES COMMON sooner and the other is to delay the
inevitable. Our system needs healing. The Choice Amidst The Argument In The
Business Of Being hellthy IS:
We shall conduct all further
psychiatric-related assessing of I exclusively in writing. Hands shall
hand-print every question put to us, as best as possible, while at Ontario
Shores in Whitby, Ontario. WE shall then answer the question on the same or
subsequent page, and ensure under-standing. Staff paid by the hour are going to
LOVE it. For my own compensation, I shall collect the pages for word-processing
and publishing in the book of life for which I’ve had a contract since June of
2012. The book is a reality book. I am told that any and everything I say or do
in a mental ward may be recorded and used for assessment purposes. Of course,
the hellth of the brainless system is of equal concern to the general-taxed
labourers who are offered a physical copy of our book in compendium to its
FREE PDF, when available, at www.talk2dream.com
23. While active, please join our petition at www.talk2dream.ca AND www.talk2dream.net .
24. Talk To Dream is the New Goal Day charity
for A Course In Miracles (acim.org) we attempted to register in May of 2012.
Our goal is to awaken common sense, that dreaming involves the projection of
ideas for benefit to The Dreamer, Self dreaming up a reality of ever-changing
objects not unlike the physical sphere in which we believe ourselves to be
awake. If we were really awake, why are we pretending that psychiatrists can
magically imbue an individual with courtroom knowledge through, exclusively,
forced injections? COMMON sense.
25. Publicity ensures honesty because honesty
is re-reciprocated consistency, 11:11, The Golden Rule, oneness ever-amplified.
Signed at MCSCS CNCC 2C8 15 Aug 2015, Rene Helmerichs.
