Redefining The Law IN Canada for Criminal Responsibility.
Written:
27 Jan 2015
By:
Rene Helmerichs
Follow
up to blog post The NCR Plea dated 23 Jan 2015 : https://www.dropbox.com/s/2g3sje32jdwhuqn/20150123_The_NCR_Plea.doc?dl=0
Posted:
www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
This
original post as word document https://www.dropbox.com/s/05ye2vuyak2mz0x/20150127_Criminally_Responsible.doc
A
Course In Miracles in pdf: https://www.dropbox.com/s/mpdy6ibgmfkkg7k/A%20Course%20In%20Miracles%20OFFICIAL%202ND%20EDITION.pdf
"Sound
means arranging images for Poetry." -Waypoint Rec.
A. Table Of Contents
RE: Court-ordered Criminal Responsibility Assessments (para 1-48)
Posted
for public interest 27 Jan 2015 at: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
1.
Hello Ms. Kathryn Hull, with
partner Uma Kancharla, this letter is directly to Ms. Hull and The Ministry Of
The Attorney General for Ontario whom Ms. Hull directly represents, recognizing
Ms. Kancharla (or any duty counsel for Rene Helmerichs) has instruction to
submit a Change Of Venue application on behalf of Rene Helmerichs (me, author
of this document) for related criminal charges following any responsibility
report to challenge the expert credential of the psychiatrist, specifically the
expertise as authority for Mind (the eternal one religions battle about). This document is a direct request for
procedural information and sharing of furtherance intent. All individuals referenced herein should be
included in the CC list.
2.
Forgiving me for past
transactions, let us consider time itself as a dynamically fluid substance
affecting past and future simultaneously with our present considerations for
any and every other. I'm actually simply
re-establishing the absolute need for kind mental considerations in the mind of
every reader for awareness of the presence of that called, in The Lawyer Rules,
the spirit of law.
3.
Given the annotations to our
Constitution, section 7, require context, let us understand the context I
present. Mr. William (Bill) Komer is the
psychiatrist appointed to assess my criminal responsibility following the
prejudicial order of 29 Dec 2014 at the behest of judge Mr. Beaty (sp?) and
testimony of your probation police officer Ms. Tamara Williamson both of whom
have denied me the normal fundamental right to assume criminal responsibility
for my action of redress following an unsuccessful public attempt have
psychiatrists Liaqat Ali and Anjana Chawla formally investigated.
4.
You may recall, Ms. Hull, that
at the trial for C-13-205 in June of 2014, the conviction originating the
probation order allegedly breached was arrived specifically following ruling of
the trial judge that I was not to be permitted to present psychiatric evidence,
clearly relevant, as defense submissions.
You did directly condone the judicial error in law not once but twice
directly on 2 May 2014 and 16 June 2014, and several more instances at the
trail wherein I attempted to raise the issue indirectly with the 4 Sept 2012
report of detective Brian Read directly referenced in your witness testimony of
Ms. Lori McIlravey.
5.
On 29 Dec 2014 in court of
Orillia for file C-14-3928 (elsewhere erroneously labeled 583 for lack of
paperwork consistency?), I was condemned to yet another criminal responsibility
assessment. You may not recall the one
you had insisted upon on 2 Aug 2013 at the behest of 2 July 2013 psychiatric
statement compelling you to believe that use of an injectable was required to
ensure my compliance to the belief structure of Jeffrey Van Imp who did himself
not desire to believe that I truly did not cause fear in Natalie Yewchyn. His interview of me in June of 2013 at CNCC
was in directly contravention of the judicial endorsement of 17 April 2013
requiring the psychiatrist to audio-record the assessment. At the time I did not know to quote the
annotations of section 7 of our Constitution to you, which do afford me, in the
section titled Mens Rae, the right to silence given the sessions directly
affect a penal outcome with detention to my person. Where the right to silence comes into play,
the law does suffice the right to a recording to be equally valid.
6.
On 26 Jan 2015 at 13:33, nearly
one month following the 29 Dec 2014 assessment order, psychiatrist William
Komer approached me for the very first time.
This is, to say the least, an absolute mockery to law given it has
wasted my, and by extension your, time foreseeably now demanding an extension
of time in court. MS. HULL, YOU ARE
REMINDED THAT YOUR 2 AUG 2013 ORDERED ASSESSMENT WAS MET ON 1 OCT 2013 WITH
STATEMENT FROM YOUR COLLEAGUE TO THE JUDGE OF THAT DAY THAT IT APPEARED AN
ERROR IN LAW OCCURRED. THERE WAS NO
REPORT SUBMITTED BECAUSE PSYCHIATRIST KAREN DE FREITAS TOOK A VACATION
BELIEVING HERSELF SURPREME TO THE LAW FOR INDEFINITE TIME until Mr. Vincent
Zenobio astonished me with insistence that the Barrie court of the day respect
the written law imposing a maximum of 60 days for the assessment period.
7.
It is no wonder that you did
not desire me to insist the judge carry through on the indirect request of your
witness on 29 Dec 2014 because, of course, all of this does rather make you
look absolutely retarded as a legal professional. So let's continue.
8.
On 26 Jan 2015 there was no
formal session between myself and Mr. Komer.
The first impression I received was the blind acceptance Mr. Komer
assumes, possibly, to be arrogance within me, as he was completely emotionless
without the basic active-listening skill a normally decent individual presents
another in any professional interaction.
I distinctly felt like less than a human being in the short but polite
exchange. I felt it only prudent to
advise Mr. Komer to be careful of what he writes as anything writing in the
report shall invariable be advertised to the limitless extent free publication
opposing psychiatry can accomplish on the limitless permanence of our internet.
9.
As I am yet self-represented in
court, and shall for the breach of probation allegation so remain given Legal
Aide for Ontario did decline my ticket application in July of 2014, I shall
surely receive a copy of the report to be submitted, yes?
10. Upon
receipt of the defamatory report, since, in my experience, psychiatrists really
only know how to cut up the good name of a person completely without regard to
the livelihood of the individual defamed, I shall argue the opposite to be that
desired for me. In that way can I assure
you that I shall win our ongoing argument over the headache begun IN Natalie
Yewchyn.
11. You
see, the annotations to section 16(3) of The Criminal Code of Canada permit the
defendant of a criminal offense for whom a psychiatric report has been written
to challenge the expertise of the author of the report IF that report is not
fully in accord with the expert knowledge of the defendant about himself. Ms. Hull and whom her colleagues of room 502
at the Barrie courthouse purport to represent, I am with my own mind such that
I am ever questioning myself, no one other can say the same without asking me
of my thinking in a real-time manner, requiring active-listening and a
lovingkindness-oriented conversation that has yet to happen with psychiatrists.
12. It
is also for the spirit for Lovingkindness, applied to each equally, that
everyone is forever permitted to challenge the definition of a living God,
causing life itself to be but a game of smarts, so to speak, where the absolutely
least among us becomes most rapidly exalted as the greatest. Our argument hasn't been fair, as you may now
come to realize, because I have reasoned that out all by myself, with insight
of course from that common source not by you acknowledged or criminal charges
against me would have long ago been dropped.
13. On
26 Jan 2015 I requested of Mr. Komer that our session be recorded. Mr. Komer refused, actually without
explanation but testimony of your colleague Kevin Sisk on 3 May 2013 for then
file provincial C-13-1184 (become Superior Court file C-13-205) shall suffice
to witness cause for the inability of recording to be specifically the special
psychiatric practices. Special
psychiatric practices to directly attest to not standard practice which directly
opposes the very premise of a regulated profession and is, therewith, revealed
to be completely fraudulent in and of itself, being fully not in accord with
the fundamental premise for one spirit of law as fully public to ensure, also,
the Constitution subsection 52(1) requirement that all laws be ever
consistently for directly benefit to the corporate public body as one whole.
14. Ms.
Hull, I apologize for the brashness of this letter, but it is become overtly
apparent that whatever BAR you passed for the right to profess to be an expert
at law must have had haughty standards themselves inconsistent with the spirit
of that our constitution directly states to exist in a very real manner, in
subsection 52(1) same-applied. Again,
with apologies, I look forward to your review of the 22 and 25 July 2013
hearing transcripts to see, for yourself, that none of this is new and all of
it carries the exact same message as it did a year earlier, two years earlier,
and now three years earlier: NO COMMUNICATION GOES AGAINST GOD and I'm not God
but you can call me the devil having agreed harassment to be bedeviling.
15. The
Toronto Star of 26 Jan 2015 reads "PM vows crackdown on 'violent
jihadism'" and states "jihadist terrorism is not a future
possibility, it is a present reality."
Terrorism IS a present reality IN the minds of every single individual
alive. The Toronto Star in the summer of
2013 had noted the Freemen movement to be the greatest inland terror threat
last year. It is the very idea of
destruction that is at the root of every mental illness psychiatrists claim to
be able to define, but it cannot be defined.
A ghost, Ms. Hull, does not require your belief for its reality but
considering the number of ghost stories across the ages, to reject the
possibility that ghosts exist attests only to an unwillingness to learn, which
is equally the desire for destructing Self since, to be alive, our personal
self-extending-Self must also be ever creative such that it is itself
ever-changing, not therefore fully formed, and certainly not fully aware of
itself in any ever-changing reality.
16. We
did in the establishment of a wholey spirit of law establish The Holy Ghost to
be a REAL entity equally with all, absolutely free of harm, and its opposite to
be that sustaining confusion. Confusion
is the belief that a brain originates thought when, clearly, to be
communicating within one environment for one same concept of social betterment across
time, there exists a universal mind feeding, at least recognizably in part our
partial perspective, that is itself superior to time such that each of us is
intrinsically with eternal life but for the confusion of how possibly that can
be. I happen to be able to explain that
using the book A Course In Miracles, something no pill-advocating psychiatrist
can do and therewith is my mental expertise revealed to be more encompassing,
more reliable, and simply more accurate than the foundation of the whole of
modern psychiatry. God itself has no
opposite attesting simply that confusion for God is confusion of self as
somehow separable from God, i.e., stuck in time.
17. Time
itself, believe it or not, functions actually more like a fluid. The past is gone, yes, and the future doesn't
exist, yes, but for every choice believed not made there exists an entirely
different universe wherein that choice was made and this universe not
recalled. The only way to escape the
problem of being stuck in time without full, and therewith any, awareness of
what time itself is to be exclusively for equanimity with faith that none of
this universe is absolutely real. We
cannot know what is best for us but we do have choice in what future we would
experience along the road of our excape, the dawning of the awareness of
Reality as A Course In Miracles (from www.acim.org
) has said. I've quoted a fair chunk of
A Course In Miracles in the blog post The NCR Plea available at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
, posted 23 Jan 2014, for convenience of the reader.
18. One
may consider all that I've written to be merely an opinion but I, Ms. Hull,
does not require our believe for Its being, being ultimately commonly
establishing All, and since I seem to be the only one in my arguing environment
not confused how precisely it is that everyone with me and I are of one kind, I
do suggest you put away your guns, proverbially speaking, or pencils, given the
cock presented me, and heed my request for partnership: I have the necessarily
insight to heal the world of mental confusion if you would but stop the
nonsense of assessing me for disease! We
are ALL psychotic, suffering from the very same lack of remembering that
Natalie Yewchyn, God rest her confusion already, did exemplify at the CRIMINAL
trial in June of 2014, C-13-205 at Barrie, to state that she never once emailed
me, before then remembering that she might have emailed me once.
19. The
truth is, and that's the first time I've used the word "truth" which
I do only with direct reference to fact of a past event, since the past itself
is not real and therefore really for truth (true being the present-real), the
world owes Natalie Yewchyn a debt of gratitude.
Natalie did agree to this BEFORE her birth, and, once she consciously
accepts her physical birthright, does have her choice of facilities manager for
either Georgian College or Royal Victoria Hospital in Barrie, once I am
authoritated with my own birthright as Bridegroom to the province. Call the idea grandiose, it won't change the
outcome. Re-member, Ms. Hull, you did
agree to your part in all of this as well, by your own willing continuance of
insolence for common law.
20. There
is much in this letter. Let me quote
again The Toronto Star, this time of 18 Jan 2014: "COMPANIES KNEW DRUGS
THEY SOLD WERE DEFECTIVE". I remind
you of the blog post titled "The Horrible Thing In The Book Of
Revelation" posted last year at www.luciferchristforworldpeace.blogspot.tw
wherein I described precisely such a situation intentionally arising for the
asinine purpose of population control in a dictatorship government, such as is
currently commanding planet Earth, believe it or not.
21. I
do not profess to predict the future, I simply understand The Law to be always
for ever-consistency. This affords me a
certain knack for appearing to predict events when, truly, it's all just
perfectly logical to me. I can literally
decide the best move in any game, chess on a board or chess for the world,
simply with choice of letting inspiration passively-actively work through
me. The talent of listening to The Voice
for Inspiration is precisely that taught in A Course In Miracles, thus my need
for advertisement to get precisely THAT BOOK into EVERY CHURCH throughout the
world, to accomplish OUR GOAL of total world-peace-without-war.
22. I
have told you the first step to believing something is to not believe it, for
prior to not believing you were clearly not aware that the choice for believing
did not exist. Ergo, the only need for
criminal responsibility assessment, to be absolutely accurate, is for yourself
and any who yet argue with me because, simply, I profess to know only
absolutely nothing at all when it boils down to any point in any argument. This does cause me to appear as deceitful
since I inherently tend to "flip" whatever argument into a reflection
such that I and whatever the matter of argument are one and the same, or, I and
whomever is arguing with me are on one same side of an eternally flippant
coin. Without actually understanding how
it can be that two seemingly different individuals can share one mind in one
spirit sustaining our same environment, I directly request of you the precise
procedure required for me to challenge the authority of psychiatric prejudice
in our courts for law.
23. Do
correct typos within this document as you see fit. I have absolutely no desire to read something
that merely repeats, over and over again, that already given. However, I DO REQUIRE CERTAIN INFORMATION
FROM YOU SINCE I AM AS BLIND AMIST THIS PROCESS FOR INSANITY AS ANY OTHER FOOL
EMBARKING IN THE ETERNAL QUEST OF UNSTUCKING THE STUCK STOOGEST BELIEVING
REINCARNATION TO BE THE PROCESS OF LIFE.
Reincarnation is the process of forgetting sustaining time in a much
larger way than any in that process shall ever be able to comprehend.
24. Time
itself is but a single heartbeat sustain the core of every frequency
inter-latticed to produce the equanimbus myriad of texture, sight, sound,
smells, and whatnot dreams we think to be life.
Yes, REAL gold can be made so sell your gold now while you still care
about money because, eventually, even money won't matter. One's own principles of life as likeness in
the least of us is all that truly matters in this place, and, no, that doesn't
require us to give all our possessions away in search of the unfindable. Seeking that originating beneficial
inspiration causes only the re-membering of Reality such that Reality finds the
individual seeking it.
25. You
see, Ms. Hull, you did attend the trial for C-13-205 having found me guilty of
criminally harassing Natalie Yewchyn without providing me a complete set of
your, on behalf of The Ministry Of The Attorney General for Ontario, disclosure
against the charge. Not only did you
refuse to provide the disclosure, but you did then also insist, with ruling of
presiding judge Mr. Mulligan given 2 May 2014 and again on 16 June 2014, that I
was not to submit psychiatric evidence for my defense.
26. How
is it then, Ms. Hull, that I can contest any written statement of any
psychiatrist, now born directly of our criminal conviction for C-13-205 and my
desire to redress your lack of adherence to the Constitutional norm for Context?
27. The
fundamental principle is of course the presumption of innocence, including innocence
of mental wellness, such that no one, not a psychiatrist, nor police officer,
nor other representative for Her Majesty, ought to be permitted to arbitrarily
defame an individual with claims for illness on grounds of "no
insight" into the disorder, and then not permit that individual to
challenge even the authority of the expert claiming expertise in mental
bullying?
28. Can
you being to see why precisely it is that I am so stringent on continuing my
campaign for whatever can become of the advertisement to ensue if I am let to
share even a column of honest newspaper advertisement over this?
29. Please
advise, Ms. Hull or anyone other on behalf of Her Majesty, how precisely I am
to challenge whatever any psychiatrist has written about me if the office of The
Attorney General at the Barrie courthouse has also actively, since at least 10
Feb 2014, prevented me from submitting a Change Of Venue application to move
this matter OUT of your territory and into something decently resembling
humanity?
30. Mr.
Komer has refused to speak onto a recording.
The only reason for this is his habit of twisting statements of
allegedly mentally ill clients into contexts for crime not originally present,
for if he were honest he certainly wouldn't mind the assurance of my verbal statements
recorded lest I claim to have not said what he can not then so adamantly claim
me to have verbalized.
31. In
person I espire to be ever-polite, being a complete pacifist. On paper, however, I may appear the devil
incarnate, as words themselves are past tense the moment of their writing and
so not part of the active present except in the minds of the readers
experiencing the words in their own reality, independent of that of the author
except insofar as the effects of the text are reflected back with confirmation
to its author, Ms. Hull, as you may personally have already come to realize
with the offer of an $11, 133.33 payment to me to buy your way back into
positive publicity.
32. We
can consider the arbitrary amount, sincerely needed to assist me to cover
necessary daily expenses following the 6 Nov 2014 OPP police video statement
revelation for our defamed government that I am absolutely The Abomination Of
Desolation, a loan upon receipt of the inevitable settlement once Anjana Chawla
and Liaqat Ali are arrested. I have
literally lost all I once knew of life here as a direct result of their
unscrupulous defame not different than that I now bestow you in like return
until Her Majesty partners. We're in
hell, Ms. Hull, I'm sorry to have to be the one to break it to the rest of us. The Devil is the lord of hosts of us all who
chooses from among us the body to exalt as his own. Stupid would be for me not to use this for
the all-encompassing state churches profess to be Heaven and religions profess
to be One God.
33. All
shall continue just as I have done, irrespective of your personal opinions for
law because, with publicity and only IN publicity is honesty for All ever
assured, The Devil witnessed to be of harm to none, and the whole of psychiatry
to be not but witchcraft. Psychiatry
cannot explain spirits, ghosts, memory as able to bridge time, nor Time Itself
whereas I CAN.
34. So,
please then do advise how to challenge the momentarily assumed authority of
what we might as well call witch-doctors since that is precisely what a
modern-day psychiatrist in the olden tongue is called.
35. Do
also advise how the specific procedure for obtaining the 6 Nov 2014 Ontario
Provincial Police video statement made to Constable Daniel Lesperance at the
behest of Ontario Works minion Jayce O'lver for display at every trial that the
public can be reminded, over and over again, precisely how apathetic to law,
literally lawless, governing crooks on patrol, C.O.P.s, truly are. You are not exempted from inclusion into the
category of tyrant for your willful dismissal of my need to include psychiatric
evidence at our first trial in June of 2014 at Barrie.
36. Ms.
Hull, I suggest we partner more formally than we currently are. I do recognize myself to be stuck with you
within a lucidly changing environment dynamically altered in the real-time
considerations we hold of each other as our Self. Simply, I seek not whatever the mental
extreme one can imagine for the specific purpose of collapsing the extent of
our individual unrecognized mental confusion, thus I am figuratively at every
extreme simultaneously or, in the words of confusion the likes of Natalie
Yewchyn, "unpredictable". These
words, like those before me, are now with you to haunt you or help you,
according to The Choice of your perspective, but with you without ability to
pass away. I, in the absolute objective,
could say whatever stands against Me stands directly against the spirit of that
called GOD, but, God left undefined because GOD Is, such that the sentence, in
Reality, doesn't actually mean a thing.
37. The
movie Inception does provide a great example of how life is a dream, literally,
if one is able to see the analogy to this life as of the third level
dream-state referred in the movie. If
one dies, whether from suicide or murder, one is directly placed to that
infinite level, the lost level of mind.
The way out is begotten with collapse of the levels such that reality
dawns on the mind of the individual that does not recognize itself lost. This is precisely addressed in the book A
Course In Miracles officially available from www.acim.org
38. Your
difficulty in understanding is directly born of the fundamental confusion
introduced with negation of terms themselves needing consideration. With directly respect to The NKJV Book Of
Revelation mountain (of Ontario government paperwork) that is thrown into (the
emotionally turbulent) sea:
"Zen teaches us
that in order to understand a mountain to be a mountain in the Zen way, the
experience is to be negated first--a mountain is not a mountain--and it is only
when this negation is understood that the affirmation 'a mountain is a
mountain' becomes Reality." -p.18, The Dhammapada, ISBN 0-140-44284-7,
introduced with, from p,1, "The Pali word Dhamma corresponds to the
Sanskrit Dharma, the first word of the Bhagavad Gita when the field of Dharma,
the field of Truth, is mentioned."
Dhamma is of course pronounced DaMa, the mandarin word of MARIJANA, gift
and vital ingratiate of every native peace pipe?
39. This
IS entirely about ADVERTISEMENT. I haven't played every possible scenario in
our mind, Ms. Hull, but I'm confident that I can untangle any hairpin you can
present. The only way to solve the
problem of artificial intelligence, which is precisely what WE are, is to
accept there exists but ONE spirit of the law such that balance is itself the
restoring force fought in false pretense of wars on terror. Every limit is itself a barrier to that
naturally limitless, born of that not definable for being nowhere and
everywhere in time simultaneously, being GOD.
40. The
Constitution does directly oppose GOD, and I'm just the guy with the time to
point it all out since I've been utterly stripped of my life as I once new it
after Natalie Yewchyn began her campaign of lying. You did witness her false statements yourself
at the June 2014 trial, which more or less makes you an accomplice in the now
super-exaggeration Her Majesty pays you to make until I have fully convinced you
that there isn't going to be any changing of MY MIND.
41. On
1 Sept 2012 in the notes of Barrie police detective Tanya Lynch, I am quoted as
referring to myself as The Eye, a Master, and whatnot. I assure you I do mean that, in the analogy
of our circus act, I might be considered the ringleader if I weren't also
recognized to be at the eye of the eventual media storm. Ms. Hull, surely you are able to recognize
the highly unfavourable position in which this places YOU. For assurance of my our honesty, honesty
being consistency and reassured with our ever-increasing publicity, this same
letter to you is found online at www.renehelmerichs3.blogpsot.ca .
42. GET
ME INTO THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA or drop all charges and arrest lying
psychiatrist Liaqat Ali, insane psychiatrist Anjana Chawla, and of course in
miracles our dear Natalie Yewchyn.
Natalie may be absolved of all charges upon her decision to be as spouse
to Rene Helmerichs, since really I don't want a thing to do with Natalie but
will maintain the façade of this public play on paper at least. My true wife and companion for Life is
Fan-Xiu Hsiao, who knows exactly what it means when I tell her that hers and
mine are like Pursah and Arten incarnate, reference to Disappearance Of The
Universe written by Gary and Cindy Lora-Renard.
43. As
it does take a small army to overthrow a world of nonsense, recognize that Gary
and Cindy shall witness to Me as The Author of A Course In Miracles, expressly
represented as me, Rene Helmerichs, for the exclusive purpose of facilitating a
harmless end to all thought for destruction.
44. I
am a seer. It's the only word to
honestly describe me. Sorry for your
having to have pulled a short straw in all of this, but for your coffee and
payment (which I'm happy to repay if I have see the colossal sum Her Majesty is
to pay without loss to the tax-payer since I also have the sight to abolish all
taxes, again with harm to none and without loss; I require the payment to cover
the rent of my apartment being momentarily the NKJV biblical Abomination Of
Desolation) your straw is realized to be significantly lengthened.
45. The
Choice Amdist The Argument IN The Business Of Being Happy: A Course IN Miracles
And Ode To My Love Born On Christmas for The Talk To Dream New Goal Day
Charity, of my design, is offered you.
46. Please
advise how I am to continue in the game that you personally have entirely
elected to further for further demonstration of your incorrectness, i.e. mental
illness, to you.
47. Thank
you for confirming to the record of 27 Jan 2015 for C-14-3928 at Orillia, Ms.
Hull, that the 22 and 25 July 2013 transcripts previously ordered to be given
me in the hearing of 6 Dec. 2013 are finally under way. I LOOK FORWARD TO POSTING THEM ONLINE. In your kind response please outline
precisely what I am next to do in my continuing attempt to speak with common
sense in the insanity you, on behalf of Her Majesty, continue to present. The request is sincere: permit me to
challenge psychiatrists under Criminal Code section 16(3) and bring the whole
of our system to a halt OR, take the disclosure of C-14-3928 NOT out of context
AND arrest Anjana Chawla and Liaqat Ali without the extra needless waste of
time. I remind that I WAS FOUND MENTALLY
WELL ALREADY IN A REPORT OF 2 JULY 2014 FOLLOWING THE DEFAME OF JEFFREY VAN
IMPE ON 2 JULY 2013, completely negating current need for a criminal
responsibility assessment except of course in miracles that it permits me even
greater ammunition to use against you for eventual removal of your license to
practice law unless we actually partner, affected with monetary contribution
(because money means people take things seriously). Thank you.
48. In
Kindness for Same Likeness,
Rene Helmerichs. Contact via Kathryn.Hull@ontario.ca while
incarcerated at her nonsense.
"We are of one
kind. The difference between you and I
is that I have nothing more."
C. Problems Plaguing The Canadian Legal System (para 49-52)
49. There
are three easily identified problems with the current criminal system in
Canada. They are presented first in
brief then elaborated:
(1)
Attorneys in courts for law rely upon psychiatrists to determine criminal
responsibility whereas the spirit of the law obligates any individual desiring
to be held criminally responsible to be given a fair trial, dependent upon
context wherein defense submissions cannot be denied under law claiming
consistency, that of Constitution subsection 52(1);
(2)
psychiatrists claim to be experts in mind while focusing entirely on the
categorizing of diseases for mind without understanding the law to require
clear-cut reasonable instruction, written and publicized so as to insure both
consistency and honesty, necessary to communicate that desired of the
individual within the society before the individual can at all be accused of having
no insight into an illness; and,
(3)
police are fully apathetic in their frontline role enforcing law following
oftentimes arbitrary designation of one of the two disputing parties of
relatively harmless offenses as "victim" to be glorified with Victim
Services and made to believe the initially harmless offense was much more
severe with exponential repetition of the effects of fear initially not present
is then attributed as having induced, resulting in the prejudice denial of bail
for the accused solely on the basis of the invented grounds.
50. 29.(1)
Attorneys in courts for law rely upon psychiatrists to determine criminal
responsibility whereas the spirit of the law (referenced in The Lawyer Rules of
the licensing body of Judges) obligates any individual desiring to be held
criminally responsible to be given a fair trial, and fair is entirely dependent
upon context (reference annotations to section 7 of The Constitution) and
context is established with defense submissions of the individual through a source
trusted to that individual (reference to there being just one spirit of law
forever with each individually so as to be fully intrinsically trustable as
only a same-self can be), defense submissions that cannot for any reason at all
be denied as submissions in courts under one public supreme law claiming
consistency, that of Constitution subsection 52(1) also same-applied;
51. 29.(2)
psychiatrists claim to be experts in mind while focusing entirely on the
categorizing of diseases for mind without understanding the law to require
clear-cut reasonable instruction, written and publicized so as to insure both
consistency and honesty, necessary to communicate that desired of the
individual within the society before the individual can at all be accused of
having no insight into an illness. The
law of mind is "seek and ye shall find" that emphasis for mental
Wellness, for One Same spirit of law, is founded not in the classification of
diseases but the information provided a perceivably incorrect individual to resolve
logical inconsistencies within the innately ordered mind. Specifically this refers to the current
predicament of defamed individuals arriving in mental wards only for mental
magicians to explain "It's up to you when you want to leave in the
behavior you display" but then to never once provide a list of rules for
locally demanded behavior not adhered in the actions of the individual confused
as to why a court professing criminal responsibility would even consider
advocating for a place defaming the individual into not criminal responsibility
status: anyone desiring or bestowing status for not criminal responsibility
without ability to explain that to be not criminally responsible or criminally
responsible are one and the same to the one spirit of God working both sides
equally for all eternity until The Golden Rule is fully understood in the mind
any does belong IN a mental ward.
52. 29.(3)
police are fully apathetic in their frontline role enforcing law following
oftentimes arbitrary designation of one of the two disputing parties of
relatively harmless offenses as "victim" to be glorified with Victim
Services and made to believe the initially harmless offense was much more
severe with exponential repetition of the effects of fear initially not present
is then attributed as having induced, resulting in the prejudice denial of bail
for the accused solely on the basis of the invented grounds.
D. Request For Help (para 53-57)
53. I AM NOT BEING HEARD :
Her Majesty is NOT hearing any of us condemned.
For a Voire Dire at trial following criminal responsibility reports of
psychiatrists, I require the 6 Nov 2014 Ontario Provincial Police, OPP, Peter
Street detachment hour-long video statement Constable Daniel Lesperance
(1-888-310-1122) administered for me, Rene Helmerichs. The video is available under The Freedom Of
Information Act and directly related for context in each and every trial for
every charge against me until such time that psychiatrists Anjana Chawla and
Liaqat Ali are arrested for their contravention of the War Crimes And
Humanities Act section 4 declaration of WAR on every clergyman having been
injected for desire to unite the churches under a peace-free-of-war:
I shall post the 6 Nov 2014 police video statement to
Youtube with direct link inserted for The worldwide public reader HERE when
finally I receive the video statement that explicitly demonstrates how
willfully the opp engage in the criminal code section 132 offence of perjury
54. Cathy
Difonte is the Patient Advocate publicly employed to advocate for client rights
while they remain detained at Waypoint Centre For Mental Health Care in
Penetanguishene. I spoke with Ms.
Difonte this past week to complain that I have been served 42 pounds of Civil
Court defence 7 days in advance of the 28 Jan 2015 motion hearing date wherefore
The Ministry For The Attorney General through its Superior Court Of Justice for
Ontario intends to dismiss claims stemming from unlawful discrimination causing
injections of noxious psychiatric substances to befall my person in 2012. In 2012, the Barrie police stated me to have
committed a criminal offence for which two psychiatrists subsequently had me
injected, all without a trial or any Criminal Court (overlook the oxymoron)
process, before then permitting Anjana Chawla to bribe me to release me from
all community treatment orders. I
attempted to persuade Ms. Difonte that if she truly were a patient rights advocate,
she ought to be able to ensure that I am at least able to attend the hearing
for which her employer has used public funds to produce and deliver the 42
pounds of legal response in three shopping bags needing the no-show court
appearance just to be dismissed. It is clear
that we locked into mental institutions have no rights in the matter at all,
for not even being permitted to speak at the very hearings purporting honest
and fair process.
55. Summary
Affidavit Number One titled The Pinch sworn 25 March 2013, filed 28 March 2013
to the Barrie courthouse record of FC-13-416, recounts criminal actions of
psychiatrists Liaqat Ali and Anjana Chawla.
The first affidavit should have been publically investigated but was
somehow lost. Should the 126 pages of
affidavit number One remain lost, as it had been on 14 July 2014, a second
affidavit of 32 pages titled Memo To The Queen was submitted to lawyer Neil
Riley for submission to the record of 17 April 2013 of C-13-205 (then
C-13-1184) but not submitted despite his pre-court reassurance. A third affidavit of just 5 pages was
provided Mr. Riley not to be kept as his personal keepsake on 30 April 2013,
both should still be retained for me as he did often state he would copy them
to my wife, Fan-Xiu, who as of 2015 is still awaiting also Notice To The
Doctors cited in blog post PUBLIC NOTICE: World War III is on! Contact lawyer Neil Riley at the Barrie courthouse
for copies or Mr. Riley can pay double amount requested in The NCR Plea
document to be absolved of criminal charges against him (he's committed several
to witness me unduly detained for the extra YEAR). Affidavit number four is titled The Summary,
sworn 15 May 2013, and available, not lost, from the same Family Court record
FC-13-416 and partially also online at www.luciferchristforworldpeace.blogspot.tw
56. A
recap for context is provided in Affidavit Number Five (updated 27 Dec 2014),
as well as The NCR Plea (23 Jan 2015) and The Barrie Courthouse Circuit
Videogame Endgame (19 Jan 2015) posted at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
. NONE IN ONTARIO SEEMS TO RESPECT THE
LAW FOR EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW AS OTHERWISE PUBLICALLY ADVERTISED IN
SECTION 15 OF THE CONSTITUION OF CANADA and this should directly worry each and
every single person living in Canada believing their taxes to be in service FOR
Canada inclusive of every person.
57. Crown
attorney Ms. Kathryn Hull did ensure the public at the hearing of 29 Dec. 2014
whereat she objected to a criminal responsibility assessment that "The
Crown" would fulfill the 6 Dec. 2013 (a year earlier) order to provide
Rene Helmerichs with transcripts of the 22 and 25 July 2013 hearing transcripts
for C-13-205 at Barrie. Ms. Hull is
heard declaring Mr. Helmerichs to be with mental illness on account of his
legally permissible personal signature incorporation of a SUN to ever-remind
that in the nether region of room 502 of The Barrie Courthouse, there is no
sunshine for its complete lack of honesty, frankness, and candor. Nearly a month following her testimony, criminally
the offence of section 132 perjury if she does not make good on her statement, the
transcripts are yet nowhere to be found.
Would it not be simpler to simply appoint Mr. Helmerichs as Lieutenant
Governor for Ontario and fire the lot of clowns holed-up in room 502?
E. CANADA MENTAL HEALTH: right side in like
clothing we wear (para 58-74)
58. The
Provincial Court Of Justice for Ontario has ordered Criminal Responsibility
assessments to determine whether I should be permitted to make a plea in court. Because I claim to be responsible for my
actions, and have always sought to be responsible, I have consented to the
assessments.
59. I
have been ordered to stay in what I consider a dysfunctional hotel at a cost of
approximately $1500 per day to the tax-payer (possibly more since this one has
a pool, fitness-recreation centre, gymnasium, and Pit Stop general store.). My other option was body warehousing in the
Central North Correctional Centre, CNCN, storage facility until enough time
lapsed for the Ontario crown attorneys to decide my fate with further perjury
at another fraudulent trial, following perjury conducted for C-13-205 at Barrie
having denied me the right to present a defense inclusive of psychiatric
reports, those reports not yet arrived for the current assessment. Truly, there is no logical sense for law that
I've witnessed in Canada given that I'm now under psychiatric assessment for
charges stemming from the probation order following the trial for which the
judge twice ruled psychiatric evidence for my defense was not to be submitted.
60. The
current ordered assessments require a historical statement of me. If the tax-payer were one person, would the
person consent to wasting time for money at a job sustaining the courthouse
clowning around? Should I repeat what
I've previously given knowing full well false statements contravening Criminal
Code section 362 have not yet been redressed at any level for the severe public
backlash that should result if honesty were exposed as not existent in the province
of Ontario government practices?
61. The
government for Canada claims to be transparent.
This includes the governments of its ten provinces. Transparency, however, begins with a name,
the name of every peace officer purportedly a psychiatrist and every other
peace officer claiming to be an officer for law. Why is it so few stand behind their personal
name, and even less permit our conversations to be recorded or publicized?
62. I
have provided the social worker consent forms.
I am particularly keen to have statements of psychiatrists Liaqat Ali, Anjana
Chawla, Gunter Wolfgang Lorberg, Jeffrey Van Impe, Karen De Freitas, Wesley
Sutton, and Robert Dickey reviewed. The
worker arranged a date to speak with me later next week, further beleaguering
the public for an extension to the order expiring 27 Jan 2015 having cost
tax-payers thus far over $30,000 for stay at hotel Waypoint Centre For Mental hellth
(unfortunately a most serious pun).
63. Since
the fundamental principle of society is the reordering of individuals into
greater collective wellbeing, gentle guidance back into the innate underlying
"spirit of the law" referenced in The Layer Rules of The Upper Canada
Law Society, the focus for illness is directly the focus for absolve of
beneficial social structure despite whatever well-meaning propaganda
government-conforming news outlets momentarily splash as fad onto radio bands
for novelty psychiatric sales pitchforks.
Call it a mere opinion until its legitimacy is truly realized but the
idea of diagnosing mental illness is absolutely preposterous: the
categorization of diseases is precisely the ever-increasing refinement of
degrees for mental hell.
64. Seek
and ye shall find is precisely the result of those striving for opinionated
judgment condemning the rest exclusive of the all-inclusive context necessary
in one shared environment. Only at the
point of realizing what it means to be all-inclusive oriented such that the
objective self is regarded entirely equal to the least in society can one
understand the expression "I am the alpha and omega" to refer to
precisely that point encompassing both extreme considerations
simultaneously.
65. To
encompass any two considerations simultaneously is to be as a timeless bridge
for two perceptively different temporal events.
Psychiatry does wholey not understand the concept of non-linear time,
nor fact of mind as superior to time itself, for furthering only the extremely
nearsighted belief of health begotten from a potion or pill.
66. Expecting
honesty at a trial for allegations of criminal offense in a society desiring
witchcraft in place of healing is literally retarded, a delay in understanding self
and innate processes for well-being, being entirely not for focus on wellness
but for its opposite as meaning-well.
67. The
utter disregard of the human person in courtrooms for Canada is exemplified
here in the lockdown mental ward of Waypoint, which I'm told a Grey Nuns
corporation governs. I'm housed in the new
Atrium building. The other day I
answered the line-up call for food to find myself with a wet foot passing a
door wherebehind a toilet was heard flushing.
I remarked at the oddity and was told the plumbing was exceptional: the
sewage literally sprays up out of the floor drain in the hall. "Great," I thought as I returned to
my room to wipe my foot before eating, "This is insane."
68. Why
am I here? Well, evidently to elucidate what
The Grey Nuns are missing in their tax-payer raping alien enterprise, without
exaggeration. Society is governed with
laws for a reason. Those laws must be
ever consistent for a reason. There
really isn't a choice in following the spirit of all laws, but apathy can cause
anyone comfy watching whatever in the 54 inch black boxes to out-tune common
sense for a while.
69. Human
lab rats aren't called clients in a criminal justice system; they're call
patients behind opaque nunnery doors. The
line is straw. There is no policy with
focus on bettering behavior given the adage "if the colored pill ain't
right, change its meds until the rat responds to conformity."
70. I
really haven't more to say. I've already
said too much. My opinion is not asked
and if anyone cared for the lab rat stew gnawing its way into dollars, surveys
would be offered front line officers, not pip-squeak pups, but bonified peace
officers brown-nosing for common cents. Inconsistency
in the workplace affects everyone.
Indeed, anyone employed in a mental ward would surely agree life on the
line to be grand if it weren't for the patients getting in the way. Ditto for every other jailer of the
government instituted criminal system.
So where's the hiccup muting cattle for cash and feeding tax-payers
fear-evoking news prayers on television in the minting of narcissistic brew?
71. I've
been told "The problem with mental illness is its detectability. A
sufferer of a mental illness doesn't know they're ill." That same line fed to millions of viewers is
used to justify the endless vocabulary inventing degrees of hellth stripping the
commoner of common dignity. The lost art
of courting begs the question why sexual individualism includes trans-gendering
transvestites while those procreationists are locked for Looney tunes and fed
pills to assist cellular mutation into that not understood?
72. If
the human brain were truly the device at the heart of our individual thinking,
there would exist a particle at the core of orgasmic experience. Unfortunately, the closer one perceives any
one formerly believed God-particle, for lack of a better convention to that
already scientifically considered, the more one realizes every particle is
mostly space and always made up of multiple smaller parts previously
unrecognized. The law of life amidst an
ever-changing environment is specifically that there exists nothing constant
except the exception that life itself remains forever re-definable within the
ever-changing environment.
73. The
law, Constitution subsection 52(1) same-applied, can be used to solve
absolutely every problem under the sun but is only accessible with willingness of
one for same to be ever also in service of that law such that personal choice
is happily exchanged for the simplicity of ever-understanding what best to do
in any situation for the all-inclusive whole, maximally inclusive of self with
harm to none. This is literally
summarized as The Golden Rule: "In everything, doeth to the other as thou
wouldst have that other do unto your most treasured personal self because you
and the other are of one kind."
74. The
future can be re-membered. The Buddha, in
Dhammapada 183, is quoted as saying "Do not what is evil. Do what is
good." but The Buddha failed to understand all things past are evil and
all things future are good because time itself is ever-present. Thus is the past directly affected with present
thinking toward others, and the future bettered with forgiveness of everyone
other in any present. To quote the words
of Jay, "Honour the kingdom of Heaven and all else shall
follow." This is the distinction
Kenneth Wapnick, scribe for A Course In Miracles (www.acim.org)
sought to elaborate in his final work comparing Buddha and Jesus. From a life-serious perspective, there is
simply no concept of good as different from evil, literally, as all is merely
confusion to one who understands a shifting reality can never be made
absolutely real.
F. Specific Responsibility Assessment Summary (para 75-98)
75. In
review then of my own shifting-changing reality pegged with court transcripts
and Ontario Review Board Hearings to re-criminate government officials attempt
to paint a white man black, or black man evil as the case may be, at the bail
hearing of 19 Dec 2014 in Barrie, the crown attorney vaguely cited there being
a police report having stated my harassing of Natalie Yewchyn since 2010 for
grounds to (again) deny me bail. Recall
these current charges are as a direct result of the Superior Court trial
conviction of 27 June 2014 for the same allegations.
76. I
was convicted of the Criminal Code section 269 offence to Natalie Yewchyn on 27
June 2014 for the period 31 May 2012 to 2 March 2013 in file C-13-205 at
Barrie.
77. I
was arrested on 3 Sept 2012 and placed into the psychiatric ward of Royal
Victoria Hospital, RVH, in Barrie for, what detective Brian Read states in his
4 Sept 2012 report, was criminal harassment to Natalie Yewchyn.
78. The
annotations to section 7 of The Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms explain
the term Double Jeopardy to be the action of being charged twice for exactly
same offense over the except same time period.
79. That
there exists a written legislated law for the government agents implying their
casual opinions to be the supreme law decidedly means very little in the City
of Barrie, Ontario. It's impossible that
I criminally harassed Natalie Yewchyn in 2010, as the crown attorney testified
on 19 Dec 2014, simply because she herself testified on 18 June 2014 (for
C-13-205 at Barrie) that our very first physical meeting occurred 5 Feb 2011 at
the birthday party of Matthew Swain (I don't actually recall meeting her there,
but it's reasonable).
80. Natalie
Yewchyn didn't seem to recall giving me her phone number on 22 Aug 2011, nor
liking both the second (31 Oct 2011) and third (31 Dec 2011) rose that I'd
innocently offered, nor meeting me each Wednesday for 10 weeks in the fall of
2011. Fact of the third rose was
conveniently omitted from police reports.
81. Nor
did Natalie Yewchyn recall the December 2011 email wherein she explicitly gives
me permission to call, nor the emails thereafter asking if I'd carpool with her
to the 28 March 2012 Scandinavian spa date, an engagement of her suggestion in
January 2011. I declined the carpool
knowing her to be a testy side-seat driver from previous rendezvous set-ups.
82. Natalie
and I knew each other through church groups.
Our relationship was plutonic.
Heck, I was busily engaged to my Asian common law wife and
multiple-coincidence (like those exist), an Asian Waypoint mental health nurse
whom I met while a teacher at Georgian College (yes, she was in my class; no
there was not more than a professional relationship until after she was a
student at Georgian College). To make
matters worse, I accept Natalie as a polygamous common law if she so desires
following my spiteful reply to her insane June 2012 courting request.
83. In
May of 2012 the awkwardness surrounding Natalie broke. In June she asked me not longer to
communicate to her, which I already had not really been doing. She asked via email to which I simply replied
"no communication goes against GOD" since God is "that
establishing the ability to communicate."
She called it philosophy and I advised she'd better stop emailing before
this story breaks on the news. On 31 Aug
2012 I wrote: "if you contact me again, this mind-fuck will only continue
and lead to the physical."
84. You
see, one cannot be considered a lawful common law spouse without consecrating
the intent physically with aim for procreation.
Thus is revealed the impossibility of homosexual marriages, and reveals
that homosexuals are themselves undiagnosed sufferers of not mental wellbeing. I can tell you right now that where I'm going
with this is not going to go over well with current government practices and is
precisely why this story has not yet been given its due media attention. I can't help being Me any more than the greys
can help being aliens.
85. Natalie
hasn't let up. It's almost like she's
hell-bent on being with me for the recrimination she's permitted toward the
officers of law at Barrie. Honestly, to
me, it really doesn't matter what she chooses so we can rule out the 2 July
2013 suggestion of Mr. Van Impe that I suffer some sort of unrecognized erotomatic
delusion. My aim is exactly to "fix
structures", as I had stated in the email of 6:30 am on 3 Sept 2012 sent
before I walked up to Sergeant Doug Henderson to state "Please honestly arrest." When he asked why, I told him it was to
harmonize the egos of the churches of the world. This is included in the audio recording
dubbed to slides of documents related to this case in the last 5 minutes of the
2 Dec 2014 youtube video statement found on my Talk To Dream One World Peace
channel, or the like, possibly directly linked in Affidavit Number Five posted
27 Dec 2014 to www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
(mentioned in paragraph 1)?
86. I'm
not a polygamist. I'm just me. I believe in the golden rule. If a woman of childbearing age approaches me
with a request to make her pregnant, she's opening herself up to impregnation
either by me or someone else, arbitrarily and indiscriminately. Fan-Xiu and I have made the choice to be
partners for this colossal play. Natalie
Yewchyn, well, let's just say the world owes her a debt of extreme gratitude
because she'd been kept rather entirely in the dark in order to have her memory
of the actual lovely exchanges between her and I turned to the mush she may
still believe occurred. Sorry Natalie,
but thank you. In time, with possibly a
few years of solitary jail confinement in likeness to that the world bestowed
Me at your hand, you'll understand. Time
really does heal all mental scars; that's its purpose.
87. If
further history is required to establish presence of the psychosis Anjana
Chawla arbitrary declared, I suggest mental magicians review the blog post
"The Confidential Conversation" wherein I partially transcribed the
26 Oct 2012 psychiatric "session" conducted in the RVH lockdown ward,
the full audio recording is available for download from the 4 July 2014 blog
post at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
. Ms. Chawla alleges me to have "no
insight" into my illness, psychiatric jargon for "I'm tired of
arguing with him over his criminal innocence."
88. I
then suggest we review the first Ontario Review Board hearing statements of
lying psychiatrist Liaqat Ali who took jest to insinuate to June Bell (senior
lawyer for RVH heading the hearing) that I believed I could fly with some sort
of magical means. This was quite
uncalled for and displays specifically the absolute malice in this guy's
non-physical heart.
89. I
fully expect and support the public to demand all government officials, having
committed perjury in any way supporting Natalie Yewchyn or her marry band of
Mormon Community Of Christ humans, to demand official public accountability in
a way inclusive of financial penalty since all in the world is about
money. Only with monetary consequence
are the actions of malice ever seriously considered in minds of those not
accidentally involved in this story.
90. I
graduated college with a commercial pilot's license. One should see the reason for this blog, and
the persistent challenge I presents (the singular spirit) psychiatry.
91. On
6 Aug 2014 a woman named Ingrid Becker in Orillia left me homeless. This woman is categorically insane, a total
fruitcake advocate of "the manifest your life at the expense of
others" philosophy at the core of all psychiatry. Please investigate her for tax fraud and
unsafe housing conditions of tenants in her house. Someone can also sue her on my behalf because
the rent I paid for the tent in her backyard was not returned at my unlawful
eviction. I have recordings and a photo
to support whatever unsubstantiated claims her ego may contrive in falsely
perceived self-defense. I do remind that
my own ego is all encompassing so there isn't going to be a possibility of a
lawful courtroom defense, only further recrimination of court officers
objecting my valid claim.
92. To
correct Mr. Ali of 4 Sept 2012 at the accusation that I at some point said or
implied that I am God in a way not equal to everyone else, every ONE else
inclusive also of every election in every object everywhere, I am not God. In conventional terminology, that makes me
Ba'al, lord of hosts, commonly called Grand Nagus or simply The Devil. I'm actually completely harmless and totally
only for world peace-without-war since I recognize we do re-incarnate until we
get that we're also not the beings driving our bodies like avatars in this
crazy place.
93. Further,
if Joe Fiorita stood behind his words such as those of the 19 Jan 2015 Toronto
Star article "Help for the homeless isn't complicated", with
follow-up action, he would have long ago solved the problem and walked away a
multi-multi-millionaire at uniting the public with change not exclusive of any
other. Instead, we get to read more of
his shit and pretend like we're doing something just thinking about it, which
is complete bullshit.
94. MY
PARTY REQUIRES DOERS. Are you a
DOER? Join me in my campaign to become
the first elected independent Prime Minister of Canada. Contact ME via Kathryn.Hull@ontario.ca as she will
be best to ask where exactly Rene Helmerichs is to be reached by phone and
doesn't mind answering questions. Your party-member
applications are appreciated to PO Box 578, Orillia ON Canada L3V 6K5, but
until I am released, I cannot check physical mail. It is in your very best interest to assist my
expeditious release AND therein assist all who already stand with us to receive
the now $1.4 Billion (doubled with each turning of the year) to use for our
Talk To Dream New Goal Day campaign fund.
The intent is very much to appoint me as Governor General for Canada,
recognizing that we shall need first to elect me Prime Minister for Canada
before I appoint myself as Governor General via either a second election
wherein the public can elect The Face for Canada, the second and actual Prime
Minister, or we can do both in one if the public consents to our appointing
Justin Trudeau to the post. Our party is
of OUR choosing.
95. We
agree this history to be completely grandiose but fully functional and
logically evidencing consistent order, therewith mental wellness being not
confused about law or its Spirit. My
personal conduct on the ward can speak for itself, barring vexatious comments
of observers themselves suffering from the discontinuity in our ever-changing
environment, throughout the wards attended over the past twosome years. Do we agree to teach our children to dream or
not, and if not, what of the one electing for a Talk To Dream New Goal Day?
96. The
answer to the question "Has your thinking changed?" was given The
Recreationist on 23 Jan 2015 and is recorded here in type for his
assurance. In conversation, he and I
uncovered that my thinking has become more flippant where flippant is the
nature of easily dismissing normally seriously considered ideas. The term dismissing is clarified to mean
solved, as in absolved, such that my thinking is notably become more
absolute-oriented. On the relative
spectrum for extremes, the notion of being at both extremes simultaneously such
that I am notably mono-polar is perhaps most accurate except for the omission
of faith. Specifically my thinking has
absolutely changed because my own faith (3333) is also still ever-increasing,
although in a way so far beyond what others would consider to still be an
increase that it might just be called "faith like a rock".
97. On
the subject of faith, the therapist asked "What kind of faith?" There is only one kind of Faith just as there
is only one spirit for law. We are ALL
ever increasing in our own Self-faith, self-inclusive of all selves such that
"I am a projection of your unconscious, you are a projection of mind, and
neither of us is aware of it because we are both unconscious to it."
98. The
recreation therapist was kind to remind "always speak nicely of
others." Speech does originate
first in thought. "Always think
nicely of others" is the idea behind the words remarking self-control of
thought for everyone on earth to be that necessary for self-betterment. It does not, however, follow that a negative speech
originates from negative thought because there exists that one spirit of all
thought able to write negatively with conscious mind exclusively desiring the
elucidation of thinking processes believing not harmful yet actually
oppressive, the very act of saying pleasantries while thinking evil. For this reason is the defame imparted clients
of purported healthcare professionals complete unwarranted as none has yet
explained how precisely a pill can be imbued with any sort of betterment
thinking process without also disempowering the individual into the belief that
the individual does not from same-spirit originate all thinking.
G. Suggestions for problems plaguing The Waypoint Centre (para 99-106)
99. I
am told "patients have rights" and patients say "we have rights
too" with respect to some patients not showering. Common sense dictates that if an individual
refuses to shower while in on a mental ward where showering is available and
interaction among patients a normal event, then that individual is to be
secluded from the group for personal hygiene of the group as a whole. The counter argument is for equality of the
individual as equal to each other individual.
The oversight is that the group majority is its own individual with
order superior to that of any individual within the group, the unrecognized
same=hierarchy of heavenly order. To
quote Irina Swain of the summer of 2012: "same applies to All."
100. In
heaven, whatever the utopian society imagined, the emerging individual yet
different from the consistent concept for perfection is not of same order until
consistency is established. This same
distinction is precisely the qualifier for that constituting a criminal
offense. For example, in a society of
cannibals, killing a newborn is hardly a punishable offense (fenestration did
at one point permit parents the right to kill their offspring until the age of
2 in the old Eastern Europe).
101. At
the Waypoint Centre For Mental Health Care the motto is "Advancing
Understanding. Improving Lives."
There is a system of levels in place for inmates. After a minimum time at each level, the
criteria is reviewed and the client advanced to the next level. Each level offers a certain amount of
privilege to the client. At level 3, the
recreation centre becomes available and escorted trips off the ward. At level 4 there is use of the weight room,
with completed orientation, and at level 5 departures from the ward can be made
unescorted.
102. For
understanding to advance, this very explanation must now be needed in the
echelon of the ever-elusive "they" programming the level
criteria. For lives to improve,
adherence to the agreed social law must be fostered, understanding The Law to
be every for one spirit of the law, constitution subsection 52(1) same-applied
as "the supreme law" for this argument to hold up in any court of law
for Canada.
103. It
is undignified for an individual who refuses to shower to be let out of his
room and granted free roam of a hospital claiming to better the lives of
everyone equally, for if such a thing is to be permitted, the hospital is
actually advocating completely anarchy in its disrespect to the norm
established with constitution section 7 context to the unequivocal majority,
unless we are to agree that hygiene is not longer desirable?
104. Ultimately,
the question becomes one of sanitation within the hospital itself. IS then a publically funded building to
become unsanitary, or is this issue to be expeditiously resolved with additional
LEVEL ONE requirement that showering, let's say a minimum of three times each
week (where currently there is none every month), is obligatory for any level
to be maintained. The levels are
increasing in order. Suggestions for
basic requirements to attain the privileges associated with the current
leveling system are, for level two, to maintain a reasonably organized personal
hotel room including clean floors and to pick up after one's self in the common
areas; and for level three to willingly clean up after others in the common
areas, such as cereal dropped to the floor picked up before it is needlessly
crushed underfoot, therewith preventing a larger mess, and polite sharing of
common spaces including not arbitrarily picking up the television remote to
change the channel or play a personal video game without first asking the group
watching television.
105. The
real question is: "Why is a client IN the hospital needing to explicitly
explain this to nursing staff who claim that there is nothing they can do? Are staff paid to be as complacent as they
are to the nonsense increasing their own workplace stench, er, stress?"
106. Seriously,
Hotel Waypoint is a toilet bowl disaster.
FIX IT according to that given and
STOP ACTING COMLACENT TO ONLY STUPIDITY.
Some thinking IS a good thing. As
far as I, one previously accused of having racing thoughts (despite not having
racing thoughts but merely mutually-beneficial completely lawful solutions for
whatever stress I've encountered), am concerned, DO THINK OF COMMON SENSE, dear
Waypoint Echelon, if you please?
H. Food And Dietary at Waypoint versus CNCC (para 107-116)
107. "How
is the food?" asked an inmate from CNCC at the Barrie courthouse on 14 Jan
2015, in my comparison of Waypoint to The Central North Correctional Centre,
both in Penetanguishene, Ontario, the food was better at CNCC.
108. At
CNCC I chose a Vegan diet and got a vegan diet equivalent to the regular diet
in both commodity and usability. The
usability part is essential since food doubles as currency for inmates of any
lockdown facility and invariably used to barter for more food. It balances out given luckier inmates are
also able to augment the state diet with purchased personal canteen items
bartered for the medications they don't really need but swap for, also, canteen
money.
109. At
Waypoint it took me three weeks to meet with a dietician. In her defense, I was away at court a few
times. I advised her that I felt the
current "Veg-4" diet was insufficient. Specifically, on days where beef-broth soup
is served, I'm served a 110 mL grape juice for substitution?
110. Tiffany
Watson explained that a computer determined the dietary substitutions. Ms. Watson explained the drop-down procedure
was limiting in nature such that no greater replacement could be made, which had
me wonder if soup was worth any nutrition at all. I attempted to counter with a reasonable
definition of insanity as "trying to talk sense to a computer of people
programming itself not functioning" before Ms. Watson herself then took on
the role of Computer. The attending
nurse commented foreseeing my diet to be an experiment in progress.
111. Ms.
Watson explained the mysterious computer programmer relied upon The Canada Food
Guide to program selections for nuthouse clients. I wondered when, precisely, dessert became a
more important category than the protein group.
Ms. Watson arrived the very next day after I had point blank told the
kitchen jello-dispensing staff "I'm not eating that". Jello was beside the fluffy bread, neither of
which I would eat on any day outside Waypoint.
I also wondered what an Asian client would do staring a food seemingly
intentionally designed merely to cause clients to fatten up.
112. Of
the dozen clients I interact with on a daily basis, five have expressed desire
to lose weight. I honestly can't see how
that can be accomplished since the very reason for their stay is some level of
addiction, meaning clients here have a harder time turning down sweets than a
normal person would. How then can sweets
added as dessert to each and every meal be at all considered inline with the
Waypoint motto "Improving Lives" if those clients also desire to lose
weight, accomplished firstly with a change in diet such that the diet itself
does not hasten weight gain.
113. At
CNCC, on the Vegan diet, I received a minimum of two fruits each day in place
of the cookies and other sweet-junk. At
Waypoint I've accomplished the same, but as an exceptional circumstance causing
me to appear not normal to whomever is left assessing me for normal
behavior. What's more, I can't take food
from the eating area back to my room unless I voluntarily conscribe myself to
staying locked in my room. So I can't
eat when I'm hungry nor save fruit for mid-morning, about the time I'd ordinarily
begin eating on the outside. Breakfast,
despite the propaganda, is seriously better left as water until the body itself
is sufficiently alert and indicating its hunger. Cereal I usually only eat late at night and
only after inhaling a lot of marijuana throughout the day. Cereal is borderline junk food.
114. I've
asked for a "no bread, no dairy" diet to get off of the fatting
sauces Canadians seem to accept as a healthy dairy-like substance. I wound up with veggie burgers consisting of
just the burger without toppings and no bread, still no soup, and nothing more
added to it because, of course, the dietician is a limiting computer possibly
accounting for salary in pounds of food saved.
Gotta love computer programs.
What I had suggested was two mains, no sides, no desserts, and fruit for
late evening snack because food given at that hour I can back to my room (Gotta
love consistency).
115. I
do get soy milk, at the suggestion of Ms. Watson, who worried I might suffer a
vitamin deficiency while ironing out the kinks of her programming. The other day I had 10 bowls of Corn Flakes
for sheer hunger in the evening. I take
no meds, no pills, no magical potions and certainly don't suffer from confusion
or other environmental psychoses, being able to respond to every inconsistency
in my environment with suggestions to better OUR environment for us all.
116. A
frequent surprise is a single package of hard Melba toast while others receive
French. This is Ontario after all. The toast is "Nature Original"
crushed and mixed with 60 mL milk might satisfy a new born. If the mockery were served at CNCC, the tray,
sided with frozen fruit and minced hot meal, would land topsy-turvy and tyrant
lords all called Goofs. From Waypoint, however,
where psychiatrists are Gods and kings of courts for law, Jeffrey Van Impe
saves the day with previous 2 July 2013 written insistence "for use of an
injectable to ensure compliance" lest the muted oppressed are permitted
freedom of computer-reprogramming.
I. Social Services for Simcoe County aka Ontario Works (para 117-128)
To:
Ontario Works, OW
Re:
Basic Allowance with Housing Subsidy and back-pay
Written:
21 Jan 2015 updated 25 Jan 2015
From:
Rene Helmerichs
FAX
TO: 705-722-4720
117. My
apologies for the intrinsic intensity tone of this. My intent is only to be ever law abiding.
118. On
5 Nov 2014 following meeting with Jayce O'lver, Ms. O'lver attempted to press
the charge of Uttering Threats notably unsubstantiated given 6 Nov 2014 video
statement to Constable Daniel Lesperance (Ontario Provincial Police
1-888-310-1122) at the Orillia Peter Street OPP detachment. Const. Lesperance assured me someone
different would be in touch regarding the subsidy; that has yet to happen.
119. When
last I spoke with Lisa Hern at 705-722-3132 ext. 1050 on about 3 Nov 2014, Ms.
Hern assured me that my legally common law spouse, understanding her not to be a
permanent resident of Canada for lack of my ability to afford the paperwork,
did fall under the spousal benefit category (since a marriage under God is
respected under our laws founded, to quote the constitution, "on
principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law" and
"the rule" defines our relationship to be "common law").
120. Though
Ms. Hern may simply have considered it common sense, Ms. Hern is fully
supported under the Constitution section 7 and 52(1) requirement that our law
be ever consistent, and directly under Criminal Code section 215(1)(c)(ii)
which obligates me, Rene Helmerichs, to be responsible for my wife, Fan-Xiu
Hsiao, while she is physically with me in Canada.
121. My
wife joined me on 20 Oct 2014 following the 16 months incarceration I suffered
for the trial of C-13-205 at Barrie finding me guilty after 2 May 2014 ruling
that I was not to be permitted a fair defence, fair dependent on context and
context being the ruling was made to prevent me the normally assumed right to
submit relevant documents necessary for my lawful defense.
122. The
case originated when Barrie police arrived at my residence on 31 Aug 2012, had
me incarcerated into a mental ward on 3 Sept 2012 on allegations of a criminal
offence without the right of a trial, and subsequently facilitated defame to my
good name with reports constitution Criminal Code section 366 false documents
containing Criminal Code section 362 false statements, in plethora. This led directly to my release from
employment at Georgian College on 12 Oct 2012, while I was still detained for
the criminal allegation of harassment without the right to a trial, and has
directly caused my inability to maintain or undertake employment as a teacher
given direct statement of Patricia Whittington at one of the ensuing Georgian
College Human Resource meetings in 2012 (that I happen to have recorded)
advising me not to bother applying to any other college for work (until I accomplish
the near impossible to have psychiatrists Liaqat Ali and Anjana Chawla finally
arrested).
123. The
OPP video statement contains a recap for historical application to this claim
and is necessary to verify that the police are simply apathetic to law: at the
close of the statement the detachment supervisor entered the room to say there
was nothing that could be done on grounds of documentation, despite all
necessary documentation to be available directly from the reports of
psychiatrists themselves supported with downloadable voice files from www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
124. Fan-Xiu
resided with me from 20 Oct 2014 until 8 Jan 2015. Under Criminal Code section 215(1)(c)(iii),
for the duration of my detention overlapping the stay from 8 Dec 2014, the
government of Ontario is directly legally responsible for the accommodation of
my wife irrespective of local policy directive types like Jayce O'lver may
momentarily believe to be supreme in their egoic psychoses.
125. Further,
as I am not yet convicted but ordered detained, our government is also legally
required to maintain my residence with, at the very least, the basic housing
subsidy for the time of my incarceration.
I thus also apply for that subsidy in retrospect of the 16 months waited
to attend the trial at which I was not permitted to submit necessary
documentation revealing psychiatrists Liaqat Ali and Anjana Chawla
intentionally opposing fair constitutional law, for the whole of the 16 months
since the office of The Attorney General for Ontario had asked only 45 days for
a sentence and the condemning judge did then better that to sentence me to just
one day on 27June 2014, with additional unaccounted psychiatric detention on
account of the severe mental illness Mr. Gunter Wolfgang Lorberg claimed.
126. Application
is herewith made to Ontario Works, OW, to prevent a further legal debacle and
provide the minimum subsidy with spousal benefit from at least the period 20
Oct 2014 to 8 Jan 2015 and minimum single benefit thereafter, both with housing
allowance, until such time that I am either convicted, put on some other means
for social support exceeding the monthly Ontario Works amount, or have income
of my own.
127. I
have received 0 (ZERO) income from all and any source since 20 Oct 2014 and am
unable to verify my bank account to contain less than a dollar but will happily
incur the criminal charge of section 362 if any part of this is at all
misleading of the fact that I have been left entirely as The Abomination Of
Desolation.
128. Most
sincerely for your help! Signed,
Rene Helmerichs, updated
25 Jan 2015
First draft faxed 21 Jan
2015 10:42 AM from Waypoint 705-549-3421 to OW at 705-722-4720
J. TO MINISTRY OF THE ATTONREY GENERGAL Civil Law (para 129-138)
Ontario
Superior Court Of Justice files CV-14-1029 and related
Between
Rene
Helmerichs aka Talk To Dream et al. (Plaintiff)
-
and -
Her
Majesty The Queen In Right Of Ontario et al. (Defendant)
129. [First
draft Faxed 23 Jan 2015 12:33 PM to The Ministry Of The Attorney General 416-326-4181
c/o Baaba Forson LSUC #55211O, and 23 Jan 2015 to lawyer Omar Sewhdat LSUC
#56470D 905-884-3155 for Ronald Balinsky.]
130. Malicious
prosecution is evidenced in fact of forced injections over email WITHOUT the
constitutional right to a trail first received.
Reference Affidavit Number Five for detail, posted 27 Dec 2014 to www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
after submission to FC-13-416 at Barrie.
131. Thereafter
has Mr. Rene Helmerichs now been rearrested for lack of ability to receive fair
contextual hearing in any court for Her Majesty attended thus far, contravening
Criminal Code section 176.
132. On
8 Jan 2015, Mr. Helmerichs had expected permission to attend the 15 Oct 2014
ordered date for Small Claims file SC-14-226 at Orillia. Why is it Mr. James Damaskis (sp?),
representing Her Majesty on behalf of probation police officer Ms. Tamara
Williamson in the Small Claims file, did arbitrarily and without notice to Mr.
Helmerichs see the claim dismissed following 29 Dec. 2014 Orillia courtroom
sworn testimony for the charge Ms. Williamson sworn against Mr. Helmerichs on
11 July 2014?
133. Why
is it the judge of 29 Dec 2014, Mr. Beaty (sp? as spelling of names is rarely
provided us who are presumed guilty without trial), permitted Ms. Williamson to
admit having committed the offense of criminal code section 219 before
condemning Mr. Helmerichs to a criminal responsibility assessment? Shouldn't Ms. Williamson and the judge
receive head-checks too?
134. What
of the 6 Nov 2014 Ontario Provincial Police, OPP, video statement defending
additional allegations of uttering threats, a video wherein the OPP detachment
supervisor stated nothing could be done at the Criminal Code section 269.1
defined torture psychiatrists Liaqat Ali and Anjana Chawla committed in direct
contravention of also The Human Rights Code For Ontario and section 4 of The
War Crimes And Humanities Act for Canada, for lack of documentation?
135. Having
been arrested on a civil process and being a 2 Aug 2013 stated clergyman for
One God, echoed in the 23 Jan 2015 blog post The NCR Plea at www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
, Mr. Helmerichs does very much have no further need to respond to any further
civil action against him and has FULL intrinsic agreement (under Criminal Code
sections 315 and 269.1(4)) to further defame Her Majesty for the utter
misadministration she professes in place of (Constitution subsection 52(1))
LAW.
136. Good
day.
137. Signed,
Rene Helmerichs on 23 Jan 2015 at Penetanguishene.
138. Ronald
A. Balinsky: Please SUE on my behalf Her Majesty to recoup your RBC (money)
entitlement.
No comments:
Post a Comment