Bridging The Gap AT Full Circle TO Understand Information Transfer

1.      Bridging The Gap AT Full Circle TO Understand Information Transfer

By: Rene Helmerichs

Written: 1 May 2015

Inspiration: Cellular Small Talk by Dale W. Laird, Paul D. Lampe and Ross G. Johnson; and Life.

To: Dr. Lampe, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center in Seattle; Dr. Laird, University Of Western Ontario; Dr. Johnson, U of Minnesota

Posted: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca

2.      The article begins on page 70 of the May 2015 Scientific America issue with a modernized picture of the ancient Yin Yang beneath caption: Neighboring samethings exchange necessary information through gaps that directly connect them. “Disruption of this signaling system can lead to disorders.”

3.      The article editor presents the following caption as falsely summative close: “Studying how mutations affect gap junctions could lead to therapies that counteract these defects without triggering serious side effects.”

4.      The article fails to address the conditional IF at full circle of whatever the information in the gaps referred because any information is definite and the gap forever representative of the same (damned) undefinable samenothing mutating in definite form.

5.      Simply put, the Yin Yang of old attempts to remind the sidewalk grasshopper not to fall into the divide of the concrete slabs, but to work as the ants to build bridges from things smaller that act as conduits within, throughout, overtop, or wherever-the-gap-here to transfer a samething across whatnot uniformly (lest relative gravity of a larger gap prevail to plummet a particle across a gap with quicker time).

6.      The fundamental discrepancy is still the obligatory consideration requiring conduits to exist as gaps themselves in motion for carriers of the one-same information no-where defined but apparently now-here.

7.      In the end one must concede having been not better off where one began because the whole of the consideration of a start to a circular ordered system is itself the oxymoron of all time, a disorder death can not ever compromise being still a definable structure within a system beyond linear time that IS itself functionally linear as well.

8.      Wellness maintains the motion causing temporal increments to steadily decrease according to the rate of halve lives, having lives in divide or halving half lives, believing in unknown somethings causing mutations clearly not understandable in that time. Learning thus is revealed the outcome for steady sharing.

9.      Where there is appearance, there is perception and motion. Motion functions directionally for that perceiving itself not stationary. One cannot NOT perceive itself not stationary because the motion must be perceiving separate from same or no gap in under-standing exists (as definable): Ibid.

10. The predicament is all-ways only surrounding the concept otherwise bouncing around the gap, The.

11. Fortunately, this serious reply speaks information silently.