1.
Now
Old News Posted For Prosperity
Attention:
Vincent Zenobio, court-appointed lawyer for me.
By: Rene
Helmerichs
Written: 26
July 2015
Length: 28
para.
2.
This
letter follows my 20 July 2015 tearful plea to you in person for honesty in the
courthouse at Barrie.
3.
Please
find included sufficient evidence for any of Constitution sections 2, 7, 9, 10,
11, 15, 52, or, and in particular for the cruel and what should be unusual
punishment, application under section 12. Please complete and submit the
necessary application on my behalf if you are to represent me. If you are only
to represent the court, then please complete the application in the language of
the court on my behalf, since I cannot be expected to accomplish anything from
a place of detention blocking even my ability to call you at any of the phone
numbers your assistant provided on 23 July 2015.
4.
The
Barrie courthouse judge Mr. Wilson is not fit to continue the practice of law.
Mr. Wilson has repeatedly demonstrated himself prejudice in a manner that
should not be tolerated by The Law Society Of Upper Canada and I duly petition
you to submit a formal complaint to the LSUC on our behalf.
Brief
Background.
5.
On 24
June 2015, for the charge of failure to appear (I had called in sick to court
as crowns are permitted to do.), charged 8 Dec 2014, judge Mr. Meijers
re-ordered the assessment for fitness to stand trial and ordered an amicus
lawyer to assist me talk sense to the wayward prosecutor Kathryn Hull.
6.
The
original Criminal Code s.672.11(a) order of judge Mr. Beatty dated 5 May 2015,
extended 26 May 2015, was returned negative. The assessing psychiatrist Mr.
William Komer at Waypoint Centre stated, in a letter to the court dated 3 Feb
2015, that he could not complete an assessment “now or in the future” while I
desired my statements audio-recorded. As I still desire my statements
audio-recorded, I wonder how he is able to submit an assessment result without
the charge of perjury also to him.
7.
We
can presume that he accepted a test completed in writing to fulfill my need for
recorded statements. I remind the court of my need following intentionally
misconstrued statements recounted in paragraphs 4 to 72 of a document given to
Mr. Zenobio on 20 July 2015 also available at www.talk2dream.info titled GOVERNMENT
ACCOUNTABILITY NOW. The marvel is that one can be deemed not fit to stand trial
for answering a test not incorrectly (i.e. needs that the desired answers were
not taught before administering the test.
8.
For
Mr. Komer now to ask the court for a treatment order, that I be medicated for
not miraculously answering the questions with answers I was never taught, is
insanity. Mr. Komer evidences to every tax-labourer the extent of psychiatric
fraud in the very fact that Mr. Komer has now submitted the same request for
medication AFTER my complaint to The College Of Physicians And Surgeons Of Ontario
about his earlier insistence that an assessment could not be done! Nor did he
retest for the 24 June 2015 order.
9.
As
you are well aware, the issue is not that I do not know what an oath is, or
perjury, or the ways to plead (loudly, softly, or continuously in silence
through blogs and petitions online), but that the Ontario government absolutely
refuses to consider honesty. I provide Mr. Wilson as a typical example of the
justice ill-served the public in the Ontario courthouse at Barrie.
Regarding
Judge Mr. Wilson (The Dishonourable)
10. On 14 March 2013, I first met the man. I
stood through a 45-minute judicial pretrial (JPT) self-represented. I requested
knowledge and the means to prepare Charter applications. I had been
incarcerated for only 11 days, had no prior Criminal Court experience, and,
really, knew a lot less than I do now over 3 years and 100 or more
self-represented appearances later. On that day, Mr. Wilson denied me access to
The Criminal Code, the most fundamental of courtroom knowledge accessibility.
11. On 5 April 2013, at the behest of some
Ministry Of The Attorney General employee (so, either the crown attorney, or
the judge, or courtroom duty counsel, or a legal aid representative) on amicus
lawyer was ordered for then file C-13-1184-OCJ. The role of the amicus, as we
know, is to act impartially and fairly. The amicus is not intended to assist
the crown convince me to plea guilty that I might continue to blog from outside
jail. It was Mr. Wilson who released the amicus on 15 May 2013 despite my
desire, despite the court rules, and despite refusal of Mr. Wilson to receive
the contents of the blog post GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY NOW on that day, the
15th of May.
12. Fast-forward through the 2 Aug 2013
ordered assessment of criminal responsibility psychiatrists Wesley Sutton and
Karen DeFreitas were simply permitted to never complete despite Criminal Code
s.672.2(2), s.129, and the $60,000 or so in assessment costs to the Ontario
public. You might recall some of this, Mr. Zenobio, as you became amicus after
Neil Riley. On 1 Oct 2013, you’d managed to get yourself removed only to
re-appear on 28 Oct 2013 for a sick day, if memory serves.
13. On 18 Oct 2013, Mr. Wilson orcastrated
another judicial pretrial for C-13-1184-OCJ. Unbeknownst to me, then morally
corrupt justice held the JPT without me present, without my consent for
absence, and with a lawyer whom I did explicitly not give consent to represent
me when I appeared in court later that day following the 10am JPT. At about 2pm
he actually insinuated a JPT had NOT taken place without me and then on 28 Oct
2013 graced me with honesty to say that it had. It was then that I’d written
the first blog post against him, and forwarded a copy to The Ontario Council
For Judicial Review not having knowledge nor access to make a formal complaint
to the LSUC.
14. On 6 Nov. 2013, I listened to Mr. Wilson
claim mental illness comes and goes, with reference to me after the crown
prosecutor’s comment to yourself, Mr. Zenobio, if you recall? I had tried to
get out of his court by escalating the case into the superior court. The
dishonourable Mr. Wilson had me return on 8 Nov 2013 just to be sure that was
what I really desired. It turns out he was right that the superior court is
even less honourable than the lower court at Barrie, if that’s at all possible.
15. I didn’t have paper on which to write a
Charter s.11(6) app., so used the back of the crown disclosure to submit to
court on Dec 2013. On 1 April 2014, crown attorney Ms. Kathryn Hull gave
written statement denying me a complete crown disclosure for trial, siting my
normal right under Criminal Code section 315 to have offended her. On 2 May
2014, she managed to have superior court injustice rule that psychiatric
evidence was not to be permitted for my defence and therein established the
ensuing guilty verdict victory for herself since none of GOVERNMENT
ACCOUNTABILITY NOW, my entire reason for bringing the matter into criminal
court with the first ever formal criminal charge against me, could then be
submitted. I’ve already launched a formal complaint to the LSUC against her,
file LSUC-2015-169169, and shall add an endless more until she is disbarred or
partners.
16. I’m not playing games, readers. Try to
talk sense to the crowns for me. See the first of many petitions online at
gopetition.com titled Discrepancies Between Intent And Practice For The Choice
linked at www.talk2dream.ca and
carefully review its supporting document GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY NOW,
paragraphs 4 to 72 of which you have also in that titled Requesting Correction
To Our Record, Vince.
17. Please realize I’m in this one for life,
literally eternal life, and know myself to adhere the one law of not
exclusivity. Since you may not understand what I mean, let us simply agree that
I’ll have a lot of seeming luck on my side as I turn absolutely every argument
thrown at me into an equally and more valid argument to use against whomever is
accusing me of whatever. I’m not bound to be anyone’s friend, so let’s just
agree to work together for the same one honesty, okay?
18. It is true sufferers of mental illness do
not recognize their psychosis. Ms. Kathryn Hull is demonstrated psychotic on
the Superior Court record of 8 June 2015 while arguing a summary conviction
proceeding to qualify for a bail review every 90 days under Criminal Code s.525
(not true). She is demonstrably adverse to her own employer with given 8 June
2015 insistence that the wrong matter before the court was correct. To this
day, Natalie’s 35th birthday in the Taiwanese way, the charge of criminal harassment
also of 8 Dec 2014, has neither received bail review hearing (excepting the
single emergency hearing adjournment of 11 May 2015) nor fair consideration for
validity “in all the circumstances” given GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY NOW has yet
to be honestly for you considered.
19. There remain the outstanding matters of a
second petition, that for clarification why detention contravening Criminal
Code sections 786 and 787 is permitted, and statement of Ms. Hull on 23 July
2015. We recognize this way seem trivial to you, but it is that for which I
remain incarcerated, the endless process for delay.
20. On 23 July 2015, birthday of the late
Stephaine Theresa Holts (1990-2012), Ms. Hull ruefully declared the application
of 30 Jan 2015, to have statements given for purposes of a mental assessment
audio-recorded, had been abandoned on 17 July 2015 following statement of chief
psychiatrist James Karagianis on page 37 of the 3 July 2015 transcript that I
desired a recording for ability to verify my statements only because I was
mentally ill and, therefore, should not need to be provided the ability. Ms.
Hull had offered the 19 Nov 2015 date to continue its hearing and I simply felt
the wait unreasonable since 30 Jan 2015. That Mr. Komer refreshed need for the
application on 20 July 2015 simply has me start the process all over again, and
this wastes only public funds and is therefore dishonest. Arrest Ms. Hull.
21. Happy Birthday Natalie Yewchyn; arrest her
finally too. Charges were sworn at the 21 Oct 2013 bail proceedings for
C-13-1184-OCJ for which Ms. Hull has to this day not provided me a transcript,
despite court orders for one.
My Desire
For You (Ubitiquous You)
22. My Desire is of course for harm to none.
However, as honesty seems mispeceived, my cautions usually come off appearing
as threats while they are actually only well-meaning, pardon the pun.
23. On 24 June 2015, judge Mr. Neijers ordered
an amicus specifically because I desired assurance that I would be let to
direct my defence per R.v. Swain (1991) and common decency since I AM mentally
capable. On 20 July 2015, Mr. Zenobio was ordered on board. That a hearing was
held on 23 July 2015 without Mr. Zenobio present makes no sense since the same
dishonourable Mr. Wilson ordered an adjournment on 28 or 30 (one of those two;
memory is inherently NOT reliable) Oct 2013 (check the years) for lack of
presence of the same Mr. Zenobio acting in the same capacity as amicus.
24. Mr. Zenobio on 20 July 2015 indicated
belief that he is representing me. As amicus, Mr. Zenobio is not legally
permitted to cross-examine Mr. Komer. However, cross-examining a guy in a court
where all listen not to what I actually say, doesn’t work either. So, if we’re
agreed the courthouse at Barrie is fully insane, we might as well let an amicus
do the cross-examination and blame him if the contents of this letter aren’t
enough to deem me fit, yes?
25. Thereafter, we can send me for an
assessment of MY morals under Criminal Code s.672.11(b), and then watch as I
demand an English-language interpreter given the Constitution s.2(b) definition
of language in the annotations to Martin’s Criminal Code 2014. If push comes to
shouve over that request, English IS my second language after German and a
German or Constitutionally sanctioned French language interpreter shall suffice
as well. The interpreter can then bill by the hour while we wait to have the
issue of audio-recording the assessment first resolved, resolve itself.
26. Eventually. I have full confidence that
you too shall find common sense and identify more with me than your current
nonsense. The “you” to which I refer is ubitiquous, just to be clear.
27. Vince, I’m sincerely appreciative of your
assistance and willingness to defend for me, but you’ll have to assist me to
have these matters tossed out of court with serious Charter applications, and
argue for audio-recording of psychiatric statements. If you want a case to give
you at least national recognition, this is the one. Involve the media. One
cannot suck and blow at the same time, unless playing to one’s own musical
tune, and must do one or the other.
28. Partnership, to Kate, begins with signing
the petition at www.talk2dream.ca
No comments:
Post a Comment