Thursday, June 18, 2015

Respecting Criminal Code Section 315, Sch.B.25

1.      Respecting Criminal Code Section 315, Sch.B.25.
5 May 2015; 8 paragraphs; Court file Num. C-14-6985
Posted: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca; talk2dream.me
From: Rene Helmerichs, professor of A Course In Miracles
1501 Fuller Ave., Penetanguishene, ON., L9M 2H4 Canada
TO: James Karagianis; attorney general; city@thestar.ca
CC: William Komer; Allison Jones; Kathryn.Hull@ontario.ca

RE: Correcting Misinformation About Dr. Helmerichs.
ATTENTION MR. JAMES LESLIE KARAGIANIS:

2.      We are politely advised that I am self-represented for the purpose of cross-examing you with respect to statements made in your affidavit sworn 30 March 2015. We are further advised that I am an individual diagnosed with several Schedule 1 psychiatric mental disorders self-representing in court of law for pre-meditated offences claiming to be not criminally responsible merely to have the opportunity to question a psychiatrist on a public record. In thanks for your assistance, stepping up to the plate so-to-speak, please expect a blog post titled “Outline Of Questions For Mr. Karagianis” to accompany a copy of your affidavit at: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca for the Victea Day weekend, or shortly thereafter.

3.      Of course in miracles, My Book at www.acim.org, announcement shall include: 1) happily publicized email inclusive of media and The Attorney General for recipients; 2) endless opportunity to partner in advance of the public courtroom confessions; and, 3) the enclosed second draft of questions to which your responses shall be recorded in court unless we begin our mutual collaboration correcting misrepresentation of facts dating to Mr. Liqat Ali and Ms. Anjana Chawla at Royal Victoria Hospital back in 2012 unnecessarily furthered in the 5 Feb 2015 Psychosocial Assessment produced by Ms. Allison Jones for Mr. William Komer (whom you defended with affidavit) at Waypoint (the place at which you currently believe yourself to be responsible for an exclusive quality-assurance way).

4.      The questions then, Take 2:
1)     Mr. Karagianis, we are here today to debate the legitimacy of your refusal of my request that psychiatrists under your charge audio-record my oral responses to medical assessments otherwise court-ordered to ascertain my mental condition. In what regard do you not share my understanding of the purpose for our meeting today?

2)     In paragraph 2 of your 30 March 2015 sworn affidavit, you state your responsibilities as Psychiatrist In Chief of Waypoint Centre in Penetanguishene, Ontario, one of the, if not THE, most state of the art mental hellth [typo imperceptible in speech] facilities in all of Canada, to include: “medical affairs; physician leadership; and medical quality assurance”. Is that correct?

3)     Does quality assurance involve maintaining a prescribed standard?

4)     In paragraph 1 of your affidavit, you state yourself to be “a psychiatrist licensed either by general or special license”, and, in paragraph 4, having “conducted over 100 court-ordered assessments”. Is this correct?

5)     Does the standard for your personal professional quality assurance involve assuring your subjects that their statements, given in faith for legal purposes, are also received as intended so as not to be accidentally misconstruced?

6)     At what point in an assessment process is recognizably false or misleading representation of essential facts best corrected, because I’m diligently STILL waiting since 3 Sept. 2012.

5.      IT IS NOT THAT MIND BRAIN BUT MIND IS GOD: Mr. Karagianis, hereafter do we enter a legal nightmare not imaginable but including investigation into every of your previous assessments and the competance of the Waypoint Centre For Mental Health Care board of directors if it does not immediately place you under full suspension pending College Of Physicians And Surgeons review of those specialist licenses that you have claimed to be abiding – The Royal College for Canada and its partnered provincial affiliates.

6.      I AM trying to communicate with you. The 5 Feb 2015 Psychosocial Assessment contains serious misrepresentations for which The Provincial Court Of Justice for Ontario, in a hearing for court file C-14-6966 at Barrie on 27 April 2015, did bestow responsibility to you, to answer to, at the cross-examination crucification. Furthermore, Mr. Karagianis, statement of Mr. William Komer dated 3 Feb 2015 to the court directly contradicts statement on page 1 of the 11-page psychosocial 5 Feb 2015 report and the only worry you expressed in vanity of the want for A Religion Of Secrecy is already addressed in Criminal Code sections 672.21, 672.5, 672.84, 672.51, and other subsections denying an accused access to statements of self for privacy concerns, barring an actual assessment standard to even exist.

7.      We are again reminded, Mr. Karagianis, that every inmate at Waypoint is directly under your charge for any purpose included in the Criminal Code section 215(1)(c)(ii) phrase “necessaries of life”, in which maintaining that elusively-secret medical quality assurance standard is certainly fully included. You’ll want to review that section because the placing of a copy of this for you with any court information accompanying the criminal responsibility assessments I intend to have ordered to bring me back under your direct charge does directly obligate you to work with me to correct the two-dozen-or-so 5 Feb 2015 misrepresentations IN ADVANCE Of our 3 July 2015 courting date or one kind Sir shall be irreperibly liable for formal charges including Criminal Negligence and medical malpractice, not to mention having wasted the court’s time, and our own, and for which you’ll still be liable even if this well-meaning note does not formally meet a clenched-jaw gaze until after the possibly delayed persecution date since you can be called again to testify at the disposition hearing for whatever any medical staff next decides to write about me (under Criminal Code section 672.5(11) for future 672.11(b) orders: either for C-14-6966, C-14-6985, C-14-6986, C-14-3928 and its appeal, C-13-205-SCJ and its appeal, or however many more bizarre emails to the Mormon Community Of Christ 2012 Barrie treasurer Natalie Yewchyn the original TORTURE redress requires).

8.      Contact Me via Kathryn.Hull@ontario.ca while she remains an attorney for The Crown and let us speak off the record to your liking. At this point, it makes absolutely no difference except to save US time and them a living legal nightmare. Sun L.C. 111. Two simple proofs are included:

9.      Proof: The Answer arise unique to any question.

10. Proof: Medication for mental health is NOT ultimately for well-being.








No comments:

Post a Comment