Item Num 12: Fax to Crown Office of 10 March 2015

Item Num 12:

Fax to Crown Office of 10 March 2015

To: The Office Of The Crown Attorneys At Barrie (FAX 705-7396551)

Re: Endorsement For Bail Review Application Assistance

Requested: The 6 Nov 2014 OPP video statement of Rene Helmerichs

Send DVD to: Rene Helmerichs c/o Hsiao Fan-Xiu

No.60 Ancheng Rd., Yanchao District, Kaohsiung City 824, TAIWAN (R.O.C.)

Ms. Hsiao has Power Of Attorney with Mr. Helmerichs and is assisting from Taiwan. The added time-delay is unfortunate.

Grounds for the request:

1.      The Honourable Mr. J.J. Douglas provided endorsement of his own accord on 4 March 2015 for MCSCS C.N.C.C. housing to assist Rene Helmerichs with Bail Review application necessaries for Self-represented charges. The 6 Nov. 2014 video statement in possession of MCSCS OPP is requested of C.N.C.C. with assistance of MAG attorneys.

2.      The video statement to OPP Constable Daniel Lesperance at the Orillia Peter Street detachment on 6 Nov. 2014 was raised at the original December 2014 bail proceedings and is necessary for applications of bail review. Bail has been denied without review of the hour-long statement also required for other applications.

3.      On 13 Feb 2015 crown attorney Ms. Ann Turny heard the 6 Nov 2014 statement to be necessary for the Ontario Works, OW, backpay application as well as the application to have mental assessments, Mas, audio-recorded. It is specifically referenced in paragraphs Sch.A.67-72 and Sch.A.10-11 of The Schedule A to each application, respectively. Hearing for the OW application has not yet been scheduled and the statement is not necessary for the April 1st New Goal Day MA application hearing date but to adduce the application as grounds for appeal to The Superior Court if the MA application is declined in Provincial court.

4.      Ms. Turny is politely corrected of statement insinuating Justice Douglas to have been prejudice against Her Majesty on 4 March 2015. Caselaw in the annotations to Constitution s.15 quoted in paragraph Sch.A.60 of the OW application reminds that Her Majesty, any member of Her Ministries acting in official capacity, does not retain equal benefit under the law for that capacity. Innately, this understanding follows realization that Justices of Her courts are defaulted superiority to every other of Her Ministry representatives, being also in Her service. However, the annotations to Criminal Code s.786(2) imply an accused with in a Summary Conviction proceeding is not at liberty to apply for a stay of proceedings on grounds of unreasonable delay and therewith also not able to claim prejudice, albeit under Constitution s.11(b), against the court of Her Majesty even when such proceeding extends 21 months as it had for Ryan Hamelin from 5 May 2013, until the unlawfully “accepted professional practice” of vexatious authorities (medical, courtroom, or police) is corrected (and a stay of Summary Conviction proceedings automatically applied at the six-month mark from the charged event date).

5.      The phrase “Yes, but...” is not a lawful legal argument for laws founded upon consistency. Individuals who do not innately understand law for consistency should hardly be permitted to refuse or delay an honest request for the 6 Nov 2014 video statement necessary to obtain bail long after crown attorneys offered Rene Helmerichs “time served” on 25 Feb 2015 for the very charges for which bail is still necessary!

6.      Please provide the 6 Nov 2014 video statement to Rene Helmerichs care of his wife in common law and Power Of Attorney Lindsay Hsiao whose contact information is provided at the start.

7.      In Kindness to the same one kind of honesty governing all laws,

Rene Helmerichs, The Bridegroom,

This 9th of March 2015 from C.N.C.C. at Penetanguishene, ON.