TO THE APRIL 2015 POPULAR SCIENCE BLACK HOLE QUERY

1.      TO THE APRIL 2015 POPULAR SCIENCE BLACK HOLE QUERY.

Written: Sometime in April 2015

Author: Rene Helmerichs

Posted: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca

Length: 15 paragraphs

A second article in response to Science America follow.

2.      The article Death By Black Hole in the April 2015 issue of Popular Science neatly illustrates The Information Paradox: “The current debate revolves around how black holes handle entangled particles – entities whose properties are quantum-mechanically linked – when one of them falls across the event horizon. It’s akin to considering a human’s fate, but more intriguing to physicists. You can think of the particles as a pair of dice where when one is rolled, the other magically rolls itself so the sum of the two is always seven. Each particle can only be linked this way to a single partner—physicists call them ‘monogamous’”.

3.      The article summarizes The Traditional View, The Firewall View, The Wormhole View, and recounts the commonly considered flaw of each, but fails to recognize The Holographic View. In addition to The Information Paradox, the article summarizes: In the traditional picture, you fall into the black hole until gravity is so warped that it stretches you out like spaghetti. But if there’s a firewall, as soon as you cross the event horizon, you’re incinerated by a wall of energy. Or, a wormhole at the black hole’s center may whisk you unscathed (well, if you’re a particle. Humans wouldn’t actually emerge unscathed) to another part of the galaxy.

4.      The Holographic View is presented in Disappearance Of The Universe by Gary Renard. It accounts for the monogamous-not-monogamous seemingly irreconcilable disparity with revelation that time itself, in any state of general relativity, remains relative to The Not Definable. The Not Definable is then realized to be more than all understanding of, within, or even for the general state and is such a way as to be also the foundation of all order within any aspect of that but not definable.

5.      In human terms, unconditional love is not definable except with designation marking its advent as beyond common understanding. Since love itself transcends understanding to be not understood, it follows that the monogamous particle disparity speaks to love but in a subset field of chronically divergent relativity otherwise classified to be the event horizon into oblivion, the black hole. It is therefore not incorrect to consider our entire visible, that is known, universe to be the firewall surrounding oblivion, not unlike a fiery ring for circular motion in a set of not definable stilling calm, collective-reassuring.

6.      Physicists are pained to recall the very nature of a particle in motion does witness to that particle as of intelligence for the inherent message using motion itself as medium.

7.      A black hole, in galactic terms, is an area with mass so dense that its gravitational field lets not even light emit – light appears to bend, or warp around it. A problem, called a disparity, arises in considering that such a unified mass adhears the known concept of reality clearly existing outside its reach. Yet, that reality is shared, there is evidenced the gravitational effect of such a unified mass is directly experienced all throughout our reality in a living dynamic way, to assure us of a general state of relativity.

8.      Every discussion revolves around the same single question, which is ultimately some fundamental variation of “does completion exist in an ever-changing state?”

9.      While physicists and psychologists disagree that both study effectively the same one ever-evolving aspect, physicists are bound to continue to consider magical analogies for factual experiences and psychologists the materialization of our collective conscious into the vacuum of thin spaces.

10. From Death By Black Hole, “According to general relativity, nothing can escape black holes, so they should only get bigger over time as they swallow up detritus. But in the 1970s, Stephen Hawking pointed out that thanks to a quirk of quantum mechanics, matter actually can escape. Quantum mechanics says pairs of particles constantly pop into existence and immediately self-annihilate.”

11. Stephen Hawking, for all his brilliance, only pointed out that we do not understand what we call a black hole. Gary Renard has subtly and quite tactfully revealed, to continue the earlier analogy of particles for humans, that humans can silently pop into existence even in one’s livingroom. The question one should be asking is “Why?” or better “For what purpose?”

12. The answer, the best answer, to every question is always, constantly, “For bettering to the perceived system as being of one kind because general relativity within one common environment establishes time itself to be the not monogamous part of that aspect establishing Its order.”

13. Until the singular unified concept thoroughly explained in the text of A Course In Miracles is fully propagated throughout our momentary temporal malady – healing our mistaken belief in the need for forgetfulness to underscore our self-absolving, healing being – there will yet be many advances in quantum mechanics, including the ability for spatial relocation without apparent motion. Where there exists change, there exist not ability for annihilation but obligatory lessons that must be taught with unconditional love for healing benefit of unconscious self-acceptance.

14. We ARE inside a “black hole” seeing light in place of Its effects that are themselves merely affects of that we not longer recognize to be the trunk of each of our beings.

15. end.