Proof: The
Answer arises unique to any question.
Written: 11
May 2015; By: Rene Helmerichs; Posted: www.renehelmerichs3.blogspot.ca
The World is
always changing.
When can we
not agree that we exist with change?
Does every
effect have a cause or is there such thing as accidents?
Science is the
process of explaining accidents.
Is the
explanation necessary to achieve understanding?
Is there a
common moral foundation?
To advance my
understanding and improve my life, please explain how I can know right from
wrong without an explanation.
Is it wrong of
me to insist that I am more than my body, as are you?
If I am more
than my body, clearly it is not my brain that governs the cause of this print
as its effect.
Since we do
agree to be always with change, we agree to co-exist in a make-ality ultimately
produced from only one cause, or else there could be no such thing as a common
foundation moral or not.
So I ask
again, is explanation necessary to achieve understanding or does understanding
arise innately in questioning?
No comments:
Post a Comment